Private sector roles - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 58
About This Presentation
Title:

Private sector roles

Description:

Operators own rolling stock and lease infrastructure. Slide 41. Franchise Agreements ... refurbished and new rolling stock, increased reliability and frequency, ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:40
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 59
Provided by: Dno2
Category:
Tags: private | roles | sector

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Private sector roles


1
Private sector roles
OzProspect Windows on Economics 2005
  • David Greig

150 330pm, 9 February 2005
2
Session content
  • A brief history
  • Private sector roles
  • Case 1 Citylink
  • Case 2 Electricity
  • Case 3 Public rail transport
  • Public private partnerships

3
Some potted history
  • Early in Australias history, private provision
    of infrastructure was common
  • In the late 19th - early 20th centuries,
    governments took over for financial or political
    reasons
  • The private sector role has now increased
  • At first it was largely construction, with
    in-house government provision phasing out

4
Some potted history (contd)
  • Then outsourcing (of cleaning, maintenance and
    later IT, HR and some management functions)
    became common
  • From the 1980s privatisation, concessions
  • In the last few years, through Public Private
    Partnerships

5
Types of private sector investment
  • Privatisation
  • Private Sector Infrastructure development
  • Build-Own-Operate (BOO)
  • Build-Own-Operate-Transfer (BOOT)/Concession
  • Design-Build-Fund-Operate (DBFO)
  • Build-Own-Lease-Back (BOLB)
  • Public Private Partnerships (PPP)

6
Reasons for private sector involvement
  • Public sector difficulties with construction cost
    overruns, operating inefficiency and lack of
    innovation
  • due to poor incentives faced by public servants,
    conflicting objectives and political interference
  • Experience with private provision, starting
    originally with the French water concessions,
    indicated scope for efficiency and innovation

7
Reasons for private sector involvement (contd)
  • Financial markets have become more flexible
  • Private sector is often better at managing risk

8
(No Transcript)
9
Claimed Pros and Cons of Private Sector
Investment
  • Pros
  • Innovation, efficiency
  • Transfer of risk
  • Private sector capital available
  • Reduced public spending/borrowing
  • Cons
  • Government can borrow more cheaply
  • Residual taxpayer risk
  • Need (sometimes) for regulatory intervention

10
The myth of cheaper government borrowing..
  • It's a myth that governments have access to
    'cheaper' finance to undertake projects a
    government's ability to borrow more cheaply is
    purely a function of its capacity to levy taxes
    to repay borrowings (Secretary, Victorian
    Department of Treasury and Finance)

11
The myth of cheaper government borrowing
(contd)
  • Private investment requires assessment and
    carrying of risk
  • Public investment risk shed onto taxpayers.
    Example Concorde

12
Some problems..
13
Private sector investment will continue
  • Expanding role and understanding of private
    sector investments
  • The private sector is improving its expertise
    with public projects
  • Financial markets are improving their ability to
    service such investments
  • Scope for increased use of PPP, especially in
    social infrastructure

14
Opportunities Australia
  • National
  • Transport (AusLink)
  • Electricity interconnectors
  • Gas pipelines
  • Water and wastewater
  • Environment/renewables

15
Opportunities Victoria
  • Infrastructure Planning Council cited needs in
  • Water (eg Melbourne -Geelong link, irrigation
    infrastructure, water sewage treatment)
  • Energy (eg extension of gas reticulation)
  • Transport (eg rail and road bottlenecks)
  • Communications (eg broadband)

16
Opportunities Other States
  • NSW flagged 5bn in next 5 years esp schools,
    major roads (eg Orbital), prison, courthouses,
    water sewerage)
  • Qld water resource development (eg Burnett),
    energy, transport
  • WA water, electricity plant, transmission, gas

17
Case 1 Citylink
  • A BOOT concession
  • Private sector built, owns, operates - and will
    later transfer to the government
  • The government negotiated the framework/rules
    (including pricing), and facilitated land
    acquisition, local connections etc

18
Citylink... continued
19
Case 2 Electricity Reform in Victoria
  • Poor investment record
  • Low operating efficiency
  • Low power station availability
  • Little customer focus
  • Performance deteriorating
  • SECV had great political power
  • State finances in crisis through late 1980s

20
Electricity Reform Objectives
  • Improve operating efficiency
  • Better investment practices
  • Empower and benefit customers
  • Reduce State debt, improve States budget
    position
  • Transfer risk away from taxpayers
  • Enhance electricity sector contribution to the
    State economy

21
Structural Framework
  • Generation, Fuel Supply and Retailing
  • Competition through competitive spot market (for
    dispatch), hedge contracts
  • Competitive retail market, competitive
    electricity sourcing
  • Distribution and Transmission (wires)
  • Monopolies regulated by Victorian ESC and the
    ACCC (Wholesale)

22
Roles
  • Government Role
  • Planning
  • Regulation (monopoly functions, safety etc)
  • Creating open access where possible
  • Private Sector
  • Operations
  • Investment
  • Risk management

23
Roles (contd)
  • Financing
  • Long term private equity and debt
  • Risk Allocation
  • Assign risks to parties best able to manage
  • Commercial risks assigned to private sector
  • Sovereign risk to government
  • Minimal residual exposure to government (but now
    debated)

24
Reform Agenda Main Features
  • Disaggregation to ensure adequate competition in
    competitive segments (generation, retail), with
    cross ownership rules
  • Capital markets were sufficiently mature to
    evaluate the businesses and provide financing
  • Cross subsidies (eg to rural distribution)

25
Reform Agenda Main Features (contd)
  • An independent regulator was established aim
    for tariffs to balance consumer and investment
    objectives (ongoing debate about this)
  • Political intervention in investment and
    operations to be avoided.

26
(No Transcript)
27
Second Stage of Reform (1994) - Corporatisation
28
(No Transcript)
29
Labour Force Reductions
  • The SECV became highly overmanned by the mid
    1980s
  • Labour force reductions started from the late
    1980s in response to financial pressures
  • Industry staff numbers
  • 1988 25,000
  • 1995 9,000
  • 1999 7,000

30
Labour Force (contd)
  • Labour productivity in generators rose sharply.
    GWh/employee
  • 1994/95 12.8
  • 1997/98 - 19
  • Voluntary departure packages there were no
    compulsory departures
  • Protection of entitlements (super etc)
  • However there was a large regional impact

31
Reform Outcomes
  • Reduction in State debt and risks
  • Lower average prices
  • Better service
  • Greater efficiency
  • New investment

32
Outcomes Debt reduction
  • Energy privatisation (1995 1999) proceeds A28
    billion
  • Net interest savings A1200 million per annum
  • State net debt
  • 1992 - A32 billion
  • 1999 - A5 billion

33
Outcomes Lower Prices
  • Households
  • Average electricity charge fell by 20 in real
    terms from 1989-1999
  • Savings for most business customers
  • Debate about electricity prices versus asset sale
    prices

34
Outcomes Efficiency Investment Gains
  • Over A 1 billion in new Victorian investment
    planned as new capacity required in response to
    forward pricing signals
  • Gas Turbine (Peaking), Combined Cycle Gas
    Turbine, Wind
  • Research continuing to improve competitiveness of
    coal

35
Outcomes Efficiency Investment Gains (contd)
  • Brown coal power station availability
  • Up from 70 to 95
  • Better industrial relations
  • Upgrade of inter-state interconnections

36
Substantial risk transfer from taxpayers
  • Interest risk on State debt reduced
  • Taxpayer ownership risk removed (cf. NSW which
    remains in government ownership - has experienced
    losses)
  • Taxpayers freed from future investment risk and
    trading risk
  • Environmental risk (Kyoto etc) substantially
    transferred

37
Substantial risk transfer from taxpayers (contd)
  • Ministers political exposure significantly
    reduced
  • Investment decisions
  • Operational performance
  • Labour relations issues
  • Supply continuity issues
  • Acknowledgment most slides in this section are
    modified excerpts from a presentation by Farrier
    Swier Consulting

38
Case 3 Trains Trams Private Franchising
  • Performance of PTC, although improved in 1990s,
    was well short of best practice
  • Hard to achieve more under the cumbersome PTC
    structure
  • Policy to introduce private sector disciplines
    and innovation
  • Tram strikes around 1990 and 1997 Grand Prix

39
Objectives of transport reform
  • Progressive improvement in quality of service
  • Substantially increased patronage
  • Minimisation of long term taxpayer costs ie
    reduce but not eliminate losses
  • Transfer of risk to private sector
  • High safety standards

40
Features of Victorian Passenger Rail Privatisation
  • Competition for passenger markets, rather than
    competition within
  • Horizontal separation and vertical integration
  • 12-15 year franchise length allows for trade-off
    between competition and investment
  • Operators own rolling stock and lease
    infrastructure

41
Franchise Agreements
  • Specify what operators must do in exchange for
    subsidies
  • Tension between prescription and encouraging
    innovation
  • Maximum fares and minimum levels of service
  • Incentives for punctuality and reliability

42
Gains from privatisation
  • Subsidy reductions based on improved efficiency
    and increased patronage
  • Bids showed subsidy reduction of 1.8b NPV but
    much lower in practice
  • Government shed most of the operating cost and
    investment risk
  • Improved services refurbished and new rolling
    stock, increased reliability and frequency, some
    facility upgrades

43
Difficulties encountered
  • Poor franchisee financial performance patronage
    increases well below forecasts
  • Only partly shed revenue risk
  • Disputes over revenue allocation
  • Continuing fare evasion
  • Little incentive to improve service mix or
    infrastructure

44
Difficulties encountered (contd)
  • National Express pulled out
  • Refranchising Connex and Yarra
  • Net benefit to Victoria remains substantial
    despite bailout costs (and NX took a large
    write-off)

45
Some lessons and questions
  • Private franchising can save subsidies, finance
    new equipment, and improve services
  • The government is involved as subsidiser and
    regulator so has borne some of the winners
    curse
  • But the expected financial gains have been
    reduced. Franchisees offered subsidy cuts they
    couldnt sustain

46
Lessons and questions (contd)
  • Some risks have moved back to the government
  • How to maintain competitive bidding yet reduce
    overbidding?
  • Wrong to conclude that networks should not have
    been divided in two. If they hadnt been, NX
    would have won the lot, and present difficulties
    would have been worse

47
Public private partnerships
  • PPP Private sector planning, financing,
    construction and operation of a facility
    providing public services
  • Central component risk sharing
  • Example courthouse (private operator provides
    accommodation services to Justice Department
    Department provides justice services to the
    people)

48
What is a PPP (contd)
  • Used for providing public infrastructure and
    related services
  • Economic infrastructure (eg roads, water)
  • Social infrastructure (eg schools, hospitals)
  • Private sector provides capital assets
  • And bears associated risks
  • Government procures services, not infrastructure

49
Rationale for PPPs
  • Value for money in delivery of public
    infrastructure services
  • Partnerships Victoria identifies key drivers
  • Risk transfer
  • Whole-of-life-costing
  • Innovation
  • Asset utilisation

50
Overview of Vic PPP Policy
  • Value for money as prime objective
  • Value risk management, innovation and efficiency
  • Applies to public infrastructure projects gt10m
  • Specific principles processes
  • Neutral accounting

51
Overview of Vic PPP Policy (contd)
  • Detailed guidance on identifying and allocating
    risk
  • Model documents
  • Approval processes
  • In some cases (eg where cannot specify outputs,
    or likely to require frequent changes) PPP
    inappropriate

52
Public Sector Comparator (PSC)
  • Mechanism for assessing value for money
  • Hypothetical risk-adjusted cost if project
    financed, owned and implemented by government
  • Based on a best public procurement option to meet
    specifications
  • Competitive neutrality

53
Economic theories underlying PPPs
  • Market failure
  • Rationale for govt involvement - but not
    necessarily direct provision
  • Private sector incentives
  • Strong commercial incentives for efficiency
  • Public sector incentives less clear-cut
  • Competition and contestability
  • Harnessing competition for the market to
    encourage efficiency

54
Economic theories underlying PPPs (contd)
  • Contract theory
  • Optimal allocation of risk
  • Principal-agent problem and need to align
    incentives in contract
  • Ways to address incomplete contracts
    (relational contracting)
  • Minimisation of transaction costs

55
Value for money?
  • Typical estimates of 15 to 20 per cent cost
    savings
  • Transaction costs reduce but do not negate
    savings
  • Improved project delivery times
  • But mainly ex-ante estimates largely based on
    value of transferred risk

56
Value for money (contd)
  • Overall costs reduced if risks allocated
    optimally
  • Eg Citylink Burnley Tunnel
  • Facilitation of greater third-party utilisation
    of assets
  • However some failures
  • Private sector failure to perform
  • Public officials may lack contract negotiation
    skills

57
Competing views on PPP
  • Enabling better infrastructure services versus
    privatisation by stealth
  • Benefits
  • Risk-sharing
  • Opportunities for revenue generation from third
    party asset utilisation
  • Improved project delivery times, efficiency, costs

58
Competing views (ctd)
  • Costs
  • Reduced budget flexibility constraints on
    Government from long-term contracts
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com