4E1: Technological Innovation Research and Practice Session 5' Course Review - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 31
About This Presentation
Title:

4E1: Technological Innovation Research and Practice Session 5' Course Review

Description:

EXAMPLE: who are players in car industry? COMPETING. PRODUCERS. Potential Entrants. SUPPLIERS ... Car Producer. Producer. Dealer. Car Hire. Corporate Fleets ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:44
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 32
Provided by: elizabet205
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: 4E1: Technological Innovation Research and Practice Session 5' Course Review


1
4E1 Technological Innovation Research and
PracticeSession 5.Course Review
  • Elizabeth Garnsey, Tim Minshall
  • http//www-mmd.eng.cam.ac.uk/ctm/teaching/4e1.html
  • ewg_at_eng.cam.ac.uk

2
OBJECTIVES OF COURSE
  • Find out about key developments in knowledge
    based industries
  • Understand drivers of technology industry
    evolution
  • Learn frameworks and models to analyse
    innovation
  • Skills communicating, research, report writing

3
Session 1 Industries
4
Product Class and Industry structure EXAMPLE
who are players in car industry?
Potential Entrants

COMPETING PRODUCERS
SUPPLIERS
BUYERS
Firms producing substitute products
Michael Porter 1980

5
2. Industry as Production or Value-adding Chain
e.g. Car industry
Car Hire

Car Producer

Dealer
Private consumer
Producer

Corporate Fleets
Car Producer
Sometimes firms providing a stage in production
chain for many sectors viewed as an industry -
e.g. packaging
6
3. Business Eco-system approach
Social and economic environment
7
Approaches to Industry Analysis (reading list)
  • 1. Industry structure approach
  • BARNEY, J. 199, GAINING AND SUSTAINING
    COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE
  • OR the original
  • PORTER .M 1980, COMPETITIVE .STRATEGY
    especially chapters
  • 10 - 12 and Appendix B
  • 2. Industry dynamics approach
  • UTTERBACK, J. 1994 MASTERING THE DYNAMICS OF
    INNOVATION
  • AFUAH, A.I 1998 INNOVATION MANAGEMENT,
    STRATEGIES, IMPLEMENTATION AND PROFIT
  • 3. Eco-system approach
  • JAMES MOORE, THE DEATH OF COMPETITION
    summarised in Predators and Prey A New Ecology
    of Competition
  • Harvard Business Review 1993

8
Key trends product and process innovations
entries/exits of producer firms
Number of firms
Rate of major innovation
Early stage
Maturation
Decline
9
Industry life cycle - does it apply to PC
industry?
?
Experiments Disruption
10
Standards, network effects
  • Design standards make possible inter-changeability
  • Dominant design meets critical user needs
  • Leading standard - incentives to provide
    ancillary products and services.
  • In IT industries technical standards allow both
  • Inter-operability between equipment
  • Interaction between users
  • Where a product helps users to interact
  • Forms a network connected by the product.
  • May be of greater value as more people use a
    product
  • Metcalfes law

11
Session 2 Technologies
12
Technology cycle diffusion of knowledge
  • Emergent - knowledge newly applied outside the
    lab
  • Diffusing - applications are increasingly taken
    up in industry
  • Assimilated - widely diffused technique
  • Ageing - approaching the end of their industrial
    life
  • Obsolete - discontinued, replaced by new products
    and processes
  • High tech industry is based on technologies
    emerging or newly diffusing from research base
  • Relative concept

13
Change and uncertainty
Technology discontinuity
Performance
Turbulence
Time / Investment / Effort
Adapted from Bower Christensen (1995)
14
Session 3 Products and markets
15
What is a Market? The high tech marketing
view a set of actual or potential customers
for a given set of products or services who
have a common set of needs or wants whose
interact ions affect their purchases Not just
aggregate sales (metric used to measure demand by
some) Geoff Moore Crossing the Chasm,
Harper Business 1995 p. 28
16

Greater the problems solved, the greater the
potential value of the innovation.
But who knows about the innovation ? Who can
it reach? Do potential users have purchasing
power?
17
Mind the Gap
Early Adopters
Early Majority
Late Majority
Innovator- Enthusiasts
Laggards
18
If network effects operate, markets may tip
towards the new technical standard
adapted from R. Henderson, MIT
1

Probability the next consumer chooses to buy A
0
0
1
As share of installed base
19
Innovation with a critical mass of adopters
Interactive Innovation (e.g. fax)
Source Rogers 1995 p. 314
20
Nasdaq went up then down
6000
5000
4000
3000
2000
1000
0
1/12/99
4/12/99
7/12/99
1/12/00
4/12/00
7/12/00
1/12/01
1/12/98
4/12/98
7/12/98
4/12/01
7/12/01
1/12/02
10/12/99
10/12/00
10/12/98
10/12/01
Source Paul Abrahams, Financial Times
21
Recurrence of cycles repeating patterns
  • Previous booms have included (Nairn, 2002)
  • Canals
  • Railways
  • Gas
  • Electricity
  • Telegraph
  • Telephone
  • But have any been as extreme as Internet?

22
Hype cycle
23
Session 4 Science base investment
24
Established Firms as Innovators
  • Established firms introduce many minor
    innovations
  • - cumulatively very important
  • Compare Model T with todays Ford
  • Their innovations are mainly
  • incremental,
  • continuous,
  • non-disruptive,
  • competence-enhancing
  • Competence-enhancing refers to impact of
  • skills and knowledge on ability incentives to
    innovate

25
Who has competitive advantage in face of an
innovation that alters skill requirements?
3. Well resourced entrants with relevant
marketing capabilities
2. New start ups
Extent to which innovation requires new
technological capabilities
high
4. Entrants with some relevant technological capab
ilities - if their known market enlarges
1. Incumbent Firms
low
low
high
Extent to which innovation requires new
marketing capabilities
26
Concern over contribution of knowledge to wealth
creation - Interest in tech transfer
  • Linear model of tech transfer
  • Discovery through to application
  • Triple Helix
  • University Industry Government
  • Third mission
  • Teaching Research Application
  • New social contract
  • From linear process to active addressing of needs

27
What we mean by alliances and partnerships?
Equity agreement
Informal agreement
Mergers Acquisitions
Contractual agreement
Joint Ownership
(Adapted from Lorange Roos, 1992)
28
Alliances between small and large firms
  • .. entrepreneurial firms are most at risk of
    being taken advantage of when the only resource
    they bring to these alliances is a new
    technology
  • .. these alliances often create economic value
    but most of this value is appropriated by the
    large firm

Alvarez, S. A. and J. B. Barney (2001). "How
entrepreneurial forms can benefit from alliances
with large partners." Academy of Management
Executive 15(1) 139-148.
29
Biotech-pharma alliances centre on discovery
Alliance Stage by year
Source Recombinant Capital and AstraZeneca
30
Company growth
Employees, revenues, profits, value
Time
31
Risk, value and funding
3 - 7 years
RD
Risk
IPO / Trade Sale
Market expansion
First product
Prototype
Idea
Time
Pre-seed grants
Zero stage
B round
Seed
A round
Mezzanine
Adapted from Siemens Venture Capital
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com