Title: Fisheries management as a regional business The case of Norway
1Fisheries management as a regional business-The
case of Norway
- Paper presented to EAFE, Rome
- 5-7th April 2004
- Torbjørn Trondsen,
- NFH, University of Tromso, Norway
-
- James A Young.
- University of Stirling, Scotland
2Plan
- Background to the case for market orientation
- Pertinent trends in Norwegian fisheries
- The relative position of North Norway
- An alternative model concept application
- Conclusions
3Background to the case for market orientation
- Property rights values
- Resource rent management allocation
- Property rights fish business development
- Governmental motivation to act
- Political industry pressure groups
- EU ?
4Pertinent trends in Norwegian fisheries
- Decline in number of fishermen vessels
- Increased engine capacity
- Concentration of fishing activities
- Regional imbalance of effort catch
5Fishermen
Trends in Norwegian fisheries
lt14000
Engine capacity
Vessels
6Concentration of pelagic fishing rights Owners
and regions
Entry regulation
7Pelagic fishing grounds
Spring herring
Capelin
North Sea Herring
Blue whiting
Mackerel
Hordaland Pelagic capitol
Catch
8The relative position of North Norway
Catches 2001
Haddock
Cod
Finnmark
Northern Norway
Saithe
Ålesund Factory trawler fleet capital
9The relative position of North Norway share of
total Norwegian cod catch
Northern Norway
Finnmark
Entry regulation coastal fishing vessels
10An alternative model the drivers for change
- Closure of fisheries due to overcapacity
- Fishing rights traded
- Expansion in factory vessels (auto longliners)
and big purse seiners in Western Norway - Localization of fishing rights a function of
capital and market control - Investment in overcapacity rewarded with fishing
rights. - Exit of Coastal fishers without individual quotas
- Weak regional management of fishing rights
- Former county fishery administration taken over
by the governmental Directorate of Fisheries in
Bergen - Norwegian Fishermens Association dominated by
quota barons influence over Fishery
Management Policy
11An alternative model North Norways demands
- Regional Societal ownership
- Fairer regional allocation of fishing rights
- Efficient economic utilization of resources
- Value adding in the coastal communities
- Compatibility with prospective EU frameworks?
12An alternative model background
- The main ideas published
- Toward Market Orientation The role of auctioning
individual seasonal quotas (ISQ). Marine
Policy-(in press) - Fisheries Management and Market Oriented Value
adding (MOVA). Marine Resource Economics Vol. 16
No. 1. (2001) - Experiences from.
- EUs regional co-management systems
- Regional/group quotas management in the US NZ
- Japanese co-management
- Norwegian attitudes regarding regional and
fisheries management and policy
- General Model SCP
- Structure
- Conduct
- Performance
- Region as a value adding competition arena
13An alternative model Regional business
management of fishing rights
- Regional Resource Enterprises (RRE)
- Owned by County authority (eg Norwegian Energy)
- Non transferable license leasing contracts to
individual fishermen - Quota asset value and leasing income
- resource rent for regional development
14ALLOCATION MODELS OF FISHING RIGHTS
Regional management
Vessel Group management
15An alternative model application of RREs
consequences for fishing operations
- No extra barriers on grounds or landing ports
- Opportunity for flexible combinations of leases
- Greater involvement of individual fishermen
industry participants - More stable competitive framework
16An alternative model application of RREs
consequences for fishing operations
- Better focus on market oriented value adding
- Compliance with PO co-management trends
- Compatibility with emergent EU CFP?
17Conclusions
- Limits on enthusiasm for change in existing power
centres - Local initiatives necessary
- Co-existence of regional standard vessel group
management models? - Regional variations possible
- Finnmark and W Norway different models?
- Political and Industry studies - reviews ongoing
- Finnmark County currently leading but wider
transnational considerations may dominate?