TETRA MoU - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 58
About This Presentation
Title:

TETRA MoU

Description:

3) Update on the TETRA market and standard. 4) Explanation of ETSI IPR policy ... All signatories will endeavour to: Support the ETSI Project Tetra process. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:285
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 59
Provided by: tcw
Category:
Tags: mou | tetra | endeavour

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: TETRA MoU


1
(No Transcript)
2
TETRA MoU
  • An organisation of
  • Operators
  • End-users
  • Regulators
  • Manufacturers
  • working to jointly promote and advance the
    TETRA standard.

3
Agenda
  • 1) Introduction from MII
  • 2) Introductions from TETRA MoU
  • 3) Update on the TETRA market and standard
  • 4) Explanation of ETSI IPR policy
  • 5) Discussion on TETRA interfaces
  • 6) Private negotiations with IPR holders
  • 7) Private negotiation with manufacturers
  • 8) Summary meeting of China and European
  • delegations.

4
Board
  • Chairman
  • Phil Godfrey - Simoco
  • Public Safety Liaison
  • Hans Borgonjen - Dutch Police
  • Ray Ginman - UK Home Office
  • Operator Association
  • Glyn Carter - Dolphin

5
Board (2)
  • Marketing of Tetra
  • Doug Gray - Motorola
  • Projects
  • Risto Toikkanen - Nokia
  • Technical Forum
  • Mogens Olsen - Tele Danmark
  • Liaison Officer to the Board
  • Jeppe Jepsen - Motorola

6
TETRA MoU
  • Founded 4 November 1994
  • MoU now has 64 signatories (19 Manufacturers)

www.tetramou.com
7
TETRA MoU Contd...
  • All signatories will endeavour to
  • Support the ETSI Project Tetra process. Objective
    being to accelerate the process while ensuring
    compliance to user needs
  • Support the initiative to obtain additional
    spectrum for civil users consistent with ERO
    activities
  • Develop a trademark that will uniquely identify
    and protect TETRA
  • Define additional items not covered by ETSI
    essential to the deployment of TETRA networks
  • The MoU is open for any entity who is prepared to
    commit to the spirit and objectives of the MoU

8
TETRA situation update
  • Norway
  • Gardamoen Airport
  • ElTele øst
  • National Network(s) in planning stage
  • Finland
  • Helsinki Energy
  • Virve
  • UK - Dolphin
  • Infrastructure contract
  • Terminals contract

9
TETRA situation update
  • UK
  • States of Jersey
  • PSRCP project
  • West Midland Ambulances
  • London Underground
  • Sweden
  • Gotland Pilot Project
  • Stockholm Municipality

10
TETRA situation update
  • Denmark
  • Copenhagen Metro
  • Interoperability testing
  • National License for civil Tetra
  • Holland
  • C2000 - Public Safety
  • Belgium -
  • ASTRID - Public Safety
  • Dolphin

11
TETRA situation update
  • Spain
  • Basque, Catalonia, Navarra local government
  • Two licenses been granted
  • Portugal
  • Cities of Oporto and Coimbra
  • Civil Tetra - Dolphin
  • National network for Public Safety
  • Germany
  • Trials in Berlin completed
  • Civil TETRA - Dolphin

12
TETRA situation update
  • France
  • Civil TETRA - Dolphin
  • Austria
  • Electricity Board
  • National Network in planning stage
  • Hungary
  • National Network in planning stage
  • Italy
  • Carabinieri

13
TETRA situation update
  • Poland
  • Warsaw Police
  • Greece
  • OTE
  • Croatia
  • MoI Electricity
  • Middle-East
  • Saudi Aramco - 800 MHz.
  • Iran

14
TETRA situation update
  • Singapore
  • 2 Tetra Contract granted
  • 3-4 more tenders calling for TETRA
  • Hong Kong
  • Public Safety has placed contract for TETRA

15
Where are they live?
  • TETRA systems are now live in operation in
    Norway, Denmark, Sweden, UK, Finland, Hungary,
    Germany, the Nether-lands, Austria, Belgium,
    Spain, Slovenia, and Jersey.

16
(No Transcript)
17
What does this mean?
  • Users require best possible prices
  • Tax payers money
  • Industry needs volume
  • GSM, Internet,
  • The WW success of Tetra does exactly that!

18
Update on the TETRA market and standard
19
Milestones in the TETRA standard
  • 1990 standardisation start
  • 1991 standard based on TDMA technology with 4
    timeslot and 25 kHz band
  • 1995 standard first phase completed
  • 1996 frequency armonisation in Europe
    (CEPT/NATO)
  • 1997 standard second phase completed
  • 1998 first systems installation
  • 2000 presence of 32 TETRA network in 21
    countries

20
Range of product
  • Availability of infrastructure and terminals with
    frequency bands
  • 380 400 MHz
  • 410 430 MHz
  • 450 470 MHz (Planned)
  • 806 921 MHz

21
TETRA 800 MHz
  • Marconi, Motorola, Nokia and Simoco are already
    committed in developing and manufacturing TETRA
    infrastructure and terminals in 800 MHz frequency
    band.
  • Launch of TETRA 800 MHz system took place during
    the 2nd TETRA world congress in Amsterdam in
    November 1999
  • Launch in China of 800 MHz TETRA system took
    place in Beijing in January 2000.
  • 1st TETRA 800 MHz system is being set-up in Saudi
    Arabia

22
TETRA start in the US market
  • APCO 25 steering Group has accepted to produce a
    modified version of TETRA as TDMA option for
    phase 2 of Project 25

23
TETRA success is based on
  • A truly open standard
  • Future evolution guaranteed by ETSI
  • 8 indipendent manufacturers at the moment
  • Coexistance with analogue systems
  • High degree of security mechanisms
  • Several frequency bands availability
  • Supporting Direct Mode (DMO)

24
Interoperability Conformance
25
Objectives of Technical Forum
26
What is interoperability?
The ability to communicate from several brands of
terminals on all manufacturers infrastructure,
via the air interface.
Brand C Terminal
Brand A infrastructure
Precondition Equipment is developed according to
the ETSI TETRA VD standard.
27
The IOP WG
  • IOP WG members
  • Simoco
  • Motorola
  • Marconi
  • Nokia
  • RS
  • Cleartone
  • And soon IFR
  • Tele Danmark, Development

Work of IOP WG. Development TIP document via
mutual negotiations on protocol implementations
and exchange of confidential development
information. Test sessions where features are
check and documented.
IOP WG is a closed WG due to the confidential
nature of information exchange. All members are
working on a voluntary basis
28
TIP life cycle
29
TIP conformance WG
Goal To insure automated IOP testing of terminals
and Infrastructure by use commercially available
test instruments.
Objective Investigate possibilities to make a
TIP test specification. Make an overview of
existing TBR35 test cases and possible
reuse. Investigate the possibility of making IOP
test cases in voluntary domain.
30
TIP vs. 1-3 features
  • Registration/de-registration
  • Individual call (MS-MS, simplex, on/off hook)
  • Group attachment (single/multiple)
  • Group call
  • Undeclared cell re-selection
  • SwMI initiated group attachment
  • Late entry.
  • Emergency call
  • Group management
  • Unannounced and announced cell reselection
  • SDS-Status
  • PSTN interconnect
  • Duplex call
  • SDS-Data
  • DMO
  • Single slot packet data
  • DTMF

TIPv1 TIPv2 TIPv3
31
Interoperability
  • TETRA Interoperability Certificates Marconi
    (TIP Certificate R2 November 1999) Motorola
    (TIP Certificate R2 November 1999) Nokia (TIP
    Certificate R2 November 1999) Simoco /
    Frequentis (TIP Certificate February 2000)

32
Discussion on TETRA interfaces
  • Presentation of TETRA standard interfaces
    available today
  • How can they be used
  • Presentation of options for additional interfaces

33
Interfacing possibilites in TETRA systems
  • Risto Toikkanen
  • Nokia Networks

34
Agenda
  • Introduction to the interfaces defined in TETRA
    standards
  • Other interfaces typically existing in TETRA
    systems
  • Needs for end-to-end applications and country
    adaptation
  • Need for local partnerships
  • Opportunities to local industry

35
Core TETRA Standards
  • Voice plus data (VD)
  • Packet Data Optimised (PDO)
  • Direct Mode Operation (DMO)
  • Conformance Testing
  • TETRA Speech Codec
  • Air Interface (AI)
  • Inter-System Interface (ISI)
  • Peripheral Equipment Interface (PEI)
  • Line Station (LS)

DMO
PEI
AI
LS
36
TETRA standard interfaces
AI
AI
ISI
PEI
SwMI
SwMI
PEI
TE
TE
LS
PSTN ISDN PDN Gateways
LS
PEI
LS
Gateways
PEI
LS
AI
TE
DMO Gateway
TE
PSTN ISDN PDN
AI
PEI
DMO
TE
37
TETRA interface standardsa) available
b) in drafting phase
  • Air interface
  • PSTN, ISDN gateways
  • Data network gateway
  • Intersystem interface (general, Indiv Call,
    Group Call, Mob Mgmt)
  • Peripheral Equipment Interface (PEI)
  • Direct mode air interface
  • Direct mode repeater and gateway
  • Lawful interception (phase 1)
  • Test specifications for interfaces
  • Intersystem interface (SDS)
  • Lawful interception (phase 2) ?
  • Line Station

38
Other typical network interfaces
Network management
Billing interface
Subscriber provisioning
Network operation
Fleet management
Control room/ dispatch appl
Packet data appl interf
Short data appl interf
PSTN signalling
Crypto key management
PABX signalling
39
Wireless Data Applications
Vehicle Location Workforce Management Unit
Status Instructions Information Push Information
Retrieval, Inquiries Task Related
Information Identity Vehicles, Weapons,
Fingerprints Maps Chemicals Reporting Task Course
Operations Control Monitoring Alarm
devices Burglar Alerts Environmental
Measurements Field Equipment Telemetry Surveillanc
e Video Still/Video Image
Control Rooms IT Systems Databases Data
Networks Instrumentation
Portable Users Vehicle Users Fixed Equipment
40
Application adaptation needs
  • Fleet management/Command Control systems are
    typically country specific
  • Data applications are often user organisation
    specific
  • In a large Public Safety radio system the value
    of applications integration may be 30 to 50
    of total contract
  • Telephony etc gateways may be country specific

41
Partnerships system integration
  • Professional radio users have specific local
    needs in each country
  • applications, data, dispatching, security
  • operational working procedures
  • user interfaces, language ...
  • Understanding know-how needed
  • Always opportunity for local partners in system
    integration

42
Opportunities to industry
  • Manufacturing
  • Software development
  • System integration
  • Technical services
  • etc ...

43
Manufacturing opportunities
  • Dispatch console systems
  • Telephonw network gateway switches
  • Mobile data terminals
  • End-to-end encryption modules
  • Complete mobile hand held radios
  • Terminal installation kits for
  • vehicles, trains, boats
  • fixed instalations

44
Software partnership opportunities
  • Dispatch, command control systems
  • Packet data application software and
  • Short data application software for
  • mobile data terminals
  • server computers, Internet, WAP,
  • Network management systems applications
  • Billinf systems
  • Customer care systems
  • Crypto key management

45
Nokia TETRA Wireless Solution Providers
46
System integration opportunities
  • SI forms big part of most radio projects
  • Integration of Command Control systems
  • Integration of telephony traffic
  • Integration of data applications
  • Integration of Customer Care Billing
  • Language adaptations
  • Other country adptations
  • Customer specific adaptations
  • Project management

47
Network implementation, maintenance technical
support
  • Implementation, installation work
  • radio base stations switches
  • control/dispatch rooms
  • data application equipment
  • mobile radio data terminals
  • Commissioning acceptance testing
  • Project management
  • First line maintenance, hardware repair
  • Help desk, software support
  • User training

48
Conclusions
  • Application interfaces open further possibilities
    in addition to standardised interfaces
  • There is a huge amount of work to be done in
    development and project partnerships
  • Contribution of local industry is vitally
    important and most welcome

49
Discussion on TETRA interfaces
  • Presentation of TETRA standard interfaces
    available today
  • How can they be used
  • Presentation of options for additional interfaces

50
Additional interfaces
  • Option 1 Have an interface standardized within
    ETSI
  • Option 2 Develop an interface in country
  • Option 3 Upgrade one manufacturers solution to
    standard
  • Option 4 Adopt TETRA standard as is.
    Manufacturers in TETRA MoU will work with local
    companies to make it possible for them to
    participate in global TETRA market.

51
Option 1 (ETSI)
  • Pro
  • Will be in line with other Tetra interfaces
  • Proven process
  • Con
  • Time to complete
  • Efforts required (Tetra standardization is being
    finalized)
  • Not practical - consensus
  • Interoperability testing and conformance testing

52
Option 2 (in Country)
  • Pro
  • Process Control
  • Con
  • Time required
  • Misalignment with ETSI standard
  • Interoperability and conformance
  • Would not allow local manufacturers to enter
    market outside China

53
Option 3 (Adopt)
  • Pro
  • Appears fast and easy
  • Con
  • No competition in foreseeable future
  • Will slow down TETRAs progress
  • Interoperability and Conformance issues

54
Option 4 (Recommended)
  • Pro
  • Much more flexible solution
  • Fastest route for local companies
  • Enables more local companies
  • Enables global market access

55
How to have an Additional interface?
  • Option 1 Have an interface standardized within
    ETSI
  • Option 2 Develop an interface in country
  • Option 3 Upgrade one manufacturers solution to
    standard
  • Option 4 Adopt TETRA standard as is.

56
Recommendation
  • The Tetra MoU recommends to adopt the ETSI TETRA
    standard as it is.
  • The Tetra MoU recommends its manufacturer members
    to work with local Chinese industry to enable
    them to participate in the global Tetra market.

57
www.tetramou.comwww.etsi.orgristo.toikkanen_at_nok
ia.comjeppe.jepsen_at_motorola.comPhil.Godfrey_at_eur
ope.simoco.com
58
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com