DG ECHO - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 31
About This Presentation
Title:

DG ECHO

Description:

HORN OF AFRICA 69 M. CENTRAL, SOUTHERN AFRICA and. INDIAN OCEAN 91.5 M ... CHAD 30 M (Refugees from Sudan and CAR; IDPs and local vulnerable populations) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:142
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 32
Provided by: Kax
Category:
Tags: echo

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: DG ECHO


1
DG ECHO
  • Operational Strategy 2009

2
HUMANITARIAN CONTEXT
  • Increase in natural disasters
  • Crises are becoming increasingly complex
  • Increasing demand on humanitarian aid
  • Difficulties in implementing aid
  • Degradation of security conditions

3
BUDGETARY CONTEXT
  • Year of constraints
  • Budget planned for 2009 for humanitarian aid
  • 504,531,000 (Humanitarian Aid)
  • 230,025,000 (Food Aid
  • 33,295,000 (DIPECHO)
  • 9,200,000 (Support Expenses)
  • TOTAL 777,051,000

4
  • Evolution of budget

5
  • Africa, Caribbean, Pacific

6
ACP COUNTRIES
  • INITIAL BUDGET 2009 339.8 M
  • Humanitarian Aid 218.8 M
  • Food Aid 116 M
  • DIPECHO 5 M

7
4 GEOGRAPHICAL CLUSTERS
  • SUDAN AND CHAD 140 M
  • HORN OF AFRICA 69 M
  • CENTRAL, SOUTHERN AFRICA and
  • INDIAN OCEAN 91.5 M
  • WEST AFRICA 27 M
  • CARIBBEAN AND PACIFIC 12.3 M

8
MAJOR CRISES AND RESPONSES
  • SUDAN 110 M (Darfur and South Sudan)
  • DRC 36 M 9 (North Kivu)
  • CHAD 30 M (Refugees from Sudan and CAR
    IDPs and local vulnerable populations)
  • ZIMBABWE 25 M (developments?)
  • BURUNDI/TANZANIA
  • 20 M (support to return and
    reinstallation of refugees)
  • SOMALIA 18 M (Central and South)

9
MAIN CHALLENGES
  • Security/access Somalia, Sudan, Chad
  • Civil-military relations Chad, CAR, Eastern DRC
    (?)
  • LRRD Liberia, Sahel, Kenya, Uganda
  • Relations with authorities Ethiopia, Eritrea,
    Sudan, Zimbabwe

10
  • Central and Eastern Europe,
  • NIS, Mediterranean countries, Middle East

11
  • Middle East, North Africa, Caucasus
  • Initial budget 2009 109 M (inc. Food Aid
    45.5 M)
  • Major crises and responses
  • Palestinian crisis 58 M (FA 30 M)
  • Iraqi crisis 30 M (FA 10 M)
  • Sahrawi refugees 10 M (FA 5.5 M)
  • Other crises
  • Chechen crisis 6 M
  • Georgia 2 M
  • Yemen 1 M
  • DIPECHO (South Caucasus) 2 M

12
Palestinian crisis
  • Occupied Palestinian Territory ( 52 M)
  • Large scale protection crisis exacerbated by
    access problems.
  • Worsening humanitarian situation to which DG ECHO
    adapts accordingly its response (food, health,
    watsan, psycho, coordination, protection/advocacy
    on access and respect of IHL).
  • Palestinian refugees in Lebanon ( 6 M)
  • Refugee camps remain with serious humanitarian
    needs, notably shelter in Nahr el Bared.

13
Crise iraquienne ( 30 M)
  • Baisse du nombre dincidents violents
    insuffisante pour un contexte propice au retour
    et au développement.
  • Conséquences sur capacité de mise en uvre
    (remote control).
  • Ciblage sur les besoins essentiels et urgents
    protection, médecine durgence, aide aux déplacés
    et aux victimes des violences.
  • Réfugiés dégradation des conditions de vie
    appui aux plus vulnérables, en coordination avec
    les autres instruments daide aux pays daccueil.

14
Sahrawi  refugees in Algeria ( 10 M)
  • Forgotten crisis with little prospect of
    immediate durable solution
  • High dependency on humanitarian aid. 
  • Constraints at local level coordination
    difficulties between official assistance and aid
    sent by the solidarity movement Very few
    donors and partner NGOs delicate balance between
    working in close cooperation with local
    authorities representing the refugees and
    maintaining an independent, needs-based,
    impartial and accountable humanitarian aid. 
  • Food aid 60 of the assistance basic food aid
    and fresh food distributions. Non Food hygiene
    items, shelter, vaccines, essential medicines,
    water, sanitation and waste management.

15
  • Tchétchénie ( 6 M) Stabilisation de la
    situation (sécurité reconstruction) confirme
    la stratégie de sortie mais accès aux victimes du
    conflit à nouveau difficile.
  • Géorgie ( 2 M) Aide massive des donateurs aux
    victimes du conflit de lété 2008 ECHO
    concentrera son appui sur les activités
    durgence protection, assistance et appui au
    retour.
  • Yémen ( 1 M) Focus sur le conflit au Nord,
    (crise oubliée) malgré problèmes daccès.

16
  • Asia and Latin America

17
  • Protracted crises
  • Response to new crises (natural disasters and new
    displacements)
  • Disaster preparedness

18
1. Protracted crises
  • Afghanistan 33 M - increasing humanitarian
    needs in a steadily worsening security situation.
  • Sri Lanka 16 M - intensified conflict, lack of
    access to IDPs, and increasing hostility to
    humanitarian agencies.
  • Burma/Myanmar 18.5 M (excl. Nargis response) -
    deteriorating humanitarian situation in many
    border regions access outside Irrawaddy Delta
    ever more sensitive.
  • Colombia 12 M - no let-up in the conflict or
    number of IDPs or refugees focus on handover to
    the authorities after emergency phase.

19
2. New crises the experience of 2008
  • Response to
  • 16 natural disasters
  • 2 new conflicts
  • 1 refugee situation
  • 92.9 M
  • Including
  • Bangladesh, Cyclone Sidr follow-up 17 M
  • Burma/Myanmar, Cyclone Nargis, May 39 M
  • Nepal/Bihar Floods - broken dam, September 6.6 M

20
3. Disaster preparedness
  • Two DIPECHO Action plans to be launched in 2009
    in South Asia and South America for 10 M each
  • Two Action Plans will continue to be implemented
    - in South East Asia and Central America (10 M
    each) - in 2009 from 2008 budget

21
Cross Cutting Issues
  • Access
  • Government restrictions (Burma/Myanmar, Sri
    Lanka)
  • Conflict restrictions (Afghanistan, Sri Lanka,
    Colombia)
  • Involvement of military forces in humanitarian
    action (Afghanistan)
  • Mainstreaming disaster preparedness
  • Adoption of small-scale disasters decision (1
    M), allowing for rapid response to disasters
    which have significant impact in limited zones

22
  • Food Aid and Disaster Preparedness

23
Humanitarian Food Assistance Budget Perspectives
Food Aid 2009
  • 2009 initial Food Aid budget 230M.
  • This is approximately 30 of DG ECHOs overall
    budget.
  • Challenging prospects for Food Aid in 2009, due
    to
  • -food price crisis continuing and
  • -the effect of the economic crisis increasing
    caseload at field level.

24
Humanitarian Food Assistance Primary objectives
for Food Assistance 2009
  • In the face of the on-going food price and
    economic crisis DG ECHOs FA objectives remain to
    save lives alleviate human suffering, by
  • Restoring maintaining stable nutritional
    status.
  • Protecting livelihoods supporting early,
    short-term livelihood recovery.
  • Enhancing the effectiveness of food assistance
    delivery.
  • DG ECHOs response to be
  • Holistic and coherent and
  • Linked with other forms of responses to needs.

25
Humanitarian Food Assistance Indicative
Geographical Allocations 2009
26
Humanitarian Food Assistance Policy Development
within DG ECHO
  • Action Plan of the European Consensus on
    Humanitarian Aid
  • Requires that the EC
  • elaborate diversified approaches to food
    assistance and livelihoods support and
  • action (must be) taken to adjust policy and
    financing to contexts and needs.
  • In 2009 DG ECHO will revisit its policy for
    Humanitarian Food Assistance
  • This will inter alia reflect better the
    increasing shift from food aid to food
    assistance.
  • It will be established in close coordination with
    other EC services and the participation of
    external stakeholders.

27
DG ECHO Strategy in DRR/DP 2009
  • Main Pillars of Action
  • Targeted DP actions with mitigation component
  • Dipecho in South America, South Asia, Caribbean
    and South Caucasus.
  • Targeted Disaster Preparedness actions in larger
    DRR initiatives.
  • 2) Strengthening Integration of DRR/DP in all
    relevant relief and recovery actions
  • - Improve the quality of the humanitarian
    response.
  • - Allow easier LRRD practice. Improve resilience
    of communities.
  • 3) Advocacy, coordination, capacity-building and
    dissemination of good practices.
  • - Improve advocacy and coordination for effective
    DRR and capacity building.
  • Strengthening UNISDR system Capacity for the
    implementation of the HFA.
  • TOTAL INITIAL BUDGET for 2009 - 34 M EURO
  • FULLY IN LINE WITH THE EU STRATEGY FOR
    DEVELOPPING COUNTRIES AND EU CONSENSUS ON
    HUMANITARIAN AID

28
  • Information and Communication

29
A reminder on visibility
  • Visibility is not optional ? contractual
    obligation.
  • Basic rules are easy
  • Commission humanitarian aid logo next to the
    partner logo
  • acknowledgment of Commission as the donor in
    media interviews, press releases or any other
    relevant situation
  • Making our action visible to the world
  • ensuring our work is understood and supported
  • Possibility of a case-by-case exemption for
    security reasons in exceptional circumstances and
    duly justified cases - but this must be agreed in
    advance

30
Visibility and communication actions in the
financing agreement
  • The principle of effectiveness applies as much to
    this as to any other element of the project
  • (1) Basic visibility does not need to be
    expensive
  • Acknowledge Commission as donor on website
    providing link to DG ECHO website
  • Press releases highlighting projects
  • Stickers, posters, t-shirts and signboards

31
Visibility and communication actions in the
financing agreement
  • (2) If you want to do more proactive
    communication
  • a lot can be achieved with a little ( a little
    imagination)
  • be results-oriented
  • Last year (2007) partners spent around 2.4
    million in visibility lines.
  • Are we - or you - getting value for money?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com