Occupational Chemical Exposure Surveillance: Design and Validation of a Survey - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Occupational Chemical Exposure Surveillance: Design and Validation of a Survey

Description:

This study on exposure surveillance methodology was funded by the National ... Health care and surgical supplies. crystalline free silica ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:24
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: ODIS
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Occupational Chemical Exposure Surveillance: Design and Validation of a Survey


1
Occupational Chemical Exposure Surveillance
Design and Validation of a Survey
  • Rukmani Ramaprasad, MSc, MS
  • Lisa Huguenin, PhD
  • Paula Knudson, MS, CIH
  • Eileen Senn, MS, CIH
  • David Valiante, MS, CIH

2
Research Funding
  • This study on exposure surveillance methodology
    was funded by the National Cancer Institute
    through NIOSHs National Occupational Research
    Agenda (NORA)
  • Three-year study began October 1999
  • Research staff include in-house research
    scientists and consultants on survey design,
    statistics, and scanning software

3
Occupational Chemical Exposure Why Survey?
  • Timely cost effective - Occupational exposure
    assessment through personal and/or area
    monitoring is costly and time consuming. Methods
    to estimate exposure for worker population in
    timely cost effective manner are needed to
    prevent occupational chemical exposure.
  • Estimate exposure hazard - This research focuses
    on developing a survey to mail to employers to
    estimate exposure hazard or the potential for
    worker exposure.
  • Initiate primary prevention - The estimates
    derived from the survey could be used to engage
    in primary prevention activities at selected
    workplaces by mitigating or eliminating exposure.

4
Research AimsDesign and Validation of a Survey
  • Design survey to learn how targeted chemicals are
    handled at specific workplaces and characterize
    exposure hazard
  • Validate and audit survey responses
  • Develop scoring method to rank workplaces based
    on exposure hazard

5
Survey Design Key Elements
  • Selection of chemicals
  • six known or probable human carcinogens
  • Selection of industries
  • Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) codes
    based on where the selected chemicals are likely
    to be handled
  • cadmium
  • ethylene oxide
  • formaldehyde
  • lead
  • methylene chloride
  • crystalline free silica

6
Survey Design Types of Industries/ Chemicals
Targeted
Industry Chemical(s) Targeted
Primary metal, pigments, non-ferrous foundries Lead, cadmium
Solvents, paint remover, rubber Methylene chloride
Pottery, brick, tile, refractory, concrete, abrasives crystalline free silica
Health care and surgical supplies Formaldehyde, ethylene oxide
7
Survey Design Sample Selection
  • New Jersey workplaces that may use one of the
    targeted chemicals is identified from
    MarketPlace, a national database of businesses.
    Workplaces with one employee are excluded.
  • A stratified random sample of workplaces is
    selected using size of workforce as strata. Each
    workplace is selected for only one chemical.
    Final survey will be sent to 700 workplaces.
  • A random sample of respondents will be selected
    to audit and validate responses on-site

8
Survey DesignKey Survey Questions
The survey questions address the three routes of
exposure inhalation, ingestion and dermal
contact and exposure control mechanisms in place.
  • Is the chemical handled?
  • What is the quantity of the chemical handled?
  • How is the chemical handled?
  • What are the patterns of handling?
  • How many workers handle the chemical?
  • What are their job titles and duties?
  • Are controls to reduce exposures in place?

8
9
Chemical Exposure SurveillanceResearch Methods
  • Develop pre-test Chemical Survey design
  • Develop pre-test on-site validation methods
  • Develop pre-test scoring system
  • Mail final version of survey to 700 workplaces
  • Conduct on-site validation and audit of a sample
    of survey respondents
  • Score final version survey responses

10
Survey Pre-tests
Three rounds of pre-tests have been conducted to
evaluate and improve the survey based on
telephone follow up of respondents and
non-respondents.
  • Evaluate survey design
  • Do employers understand the studys objectives?
  • Are instructions and questions clear and easy to
    read?
  • Is the order of the questions logical?
  • Evaluate protocol
  • Are procedures practical and useful?
  • Can deadlines be met?
  • Evaluate employer cooperation
  • Do employers complete and return survey?

10
11
Pre-tests Response Rates
Pre-test Number of Workplaces Surveyed Response Rate
1st 38 77
2nd 50 44
3rd 116 17
4th 80 Pending
12
Survey Key Revisions
  • Narrowed selection of chemicals
  • From original 34 carcinogens
  • To six many OSHA 6B chemicals not in use
  • Changed source for identification of workplaces
  • From workplaces reporting chemical use in the New
    Jersey Right to Know database
  • To those in selected SIC codes from MarketPlace
    database
  • Changed chemical use questions
  • From Is chemical produced or used?
  • Answer - Yes or No
  • To How is lead typically handled at this
    worksite?
  • Answer - Yes or No to 17 statements

12
13
Survey Key Revisions (contd)
  • Survey Packet - 1st Pretest
  • 2 cover letters, suggested steps, FAQs, 3 survey
    forms (37 questions total)
  • Survey Packet - 4th Pretest
  • Brochure with Confidentiality Statement
  • Instruction sheet
  • Chemical Survey (39 questions)
  • Participant Form (12 questions)
  • Survey formatted for use with scanning software
    (Cardiff Teleform)

14
Whats Next?
  • Pre-test on-site validation and audit methods
  • Select sample of 700 employers and conduct final
    survey
  • Select random sample of respondents and conduct
    on-site validation

15
Challenges Ahead
  • Survey
  • Survey is not mandatory
  • Must rely on employer cooperation
  • Cant offer financial incentives
  • Balance number of questions vs.employers time
  • On-site validation
  • Gain employers cooperation for on-site visit
  • Finalize method to determine validity of
    responses
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com