Sicherheit in Rechnernetzen - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Sicherheit in Rechnernetzen

Description:

TU Dresden, Fakult t Informatik, D-01062 Dresden ... seal, hologram. pollution. knows. password. answers to questions. calculation results for numbers ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:82
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: cryptonenr
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Sicherheit in Rechnernetzen


1
Biometrics how to put to use and how not at
all? How to handle security problems of
biometrics and how to handle security and privacy
problems caused by biometrics?
Andreas Pfitzmann TU Dresden, Fakultät
Informatik, D-01062 DresdenPhone 49 351
463-38277, e-mail pfitza_at_inf.tu-dresden.de,
http//dud.inf.tu-dresden.de/
2
Structure of Talk
  • What is biometrics?
  • Biometrics for what purpose?
  • Authentication vs. Identification
  • Security problems of biometrics
  • FMR vs. FNR
  • Security problems caused by biometrics
  • Devaluation of classic forensic techniques
  • Safety problem Stealing a finger to steal a car
  • Wanted multiple identities could be uncovered
  • Privacy problems caused by biometrics
  • Sensitive personal data, e.g. by retina scan or
    fingerprint
  • Processing of personal data without the data
    subject getting to know of it, e.g. face
    recognition
  • How to put to use and how not at all?
  • Only between the data subject and his/her
    devices!
  • Outlook

3
1. What is Biometrics ?
  • Measuring physiological or behavioral
    characteristics,
  • e.g.
  • (Shape of) Face
  • Facial thermograms
  • Fingerprint
  • Hand geometry
  • Vein patterns of the retina
  • Patterns of the iris
  • DNA
  • ...
  • Dynamics of handwriting (e.g. handwritten
    signature)
  • Voice print
  • Gait
  • ...

4
2. Biometrics for what Purpose ?
Physiological or behavioral characteristics are
measured and compared with reference values to
  • Authenticate (Is this the person (s)he claims to
    be?)
  • or even to
  • Identify (Who is this person?).

5
3. Security Problems of Biometrics
  • Figure taken from
  • Anil Jain, Lin Hong, Sharath Pankanti Biometric
    Identification Communications of the ACM 43/2
    (2000) 91-98

Liberal systemDo not exclude might-be offenders!
Low FMR causes high FNR and vice versa !
Conservative systemPrevent break-ins!
6
4. Security Problems caused by Biometrics (1)
  • Devaluation of classic forensic techniques
  • Databases of fingerprints or common issuing of
    ones fingerprint essentially ease the
    fabrication of finger replicas and thus leaving
    someone elses fingerprints at the site of crime.
  • The more fingerprints a forger has at his
    discretion and
  • the more he knows about the holder of the
    fingerprints
  • the higher the plausibility of somebody elses
    fingerprints he will leave ...
  • If biometrics employing fingerprints is used to
    secure huge values, an industry fabricating
    replicas of fingers will arise.
  • If fingerprint biometrics are rolled out to the
    mass market,
  • huge values to be secured arise by accumulation
    automatically.
  • As infrastructures, e.g. for border control,
    cannot be upgraded as fast as single machines to
    fabricate replicas of fingers, a loss of security
    is to be expected overall.

7
4. Security Problems caused by Biometrics (2)
  • Stealing body parts (Safety problem of
    biometrics)
  • Example Cut off a finger, to steal an S-class
    Mercedes.
  • Even a temporary (or only an assumed) improvement
    of security by biometrics is not necessarily an
    advance, but endangers physical integrity of
    persons.
  • If checking that the body part measured
    biometrically is still alive really works,
    kidnapping and blackmailing will replace the
    stealing of body parts.
  • Wanted multiple identities could be uncovered as
    well
  • Agents of secret services each country will set
    up person-related biometric databases of all
    foreign citizens.
  • Undercover agents and persons in
    witness-protection programs in particular
    organized crime will set up person-related
    biometric databases.

8
5. Privacy Problems caused by Biometrics
  • Sensitive personal data, e.g. retina scan
    reveals information on consumption of alcohol,
    fingerprint might reveal data on homosexuality.
  • Processing of personal data without the data
    subject getting to know of it, e.g. face
    recognition
  • Employing several kinds of biometrics in parallel
    to cope with the insecurity of each single kind,
    multiplies the privacy problem (cf. mosaic theory
    of data protection).

Data protection by erasing personal data does not
work on the Internet, since it is necessary to
erase all copies. Therefore even the possibility
to gather personal data has to be avoided.
9
6. How to put to Use and how not at all ? (1)
  • Between data subject and his/her devices
  • Authentication by possession and/or knowledge and
    biometrics
  • No devaluation of classic forensic techniques
  • No privacy problems caused by biometrics
  • But Safety problem remains unchanged? Provide
    possibility to switch off biometrics after
    successful biometric authentication.
  • Active biometrics (i.e. person does something
    explicitly) in passports and/or towards foreign
    devices can be avoided and should be!
  • Passive biometrics by foreign devices cannot be
    prevented regrettably.

10
6. How to put to Use and how not at all ? (2)
  • Visas including biometrics do much less endanger
    privacy than passports including biometrics.
  • Foreign countries will try to build up
    person-related biometric databases of visitors
    we should not ease it for them nor should we make
    it cheaper for them by making our passports
    machine readable.
  • Organized crime will try to build up
    person-related biometric databases we should
    not ease it for them by establishing it as common
    practice to deliver biometric data to foreign
    machines, nor should we help them by making our
    passports machine readable without keeping the
    passport holder in control (cf. insecurity of
    RFID-chips against unauthorized reading).
  • Since biometric identification is all but
    perfect, different measurements and thereby
    different values of biometric characteristics are
    less suited to become a universal personal
    identifier than a digital reference value
    constant for 10 years in your passport. Of course
    this only holds if these different values of
    biometric characteristics are not always
    accompanied by a constant universal personal
    identifier like the number of your passport.

11
7. Outlook
  • Balancing surveillance and privacy should not
    only happen concerning single applications, but
    across applications.
  • Genome databases will possibly undermine the
    security of biometrics measuring inherited
    physiological characteristics.
  • Genome databases and ubiquitous computing (
    pervasive computing computers in all physical
    things connected to a network) will undermine
    privacy primarily in the physical world.
  • Privacy spaces in the digital world are possible
    (and probably needed, cf. story of my Christian
    youth group) and should be established instead
    of trying to gather and store traffic data for a
    longer period of time (data retention) at high
    costs and for (very) limited use (in the sense of
    balancing across applications).

12
Literature
  • Andreas Pfitzmann Biometrie wie einsetzen und
    wie keinesfalls? Informatik-Spektrum 29/5 (2006)
    353-356.
  • Andreas Pfitzmann Der ePass innovativ, aber
    ein Sicherheitsrisiko iX, Magazin für
    professionelle Informationstechnik /10 (Oktober
    2007) 48.

13
Another Hot Topic w.r.t. ID-documents RFIDs
  • RFIDs integrated into passports (starting autumn
    2005 in Germany) and identity cards (starting
    2009 ?) support not only the creation of movement
    profiles, but also building ID-document specific
    bombs detonating exactly when (the holder of) the
    ID-document is in close proximity.
  • The improvement of the German BSI et al. w.r.t.
    the security of RFIDs in ID-documents (basic
    access control) does not change this Whoever
    did have access to the paper part of the
    ID-document (issuing country, immigration offices
    at immigration or emigration sellers of pre-paid
    mobile phones requiring a photocopy of the
    buyers ID-document) or colludes with someone who
    did, can read the RFID whenever it is in close
    proximity.

14
Security Improvement of RFIDs by BSI et al. is
Insufficient
Taken from Dr. Dennis Kügler Risiko Reisepass?
Schutz der biometrischen Daten im RF-Chip ct
5/2005, page 88
15
Does PKI for RFID-readers help ?
Reader identifies itself against the RFID-chip
(e.g. signs a challenge and sends PKI-certificate
of its public key) before the RFID-chip sends any
chip-specific information.
  • If PKI is only used for access control to some of
    the data fields, there is only a small gain
    w.r.t. creation of movement profiles and no gain
    w.r.t. building ID-document specific bombs
    (extended access control).
  • If PKI is used for each access and no cloning of
    readers possible and no failed state
    participating (which for reasons of global
    validity of ID-documents means no failed state
    on earth), then the RFID access problem is
    solved.
  • Very advisable Output by the ID-document or (in
    a way which can not be manipulated!) by the
    reader, whether the holder of the ID-document
    shall cooperate to give his/her biometric data to
    the reader.

16
Resulting political agenda
  • Biometrics should not be pushed, but only
    introduced with great care.
  • Gathering and storing biometric information
    outside devices operated by the person
    him/herself poses a high security and privacy
    risk and should be avoided whenever possible.
  • Before incorporating digitized biometric data
    into passports and identity cards, a thorough
    cost/benefit analysis has to be conducted and
    discussed in the public. Maybe the plans to
    incorporate biometrics have to be revised.
  • Even with the security enhancements
    (basic/extended access control) developed by the
    German BSI et al. implemented RFIDs in
    ID-documents endanger body and life of their
    holders. RFIDs in ID-documents either have to be
    completely avoided or they have to be protected
    against unauthorized access by physical shielding.

17
Identification of human beings by IT-systems
?
hand geometry finger print picture hand-written
signature retina-pattern voice typing
characteristics
What one is
ID-card
paper document metal key magnetic-strip
card smart card (chip card) calculator
has
password, passphrase answers to
questions calculation results for numbers
knows
18
Identification of IT-systems by human beings
?
casing seal, hologram pollution
What it is
password answers to questions calculation results
for numbers
knows
Where it stands
19
Identification of IT-systems by IT-systems
password answers to questions calculation
results for numbers cryptography
What it knows
Wiring from where
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com