Radiation dosage - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 13
About This Presentation
Title:

Radiation dosage

Description:

Radiation dosage ... A typical energy of a neutron or gamma ray emitted in a ... (0.006 rem) or natural background level in Harrisburg area ~ 0.1 rem per year ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:28
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: phys3
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Radiation dosage


1
  • Radiation dosage
  • Start with the energy given to an electron if it
    flows from the negative terminal of a 1 Volt
    battery to the positive 1 electron volt 1 eV.
  • A typical energy of a neutron or gamma ray
    emitted in a radioactive decay is 1 million eV
    1 MeV.
  • If every cm2 of your body is exposed to 2 billion
    gamma rays of typical 1 MeV energy, your exposure
    is 1 rem.
  • Dental x-ray 0.001 rem
  • Typical annual exposure 0.4 rem per year
  • Radiation sickness 200 rem
  • 50 chance of lethal dose 300 - 450 rem

2
  • American Nuclear Society table of exposures
    (http//www.ans.org/pi/resources/dosechart)
  • typical US exposure 360 mrem per year
  • Dose needed to cause cancer 2500 rem
  • 360 rem x 75 year life span / 2500 rem ? 1
    chance of cancer due to natural environmental
    radioactivity
  • Estimated 1.4 million new cancer diagnoses
    expected per year in US / 304 million US
    population 0.5
  • (570,000 deaths in US per year due to cancer
    ?
  • likelihood of dying due to cancer 15
    20,
  • significantly higher than rate due to
    natural radioactivity. Radiation causes
    excess deaths above
  • 20 level)

3

4
  • Body has natural defenses against radiation
  • Body repairs damage due to low doses
  • Below 100 rem, usually no immediate effects
  • Cancer requires that multiple genes be damaged
    before
  • unregulated cell multiplication occurs,
    usually requires
  • multiple exposures
  • For doses above 100 rems, symptoms of radiation
    sickness include
  • nausea
  • vomiting
  • headache
  • loss of white blood cells

5
  • Doses gt 300 rems
  • hair loss
  • internal harm (damage to nerve cells and the
    cells that line the digestive tract)
  • Loss of white blood cells (body's main defense
    against infection) makes radiation victims
    vulnerable to disease.
  • Reduced production of blood platelets (important
    for blood clotting) makes victims of radiation
    sickness vulnerable to hemorrhaging.
  • Fever and diarrhea
  • Half of all people exposed to 450 rems die.
  • Doses of 800 rems always fatal within 2 weeks.
  • Immediate survivors still face prospect of
    leukemia (cancer of the blood), lung cancer,
    thyroid cancer, breast cancer, and cancers of
    other organs.

6
Linear dose-cancer hypothesis
100 chance
2500 rem
7
  • How do we know relation between radiation
    exposure and cancer?
  • Early radiation workers had high incidence of
    cancers. (e.g., Marie Curie, who first isolated
    radium from uranium ore, died of leukemia.)
  • In the 1920's, watch dials were painted with
    radium-based luminous paint. Employees often
    licked their paint brushes to give them a sharp
    point and ingested small quantities of paint.
    Radium in bones resulted in bone tumors 8 - 40
    years later.
  • 6500 British arthritis patients were treated with
    large doses of x-rays. Of the 6,500 patients, 30
    developed leukemia compared with an expected
    incidence of 7 cases.

http//www.jplabs.com/html/effect_of_radiation.HTM
8
  • Survivors of the Hiroshima and Nagasaki attacks
    Of 80,000 survivors of the initial attacks, 126
    died of leukemia, nearly double the normal
    figure. Incidence of leukemia was related to
    distance from the explosion and therefore to the
    radiation dose received. Highest incidence was in
    survivors closest to the explosion. Clear
    evidence of the dose-dependent relationship of
    leukemia to radiation, i.e. the higher the dose,
    the greater the risk. Also seen increase in
    frequency of stomach, lung and breast cancer.
    These have taken much longer to develop and some
    are still appearing now.
  • A-bomb data show that there is a delay (called
    the latency) between the radiation exposure and
    death from cancer. Mean latency from leukemia
    10 years, and for other cancers gt 20 years.
    Excess cancer deaths still occurring 40 50
    years after the exposures. (http//www.triumf.ca/s
    afety/rpt/rpt_4/node20.html)

9
But at low doses, linear dose-cancer hypothesis
is conservative. Is there a low-dose
threshold?
100 chance
2500 rem
10
  • Why is this important?
  • Hiroshima Nagasaki survivors received avg. dose
    20 rems ? 0.8 chance of cancer as a result
  • 80,000 survivors have 20 chance of dying of
    cancer anyway ? 16,000 cancer deaths not
    connected to A-bombs
  • 0.8 excess cancer death rate ? 640 extra cancers
    due to A-bombs (4 of total cancer deaths, 0.6
    of total A-bomb deaths)

11
  • Chernobyl 30 of reactors radioactivity
    released into atmosphere.
  • 30,000 people in vicinity received average dosage
    of 45 rem
  • ? chance of additional cancer due to Chernobyl
    release
  • 45/2500 1.8
  • ? 30,000 x .018 540 extra deaths compared to
  • 30,000 x 20 6,000 normal cancers (9 excess)

12
  • Chernobyl 30 of reactors radioactivity
    released into atmosphere.
  • 30,000 people in vicinity received average dosage
    of 45 rem
  • ? chance of additional cancer due to Chernobyl
    release
  • 45/2500 1.8
  • ? 30,000 x .018 540 extra deaths compared to
  • 30,000 x 20 6,000 normal cancers (9 excess)
  • How about living in Denver?
  • Extra exposure 0.025 rem due to cosmic rays at
    5000 ft and 0.040 rem due to radioactivity from
    ground 0.065 rem per year
  • ? additional cancer deaths after 10 years of
    exposure 0.065 x 10 / 2500 x 2,400,000 people
    620 people
  • If Chernobyl was serious, should Denver be
    evacuated?

13
  • Three Mile Island
  • Loss of coolant accident in 1979 led to partial
    core meltdown.
  • Average dose to 2,000,000 people in area 0.001
    rem according to NRC
  • Compare to chest x-ray (0.006 rem) or natural
    background level in Harrisburg area 0.1 rem per
    year
  • lt 1 extra cancer death
  • Next Read Mullers discussion of Yucca Mountain
    and nuclear waste disposal issue
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com