Writing submissions to law reform bodies: the National Human Rights Consultation and Beyond - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

Writing submissions to law reform bodies: the National Human Rights Consultation and Beyond

Description:

Bills of Parliament to be scrutinised against HRA. ... A HRA transfers huge power from Parliament to judges. Will create a flood of litigation ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:57
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: LAW348
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Writing submissions to law reform bodies: the National Human Rights Consultation and Beyond


1
Writing submissions to law reform bodies the
National Human Rights Consultation and Beyond
  • Australian Human Rights Commission 27 February
    2009
  • Kate Temby, Acting Director, Human Rights Unit,
    Australian Human Rights Commission
  • Edward Santow, Director, Charter of Rights
    Project, Gilbert Tobin Centre of Public Law

2
Outline
  • Background to the National Consultation
  • What are human rights?
  • How are rights currently protected?
  • How could rights be better protected?
  • How would a Human Rights Act make a difference?
  • What should we include in our submission?
  • How can we get others involved?

3
National Human Rights Consultation the Brennan
Committee
Father Frank Brennan AO
Mary Kostakidis
Mick Palmer AO APM
Tammy Williams
  • Timeline
  • Roundtable meetings now
  • Submissions due 15 June 2009
  • Committee to report by 31 August 2009
  • Consultation website www.humanrightsconsultation.
    gov.au

4
National Human Rights Consultation Getting
involved
  • Three questions posed to the Committee
  • 1. Which human rights (including corresponding
    responsibilities) should be protected and
    promoted?
  • 2. Are these human rights currently sufficiently
    protected and promoted?
  • 3. How could Australia better protect and promote
    human rights?
  • Terms of Reference requirements
  • The Committee must consult widely, and assess
    community support for the various options.
  • The Committee must not consider a constitutional
    Bill.
  • The Committee must consider all methods of
    protecting HR.

5
A significant opportunity
  • Why should we participate?
  • this is a once in a generation opportunity
  • Australia has very limited constitutional and
    legislative protection of human rights
  • greater human rights protections will improve
    public services and empower individuals
  • this is an opportunity to consider a range of
    legislative and non-legislative measures.

6
What are human rights?
  • Human rights designed to protect peoples dignity
    and ability to participate in society
  • Two main categories of human rights
  • Civil and political rights.
  • Economic, social and cultural rights.

7
Economic, social and cultural rights
  • Your right to
  • family life, and to look after your children
  • work and to be treated fairly at work
  • form and join a trade union
  • an adequate standard of living, including
    adequate food, clothing and housing
  • access appropriate health care
  • a basic education
  • maintain your culture and language
  • access services regardless of your race, gender,
    age or disability.

8
Civil and political rights
  • Your right to
  • life
  • not to be tortured or suffer other cruel or
    degrading treatment
  • be free from slavery and forced labour
  • liberty and to be free from arbitrary arrest or
    detention
  • be treated with humanity if deprived of your
    liberty
  • freedom of movement

9
Civil and political rights (contd)
  • Your right to
  • be treated equally by the courts
  • be presumed innocent until proven guilty and to
    be tried without delay
  • privacy
  • think what you like and to practise any religion
  • say what you like (without inciting hatred or
    violence)
  • vote and to participate in public life
  • be treated equally by the law.

10
How are human rights protected now?
  • Constitutional protection (limited).
  • Specific legislationeg, anti-discrimination
    laws.
  • The common law.
  • A culture of human rights protection.

11
Case Study 1 how the UK HRA helped protect a
family
  • The UK has had a Human Rights Act since 1998. A
    woman fled domestic violence with her children.
    The womans husband attempted to track the family
    down and they moved towns whenever he discovered
    their whereabouts. The family eventually arrived
    in London and were referred to the local social
    services department. Social workers told the
    mother she was an unfit parent and that she had
    made the family intentionally homeless. They said
    that her children had to be placed into foster
    care.

12
Case Study 1 a human rights response
  • An advice worker helped the mother to challenge
    this claim on the basis of the right to respect
    for family life. As a result, the family were
    permitted to stay together and the social
    services department promised to provide the
    deposit if they could secure private rented
    accommodation.

13
How could human rights be better protected in
Australia?
  • A range of measures could make a difference
  • enhanced constitutional protections
  • a National Human Rights Action Plan
  • enacting specific lawseg, a law setting out how
    people in immigration detention should be treated
  • developing national programs to prevent or
    address specific issueseg, violence against
    women and girls
  • implementing a national public education program
    about human rights.

14
A Human Rights Act
  • Comprehensive human rights protection
  • Nomenclature Bill of Rights, Charter of Rights,
    Human Rights Act all mean the same thing.
  • Dominant Human Rights Act model
  • Statutory, not constitutionally entrenched.
  • Bills of Parliament to be scrutinised against
    HRA.
  • Public authorities required to conform to HRA.
  • Court cannot strike down incompatible
    legislation only issue a declaration of
    incompatibility.

15
Features of the dominant HRA model
  • Dialogue model that preserves Parliamentary
    supremacy.
  • Focus on achieving better accountability, and
    public service decision making.
  • Protection of, at least, civil and political
    rights. Debate over inclusion of ESC rights.

16
HRA Impact on Parliament?
  • A Human Rights Act would
  • make the federal Parliament consider how laws
    impact on human rights eg, Parliament would
    need to consider whether a law requiring the
    mandatory detention of all unlawful
    non-citizens could be justified in light of the
    fundamental human rights breaches it leads to

17
HRA Impact on policy development?
  • A Human Rights Act would
  • make the federal government respect human rights
    when developing policy eg, guidance given to
    the Department of Immigration in deciding what
    conditions are attached to a bridging visa should
    require the Department to consider the human
    rights of asylum seekers

18
HRA Impact on public decision making
  • A Human Rights Act would
  • make public servants respect human rights when
    making decisions and delivering services eg,
    when deciding whether an immigration detainee can
    see a medical specialist, the Department of
    Immigration and detention service providers would
    need to consider the right of all persons to the
    highest attainable standard of physical and
    mental health

19
HRA Remedies
  • What should happen if a public authority breaches
    a persons human rights? Options include
  • the public authority could be required to
    mediate with the person to agree on a solution
  • the public authority could be compelled to
    cease the behaviour
  • the person could have a right to damages.

20
A Human Rights Act myths
  • Democracy and the common law adequately protect
    human rights
  • A HRA transfers huge power from Parliament to
    judges
  • Will create a flood of litigation
  • Will promote bureaucracy and will be costly
  • Will be used only by criminals and terrorists to
    exploit loopholes.

21
What should we say in our submission?
  • Discussion
  • What examples can you provide of situations where
    human rights have not been adequately protected?
  • What would have made a difference in this
    situation?

22
Making a submission
  • Every submission counts, no matter how large or
    small!
  • Some questions to consider
  • What expertise and experience does our
    organisation have?
  • What value can we add?
  • What resources do we have?
  • Options
  • Write your own submission
  • Modify another submission to suit your
    organisation

23
Where can I go for help?
  • Australian Human Rights Commission toolkit and
    website humanrights.gov.au/letstalkaboutrights
  • Gilbert Tobin website gtcentre.unsw.edu.au
  • Australian Human Rights Group humanrightsact.com.
    au/ahrg

24
How can I engage others?
  • Encourage other organisations or individuals to
    make a submission
  • Help others write a submission
  • Run a workshop with your clients/member
    organisations
  • Talk to your family and friends
  • Attend the National Consultation community forums
  • Distribute resources such as toolkits
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com