LIPIDBASED ANTIFUNGAL AGENTS - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 38
About This Presentation
Title:

LIPIDBASED ANTIFUNGAL AGENTS

Description:

Available for IV use as amphotericin B deoxycholate (Fungizone ... compartment. Endocytosis. Liposome. Lysosome. Fusion. Liposome. degradation. Endocytic. vesicle ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:174
Avg rating:5.0/5.0
Slides: 39
Provided by: sevtap
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: LIPIDBASED ANTIFUNGAL AGENTS


1
LIPID-BASED ANTIFUNGAL AGENTS
  • Sevtap Arikan, MD
  • Hacettepe University Medical School
  • Ankara Turkey

2
Fungi can infect..
3
Fungal infections
  • Superficial mycoses
  • Subcutaneous mycoses
  • Endemic (true systemic) mycoses
  • Opportunistic mycoses

4
Commonly isolated fungi
  • Dermatophytes
  • Thermally dimorphic fungi
  • Candida
  • Aspergillus
  • Cryptococcus
  • Zygomycetes
  • ...

5
An optimal antifungal drug has..
  • Wide spectrum of activity
  • Favorable pharmacokinetic profile
  • Adequate in vivo efficacy
  • Low rate of toxicity
  • Low cost

6
Amphotericin B is in clinical use since 1960
  • A polyene macrolide
  • Isolated from Streptomyces nodosus
  • Insoluble in water
  • Solubilized by sodium deoxycholate
  • Available for IV use as amphotericin B
    deoxycholate (Fungizone)

7
Amphotericin B binds to ergosterol and generates
pores
  • Clin Microbiol Rev
    1999 12 501

8
Amphotericin B is active in vitro against
  • Candida spp.
  • (including azole-resistant species)
  • Aspergillus spp.
  • Cryptococcus neoformans
  • Mucor spp.
  • Blastomyces dermatitidis
  • Coccidioides immitis
  • Histoplasma capsulatum
  • Paracoccidioides brasiliensis

9
Reduced susceptibility or resistance to
amphotericin B
  • C. lusitaniae
  • C. krusei
  • C. neoformans
  • Trichosporon spp.
  • A. terreus
  • Walsh et al. JCM 1990 28 1616
  • Sutton et al. JCM 1999 37 2343
  • Arikan et al. JCM 1999 37 3946 Arikan et al.
    JCM 2002 40 1406
  • S. apiospermum
  • Fusarium spp.
  • C. carrionii
  • F. pedrosoi
  • ...

10
Detection of amphotericin B resistance in vitro
  • Technical problems
  • The current NCCLS method may fail to discriminate
    resistant isolates from the susceptible ones

11
But..
  • In vivo amphotericin B resistance is observed
  • Is usually due to the impaired immune system of
    the host

12
Clinical Indications
  • Candidiasis Coccidioidomycosis
  • Aspergillosis Histoplasmosis
  • Cryptococcosis Paracoccidioidomycosis
  • Blastomycosis Sporotrichosis

Systemic mycoses
Febrile neutropenic patients unresponsive to
antibacterial therapy
13
WHY LIPID FORMULATIONS?
14
Because..
  • ? Amphotericin B is toxic
  • SIDE EFFECTS OF AMB
  • Nephrotoxicity
  • Acute infusion related reactions
  • Hypopotassemia, anemia, hepatic
  • dysfunction..

15
LIPID amphotericin B formulations in use
  • (ABLC Abelcet)
  • (ABCD Amphocil or Amphotec)
  • (L-AMB Ambisome)

Amphotericin B Lipid Complex
Amphotericin B Colloidal Dispersion
Liposomal Amphotericin B
16
ABLC
  • Ribbon-like particles
  • Carrier lipids DMPC, DMPG
  • J Liposome Res 1993 3 451

17
ABCD

  • Disk-shaped particles
  • Carrier lipid Cholesteryl sulfate
  • J
    Pharmaceutics 1991 75 45

18
The LIPOSOME..
  • Hospital Practice 1992
    30 53

19
L-AMB
  • AMB incorporated in true unilamellar liposomes
  • Carrier lipids HSPC, DSPG, cholesterol

20
Comparative Pharmacokinetics
21
Comparative in vitro activity
  • AMB L-AMB
  • (Anaissie et al. Eur J Clin Microb Infect Dis
    1991 10 665)
  • AMB gt L-AMB
  • (Pahls et al. J Infect Dis 1994 169 1057)
  • AMB ABCD gt L-AMB ABLC
  • (Oakley et al. AAC 1999 43 1264)

Candida spp.
Aspergillus spp.
22
Comparative in vitro activityTwo questions..
  • 1. Is testing the lipid formulation meaningful?
  • 2. Are the in vitro results significant in vivo?

Done initially to verify maintanence of
antifungal activity The enhanced in VIVO activity
is the major concern
23
Comparative in vivo efficacy

24
Why are they occasionally more efficacious in
VIVO ??
  • Exact mechanism unknown
  • ? Selective uptake into RES
  • ? Higher uptake, retension, and slow release by
    macrophages
  • Storm et al. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis
    1997 1664
  • Wasan et al. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis
    1997 16 81
  • Mehta et al. J Infect Dis 1997 175 214

Macrophage
Liposome
Lysosome
Fusion
Liposome degradation
Endocytosis
Endocytic vesicle
Release from macrophage
Release in blood compartment
25
Comparative nephrotoxicity
26
Comparative rates of infusion related side effects
27
More about the clinical use and toxicity
  • Optimal doses remain unknown (1-7 mg/kg)
  • Different modes of interaction of lipid
    formulations with plasma lipoproteins may play
    role in reduction of nephrotoxicity
  • Wasan et al. AAC 1998 42 3146

28
Major advantages of lipid AMB formulations
  • Tolerable at high doses
  • (3-7 mg/kg vs. 0.6-1 mg/kg for AMB)
  • Significantly less toxic

29
Major disadvantage of lipid AMB formulations is
their high primary cost
  • Daily cost in USD
  • for a 70 kg patient
  • AMB (1 mg/kg)
  • ABLC (5 mg/kg)
  • ABCD (5 mg/kg)
  • L-AMB (5 mg/kg)

30
Lipid AMB formulations--Clinical indications
  • NOT primary choices for any indication
  • Used in cases who are refractory or intolerant to
    conventional AMB

31
Other lipid AMB formulations under investigation
  • AMB with immunoliposomes
  • Otsubo et al. AAC 1998 41 40
  • AMB with long circulating liposomes
  • (PEG-L-AMB)
  • Storm et al. Eur J Microb Infect Dis 1997 16
    64
  • AMB cochleate
  • Graybill et al. ICAAC 1999, abst. no. J-2009

32
Nystatin
  • A polyene derived from Streptomyces noursei
  • Topical antifungal agent
  • Toxic when administered systemically

33
Liposomal nystatin is a systemic formulation
  • Multilamellar liposome
  • Carrier lipids DMPC, DMPG

34
Liposomal Nystatin (Nyotran) is in late Phase
III trials
  • Candida (including azole and some AMB-resistant
    strains)
  • Aspergillus
  • C. neoformans
  • Trichosporon
  • Fusarium
  • Rhizopus
  • Sporothrix
  • ...
  • Quindos et al. Eur J Clin Microb Infect Dis
    2000 19 645
  • Arikan et al. JCM 2002 40 1406

IN VITRO ACTIVITY
35
Liposomal nystatin may be used for salvage therapy
  • Candidiasis
  • Aspergillosis
  • Offner et al. ICAAC 2000, abst. no. J-1102

IN VIVO EFFICACY
?A potential salvage agent in cases who do not
respond to currently available antifungal drugs
36
Side effects of liposomal nystatin are usually
mild
  • Hypokalemia
  • Fever
  • Dose-dependent nephrotoxicity
  • Infusion-related side effects
  • Rash
  • Powles et al. ICAAC 1999, abst. no. LB-4
  • Offner et al. ICAAC 2000, abst. no. J-1102

37
Other lipid antifungal formulations under
investigation
  • Liposomal ketoconazole
  • Liposomal miconazole
  • Liposomal hamycin

38
Lipid antifungal agents..Many questions remain
  • A great and promising progress in antifungal
    therapy..
  • Comparative efficacywhich one is the best?
  • Pharmacodynamics
  • Mechanism of action
  • Basis of improved therapeutic index
  • Long term toxic effects
  • Interactions with other drugs cytokines
  • Role in first-line therapy
  • Role in prophylactic therapy
  • Initial optimal doses
  • Pharmacoeconomics cost-effectivity
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com