Aggression and Suicidal Behavior During Latency - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 14
About This Presentation
Title:

Aggression and Suicidal Behavior During Latency

Description:

Follows conflicts produced by Oedipus Complex. Sexual and aggressive drives become latent or dormant, ... Casual minimizing or dismissing of attachment needs ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:34
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: cwp9
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Aggression and Suicidal Behavior During Latency


1
Aggression and Suicidal Behavior During Latency
  • What is latency?
  • Follows conflicts produced by Oedipus Complex
  • Sexual and aggressive drives become latent or
    dormant, becoming sublimated in industrious
    activities (e.g., hobbies, sports)
  • Peer relationships assume greater importance

2
Problems during Latency
  • Conflicts from the Oedipal period as well as
    earlier periods (oral, anal periods) are poorly
    resolved or not resolved at all
  • Attachment insecurities assume different forms
  • secure confidence in relationships,
    goal-corrected partnership, autonomy
  • Casual minimizing or dismissing of attachment
    needs
  • Busy distracting oneself from affective
    components of attachment through activity or
    displacement of fears onto others (projection,
    reaction formation)
  • Controlling
  • Punitive
  • Caregiving

3
  • Resulting symptomatologyaggression or depression
  • Possible etiologies
  • Wants to hurt others because not Oedipal victor,
    not in control of parents (anal), or not getting
    basic security needs met (oral)
  • Wants to hurt self because of guilty feelings
    over being Oedipal victor, fantasies of having
    destroyed mother (oral), need to destroy internal
    representation of mother or father, need to
    activate caregivers concern

4
Attachment Disorganization In Prepubertal
Psychiatric Inpatients
  • Three traditional patterns of attachment (A, B,
    C)
  • Fourth category (D)
  • Four proposed subtypes of Dlooking for
    organization within disorganization
  • Direct-aggressive outward
  • Direct-aggressive inward
  • Indirect-aggressive pseudosecure
  • Indirect-aggressive displaced

5
  • Each attachment pattern subtype is coherently
    related to both psychiatric diagnosis and
    clinical symptomatology, as well as to what we
    know about the relationship to the mother (but
    diagnosis and symptomatology can imply other
    pathways)
  • Each child had experienced significant separation
    from a significant or primary caregiver

6
  • Psychotic features could be related to
    disturbances in the attachment relationship
    (difficulties with separation)
  • Is the disorganization attachment-relevant, or
    more global psychosis?
  • Is the disorganization attachment-relevant, or
    more neurologically based?
  • Could florid psychotic features (in subtype 1 and
    2) develop into more reality-based
    disorganization (in subtypes 3 and 4)?

7
Effects of Attachment Disorganization during
Latency I (Solomon et al.)
  • Children who appear controlling upon reunion
    appear frightened (chaotic or inhibited) in story
    completions
  • Frightened children appear more aggressive at
    home and more hostile at school then children
    with organized attachment strategies
  • Development of coding system related to
    development sample (p. 460, 2nd column)

8
  • 6/13 D, 4/27 non-D fell into highest quartile on
    CBCL
  • 7/11 D, 4/29 non-D fell into lowest quartile of
    ISCS

9
Effects of Attachment Disorganization During
Latency II (Easterbrooks et al.)
  • Do attachment security and verbal intelligence
    moderate the effects of psychosocial risk on
    behavioral adaptation (aggression in classroom)?
  • How psychosocial risk is measured
  • Family income
  • AFDC status (welfare)
  • Maltreatment reports to DSS
  • Law enforcement problems during past two years
  • Serious injuries or hospitalization of child
    during past two years
  • Maternal depression (CES-D) 16 (clinical
    cutoff)
  • Sum sum of yes scores to all six areas
    (composite risk)

10
  • Correlation matrix
  • Risk related to attachment security (p lt .05)
  • Risk not related to attachment avoidance (n.s.)
  • Risk marginally related to verbal intelligence (p
    lt.10)
  • Attachment security related to verbal
    intelligence (p lt.05)
  • Attachment avoidance related to verbal
    intelligence (p lt.05)
  • Attachment security related to attachment
    avoidance (p lt.001)
  • Risk related to externalizing, total behavior
    problems
  • Attachment security related to internalizing,
    externalizing, total behavior problems
  • Attachment avoidance related to internalizing,
    externalizing, total behavior problems
  • Verbal intelligence not related to behavior
    problems

11
  • Predictions (RAVRARV ? behavior problem)
  • Risk predicted externalizing and total problems
    in both mother and father reports
  • Attachment security predicted internalizing,
    externalizing, and total problems, but only in
    teacher reports
  • No interaction effects in behavior-problems
    analyses
  • Verbal intelligence did not predict behavior
    problems
  • Insecure attachments more likely to appear in
    clinical range than secure attachments (88 vs.
    45, 100 controlling)

12
Suicidal Behavior During Latency
  • Maternal suicidal ideas and gestures (severity)
    related to childs treatment status (p lt .01)
  • Prevalence of diagnosis
  • Inpatient conduct disorder, MDD, Organic Brain
    Syndrome, PDD, Schizophrenia, BPD
  • Outpatient adjustment disorder
  • Nonpatient anxiety disorder

13
  • Variables associated with suicidal behavior
  • Recent general psychopathology
  • Preoccupation with death
  • Recent and past depression
  • Introjection (inpatient, nonpatient)
  • Past general psychopathology
  • Recent aggression (outpatient)

14
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com