Overview of AMSB and a search at ATLAS - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 17
About This Presentation
Title:

Overview of AMSB and a search at ATLAS

Description:

Transmitted to the visible sector by Gravity messenger(s) ... Transmitted to the 'messenger sector' (gauge (s)particles) and then to the visible sector ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:28
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: rishiraj4
Category:
Tags: amsb | atlas | overview | search

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Overview of AMSB and a search at ATLAS


1
Overview of AMSB and a search at ATLAS
  • Rishiraj Pravahan
  • UTA

2
Content
  • What is AMSB?
  • Attractive features?
  • Drawbacks?
  • Expected signatures
  • Questions

3
What is ASMB
  • Anomaly mediated SUSY breaking!
  • Hypothesis weak scale supersymmetry i.e. some
    superpartners at 1 TeV
  • We know that SUSY is broken
  • Question is how, where
  • I will have more notes on these topics over
    time on this wiki
  • It is not possible to break SUSY at TeV scale
    within MSSM. So there are different solutions

4
mSUGRA
  • Susy is broken in a hidden sector
  • The scale is M 1011 GeV
  • Transmitted to the visible sector by Gravity
    messenger(s)
  • Disadvantges
  • Predicts unobserved Flavour Changing neutral
    currents
  • needs fine tuning
  • Problems with CP violating processes
  • Advantages
  • Minimal set of parameters
  • Theoretically better understood
  • Available tools, softwares etc.

5
GMSB
  • SUSY is broken in hidden sector
  • Scale of M 10 TeV
  • Transmitted to the messenger sector (gauge
    (s)particles) and then to the visible sector
  • Advantages
  • No FCNC
  • Only five extra parameters from SM
  • Very characteristic mass spectrum with light
    gravitino as LSP
  • Long lived NLSPs
  • Disadvantages
  • Extensive searches have not resulted in any
    indication of GSMB in D0 Run II or LEP II
  • Dipanjan should know more!

6
AMSB
  • Another SUSY breaking mechanism but not in a
    hidden sector.
  • It has been noted that all SUSY breaking
    mechanism involve anomaly mediation from a
    sequestered sector
  • AMSM predicts that the dominant SUSY breaking
    mechanism lies in the Anomaly Mediation from the
    sequestered sector. Such sectors might be in
    another Brane and transmission happens through
    gravity.

7
Advantages
  • Theoretically very elegant
  • Does everything GMSB does
  • Very simple parameter space with

8
Distadvantages
  • ALL SLEPTONS ARE TACHIONS!!
  • THE LSP CANNOT BE DARK MATTER

9
mASMB
  • The simplest way to solve the tachionic slepton
    problemis to add an extra parameter m0
    Universal Scalar Mass to ASMB.
  • Dark matter can be axions. Also solved by the
    bulk-brane scenarios/string theories.
  • Certainly according to Frank this makes the model
    ugly!
  • This model is called mASMB
  • Numerous other solutions exist, notable among
    them are, Deflected AMSB, Gaugomaly mediation,
    and Gaugino Assisted ASMB
  • Note I have been looking into all the different
    mechanisms and I personally favour the gaugino
    assisted mediated processes as promising. They
    contain the elegance of AMSB with the advantages
    of GSMB with the tachionic slepton problem solved
    by the presence of gauge mediation as well. Most
    theory work right now is going on in this sector
    as theorist do not think MSUGRA is a viable SUSY
    breaking mechanism. Not much is done in terms of
    phenomenology or experimental (MC) searches. May
    be in our group we can discuss some sort of a
    merger of the Gaugino assisted study with the
    ASMB study. This also has promising channels with
    Tau decays. May be Paul can comment.

10
Some phenomenological details of mASMB
  • With m0 0 Mi (ßgi/gi) m3/2 where
  • gi gauge coupling constant
  • ßgi corresponding RG beta functions
  • For i 1,2,3, Mi are the Gaugino masses
  • This says that,
  • M1 M2 M3 2.8 1 7.1 so the
  • WINO is the LSP and the Gluino is an order of
    magnitude heavier.
  • Note Theoretical consideration that the scalar
    masses are proportional to the gauge and Yukawa
    couplings, guarantees universality between first
    and second generation scalar flavours thus
    eliminating SUSY flavour problems. They also
    solve the SUSY CP problem.

11
Continuesgt
  • the LSP is a wino
  • the wino and chargino masses are nearly
    degenerate this is a very characteristic
    signature
  • If ?m mchargino mwino then, for ?m lt 200 the
    chargino can live long to penetrate few
    centimeters into the detector.
  • Squark masses are insensitive to m0 and mASMB
    based searches are mostly applicable to mSUGRA
    and other ASMB scenarios and vice-versa.
  • Nearly mass degenerate and highly mixed same
    flavour sleptons
  • The LSP candidate depends on the choice of m0 ,
    the other possibilities being, the sneutrino or
    stau for low values of other parameters

12
Example of mASMB mass spectrum
13
Example of mASMB mass spectrum
14
Search Strategy Possibilities (As per
discussion with Frank)
  • The only existing paper on discovery potential of
    AMSB at the LHC is by Barr et. al. Aug 2002. No
    search for ATLAS is underway
  • Search for physics with heavy flavour b tagging
  • Search for nearly degenerate sleptons using the
    egde endpoints in the effective mass distribution
    of the dileptons (this is suggested in a paper by
    F Paige, hep-ph/0001249, 2000 but has not been
    done by anyone, to his knowledge) (See reference
    slide 15)
  • Look at the different channels for the gluino to
    squark decays and use combinatorics!
  • Look at b1 and t1 decays into bs and neutralinos
    or charginos respectively and their consequent
    decay into pions and neutralino LSP. Use the
    method of MT2 . (See reference slide 16).
  • Look for Charginos in the detector. This requires
    being friends with inner detector people.
  • Note I will put details of each study on the
    wikipage as I learn enough and make notes.

15
The dilepton mass distributions.
16
Athens workshop
17
Questions
  • I seem to be the only one working in this at
    ATLAS. Anyone else interested?
  • Should we as a group look into gauge assisted
    ASMB scenarios?
  • Can I use the same (AOD) files generated by the
    group?
  • We need to (ask) make changes to the MC to
    generate data corresponding to the theories. Is
    it worth it? Can we get theorists on board?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com