A Report to the Patient Safety Committee of Arizona General Hospital - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 66
About This Presentation
Title:

A Report to the Patient Safety Committee of Arizona General Hospital

Description:

University of Missouri-Columbia Interdisciplinary Workgroup ... Orthopedics. Spine Care. AGH. CASE OVERVIEW. 36 year old female. 20 year history of schizophrenia ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:163
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 67
Provided by: Ret83
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: A Report to the Patient Safety Committee of Arizona General Hospital


1
A Report to thePatient Safety Committeeof
Arizona General Hospital
  • Prepared by Members of the
  • University of Missouri-Columbia Interdisciplinary
    Workgroup
  • for the CLARION INTERPROFESSIONAL CASE
    COMPETITION
  • SPRING 2005

2
INTRODUCTIONS
  • Ashley Mahon
  • Accelerated Option BSN, RN Program
  • UMC School of Nursing
  • Russell McCulloh
  • 4th Year, MD Program
  • UMC School of Medicine
  • Kevin Norris
  • 3rd Year, PT Program
  • UMC School of Health Professions
  • Brian Stout
  • 3rd Year, MHA/MBA Dual Degree Program
  • UMC Schools of Medicine Business

3
She might be trouble -Bus Driver
4
PRESENTATION OVERVIEW
  • Case Overview
  • Methods of Analysis
  • Major Findings
  • Specific Findings
  • Recommendations/Action Plan
  • Tracking Indicators
  • Cost Analysis
  • Systems Issues
  • References/Acknowledgments

5
CASE OVERVIEW
  • Arizona General Hospital
  • Tertiary care center
  • 620 bed-facility
  • 97 Behavioral Health Beds
  • AGH Values
  • Dignity
  • Collaboration
  • Stewardship
  • Excellence

6
CASE OVERVIEW
  • Part of Southwest HC System (SWH)
  • Flagship for HC delivery in Maricopa Co.
  • 10 affiliated clinics
  • Clinical Expertise Centers of Excellence
  • Behavioral Health
  • Womens Health
  • Rehabilitation
  • Cardiovascular services
  • Neuroscience
  • Oncology
  • Orthopedics
  • Spine Care

7
CASE OVERVIEW
  • 36 year old female
  • 20 year history of schizophrenia
  • Admitted for decreased mental status
  • Treated for suspected overdose
  • Self-administered medication overdose in hospital
  • 3-week stay in BHU
  • Discharged to home
  • Readmitted seven weeks later for relapse of
    psychotic symptoms and alcohol intoxication

8
METHODS
  • Investigation
  • Identification of Major Events
  • Causal Flow Analysis
  • Root-Cause Analysis (VA-NCPS)
  • Identification of Contributing Factors
  • Remediation
  • Literature Review
  • Development of Recommendations
  • Progress Assessment
  • Cost Analysis
  • Extrapolation

9
MAJOR FINDINGS
  • Three adverse events were identified
  • Self-Induced Clozaril Overdose
  • Job/Coverage Loss Rehospitalization
  • Self-Extubation
  • Self-Induced Overdose
  • Unsuccessful suicide attempt
  • Near-miss of a reportable JCAHO sentinel event
  • Any suicide of a patient in a setting where the
  • patient is housed around-the-clock

10
Self-InducedDrug Overdose
11
Self-Induced Overdose Timeline
12
Self-Induced OverdoseFlow Diagram
13
Self-Induced Overdose RCA
  • Root Cause Statement
  • Level of patient observation and
  • access to potentially toxic medications
  • resulted in increased possibility
  • of self-induced overdose.
  • Three contributing factors domains were identified

14
Care Team Communication
15
Care Team Role Definition
16
Policies Procedures
17
Self-Induced OverdoseIshikawa
18
Self-Induced OverdoseContributing Factors
  • Care Team Communication
  • Parallel and informal evaluation and
    communication of self-harm risk
  • Informal assumption of polysubstance abuse
  • Care Team Roles
  • Medication identified solely by ER staff
  • Primary focus on only physical health aspects of
    admission
  • Policies Procedures
  • Persistent access to patient of potentially toxic
    medications
  • PMH gathered solely from patients medication
    bottle

19
Self-Induced OverdoseRecommendations
  • Care Team Communication
  • AMR tab dedicated to psychosocial issues1
  • Care Team Roles
  • All pt home meds are to be ID by pharmacist2
  • Policies Procedures
  • Develop a standard protocol for evaluation
    management of all overdose patients3
  • Establish procedures for pts. at possible risk
    for self harm1,4
  • Establish security procedures for the intake,
    storage, and disposition of pt home meds2
  • Similar policy for potentially harmful pt. items2

20
Self-Induced OverdoseTracking Indicators
  • Suspected overdose patients assessed for
    self-harm risk
  • Employees scoring 70 or greater on knowledge
    assessment of behavioral health training courses
  • Home medications stored securely
  • All indicators are percentage-based goals for
    implementation are to be set at 100 compliance

21
Self-Induced OverdoseCost Analysis
  • Incurred costs
  • Room sitters (personnel-dependent)
  • Time/resource demands for training personnel
    re new assessment procedures
  • Monitoring/ongoing risk assessment
  • Cost-neutral measures
  • AMR changes covered by IT contract
  • Estimated savings
  • Reduced risk of emergent intervention

22
Self-Induced Overdose Dollars and Sense
23
Job/Coverage Loss and Rehospitalization
24
Job/Coverage Loss Rehospitalization Timeline
25
Job/Coverage Loss Rehospitalization Flow Diagram
26
Job/Coverage Loss Rehospitalization RCA
  • Root Cause Statement
  • Level of social services involvement led to the
    patients job coverage loss and ultimately
    resulted in patients relapse readmission to
    the hospital.
  • Three contributing factor domains were identified

27
Care Team Communication
28
Inadequate Social Services
29
AMR Usage
30
Job/Coverage Loss Rehospitalization Ishikawa
31
Job/Coverage Loss Rehosp.Contributing Factors
  • Care Team Communication
  • Care teams engaged in parallel and informal
    communication
  • Coordination of Social Services
  • Patient assigned to HCC
  • Currently defined roles for HCC and SW
  • HCC only involved near end of pts stay
  • AMR Usage
  • Hospital staff unfamiliar with documenting
    psycho-social information into the AMR
  • Incomplete integration of AMR with organizational
    culture

32
Job/Coverage Loss Rehosp.Recommendations
  • Care Team Communication
  • Psych team and SW make daily rounds together for
    all primary diagnoses of mental illness,
    psychosis, and drug overdose5
  • Fully integrated multi-disciplinary teams
  • Coordination of Social Services
  • Redefine the role of the HCC6,7,8
  • Automatic referral to SW in cases with primary
    dx. of mental illness, psychosis, or drug
    overdose
  • AMR Usage
  • AMR Tab for psycho-social information
  • Formal mechanism for staff feedback

33
Job/Coverage Loss Rehosp. Tracking Indicators
  • Staff satisfaction rate with AMR (20 increase
    from baseline)
  • Voluntary exit survey for patients receiving
    Psych/SW team care
  • Percent of pts. admitted with diagnosis of mental
    illness, psychosis, or drug overdose, assessed by
    SW (100)
  • Percent of pts seen by HCC within
  • - 36 hours of admission (gt95)
  • - 48 hours of admission (100)
  • 5. Number of readmissions due to mental illness,
    psychosis, or drug overdose (10 reduction)

34
Job/Coverage Loss Rehosp. Cost Analysis
  • Cost Neutral Recommendations
  • AMR changes (provided through IT contract)
  • Social Worker/Psych rounds
  • Referral policies
  • Incurred Costs
  • Additional HCCs (case managers)9
  • Savings
  • Reduce number of psych readmissions6
  • Reduced LOS by 10 with multi-disciplinary
    rounds5
  • Reduced per-patient cost of stay by up to 16
    with multi-disciplinary rounds5

35
Job/Coverage Loss Rehosp. Dollars and Sense
36
Job/Coverage Loss Rehosp. Dollars and Sense
37
Self-Extubation
38
Self-Extubation Timeline
39
Self-Extubation Flow Diagram
40
Self-Extubation RCA
  • Root Cause Statement
  • The level of sedation agitation
  • management increased the likelihood
  • of patient self-extubation
  • Three major contributing factor domains were
    identified

41
Care Team Communication
42
Policies Procedures
43
Scheduling
44
Self-Extubation Ishikawa
45
Self-ExtubationContributing Factors
  • Care Team Communication
  • Time/location of pharmacist involvement
  • Communication b/w front-line providers
  • Policies Procedures
  • Extent of behavioral assessment
  • Availability/use of agitation management
    protocols
  • Availability/use of sedation and weaning
    protocols
  • Scheduling
  • Provider staffing-level in ICU

46
Self-ExtubationRecommendations
  • Care Team Communication
  • Ensure timely urine/serum toxicology screens in
    conjunction with overdose protocols
  • Develop AMR flag for pharmacist consult in all
    cases involving drug overdose
  • Policies Procedures
  • Institute routine use of agitation management
    protocols by ICU staff (Ramsay)10
  • Institute use of sedation protocols in ICU11,12
  • Institute use of weaning protocols in ICU10,13
  • Scheduling
  • Evaluate adequacy of ICU staffing/training10,14,15

47
Self-ExtubationTracking Indicators
  • Incidence of self-extubation (ICU)
  • Length of ventilator support (ICU)
  • ICU pt-nurse staffing ratios (1.5-1.7)
  • Number of pts (per 100 intubated pts) that score
    below 3 on two consecutive hourly Ramsay
    Assessments (Zero)
  • Percent of overdose pts whose records include RPh
    consult notes (100)
  • Percent of overdose pts whose urine/serum
    toxicology screens are ordered w/in 1 Hr of admit
    to ER (100)

48
Self-ExtubationCost Analysis
  • Incurred Cost
  • Increased ICU Staffing?
  • Physician/RPh Consult Fees
  • Implementation of protocols/training
  • Monitoring/ongoing risk assessment
  • Estimated Savings
  • Decreased LOS in ICU (Decrease of 3.5 days)16,17
  • Shorter Duration of Ventilator Support (Decrease
    of 2.5 days17 between 63 and 89 of SEs do not
    require reintubation10)
  • Costs of Reintubation (gt40 Decrease)11

49
Self-ExtubationDollars and Sense
50
The Big Picture
51
Recommendation Summary
  • Communication
  • AMR/organizational culture integration
  • Policies and Procedures
  • Expansion of care team member roles
  • Supporting AGH mission and values
  • Dignity
  • Collaboration
  • Stewardship
  • Excellence

52
What If
  • Psych would have been more actively involved in
    patient care?
  • Risk for self-harm would have indicated need for
    11 staffing and/or suicide observation in ICU
    and suicide observation in Ward 10A
  • Pharmacy would have been more actively involved
    in patient care?
  • Patient and drug ID would have been confirmed
  • Patient PMH might have been available
  • Concerns over sedative interactions might have
    been dismissed

53
What If
  • Social Services would have been more actively
    involved in patient care?
  • Patient job/coverage loss might have been avoided
    altogether
  • Patient would have had access to local mental
    health resources and safety net coverage
  • All three domains had been aligned with delivery
    of acute care?
  • No adverse events?
  • Patient would have certainly left our institution
    better off than when she arrived (in many ways)

54
Targeting Continuity of Mental Health Services
  • Within the Institution
  • Mental Health Services
  • Pharmacy
  • Social Services
  • Acute/Chronic Care
  • Within the Community
  • Provider/MCO Collaboration
  • Partnerships
  • Regional Leadership

55
Future Directions
  • Increase pharmacy integration
  • Discharge Planning/Consultation18,19,20
  • Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committee18,19
  • Collaborative Drug Therapy18,19
  • Medication Reconciliation21
  • Psychiatric Pharmacist22,23
  • Integrating social services behavioral health
  • Functional Integration Team18 (AGH BHCE)
  • Wellness Recovery Action Plans24 (WRAP)
  • Ongoing collaboration between
  • AGH community pharmacies
  • AGH satellite clinics
  • SWH ValueOptions25,26

56
Concluding Remarks
  • Consistent with
  • Our institutional mission
  • IOM IHI vision of the future
  • Our patients needs/rights to access receive
    safe, reliable, and comprehensive care
  • It doesnt work to leap a twenty-foot chasm
  • in two ten-foot jumps
  • -American Proverb

57
A Report to thePatient Safety Committeeof
Arizona General Hospital
  • Prepared by Members of the
  • University of Missouri-Columbia Interdisciplinary
    Workgroup
  • for the CLARION INTERPROFESSIONAL CASE
    COMPETITION
  • SPRING 2005

58
References
  • Dlugacz, Y.D., Restifo, A., Scanion, K., Nerlson,
    K., et al. (2003). Safety Strategies to Prevent
    Suicide in Multiple Health Care Environments.
    Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Safety,
    29(6), 267-278.
  • Harry S. Truman Memorial Veterans Hospital-
    Pharmacy operations and drug procedures. December
    30, 2004.
  • Harry S. Truman Memorial Veterans Hospital-
    Prevention and management of disturbed behavior.
    April 22, 2004.
  • Harry S. Truman Memorial Veterans Hospital-
    Management of suicidal policy. April 26, 2004.
  • Curley, C., McEachern, K. E., Speroff, T. (1998).
    A Firm Trial of Interdisciplinary Rounds on
    Impatient Medical Wards An Intervention designed
    using continuous quality improvement. Med Care,
    36(8), AS4-AS12.
  • Cox, W.K., Penny, L.C., Statham, R.P., Roper,
    B.L. Admission intervention team medical center
    based intensive case management of the seriously
    mentally ill. Care Management Journals, 4(4),
    178-184.

59
References
  • Rubin, A. Is Case Management Effective for
    People With Serious Mental Illness? A research
    review. Health Social Work, 17(2), 138-150.
  • Wickizer, T.M., Lessler, D. Do Treatment
    Restrictions Imposed by Utilization Management
    Increase the Likelihood of Readmission for
    Psychiatric Patients? Medical Care, 36(6),
    844-850.
  • 2003 Case Management Salary Survey Results. In
    Advance for Providers of Post-Acute Care.
    May/June 2003, 51-54.
  • Maccioli GA et al. (2003). Clinical practice
    guidelines for the maintenance of patient
    physical safety in the intensive care unit Use
    of restraining therapies-American College of
    Critical Care Medicine Task Force 2001-2002.
    Critical Care Medicine. 31(11), 2665-2676.
  • Wagner IJ. (1998). A sedation protocol to prevent
    self-extubation. Chest. 113(5),1429.
  • Powers J. (1999). A sedation protocol for
    preventing patient self-extubation. Dimensions of
    Critical Care Nursing. 18(2), 30-4.

60
References
  • Razek T et al. (2000). Assessing the need for
    reintubation a prospective evaluation of
    unplanned endotracheal extubation. Journal of
    Trauma-Injury Infection and Critical Care. 48(3),
    466-9.
  • Bray K et al. (2004). British Association of
    Critical Care Nurses position statement on the
    use of restraint in adult critical care units.
    BACCN Nursing in Critical Care. 9(5), 1-19.
  • Martin B and Mathisen L. (2005). Use of physical
    restraints in adult critical care A bicultural
    study. American Journal of Critical Care. 14,
    133-142.
  • Ramsay MAE. (2005). How to use the Ramsay Score
    to address the level of ICU sedation. Referenced
    Wed Document. Available at http//5jsnacc.umin.ac
    .jp/How20to20use20the20Ramsay20Score20to20a
    ssess20the20level20of20ICU20Sedation.htm.
    Accessed on March 23rd, 2005.
  • Kress JP, Pohlman AS, and Hall JB. (2002).
    Sedation and analgesia in the intensive care
    unit. American Journal of Respiratory Critical
    Care Medicine. 166, 1024-1028.

61
References
  • IHI 100,00 Lives Campaign. (2004). Getting
    Started Kit Prevent Adverse Drug Events
    (Medication Reconciliation). The Institute for
    Health Improvement. Available at www.ihi.org.
  • Paone D, Levy R, and Bringewatt R. (1999).
    Integrating pharmaceutical care a vision and a
    framework. The National Chronic Care Consortium
    The National Pharmaceutical Council. Available at
    www.npcnow.org/resources/PDFs/IPCvisionpaper.pdf.
  • Saunders, S.M., Tierney, J.A., et al. (2003).
    Implementing a pharmacist-provided discharge
    counseling service. AMJHSP, 60, 1101-1103.
  • Rosen CE and Holmes S. (1978). Pharmacists
    impact on chronic psychiatric outpatients in
    community mental health. American Journal of
    Hospital Pharmacy. 35(6), 704-8.
  • Kaushal R and Bates DW. (2005). Chapter 7 The
    clinical pharmacists role in preventing adverse
    drug events. AHRQ Patient Safety Manual.
    Available at www.ahrq.gov/clinic/ptsafety/chap7.

62
References
  • Arizona State Hospital. Wellness Recovery Action
    Plans (WRAP). http//www.azdhs.gov/azsh/patient_pr
    ograms.htm.
  • ACP-ASIM. (2000). Pharmacist Scope of Practice.
    Position Paper. American College of Physicians
    American Society of Internal Medicine.
    www.acponline.org/hpp/pospaper/pharm_scope.pdf.
  • ValueOptions of Arizona. Assertive Community
    Treatment (ACT). http//www.valueoptions.com/arizo
    na/en/programs/act.htm
  • ValueOptions of Arizona. Contract implementation
    fact sheet Recovery for adults with serious
    mental illnesses. Available at http//
    www.valueoptions.com/arizona/en/publications/fact_
    sheet_adult.pdf.

63
Data Sources for Cost Analyses
  • A - University Health System Consortium Clinical
    Database January through December 2004 (Drawn
    from 9 geographically dispersed academic medical
    centers, bed size from 616 to 692, average of
    beds 660 when applicable, adjusted for 620 bed
    institution)
  • B - Annual Salary from 2003 Case Management
    Salary Survey Results. Published in Advance for
    Providers of Post-Acute Care May/June 2003,
    51-54.
  • C - University of Missouri Health Care,
    University Hospital January through December
    2004. (Identified at group request by the UMHC
    Office of Clinical Effectiveness when
    applicable, adjusted for 620 bed institution)
  • D - Medicare Fee Schedule 2004 (Intubation
    Endotracheal Emergency Code 31500)

64
Acknowledgments
  • Kristofer Hagglund, PhD. Dean of Health Policy.
    School of Health Professions. University of
    Missouri-Columbia.
  • Kathryn Nelson, MHA. Patient Safety Officer.
    Office of Clinical Effectiveness. University of
    Missouri-Columbia Hospital.
  • Betty Nikodim. Senior Analyst. Office of Clinical
    Effectiveness. University of Missouri-Columbia
    Hospital.
  • Tim Anderson, RN. Patient Safety Manager. Harry
    S. Truman Memorial Veterans Hospital. Columbia,
    MO.
  • Barb Aston, MSW. Social Worker (Retired).
    Mid-Missouri Mental Health Center.
  • Kathryn Burks, RN, PhD. Faculty Advisor.
    University of Missouri-Columbia Sinclair School
    of Nursing.
  • Charles Brooks, MD, FACP. Residency Director.
    Department of Internal Medicine. UMC School of
    Medicine.
  • Rachel Haverstick, MA. Executive Staff Assistant.
    Center for Health Care Quality. University of
    Missouri-Columbia.

65
Acknowledgments
  • Laurel Despins, MS, APRN, BC, CCRN. Project
    Director. Office of Clinical Effectiveness.
    Clinical Nurse Specialist, Medical-Neurosurgical
    ICU. University of Missouri-Columbia.
  • Mark Kruse. Medical Records. Harry S. Truman
    Memorial Veterans Hospital. Columbia, MO.
  • Rebecca Wirth, MSW. Social Worker. Harry S.
    Truman Memorial Veterans Hospital. Columbia, MO.
  • Deborah Hurley. Human Resource Associate.
    Department of Health Management and Informatics.
    UMC School of Medicine.
  • Jane Bostick, RN, PhD. Faculty Advisor. UMC
    Sinclair School of Nursing.
  • Linda Headrick, MD. Sr. Associate Dean for
    Education. University of Missouri-Columbia School
    of Medicine.

66
Contact Information
  • Presenter Contact information
  • Ashley Mahon aem7ee_at_mizzou.edu
  • Russell McCulloh rjm42b_at_mizzou.edu
  • Kevin Norris kdn337_at_mizzou.edu
  • Brian Stout bjs13e_at_mizzou.edu
  • UMC CLARION group was coordinated through the
    University of Missouri-Columbia Center for Health
    Care Quality (CHCQ)
  • For more information, please contact
  • Rachel Haverstick, Executive Staff Assistant.
  • UMC Center for Health Care Quality
  • Medical Sciences Building, MA128
  • University of Missouri-Columbia. Columbia, MO
    65211
  • Voice (573) 882-8905
  • Fax 573 884-0474
  • Email haverstickr_at_missouri.edu.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com