Participatory evaluation of agroecological and socioeconomic innovations in Southern Cameroon - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 13
About This Presentation
Title:

Participatory evaluation of agroecological and socioeconomic innovations in Southern Cameroon

Description:

Participatory evaluation of agroecological and socioeconomic innovations in Southern Cameroon ... Insuficient funds invested on R&D over the past 20 years ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:37
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: ECA1
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Participatory evaluation of agroecological and socioeconomic innovations in Southern Cameroon


1
Participatory evaluation of agroecological and
socioeconomic innovations in Southern Cameroon
  • Mala Armand William
  • Center for International Forestry Research
    (CIFOR)
  • Central Africa Regional Office, Yaoundé

2
Outline
  • Context of RD in Cameroon
  • Background elements of ASB
  • Objectives and major findings of the evaluation
  • Lessons learned

3
Context
  • Insuficient funds invested on RD over the past
    20 years
  • Research activities are financed by external
    funds and short-term projects
  • Crise of extension service
  • Farmers fatigue

4
Objectives of the 3rd phase ASB
  • Three years project conducted between 1999-2004
    in Cameroon funded by EU.
  • develop and articulate of new technological
    options along with appropriate policies and
    institutional arrangements for the humid forest
    zone
  • develop replicable participatory assessment
    techniques and databases on the social, economic,
    and environmental performance of landscape
    mosaics
  • develop methods and models for monitoring,
    assessing, and managing dynamic and uncertain
    environmental and economic interactions and the
    subsequent stakeholder conflicts over a range of
    ecological scales.

5
Means for achieving objectives of ASB
  • On-farm agronomic testing of a range of
    innovations
  • Participatory appraisals and mapping
  • Development of criteria and indicators for
    measuring agronomic sustainability
  • Community action plans and models of landscape
    use change across a continuum of forest resource
    use pressures

6
Purpose of participation evaluation
  • Assess the impact of innovations on the
    transformation of socio-economic and natural
    capital as well as the general approach of the
    research

7
Major findings
  • Participatory action research has induced the
    transformations of the capital and financial
    capital when the collective choices were based on
    the consensus such like in the commercialization
    of the cocoa and horticultural crops
  • Price of cocoa per kg has increased up to 250 in
    two years and the numbers of farmers
    organizations and their membership have increased
    significantly from 3 to 15 organizations within 3
    years to reach up to 1500 members

8
Findings (contd)
  • Changes related to agroecological innovations
    were difficult to capture because there was a
    discrepancy of the implementation of the project
    between the three pilots sites and more
    important, weve identified a gap between the
    social demand of agricultural technology and
    those tested by researchers

9
Findings (contd)
Table 1. Gaps between social demand of
innovations and innovations introduced
10
Findings
  • Social and financial transformations were not
    consolidated in the absence of mechanisms of
    cyclical monitoring-evaluation, of transparency
    in financial management, communication and
    distribution of the benefits
  • The links between agroecological and
    socio-economic innovations have been weakly
    articulated during the implementation of the
    project.

11
Lessons learned
  • Participatory action research can create a
    productive junction between knowledge production
    and transformation of reality when there is (i)
    a good coordination/collaboration of activities
    by stakeholders based on the effective
    distribution of the scientific and methodological
    responsibilities and of the benefits (ii) a
    fluidity of the intercultural communication and
    information flow on the object of research and
    the articulation of the perspectives (iii) a
    joint definition of the socio-ecological and
    institutional bases on which knowledge and the
    innovations will be internalised in
    spatio-temporal scale to improve social and
    economic gains
  • Shift from classical RD approaches to
    innovations systems approach
  • Issue of governance.

12
Issues to our dream of RD in Africa
  • RD in Africa should rely on niches where we have
    good comparative advantages leadership
  • Industrialisation of agricultural and forest
    products (beef, coton, wood, coffee, cocoa)
  • Increase inter-state market
  • Funding issue
  • Comitment of African governements to support RD
  • Good governance.

13
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com