Title: Pollution Prevention Recommendations and Public Education for Clermont County Phase II Stormwater Re
1Pollution Prevention Recommendations and Public
Education for Clermont County Phase II Stormwater
Regulations
- Miami University
- Institute of Environmental Science
2Background
- Stormwater - urban runoff
- Potential for stormwater pollution
- Storm sewer vs.
- Sanitary sewer
- Regulated by USEPA
- Permits by OEPA
3- Clean Water Act
- Amended, 1987
- National Pollution Discharge and Elimination
System (NPDES) program - Phase I (1990)
- Medium and large Municipal Separate Storm Sewer
System (MS4s) - Phase II (1999)
- Small MS4s (lt100,000)
- Small construction projects
4Clermont County
- 15 small MS4s under Phase II stormwater
regulation - Stormwater Task Force, 2002
- Stormwater Management Plan
- 6 minimum controls
5Clermont County, Ohio
66 Minimum Controls
- Public education and outreach
- Public involvement/participation
- Illicit discharge detection/elimination
- Construction site runoff control
- Post-construction stormwater management
- Pollution prevention/good housekeeping for
municipal operations
76 Minimum Controls
- Public education and outreach
- Public involvement/participation
- Illicit discharge detection/elimination
- Construction site runoff control
- Post-construction stormwater management
- Pollution prevention/good housekeeping for
municipal operations
8Service Project Goals
- 1. Inventory existing Clermont County municipal
pollution prevention measures. - Make pollution prevention recommendations.
- 2. Develop web content for public education and
outreach on stormwater impacts and public
involvement/participation.
9Presentation Outline
- Methods Pollution Prevention Survey
- Results P2 and Recommendations
- Methods Web Content
- Web Content Recommendations
- SW Public Education website
10Stormwater Management Plan
- Pollution prevention
- Current practices
- Areas for improvement
- Need for evaluation of programs
- Differences across communities
- Discover areas for improvement
11Methodology Outline
Literature Search Stormwater Management Plan
Municipal Survey
Evaluate
Recommendations To Municipalities
12Recommendations
- Consult County Phase II Storm Water Management
Plan - List of Measurable Goals
- List of existing programs
13Participation
- 14 responses
- Response detail
- Operation extent
- Benefits
- Meets Measurable Goal
- Individual summary recommendations
14(No Transcript)
15Municipal Operations Survey
- Storm sewer maintenance
- Department responsible for maintenance
- Procedures for reporting and maintenance
- Common causes of blockages
- Phase II Coordinator
- Storm drain labeling
Charles River Watershed Association Website, 2003
16Results County Overview
- Current Storm Sewer Maintenance
- Nearly ½ have designated a Phase II Coordinator
- Common blockages
- Only City of Milford - storm drain labeling
- Only 2 provide training
17Municipal Operations Survey
- Vehicle maintenance
- Disposal of fluids and solvents
- Storage and disposal of batteries
- Maintenance garage drains
- Training and record keeping
US EPA Website, 2003
18Results County Overview
- Current Vehicle Maintenance
- Applicable municipalities
- Dispose vehicle fluids
- Garage drains
- Battery disposal
- Maintenance records fluid use and disposal
- 5 municipalities
- Training about storm water issues
- 4 municipalities
19Municipal Operations Survey
- Grounds Maintenance
- Current usage of chemical applications
- Strategies to minimize chemical applications
- Training and record keeping
- Street Sweeping
- Which streets, when and how often
- Coordination with storm sewer maintenance
20Results County Overview
- Grounds Maintenance
- Only 1 respondent
- Current Street Sweeping
4 sweep streets City of Milford record
keeping Coordinate w/ storm sewer maintenance
21Municipal Operations Survey
- Road Salt Application
- Storage facility
- Spreader calibration
- Automatic spreaders
- Training and record keeping
US EPA Website, 2003
22Results County Overview
- Current Salt Application
- 6 of 8 respondents
- Storage
- Most kept records of usage
- ½ provide training
- 4 calibrate spreaders
23Municipal Operations Survey
- Municipal construction
- Sediment runoff and erosion controls
- Waste disposal and recycling
- Municipal recycling
- Residential recycling
- Promotion of recycling
24Results County Overview
- Municipal Construction Practices
- 6 of 10 respondents follow Water Management and
Sediment Control Regulations
25Results County Overview
- Current Waste Disposal and Recycling
- Trash Disposal
- Majority use Rumpke, Inc.
- Recycling plan
- Only 3 promote recycling
26Public Education Website
- Minimum Controls
- Storm Water Education
- Public Involvement
Public Focus Group
Summarize Develop
Final Content
Other SW Education Sites
Info Design (ENG 697)
27Methods Focus Group
- IRB Approval
- Held at OEQ Offices
- Announcements to municipal contacts,
- schools and county-wide paper
- 12 participants viewed two other sites
- 2 Types of Questions
- Content
- Usability
28Summarized Recommendations
- Reasons participants would go to a storm water
website. - Need to dispose of car products
- Need to dispose of household products
- Proper land care techniques
- Composting information
29Summarized Recommendations
- Topics participants want on website
- Storm and sanitary sewer differences
- Storm water importance
- Hazardous waste
- Phase II
- BMP manuals
30Summarized Recommendations
- Topics participants want on website
- Do-it-yourself
- Lawn care
- Pond treatment
- Septic system
- Pet waste
31Summarized Recommendations
- Topics participants want on website
- Pollution prevention
- Litter
- Recycling information
- Educational materials
- Newsletters
- Reporting forms
- Interactive quizzes
32Usability Recommendations
- Visuals
- Avoid large blocks of text
- Connections
- Direct text
- Provide links
- Navigation
33Acknowledgements
- John McManus
- Clermont County OEQ
- Clermont County Municipal Personnel
- Dr. Vincent Hand
- IES Faculty and Staff
- Dr. Michelle Simmons (faculty advisor)
- ENG 697 (Info Design) Class