Interconnected Parliaments - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 36
About This Presentation
Title:

Interconnected Parliaments

Description:

harmonisation of legislation. but. locally focused solutions. national/institution ... harmonisation of African legislation. OPEN SOURCE and COMMON application ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:24
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 37
Provided by: ictparl
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Interconnected Parliaments


1
Collaborative software and content development
Flavio Zeni UN-DESA - Nairobi
Interconnected Parliaments Africa
i-Parliaments Action Plan
2
Collaboration is ....
  • ... SMART and GOOD
  • our presentation assumes that!
  • ...after all we are here because in 1889 people
    saw the benefits of an inter-parliamentary
    collaboration and founded IPU ...
  • ... UN are about collaboration
  • ... ICTs are about collaboration
  • Collaboration... SMART and GOOD!

3
Please note ...
  • I have said that
  • collaboration is
  • SMART and GOOD
  • I have NOT said or implied that
  • collaboration is
  • EASY, CHEAP or
  • without PROBLEMS

4
Collaboration about ...
  • This presentation try to identify
  • the types of collaborations that
  • actually do exploit at best
  • present technological environment
  • Collaboration/sharing might also lead to
    cost-saving and synergies
  • but the core rationale to adopt a
    collaborative software and content development is
  • quality and sustainability
  • for ALL Parliaments

5
Context Parliaments have similar...
  • similar inputs
  • speeches make by people (MPs, experts, etc.)?
  • written documents (bill, questions, motions, etc.
  • similar macro-processes (with different
    procedures)?
  • plenary proceedings
  • committees proceedings
  • management of the flow of the above documents
  • similar output
  • verbatim/minute/reports/agenda/etc.

6
Context Similar needs but ...
Parliaments use different systems that have
very similar features and functionality, in the
best case. There are affluent parliaments
that are likely (not guaranteed)? to have better
system then less affluent parliaments There
is growing digital divide among do and do-not
parliaments
7
Context ICTs uniqueness ...
  • ICTs are
  • very reusable, very adaptable, very
    accessible and reproducible at very low marginal
    costs
  • even more
  • ICTs made possible the impossible
  • the more information services/systems are
    used, the more diversified are the users
  • -the better they become
  • but also ...
  • very dynamic and in constant evolution

8
Why ICTs collaboration is not ...
  • We agree that
  • collaboration is smart and good
  • Parliaments share more then what they
    differentiate them
  • ICTs tools and services to get better the more
    they are used/shared
  • Still not many parliaments seem to
    appreciate/exploit the opportunity that
    collaboration and sharing of tools and content
    could brings in terms of
  • quality - sustainability - bridging the
    Digital Divide
  • Why? ... you tell me!

9
Collaboration at what level?
  • ICTs have brought about technical opportunities
    that are unprecedented in at least two areas
  • Access to information
  • Collaboration
  • removing
  • time or geographical location limitations

10
PREVALENT approach
  • Access
  • access documents (HTML/PDF)?
  • access to ONLY document as the users were
    local and speaking the very same language
  • Collaboration
  • Exchange e-mails and documents
  • no exploitation of creation of quality and
    sustainability through collaboration and sharing
    of applications

11
ICTs opportunities potential
  • Access
  • structure/semantics
  • across countries and languages
  • across media
  • Collaboration
  • Development and maintenance of
  • information services
  • Information system

12
Strategic GAP (needs)?
  • .... between
  • global/continental needs
  • of economic integration and
  • harmonisation of legislation
  • but
  • locally focused solutions
  • national/institution focussed

13
Strategic GAP (technologies)?
  • .... between
  • technological opportunities
  • semantic web open/shareable solutions
  • and
  • practical approach
  • e-paper paradigm
  • no efforts to think global-continental in terms
    of standards, languages, search facilities, etc.
  • no exploitation of sustainability through
    collaboration

14
Technological opportunities
  • Semantic web
  • processing information according to its content
    (or meaning), and not only as a pure text by
    embedding computer readable specifications
    (XML/RDF/OWL) to make computer understand
    documents
  • Open Source Development Model
  • develop once, together, for better and more
    sustainable tools for all parliaments

15
How did we in Africa fill the GAP ...
  • AKOMA NTOSOParliamentary Document Open Access
    Infrastructure (XML/RDF/OWL)?
  • BUNGENIParliamentary and legislative Information
    System (based on Open Source application and
    tools)?

16
Strategic choices WHY?
  • OPEN and COMMMON standards
  • because they are the best way to
  • address the political African agenda
  • of economic integration of Africa and
  • harmonisation of African legislation
  • OPEN SOURCE and COMMON application
  • because they are the best way to deliver
  • high and sustainable quality information system
    and the critical mass to make this happen
  • for ALL African Parliaments

17
AKOMA NTOSO
  • AKOMA NTOSO
  • (Architecture for Knowledge-Oriented Management
    of African Normative Texts using Open Standards
    and Ontologies)?
  • is a set of common standards to produce, classify
    and share digital Parliamentary and Legislative
    documents

Akoma Ntoso Linked Hearts a symbol used by
the Akan people of West Africa to represent
understanding and agreement
18
Document components
  • Content
  • What exactly was written in the document
    (semantics)?
  • Structure
  • How the content is organized
  • Presentation
  • The typographical choices to present a document
    on screen or on paper.

19
After HTML ... XML
  • HTML helped make the Web a big success .. but
  • it is just a publishing medium,
  • it is constrained by its own simplicity and few
    rules not even strongly imposed
  • A different format is required that provides
  • Clear differentiation between visual aspect and
    actual meaning and presentation
  • Strong syntactic rules heavily imposed to
    guarantee uniformity, homogeneity, sophisticated
    applications

20
XML describes structures ..
  • Support for documents generation
  • Drafting activities, record keeping, translation
    into national languages, etc.
  • Support for workflow
  • Management of documents across lifecycle,
    storage, security, timely involvement of relevant
    individuals and offices
  • Support for citizens access
  • Multi-channel publication (on paper and on the
    web), search, classification, identification
  • Further activities
  • Consolidation, version comparison, language
    synchronization, etc.

21
XML-AKOMA NTOSO understands ..
  • HMTL presents
  • XML-Akoma Ntoso understands
  • Understand ... means to make accessible the
    structures and semantic components of
    parliamentary and legislative documents in a
    machine readable format
  • to deliver
  • high qualities information service

22
AKOMA NTOSO purpose
  • Define a common FORMAT for recording
    parliamentary activities
  • Define a MODEL for data interchange and open
    access to parliamentary documents
  • Define a common African parliamentary DATA schema
  • Define a common African parliamentary METADATA
    schema and ontology
  • Define a mechanism for citation and CROSS
    REFERENCING of documents between parliaments

23
AKOMA NTOSO document types
24
(No Transcript)
25
AKOMA NTOSO naming convention
  • http//www.parliament.za/za/act/2003-03-12/3/eng_at_
  • http//www.parliament.za/za/act/2003-03-12/3/eng_at_2
    005-07-13
  • http//www.parliament.za/za/act/2003-03-12/3/eng_at_2
    007-05-03
  • http//www.parliament.za/za/act/2003-03-12/3/eng
  • RSA Act n. 3 of the 12 April 2003
  • Original version
  • Amended version (expression) of 13 July 2005
  • Amended version (expression) of 3 May 2007
  • Current consolidated version (expression)
  • URI NOT URL ... IDENTIFICATION vs LOCATION

26
BUNGENI Parliamentary and legislative
Information System
Bungeni is an integrated suite of multi-platform
architecture software applications, based
on Open Source Software and Open Standards that
automates the lifecycle of parliamentary
documents
27
BUNGENI features
  • Bill Process
  • Motions and Questions
  • Debate Records
  • Parliamentary Business
  • Votes and Proceedings
  • Virtual Workspace
  • Citizens' interactivity and participation

28
The rationale for ...
  • The rationale for developing and distributing
    Bungeni under a Free/Libre/Open Source Software
    (FLOSS) licence is
  • to optimise its functionalities
  • as far as possible as well as the
  • geographical spread
  • Please note that
  • Regional, Provincial and also municipal
    assemblies are ... parliament-like
    organisations
  • that have very similar information
    needs/requirements

29
Development option optimisation
  • The optimization strategy consists of
  • using a commoditised software
  • (e.g. the Plone/Zope, OpenOffice.org)?
  • as a basis for the developments and make the
    public sector solution on top of that
    commoditised software and limit the development
    to what is absolutely necessary
  • This approach
  • contains investments,
  • leverages the existing community
  • creates fruitful synergies between public sector
    initiatives and communities increasing
    sustainability

30
EC Study benefits
  • Impact and return on investment of a FLOSS
    development project
  • scaling effect (dividing the investment and
    maintenance between a number of partners)?
  • independence (avoiding long term vendor lock-in
    and proprietary formats)?
  • better response to specific public sector needs
  • developing local innovation spirit, employment
    and knowledge
  • Study on the effect on the development of the
    information society of European public bodies
    making their own software available as Open
    Source (2007)?

31
Synergies
  • PloneGov aims to create a common platform of
  • Plone-based e-Government initiatives
  • in order to promote information and best
    practices benchmarking and software sharing
  • www.plonegov.org

32
6 projects merged into PloneGov

33
In summary ...
  • XML technologies and collaboration are
  • SMART and GOOD
  • if you are not using or thinking to use
  • XML family of technologies
  • collaborative modalities (many forms and ways)?
  • ... you SHOULD!

34
Please note ...
  • I have NEVER said or implied that
  • XML-technologies/collaboration are
  • EASY, CHEAP
  • or without PROBLEMES
  • ... we are NOT in the business
  • of the easy things but the RIGHT things
  • advanced information systems and services
  • for ALL
  • affluent and so so affluent parliaments

35
A quote from ...
The Mythical Man-Month of Fred Brooks,
a classic in the software engineering
field "How does a project get to be a year
late? ...one day at a time"
36
Thank you
Africa i-Parliaments Action Plan
  • i-nterconnect Parliaments to make them
  • to strengthen the role of African Parliaments in
    fostering Democracy and Good Governance in Africa
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com