Comparison of conventional pure tone audiometry and 2f1f2 distortion product otoacoustic emissions i - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 38
About This Presentation
Title:

Comparison of conventional pure tone audiometry and 2f1f2 distortion product otoacoustic emissions i

Description:

... of conventional pure tone audiometry and 2f1 ... Able to yield reliable responses during pure tone audiometry ... Changes in pure tone thresholds seen at Test 5 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:266
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 39
Provided by: Lucr6
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Comparison of conventional pure tone audiometry and 2f1f2 distortion product otoacoustic emissions i


1
Comparison of conventional pure tone audiometry
and 2f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic
emissions in TB sufferers receiving
aminoglycosides
  • Lucretia Petersen Shajila Singh
  • Division of Communication Sciences and Disorders
  • University of Cape Town

2
Introduction
  • Identification and management of TB national
    priority in SA
  • In 1993, TB most commonly reported infectious
    disease in SA with a national prevalence of 223
    per 100 000
  • Prevalence in Western Cape (1993) of 703 per 100
    000

3
Introduction (cont.)
  • WHO Report (2003) prevalence in 2001 gt 300 per
    100 000 nationally
  • Epidemic of TB boosted by concurrent HIV
    infection (WHO, 2003)
  • HIV increases susceptibility for TB infection
  • Chances of MDR-TB greater with increased
    likelihood of reinfection

4
Introduction (cont.)
  • MDR-TB TB that is resistant to isoniazid and
    rifampicin which form part of standard TB
    treatment regimen (Fätkenhauer et al. 1999)
  • Increasing bacterial resistance to standard
    anti-TB drugs has led to more frequent reliance
    on aminoglycosides like streptomycin and
    kanamycin
  • Known side effects nephrotoxicity, ototoxicity
  • Despite side effects aminoglycosides are still
    widely used due to effectiveness against
    gram-negative bacteria causing TB, as well as low
    cost

5
Introduction (cont.)
  • These advantages have lead to persistence of
    aminoglycoside use, especially in developing
    countries like SA
  • With respect to the inner ear, aminoglycosides
    may either injure the cochlea or vestibular
    system
  • In SA streptomycin and kanamycin form part of
    drug regimen administered to MDR-TB sufferers
  • Streptomycin primarily vestibulotoxic, with
    minor cochleotoxic effect (Bennett, 1996)
  • Kanamycin predominantly cochleotoxic (Voogt
    Schoeman, 1996)

6
Introduction (cont.)
  • Incidence of ototoxicity varies between 0-20
    depending on type of aminoglycoside
  • Aminoglycosides affect outer hair cell (OHC)
    integrity in the cochlea, with initial damage in
    the basal area that could progress to the more
    apical region
  • Hearing changes due to OHC destruction are most
    likely irreversible
  • Damage to auditory system can continue even after
    cessation of drug administration (Hall, 2000)

7
Introduction (cont.)
  • Risk factors include genetic susceptibility,
    prior noise exposure, young or old age,
    pre-existing sensory hearing loss, renal
    problems, concomitant treatment of nephrotoxic or
    other ototoxic drugs, and prior aminoglycoside
    treatment
  • Risk for developing cannot be predicted due to
    intersubject variability, thus monitoring the
    auditory functioning of all individuals receiving
    aminoglycosides is imperative
  • An auditory monitoring procedure that permits
    early identification of ototoxicity (prior to
    subjective detection by individual) could
    potentially prevent permanent communication
    deficits

8
Introduction (cont.)
  • Until recent years ototoxicity could only be
    monitored by conventional pure tone audiometry,
    i.e. between 250-8000Hz
  • Behavioural test audiologist has to rely on
    active participation of patient, which can be a
    problem in very ill patients
  • Could potentially be a time-consuming procedure,
    especially where responses are unreliable
  • Late detection of cochlear damage, i.e. when
    frequencies in speech range (lt 8000 Hz) are
    affected, whereas initial damage occurs beyond 10
    kHz

9
Introduction (cont.)
  • Also likely that normal behavioural sensitivity
    to pure tones in quiet circumstances can depend
    on responsiveness of only a few OHC, IHC and
    associated eighth nerve fibres
  • Thus deterioration in frequency selectivity of
    the cochlea can occur before pure tone threshold
    elevation, therefore conventional pure tone
    audiometry of limited clinical value in
    ototoxicity monitoring
  • High frequency audiometry involves obtaining
    behavioural auditory thresholds of frequencies
    between 8-20 kHz
  • HFA has been established as a sensitive method
    for early detection of ototoxicity (Voogt
    Schoeman, 1996)

10
Introduction (cont.)
  • Special audiometers and transducers needed that
    are capable of producing high frequency stimuli -
    more expensive than standard audiometers and
    transducers a problem in a country like South
    Africa where resources are limited
  • HFA cannot be used to the exclusion of
    conventional pure tone audiometry, because normal
    or unchanged high frequencies do not guarantee
    unchanged thresholds in the conventional range
  • Time-consuming procedure problem with ill
    patients

11
Introduction (cont.)
  • HFA might also yield problems with the elderly,
    because a vast portion of the geriatric
    population might not have sufficient high
    frequency hearing for high frequency monitoring,
    due to presbyacusis
  • Behavioural procedure, thus has to rely on active
    participation of testee
  • Otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) constitute the only
    non-invasive means of objective cochlear
    investigation to date (Stavroulaki et al., 1999)
  • OAEs are sounds that originate due to activity of
    the OHCs in the cochlea, and are measured in the
    external auditory meatus (Kemp, 1978)

12
Introduction (cont.)
  • The two types of evoked OAEs used most often
    clinically are transient evoked OAEs (TEOAEs) and
    distortion product OAEs (DPOAEs)
  • Both are low level sounds emitted from the
    cochlea as a result of acoustic stimulation
    (Hall, 2000)
  • The presence of evoked OAEs is associated with
    normal, or near normal, mechanically active,
    functioning of the (OHCs)
  • TEOAEs are elicited by brief broadband stimuli,
    e.g. clicks or tonebursts, which simultaneously
    stimulate the cochlea across a wide frequency
    region thus representing an averaged overview of
    cochlear activity

13
Introduction (cont.)
  • DPOAEs are defined as acoustic energy in the ear
    canal arising from the non-linear interaction of
    two simultaneously applied pure tones, of
    frequency f1 and f2, within the cochlea
  • F1 and f2 are known as primaries, with
    intensities L1 and L2 respectively.
  • Several combination tones may be predicted
    mathematically with such stimulation, but the
    tone at the frequency 2f1-f2 is the most robust
    and the easiest to detect in human ears (Beattie
    Bleech, 2000)

14
Introduction (cont.)
  • Generation of 2f1-f2 depends upon active
    non-linear processes within the cochlea at the
    frequency place where f1 and f2 interact. When
    this cochlear region is altered, then DPOAEs are
    either reduced in amplitude or eliminated
  • Changes in DPOAE-amplitude are specific to the
    frequencies affected by the damage, and the
    amplitude of DPOAEs generated in other frequency
    regions remains unchanged
  • Research is suggesting that DPOAEs are more
    frequency-specific than TEOAEs for determining
    minor cochlear dysfunction, thus better tool to
    use in monitoring ototoxicity

15
Introduction (cont.)
  • Currently 2 methods of DPOAE-measurement are used
    in clinical applications, namely DPgram and DP
    input/output function (growth function) (Ozturan
    Lam, 1998)
  • With appropriate stimulus parameters, DPOAEs can
    be measured in nearly all normally hearing ears,
    providing that middle ear status is normal (Hall,
    2000).
  • Stimulus parameters influence the amplitude of
    the DPOAE, as well as the region of the cochlea
    being stimulated
  • High stimulus levels (? 70 dB SPL) tend to
    stimulate passive cochlear processes, whereas
    moderate level stimuli elicit active cochlear
    responses

16
Introduction (cont.)
  • Relationship of L1 and L2 L1gtL2 yields highest
    DP amplitudes, thus sensitivity to cochlear
    deficits is enhanced
  • Stimulus levels of L165 and L255 are generally
    used in clinical applications
  • Frequency separation of the primaries also plays
    a critical role in DPOAE measurement, an f2/f1
    ratio of 1.22 yields maximum DPOAE amplitude
    between 1-4 kHz
  • Clinically effective f2/f1 ratio is between 1.20
    and 1.23 (Hall, 2000).

17
Introduction (cont.)
  • Support for the notion that OAEs act as early
    detectors of imminent cochlear dysfunction, are
    clinical observations in humans of reduced OAEs
    in normal-hearing patients, who typically have
    been exposed to noise, or potentially ototoxic
    drugs, and who complain of hearing difficulties,
    which are not picked up by conventional pure tone
    audiometry. Therefore the assumption is made that
    the DPOAE amplitude indicates the summed activity
    of a substantial number of OHCs, rather than only
    a few OHCs as in the case with conventional pure
    tone audiometry (Arnold et al., 1999).

18
Introduction (cont.)
  • To date 122 institutions in Western Cape where
    aminoglycoside treatment is provided to TB
    sufferers ototoxicity monitoring takes place at
    only one of these
  • Because of limited resources monitoring takes
    place once a month at this one institution, using
    conventional pure tone audiometry ototoxicity
    often detected late
  • Even less frequent testing with ill patients
  • Purpose of this study compare use of DPOAEs and
    conventional pure tone audiometry as ototoxicity
    monitoring tools, to develop a more efficient
    testing protocol

19
Methodology
  • The study set out to determine
  • the time difference between changes in
    conventional pure tone audiometry and DPOAEs due
    to cochlear changes during ototoxicity monitoring
  • the sensitivity of the DPgram in comparison to
    that of the DP I/O function in ototoxicity
    monitoring
  • whether the clinical use of DP I/O function is
    feasible

20
Methodology (cont.)
  • Design one-tail repeated measures-
    aminoglycoside intervention study
  • Subjects were recruited from a TB-hospital in the
    Western Cape after consent was received from the
    superintendent of the institution in question
  • The resident audiologist weekly provided a list
    of newly admitted patients with normal hearing
    who were treated with either streptomycin or
    kanamycin. If patient consented to participation
    and fitted the selection criteria, they were
    included in the study

21
Methodology (cont.)
  • Selection criteria
  • In-patient at the TB-institution, and scheduled
    for aminoglycoside treatment for minimum of 14
    days
  • Normal otoscopy, middle ear functioning and
    hearing thresholds
  • Able to yield reliable responses during pure tone
    audiometry
  • DPOAEs present for at least 5 out of 9
    frequencies
  • 16 years or older

22
Methodology (cont.)
  • Subjects
  • N 17
  • 11 females 6 males
  • Average age 31years range 16-58 years
  • HIV ve 5
  • MDR-TB 8
  • Prior aminoglycoside treatment 9
  • Prior noise exposure 3

23
Methodology (cont.)
  • Ethics
  • Informed consent of superintendent and all
    subjects
  • Could withdraw at any stage, without treatment
    being affected
  • Ethical consent from UCT Health Sciences Ethics
    Committee

24
Methodology (cont.)
  • Procedure
  • Non-diagnostic otoscopy, screening tympanometry,
    conventional pure tone audiometry, DPgram, DP I/O
    function performed to obtain baseline measures
  • Repeated once every two weeks for two months
    total of 5 test sittings
  • DPgram stimulus parameters
  • 1000-6000 Hz
  • F2/f1 ratio1.22
  • L165 L255 dB SPL

25
Methodology (cont.)
  • Procedure
  • DP I/O stimulus parameters
  • 1000-6000 Hz
  • F2/f1 ratio1.22
  • L1gtL2, with 10 dB difference
  • Intensity range 45-75 dB

26
Methodology (cont.)
  • Equipment
  • Heine Minilux otoscope
  • Madsen Screen-Tymp
  • Amplaid audiometer with TDH-39 earphones
  • Otodynamics ILO 92
  • All testing in sound-treated booth

27
Methodology (cont.)
  • Data analysis
  • Descriptive statistics mean, mode, range,
    standard deviation
  • Future analysis will involve non-parametric
    statistics, including Friedmans ANOVA, factor
    analysis, and multiple regression analysis
  • SPSS statistical package
  • Qualitative analysis will involve examining data
    for trends relating to changes over time in pure
    tone thresholds, amplitudes of DPgram and DP I/O
    function, as well as in DP I/O thresholds

28
Results
  • Preliminary results visual comparison of mean
    changes over time in pure tone audiometry, DPgram
    and DP I/O function

29
Results (cont.)
30
Results (cont.)
31
Results (cont.)
32
Results (cont.)
33
Results (cont.)
34
Results (cont.)
35
Discussion
  • Changes in pure tone thresholds seen at Test 5
  • With DPgram cochlear damage visible at Test 4,
    thus earlier detection than with conventional
    pure tone audiometry
  • Consistent with previous research that found
    DPOAE testing to be more effective in early
    detection of cochlear damage due to ototoxicity
  • DP I/O results inconclusive, with no clear
    patterns/trends observable
  • More research with lower stimulus levels in DP
    I/O function might yield different/clinically
    useful results

36
Discussion
  • Study with more regular test intervals, and
    greater subject sample will provide more precise
    information regarding ideal test protocol
  • More homogenous subject sample advised

37
Conclusion
  • The use of aminoglycosides for tuberculosis
    treatment is unavoidable in most cases
  • It is therefore the responsibility of the
    audiologist to ensure that frequent monitoring of
    these patients occurs using reliable techniques
  • Thus we need to constantly explore more efficient
    ways of monitoring, in order to do more with the
    limited resources in our country
  • Only then will ototoxicity be detected early and
    the negative side effects avoided or alleviated

38
Acknowledgements
NIH
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com