Protecting Children is Everybodys Business: Investigating the Demand for Service at the Childrens Ai - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 68
About This Presentation
Title:

Protecting Children is Everybodys Business: Investigating the Demand for Service at the Childrens Ai

Description:

Investigating the Demand for Service at the Children's Aid Society of London and ... were in compliance with MCSS Standards for investigating child abuse cases ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:144
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 69
Provided by: alanle8
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Protecting Children is Everybodys Business: Investigating the Demand for Service at the Childrens Ai


1
Protecting Children is Everybodys Business
Investigating the Demand for Service at the
Childrens Aid Society of London and Middlesex
  • Research Team Alan W. Leschied, Paul C.
    Whitehead, Dermot Hurley and Debbie Chiodo
  • The University of Western Ontario, London,
    Ontario CANADA
  • October, 2003
  • This research was funded by the United Way of
    London Middlesex, The City of London, The
    County of Middlesex
  • and an anonymous donor

2
  • Perhaps we will always live in a world where
    children suffer,
  • But we can reduce the number of suffering
    children.
  • And if you do not help us in this pursuit my
    friend,
  • Who in this world will help us do this?
  • Robert
    F. Kennedy

3
Goals of Research
  • To examine factors that could help account for
    the increase in the demand for service at the
    Childrens Aid Society of London and Middlesex

4
Increases in Ontarios Cases of Abuse and Neglect
(Rivers, Trocme, Goodman Marwah, 2002 )
  • Children suspected of abuse or neglect rises by
    44 (1993- 1998)
  • Investigations for neglect increases from 4,400
    to 8,900 children (1993-1998)

5
Ontarios Admissions to Care (Rivers, Trocme,
Goodman Marwah, 2002 )
  • The number of children admitted to care increases
    by 51.7 (1996-2001)
  • Children admitted to care increases from 10,419
    to 15,792 children (1996-2001)

6
The Number of Children Admitted to Care (London
and Middlesex CAS (1993-2002)
7
The Number of Children in Care at Year End
8
Research Informed by
  • Extensive review of the literature
  • other jurisdictions experiencing similar
    increases
  • Identified most frequently cited hypotheses for
    increases
  • clinical reasons explaining referrals to CAS and
    admissions to care
  • Focus groups at the CAS of London and Middlesex
  • Expertise of the community advisory committee
  • Consultation with leading researchers in child
    welfare

9
The Focus Groups Told Us
  • 1995 is seen as a pivotal year in charting the
    increase
  • No single reason should be isolated as the factor
    accounting for the increase
  • Multicausal factors should include
  • policy changes in child welfare
  • legislative changes in child welfare
  • social, psychological, economic changes impacting
    on children and families in London and Middlesex

10
The Method
  • Random sample of cases opened at London CAS in
    1995 and 2001 examined on a broad range of
    factors - 1042 out of a possible 2316 cases
  • 1995 - 450 children (176 in care and 274 not in
    care)
  • 2001 - 592 children (381 in care and 211 not in
    care)
  • Six trained researchers completed the review of
    files in the summer of 2002
  • Raters trained to understand the Child Protection
    Risk Assessment Model

11
The Risk Assessment Tool
  • Developed as the Risk Assessment Model for Child
    Protection in Ontario
  • Includes 22 areas that describe child welfare
    risk related areas
  • Caregiver Influence (Parental capacity)
  • Childs Influence (Vulnerability, health status)
  • Family Influence (Violence, social supports)
  • Intervention Influence (Motivation, cooperation)
  • Abuse and Neglect (history and severity)

12
Cumulative Risk Assessment Score
  • Risk assessments done by the trained researchers
    is based on a cumulative risk assessment score
    comprised of a total score of the 22 individual
    risk elements
  • The application of the Risk Assessment Tool
    completed by child protection workers does not
    include a cumulative risk assessment score
  • The cumulative risk assessment score was
    completed independent of the child protection
    worker rating that was included in the case file

13
Policy, Clinical and Systemic Issues
  • Issues of Policy Relevance
  • Changing pattern and source of referrals
  • Changing standard of risk in admissions to care
  • Estimates of risk by less experienced case
    managers
  • Issues of Clinical Relevance
  • Child maltreatment
  • Woman abuse
  • Parenting capacity
  • Maternal depression
  • Previous history with CAS
  • Issues of Systemic Relevance
  • Poverty

14
Policy, Clinical and Systemic Issues
  • Supplementary Reports
  • Developmentally and medically fragile children
  • First nations children with the CAS
  • Community Feedback

15
1990 Events that Influenced Ontario Child
Welfare Policy
  • Ontario Child Mortality Task Force
  • Investigating deaths of children known to CAS
  • 16 recommendations to improve Ontario child
    welfare system
  • Child Protection Review
  • 87 of CASs were in compliance with MCSS
    Standards for investigating child abuse cases
  • Conformity with MCSS standards for case
    management and record keeping was a concern
  • Child Welfare Accountability Review
  • Called for revisions by the Ontario Ministry of
    Community and Social Services in the areas of
    setting goals and expectations, contracting,
    monitoring and follow-up in their relationship
    with CAS
  • Protecting Vulnerable Children
  • Recommendations to amend the Child and Family
    Services Act (CFSA)

16
Bill 6Amendments to the CFSA
  • Represented the most substantial change to the
    Child and Family Services Act (CFSA) in almost
    two decades
  • The primary goal was to increase protection for
    children considered at risk for abuse or neglect

17
Bill 6Amendments to the CFSA
  • Purpose of the Act
  • Grounds for determining whether a child is in
    need of protection
  • Inclusion of past evidence of parenting in child
    welfare proceedings
  • Clarified and expanded the duty to report child
    maltreatment
  • Addressed timelines relating to society wardship
    and permanency planning
  • Improved CAS access to information
  • Clarified family access to children in care
  • Mandated a regular review of the Act

18
Testing Five Hypotheses
  • Changing level of risk of children and families
    referred to the CAS from 1995 - 2001
  • Changing level of risk of children admitted to
    care to the CAS from 1995 - 2001
  • Change in the length of time children remained in
    care
  • Change in the patterns of the sources of referral
  • Risk estimates comparing more and less
    experienced child protection workers

19
Changing Level of Risk of Children and Families
  • With the expanded definition of a child in need
    of protection, one would expect lower risk scores
    for children and families in 2001 relative to
    1995
  • The Outcome
  • Cumulative risk scores are actually higher in
    2001 relative to 1995
  • 1995
    2001
  • Average risk score 25.3
    29.4

20
Changing Level of Risk of Children Admitted to
Care
  • If the threshold for admission to care has been
    lowered, risk scores will be lower in 1995
    relative to 2001
  • The Outcome
  • The average cumulative risk score for families is
    higher in 2001 relative to 1995
  • 1995
    2001
  • Average risk score 31.5
    34.7

21
Change in the Length of Time Children Remain in
Care
  • Are children remaining in care longer in 2001
    relative to 1995?
  • The Outcome
  • Children do not spend greater lengths of time in
    care in 2001

22
Change in the Patterns of the Sources of
Referral
  • Is there a change in referral patterns between
    1995 and 2001?
  • The Outcomes
  • Patterns of referrals across the years is
    consistent
  • Source of Referral Percent
  • Parent 20.0
  • Police 17.9
  • Family Associate 17.3
  • Childrens Service Provider 14.6

23
Change in the Patterns of the Sources of Referral
  • Is there a shift in sources of referral for
    neglect cases?
  • The Outcome
  • Referrals for neglect proportionally remain the
    same across both years
  • Professionals are more likely in 2001 to be the
    source of referral for cases of neglect
  • Source of Referral 1995
    2001
  • Professional 51 73

24
Risk Estimates Related to Experience of Workers
  • Do less experienced case workers rate risks to
    children higher than more experienced case
    workers?
  • The Outcome
  • Less experienced case workers do not rate risk
    higher than more experienced case workers

25
Training of Workers
  • Mandatory new worker training and supervisory
    consultation on all admissions to CAS care has
    offset the effects of inexperience of child
    protection workers

26
Relevant Findings
  • The degree of risk of children referred to and
    admitted to care is higher in 2001 compared to
    1995
  • All referral sources are equally increasing their
    rate of referrals to the CAS the most likely
    sources of referral are parents, children service
    professionals and police officers
  • No one type of child maltreatment is
    disproportionately driving the increase of
    children in care in 2001
  • Inexperienced CAS workers are no more likely to
    rate children as higher risk compared to more
    experienced workers and neither are they more
    likely to recommend that a child be taken into
    care

27
Study 1
  • Child Maltreatment

28
Child Maltreatment
  • Ontario Incidence Study
  • Rates of substantiated maltreatment between 1993
    and 1998 have doubled.
  • Exposure to domestic violence nine-fold increase
  • Neglect and Physical Abuse Doubled
  • Sexual Abuse Decreased by 44

29
Frequency of Substantiated Maltreatment
  • Major increase in cases of physical abuse
  • Three times the rate in 2001 over 1995
  • Proportion of cases of sexual abuse, emotional
    abuse, and neglect do not differ across years
  • Reported in percent

30
Children in Care
  • Significant increase in
  • CAS admissions to care of maltreated children in
  • 2001 compared to 1995
  • (71 vs. 44)
  • The proportion of
  • substantiated cases of
  • neglect, physical, sexual,
  • and emotional abuse do
  • not differ across years

31
Study 2
  • Woman Abuse

32
Woman Abuse
  • Exposure to woman abuse is associated with poor
    child outcomes similar to the effects of physical
    abuse
  • Exposure to woman abuse and physical abuse is
    associated with higher levels of poor child
    outcomes compared to either experience alone

33
Woman Abuse
  • The Outcomes
  • In only two outcomes do physically abused
    children differ from children exposed to women
    abuse high degree of similarity between
    children
  • Conclusions from children experiencing two forms
    of violence (physical and exposure to violence)
  • children exposed to woman abuse and physically
    maltreated
  • higher rates of ADHD
  • higher rates of cumulative child welfare risk

34
Woman Abuse Among Caregivers of CAS Children
  • Increase of six percent between 1995 and 2001

35
Caregivers Experiencing Woman Abuse

  • Abused Non abused

  • () ()
  • Major mental disorders 45 37
  • Substance abuse 23 12
  • Chronic medical condition 20 13

36
Families Where Woman Abuse is Present
  • More likely to be on social assistance/welfare
    (66 vs. 44)
  • More likely to be unemployed (69 vs. 59)
  • More likely to have less reliable and useful
    social supports
  • More likely to have experienced abuse as children

37
Study 3
  • Poverty

38
Rates of Child Poverty
  • 1996 census Canada ranks sixth of the worlds
    twenty five most industrialized countries
  • National rate of child poverty - 21.1
  • Ontario rate of child poverty - 20.3
  • 1996 census Ontarios child poverty rate
    increased by 5 relative to 1990 census (largest
    provincial increase 390,000 children in Ontario
    live in poverty)

39
Family and Child Poverty in Canada, Ontario and
London/Middlesex
  • Rates of Child Poverty
  • Canada 21.1
  • Ontario 20.3
  • London 18.8
  • London and Middlesex 17.1
  • Canada and Ontario relates to child poverty
  • London and London and Middlesex relates to family
    poverty

40
Children Age 15 and Under Living in Poverty
  • Proportion of London Children Age 15 and Below
  • living in Poverty
  • Total Poor Total
    Poor Poverty Rate ()
  • All Cities 2,325,000 693,700
    19.1 23.3 29.8
  • London 66,200 16,100
    20.6 26.6 24.5

41
Poverty and CAS Involvement
  • Rate of families on social assistance open to CAS
    remains consistent
  • 1995 - 65 2001 - 64
  • Evidence that those on social assistance are not
    doing as well in 2001
  • Families on social assistance seen at the CAS
    with children in care
  • 1995 - 48 2001 - 80
  • Single mothers on social assistance with children
    seen at the CAS
  • 1995 - 71 2001 - 83

42
Poverty and Neglect
  • Children living with single moms in 2001 more
    likely to suffer from neglect
  • Children of families on social assistance in 2001
    are more likely to suffer from neglect and
    emotional abuse
  • Increases in rate of single mothers on social
    assistance experiencing violence
  • 1995 - 63 2001 - 84

43
Differential Contribution to Child Risk
  • Examination of what contributes to cumulative
    child risk scores?
  • Violence
  • Poverty

44
Study 4
  • Maternal Depression and Child Risk

45
Increase in Rates of Maternal Depression in
Children Admitted to Care
  • Identifies formal diagnosis of depression or
    identification of depression as interfering with
    parenting capacity
  • 15 of cases in 1995 had mothers diagnosed with
    depression as compared to 29 in 2001

46
Child Outcomes Related to Maternal Depression
  • Children more likely to
  • Be diagnosed with ADHD
  • Receive medication for an adjustment disorder
  • Have higher cumulative risk scores
  • Be suspended from school more often

47
Cumulative Risk Score Higher for Child/families
with Depressed Mothers
  • Overall risk score
  • Presence of maternal depression 33.2
  • Absence of maternal depression 28.0

48
Study 5
  • Parenting Capacity

49
Tracking Parenting Capacity
  • Nico Trocmé of the Bell Center of Excellence in
    Child Welfare Research suggests that the Ontario
    Risk Assessment (ORAM) tool provides an
    acceptable measure for tracking parenting
    capacity
  • Three items from the ORAM refer directly to
    parenting
  • Caregivers expectation of child
  • Caregivers acceptance of child
  • Family Identity and Interactions

50
Parenting Capacity Scores
  • All caregivers received a score of parenting
    capacity ability based on the three risk
    assessment item scores from the ORAM
  • Impaired parenting capacity scores reflect
  • caregivers with unrealistic expectations and
    angry conflicts with child
  • caregivers who disapprove, reject and are
    indifferent to child
  • family interactions are generally negative or
    inconsistent

51
Parenting Capacity Scores
  • Caregivers in 2001 had higher scores on parenting
    capacity compared to caregivers in 1995
  • Parents are
  • more likely to have unrealistic expectations of
    their child
  • emotionally indifferent to their child, and
  • family interactions are generally more negative
    and hostile.
  • (higher scores denote poor parenting capacity)

52
Impaired Parenting Capacity Results in
  • The diagnosis of children with ADHD
  • The diagnosis of children with conduct disorder
  • The likelihood that a child is or was previously
    on medication for an adjustment-related disorder
  • Children receiving suspensions from school
  • Children experiencing chronic truancy

53
Impaired Parenting Capacity in Adults is Related
to
  • Caregiver diagnosed with major mental illness
  • Caregiver diagnosed with depression

54
Impaired Parenting Capacity for Families is
Related to
  • Homelessness
  • Unemployment
  • Receipt of social assistance and welfare
  • Woman Abuse

55
Study 6
  • Intergenerational CAS Involvement

56
Intergenerational CAS Involvement
  • The Question
  • What are the long term outcomes for adults who
    had previous involvement with CAS?

57
Children with Families with Previous CAS Contact

  • Children Served in the Community
  • 1995 2001
  • 26 35
  • Children in Care
  • 1995 2001
  • 36 42

58
Impact of Previous CAS Contact
  • Overall risk for children is higher for those
    with caregivers with previous CAS contact
  • And this finding consists primarily of risk
    related to parent factors
  • Caregiver influence (abuse and neglect)
  • Caregiver influence / alcohol and drug use
  • Caregivers motivation for seeking intervention
  • Severity of abuse / neglect

59
Caregivers with Previous CAS Contact
  • Caregivers previously involved with CAS
  • more likely diagnosed with depression
  • more likely diagnosed with major mental illness
  • involved with woman abuse
  • children exposed to woman abuse
  • unemployed
  • on social assistance
  • score higher in the severity of their mental,
    emotional and intellectual capacity to care for
    children

60
Protecting Children is Everybodys Business
61
Key Findings
  • Violence against children
  • 7 out of 10 children were admitted to CAS care in
    2001 for reasons of abuse and neglect, up from 4
    out of 10 in 1995
  • The rate of children admitted to CAS care for
    reasons of physical abuse tripled from 1995 to
    2001

62
Key Findings
  • Woman abuse
  • Witnessing abuse is as detrimental to a child as
    being physically abused
  • The combination of both witnessing abuse and
    being physically abused is more devastating than
    either one alone
  • By 2001, more than half of the mothers of
    children with open cases with CAS were victims of
    woman abuse
  • 45 of them suffered from a mental health
    disorder
  • 23 of them had a substance abuse
  • 20 experienced a chronic medical condition

63
Key Findings
  • Poverty
  • Almost double the number of children who were
    admitted to CAS care in 2001 were living in
    poverty as compared to 1995

64
Key Findings
  • Mental Health
  • The number of depressed mothers receiving service
    from CAS almost doubled from 1995 to 2001
  • The children of depressed mothers are twice as
    likely to experience a mental health disorder as
    compared to children of non-depressed mothers

65
Key Findings
  • Impaired Parenting Capacity
  • Parents receiving services from CAS have less
    effective parenting skills in 2001 as compared to
    1995

66
Key Findings
  • Intergenerational CAS involvement
  • 4 out of 10 children admitted to care in 2001 had
    a parent who was involved with CAS as a child
  • The number has grown and continues to grow since
    2001

67
Protecting Children is Everybodys Business
  • We cannot leave it to the child welfare system
    alone
  • (Allen, 2002)
  • The problem is too large
  • Its impact is too far reaching
  • Its causes are too complex
  • Necessary solutions are too comprehensive

68
  • Protecting Children is
  • Everybodys Business
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com