Restoration: The Ultimate Test - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 29
About This Presentation
Title:

Restoration: The Ultimate Test

Description:

... the Structure of Pond Zooplankton Communities. By Jonathan Shurin ... The scientist introduced a sample of non-native zooplankton in several fishless ponds ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:36
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 30
Provided by: vinc179
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Restoration: The Ultimate Test


1
Restoration The Ultimate Test
  • By Nicole Kroutter
  • Rob Harvey
  • Nikki Thurgate

2
Restoration A Win - Win Situation
  • In his article, John Ewel proposes that
    ecosystem restoration is an activity at which
    everyone wins
  • When successful, a disrupted fragment of the
    Earths surface is returned to its undisturbed
    state.
  • When plagued with failure, the information
    learned about the environment becomes a powerful
    tool for future success.

3
Ewels Five Point Criteria
  • Sustainability
  • Invasibility
  • Productivity
  • Nutrient Retention
  • Biotic interactions

4
Sustainability
  • Sustainability is the ability of the newly
    reconstructed environment to perpetuate itself
    without constant management.
  • Proper planning can increase the chances of a
    new system becoming independent.
  • Sustainable development has become an important
    issue for restoration ecologists

5
Sustainability Models
  • Dr. Sylvia Earl, in conjunction with National
    Geographic has proposed a model for a Sustainable
    Seas program.
  • Her program, like others, devotes itself to the
    human -side of sustainable development

6
Invasibility
  • To fulfill this criteria, a reconstructed
    community must be capable of resisting invasion
    by new species.
  • Intact communities are more resistant to invaders
    than those that have suffered from disruption
  • Invasion by non-indigenous species are now
    recognized as one of the leading threats to
    biodiversity and ecosystem function.

7
Tracking the Enemy
  • Invasive plants alter ecological processes,
    displace desirable species, and reduce wildlife
    habitat quality.
  • Invasive species usually entered disturbed areas
    and fill in newly formed niches.
  • Ecologists are devoting a great deal of study
    into what makes a species an invader and why some
    communities are resistant to invasion.

8
Predicting Invaders
  • Invasive species have a variety of
    characteristics that increase their fitness.
  • In plants these includea history of invasion,
    an uneven phylogenetic distribution, and
    vegetative reproduction.

9
Establishment as an Invader
  • Species entrained in transport path
  • Species survives transport and introduction
  • Species becomes established in the new geographic
    area
  • Species spreads from the point of introduction
  • Species becomes abundant, and begins to fill in
    niches while adversely effecting the native
    population.

10
Productivity
  • Productivity depends upon the efficient use of
    resources by the restored community.
  • Ideally, the newly restored community will become
    as productive as the original.
  • Productivity can be measured on several levels

11
Measurements of Productivity
  • Primary production
  • Secondary production
  • Gross productivity
  • Net productivity
  • Net productivity is especially useful because it
    incorporates critical live processes such as
    respiration and photosynthesis.

12
Productivity
  • Improving productivity of the soil can have a
    powerful impact on the overall health of a
    restored or damaged community
  • Tropical shifting cultivation systems that employ
    fallow periods have shown an increase in overall
    soil productivity.
  • The increase in productivity increases the system
    resistance to invasive species especially weeds

13
Nutrient Retention
  • A reconstructed community must be able to
    maintain a steady level of critical nutrients.
  • If the community can not control the rate of
    nutrient loss or gain of certain nutrients, the
    restored community will suffer.
  • Either extreme of nutrient balance will result
    in a decrease in productivity, sustainability,
    and lead to invasion by other species

14
Nutrient Retention in Action
  • Two of the most critical nutrients are Carbon
    and Nitrogen.
  • Good retention of these nutrients increases the
    chance of recovery for a disturbed area

15
Additional Benefits of Nutrient Retention
  • Nutrient Retention is not only necessary for
    plant survival, but offers many benefits to the
    ecosystem.
  • One experiment focused on the effects of
    macrophyte species richness on wetland function.
  • The increase in macrophyte diversity helped the
    wetland to retain additional amounts of
    Phosphorus, an environmental pollutant

16
Biotic Interactions
  • The successful establishment of biotic
    interactions may be one of the most important
    steps in the restoration process.
  • For many restored areas the reassembly of the
    plant population is enough to trigger
    colonization by various animal species.
  • The interactions of a few key species, though,
    may determine the ultimate success of the
    community

17
Biotic interactions and Key Species
  • Key species are those species that have a large
    impact on a community.
  • Key species can be seen as ecosystem engineers.
  • If key species are removed or do not returned to
    a restored area, large changes in ecosystem
    function will result

18
The influence of Biotic Interactions
  • Experiments on species co-existence in temperate
    forests have offered some valuable insight into
    the role of biotic interactions.
  • Biotic interactions are incredible important
    in the time frame from reproduction to
    establishment of a seedling
  • These interactions include the role of
    pollinators and other critical species

19
Valuable Biotic Interactions
  • Birds play a major role in seed dispersal
  • Mycorrhizal interactions can provide the seedling
    with various nutrients
  • Different species of tree have different
    advantages at different stages

20
Ewels Criteria in Action
  • Case Study 1
  • Restoring Enriched Grassland Effects of Mowing
    on Species Resistance, Productivity, and Nutrient
    Retention
  • By John Maron
  • Case Study 2
  • Dispersal Limitation, Invasion Resistance, and
    the Structure of Pond Zooplankton Communities
  • By Jonathan Shurin

21
Case Study One
  • In this experiment, scientists examined the
    effects of nitrogen enrichment on species- rich
    grasslands.
  • Nitrogen enrichment has become an increasing
    problem due to the build up of nitrogen oxides in
    the atmosphere and soil
  • The areas of nitrogen enrichment are prone to
    invasion by exotic species, increases in biomass,
    and loss of species diversity.

22
Case Study One
  • The scientists hypothesized that removal of
    biomass through repeated mowing of the research
    area would lead to a drop in Nitrogen levels.
  • Also it was hypothesized that the mowing would
    increase native species diversity, through the
    removal of nitrogen- fixing invaders such as bush
    lupine.

23
(No Transcript)
24
Results of Case Study One
  • Mowing and the removal of biomass resulted in a
    dramatic change in species assembly
  • The population shifted from exotic species to a
    mixture of exotic and native forbs community.
  • Due to biomass removal and the shift in species,
    there were changes in nitrogen retention

25
Results of Case Study One
  • The mowing ,though useful in increasing species
    diversity and productivity, did not succeed in
    reducing Nitrogen levels.
  • In fact, the switch to the combination of exotic
    and native forbs due to mowing, actually resulted
    in increased nitrogen retention.

26
Case Study Two
  • This experiment highlights the invasion
    resistance capabilities of a pond community
  • The scientist introduced a sample of non-native
    zooplankton in several fishless ponds

27
Case Study Two
  • In cases were native species diversity was high,
    the introduced invaders could not establish a
    foothold in the community.
  • In fact, the success rate of introduction was low
    with many of the invaders becoming extinct.
  • For those that became established, they had no
    impact on the overall community, since their
    total numbers were very low.

28
Results of Case Study Two
  • The pattern established in this experiment
    supports the hypothesis that an increase in
    species diversity confers invasion resistance.
  • The increase in biotic interactions among the
    natives also reduced the chance of invasion
  • The same experiment conducted a test on the
    effects of introduced invaders on a community
    with limited diversity.
  • In this test, the invaders did become
    established in the community.

29
Final Thoughts
  • Both experiments illustrated the importance of
    nutrient retention, biotic interactions,
    invasibility, and productivity on the
    construction of a sustainable community.
  • While one experiment failed to achieve its main
    goal and the other succeed, the overall knowledge
    of the interactions in a community was increased,
    making the efforts part of a win-win situation
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com