Alan R' Thornhill Ph'D' Scientific Director, The London Bridge Fertility, Gynaecology and Genetics C - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

Alan R' Thornhill Ph'D' Scientific Director, The London Bridge Fertility, Gynaecology and Genetics C

Description:

Embryology. Genetics. Family and medical history. Assess severity of condition ... Embryology. Prepare and introduce gametes in vitro. Culture embryos. Biopsy embryos ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:40
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: jackh7
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Alan R' Thornhill Ph'D' Scientific Director, The London Bridge Fertility, Gynaecology and Genetics C


1
Alan R. Thornhill Ph.D.Scientific Director, The
London Bridge Fertility, Gynaecology and Genetics
CentreAssistant Director, Bridge genoma
Organisation of a PGD centre Basic genetics for
ART practitioners March 23, 2007
2
Organisation of a PGD centre
  • What makes an excellent PGD centre?
  • Building the PGD puzzle
  • Patient vs centre experience of PGD
  • Satellite/transport PGD - Pros and Cons
  • More to come from PGD?

3
What makes an excellent PGD centre?
  • Excellent Genetic Evaluation and Counselling
  • Excellent IVF Platform
  • Excellent Diagnostics Laboratory
  • Excellent Patient experience
  • Integration of Services
  • Rigorous Quality Control/Quality Assurance
  • Commitment to Follow-up/Comprehensive Ethical
    Review

4
Building the PGD puzzle
  • Ensure appropriate testing (counselling/testing)
  • In Vitro Fertilization
  • Embryo biopsy
  • Diagnostic test on biopsied blastomere
  • Reporting and explaining results
  • Transfer of selected embryos to the uterus
  • Follow-up of pregnancy and resulting child

5
Diagnostics
Genetics
Embryology
Fertility
6
Genetics
  • Family and medical history
  • Assess severity of condition
  • Estimate genetic risk
  • Provide realistic expectations
  • Explain process, disorder and tests
  • Ensure appropriate tests offered
  • Discuss options (risk/benefit)
  • Obtain consent

7
Options for potential PGD patients
  • Contraception
  • Childlessness
  • Prenatal testing ( pregnancy termination)
  • Donation (egg, sperm, embryo)
  • Adoption
  • Reproductive roulette (emotional, physicial
    financial cost of affected child?)

8
Genetics
Ensure appropriate testing
Ensure PGD valid option
Provide realistic expectations
9
Fertility
  • Reproductive and medical history
  • Provide realistic expectations
  • Explain IVF process and tests
  • Discuss options (risk/benefit)
  • Obtain consent
  • Prescribe IVF medication
  • Perform IVF procedures (EC and ET)

10
Obtain appropriate consents
Set realistic expectations
Facilitate high quality eggs
Fertility
Ensure appropriate stimulation
11
Embryology
  • Prepare and introduce gametes in vitro
  • Culture embryos
  • Biopsy embryos
  • Prepare diagnostic sample (single cells)
  • Culture biopsied embryos
  • Select embryo(s) for transfer (based on genetic
    result and morphology)

12
Embryo Biopsy
Cleavage stage
Blastocyst
Polar Body
Day 1
Day 3
Day 5/6
13
Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization (FISH)
Biopsied blastomere
Polymerase Chain reaction (PCR)
14
A 38 year old woman
Select the best two embryos for transfer
15
Provide accurate comprehensive documentation
Meet diagnostic centres acceptance criteria
Prepare high quality samples
Obtain high quality embryos
Embryology
Obtain high quality embryos
16
Diagnostics
  • Develop and validate single cell test
  • Receive and accession sample
  • Run test
  • Report results
  • Provide interpretation

17
Diagnostics
Provide appropriate test
Provide high quality test
Meet rapid turn-around time
Provide user- friendly report
18
Patient experience of PGD
Centres experience of PGD
  • Confusing
  • Complex
  • Control (lack of)
  • Communication (absolutely necessary)

19
(No Transcript)
20
Satellite/transport PGD - Pros and Cons
  • Pros
  • Improved patient access and convenience
  • Lower costs
  • Experienced reference diagnostics lab
  • Centres of excellence model
  • Cons
  • Quality of sample preparation
  • Transportation risks and timings
  • Inadequate counselling/pre-cycle screening
  • Negligible follow-up /responsibilities

21
More to come from PGD?
  • More quality control/quality assurance
  • More tests (whole genome amplification)
  • More screening (aneuploidy, gene expression,
    protein)
  • More funding for PGD
  • More satellite and transport PGD
  • More access for patients
  • More efficient but more complex

22
Relevant bibliography
  • Kuliev A, Verlinsky, Y. (2004) Thirteen years'
    experience of preimplantation diagnosis report
    of the Fifth International Symposium on
    Preimplantation Genetics. Reprod Biomed Online.
    8(2)229-35.
  • Robertson JA. (2003) Extending preimplantation
    genetic diagnosis the ethical debate Ethical
    issues in new uses of preimplantation genetic
    diagnosis. Hum Reprod. 18(3)465-71
  • ESHRE PGD Consortium Steering Committee (2002)
    ESHRE Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis
    Consortium data collection III (May 2001). Hum
    Reprod. 17(1)233-46
  • Geraedts et al. (2001) Preimplantation genetic
    diagnosis (PGD), a collaborative activity of
    clinical genetic departments and IVF
    centres.Prenat Diagn. 21(12)1086-92.
  • Soini et al. (2006) The interface between
    assisted reproductive technologies and genetics
    technical, social, ethical and legal issues.Eur
    J Hum Genet. 14(5)588-645.
  • Thornhill et al (2005) ESHRE PGD Consortium 'Best
    practice guidelines for clinical preimplantation
    genetic diagnosis (PGD) and preimplantation
    genetic screening (PGS)'. Hum Reprod.
    20(1)35-48.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com