Title: Budget Institutions and Fiscal Outcomes Ten years of inquiry on fiscal matters at the Research Department
1Budget Institutions and Fiscal OutcomesTen
years of inquiry on fiscal matters at the
Research Department
- Gabriel Filc Carlos Scartascini
- Research Fellow Economist
- Office of Evaluation and Oversight
- Inter-American Development Bank
Former Junior Professional at the Research
Department (2002 - 2003) The views and
interpretations expressed in this paper are those
of the authors and should not be attributed to
the Inter American Development Bank, or to any
individual acting on its behalf.
2Budget Institutions and Fiscal Outcomes.Ten
years of inquiry on fiscal matters at RES
- Objective
- To serve as a tribute to the work on Budget
Institutions and Fiscal Outcomes RES has engaged
in since its creation
3Budget Institutions and Fiscal Outcomes.Ten
years of inquiry on fiscal matters at RES
- Method
- We construct a new index of fiscal rules and
budget procedures following the methodology in
Alesina, Haussman, Hommes and Stein (1996, 1998),
and we test their hypotheses in a sample of Latin
American and in a larger sample of developing
countries - We review the new lines of research RES is
promoting and developing jointly with other
researchers. Basically, the PMP methodology.
4Budget Institutions and Fiscal Outcomes.Ten
years of inquiry on fiscal matters at RES
- The New Index
- Following Alesina, et al (1996, 1998) we
construct a new index and several sub-indexes
using the OECD/WB(/IDB) Budget Practices and
Procedures Survey. - The survey includes 359 questions on almost(?)
every topic related to budget practices and
procedures. Includes information on every stage
of the budget process at each one of the branches
of government. - So far, 43 countries have answered the survey,
including 11 (12) Latin American countries and 21
developing countries. - We selected 22 questions that provide information
on fiscal rules, the degree of hierarchy and
transparency of budget procedures.
5Budget Institutions and Fiscal Outcomes.Ten
years of inquiry on fiscal matters at RES
- The New Index
- Composite index (INDEX)
- Fiscal rules (FISCRULES)
- Fiscal limits (FISCLIMITS)
- Medium Term Fiscal Frameworks (MTFF)
- Borrowing limits (BORRCONST)
- Reserve Funds (RESERVFUND)
- Hierarchical procedures (HIERARCHICAL)
- Within the Executive Branch (RESTMINS)
- Executive-Legislative relations (RESTLEGS)
- Cash management (CASHMANAG)
- Transparent procedures (TRANSPARENCY)
6Budget Institutions and Fiscal Outcomes.Ten
years of inquiry on fiscal matters at RES
- Insights
- Fiscal rules laws and/or regulations which
establish ex ante constraints on deficits and/or
debt may be conducive to fiscal discipline. - Hierarchical procedures (in contrast to more
collegial procedures) tend to reduce the
incidence of the commons problem and give primacy
in the bargaining over the budget to those agents
with political incentives to keep finances under
control. - Transparent procedures should lead to more
fiscal discipline as they could increase the
chances of enforcement. Even the most stringent
fiscal laws can be circumvented if budget
documents are unintelligible and unrelated to the
real fiscal situation.
7Budget Institutions and Fiscal Outcomes.Ten
years of inquiry on fiscal matters at RES
- Hypothesis
- Countries with more stringent fiscal rules,
hierarchical budget procedures and more
transparent budget processes should present
better primary fiscal balances (lower primary
deficits).
8Budget Institutions and Fiscal Outcomes.Ten
years of inquiry on fiscal matters at RES
- Preliminary evidence seems to indicate that a
country within the group with high scores would
have a more positive primary fiscal balance than
a country within the group with low scores. - The following table shows the differences on
primary fiscal balances as percentage of GDP
between countries with the average high and low
scores.
9Budget Institutions and Fiscal Outcomes.Ten
years of inquiry on fiscal matters at RES
- For the econometric analysis, we run the
regressions, based on the Alesina, et al (1998)
model, for every country, for the developing
countries, and for the sample of Latin American
Countries. - We use the same control variables Debt, Trade,
Popgt65, and Poplt15, ( debt service) and the
same dependent variable general government
primary fiscal balances, ( central) - As it can be deduced from the following graphs,
the fitness of the regressions is better for the
developing and Latin American countries than for
the world sample (Maastricht, Monetary Union,
etc).
10Budget Institutions and Fiscal Outcomes.Ten
years of inquiry on fiscal matters at RES
11Budget Institutions and Fiscal Outcomes.Ten
years of inquiry on fiscal matters at RES
12Budget Institutions and Fiscal Outcomes.Ten
years of inquiry on fiscal matters at RES
13Budget Institutions and Fiscal Outcomes.Ten
years of inquiry on fiscal matters at RES
14Budget Institutions and Fiscal Outcomes.Ten
years of inquiry on fiscal matters at RES
15Budget Institutions and Fiscal Outcomes.Ten
years of inquiry on fiscal matters at RES
16Budget Institutions and Fiscal Outcomes.Ten
years of inquiry on fiscal matters at RES
17Budget Institutions and Fiscal Outcomes.Ten
years of inquiry on fiscal matters at RES
- Even though recommendations have not been
implemented exactly as devised, some budget
reforms that took place in the 90s did not
achieve the expected results. - The lack of success of some of these reforms
could be blamed on the policies themselves, but
in other cases, the recommendations have not
taken into account the specific characteristics
of the countries. - Studies aiming to understand the budget process
and to render successful recommendations should
not only consider the existence or not of certain
fiscal rules and budget procedures but most
importantly, to consider the incentives of
managers of public monies to comply with budget
rules and procedures, and the overall
policymaking process in which the acceptance and
compliance with rules and procedures is embedded.
18Budget Institutions and Fiscal Outcomes.Ten
years of inquiry on fiscal matters at RES
- The lenses provided by the PMP methodology
(as explained by Spiller, Stein, and Tommasi
(2003)) and the BMP (its application to the
analysis of the budget process) forces the
analyst to understand the transaction environment
behind the budget process and to comprehend the
actions of the agents in charge of budgetary
decisions according to their incentives,
incentives that are affected by the political
institutions of each country. - Under this methodology, public expenditures are
the outcome of complex intertemporal exchanges
among political actors that participate in the
budget process.
19Budget Institutions and Fiscal Outcomes.Ten
years of inquiry on fiscal matters at RES
- Using these lenses, we could evaluate whether
traditional and generally pertinent
recommendations are useful to solve fiscal
challenges when applied to countries with
different features of the policymaking process. - The paper presents some case studies, that show
that very reasonable reforms like increasing
transparency, reducing the discretionary funds of
legislators, and reducing the discretion of the
executive branch for cash managing expenditures,
recommendations usually proposed for Latin
America, could have unintended effects,
potentially worsening the reality they are
designed to improve because of the policy
environment in which they are inserted. - Examples Cash-management in Brazil, auxilios
parlamentarios in Colombia, transparency and
roll call votes in Paraguay, and the Copper
Stabilization Fund in Chile.
20Budget Institutions and Fiscal Outcomes.Ten
years of inquiry on fiscal matters at RES
- Reducing the discretionary power of the
Executive. The case of - cash-management in Brazil.
21Budget Institutions and Fiscal Outcomes.Ten
years of inquiry on fiscal matters at RES
- Summary
- Following previous work by RES, we constructed a
new index of fiscal rules and budget procedures
and several subindexes. - Empirical results indicate that countries with
more stringent fiscal rules, and especially with
more hierarchical budget procedures seem to
present better primary fiscal balances (lower
primary deficits). - Among the components of fiscal rules the use of
medium term fiscal frameworks. - Among the components of hierarchical procedures
the capacity of the executive to cash-manage
expenditures, restrictions on the legislature,
and restrictions on the bargaining within the
executive branch.
22Budget Institutions and Fiscal Outcomes.Ten
years of inquiry on fiscal matters at RES
- Summary
- Reforms on budget procedures and the introduction
of certain fiscal rules have not achieved the
expected results. - Given the state of disenchantment of the
population in Latin America, it is peremptory
that policy researchers suggest those
recommendations with the highest probability of
success.
23Budget Institutions and Fiscal Outcomes.Ten
years of inquiry on fiscal matters at RES
- Summary
- Because the success of policy reforms depend on
the characteristics of the policy environment in
which they are inserted, in-depth knowledge of
the policymaking process is needed. - The lenses suggested in the PMP and the BMP
methodology could help on this regard.