Subdivision of group ranches in Maasailand - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 16
About This Presentation
Title:

Subdivision of group ranches in Maasailand

Description:

Subdivision of group ranches in Maasailand. Case of Kajiado District, Southwestern Kenya ... Subdivision a defensive strategy to secure against unsanctioned ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:39
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: undp
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Subdivision of group ranches in Maasailand


1
Subdivision of group ranches in Maasailand
  • Case of Kajiado District, Southwestern Kenya
  • Esther Mwangi, IFPRI (CAPRi)

2
(No Transcript)
3
Group ranch subdivision Why?
  • Gained momentum early to mid-1980s
  • Subdivide and distribute amongst shareholding
    members
  • Maasai pastoralism has evolved under conditions
    of low (typically varying between 400-500mm) and
    variable rainfall
  • Patchily distributed resources in space
  • Mobility

4
The Maasai Group Ranches
  • Stabilize environment commercialize livestock
    enterprise
  • The Land Adjudication Act of June 1968 recording
    of rights and interests in customary lands, and
    their assignment to their customary users.
  • The Land (Group Representatives) Act i.e. the
    Group Ranch Act governance and administration of
    group ranches.

5
  • group ranch is owned jointly by all members in
    equal, undivided shares
  • Elect management committee at AGM livestock
    quotas decisions on behalf of members
  • Annual meetings quorum of at least 60 group
    decision? 60 of members present at meeting
  • KLDP WB USAID
  • 57 group ranches adjudicated

6
Demands for subdivision
  • Barely 10 years after creation (mid-1970s)Kaputie
    i
  • Gained momentum in mid 1980s
  • By 1985, 22 group ranches had resolved to
    subdivide 7 subdivided (Munei, 1987). By 1996,
    22 subdivided and individual land titles being
    issued. 11 others subdividing. 2000, 31
    subdivided and been issued with titles. 14 under
    survey/demarcation. 12 resisted subdivision.
  • What fueled the increased demands for
    subdivision? Why the transition?

7
Study sites and methods
  • Four study sites, Enkaroni, Meto, Nentanai,
    Torosei
  • Central division soils, vegetation, geology and
    rainfall, ethnic composition are relatively
    homogeneous
  • Variation in size distance from Bissel, main
    marketing center
  • Interviews archival search

8
(No Transcript)
9
(No Transcript)
10
Some findings Mixed motivations
11
But what else?
  • Historical losses
  • Settlement of European immigrants (2 M Ha) early
    20th century (Kipury Halderman)
  • Wildlife conservation (about 26000 Km2) 1946-61
    (Kituyi)
  • Overspill from high population density areas
    1950s-60s (FratkinCampbell)
  • More recent losses under group ranch

12
(No Transcript)
13
Theres more.. currently
  • Re-aggregating parcels
  • Continued herd redistribution

14
(No Transcript)
15
The meaning?
  • Subdivision a defensive strategy to secure
    against unsanctioned appropriations
  • Subdivision in a variable environment perhaps
    unstable, to enhance viability of production
    systems, renegotiation of access, withdrawal
    rights.

16
Some thoughts
  • Insecure tenures for the collective
  • Insecure tenure within the collective
  • ?inappropriate tenure regimes
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com