Title: I pazienti infertili in Europa: situazioni legali e mediche a confronto
1- I pazienti infertili in Europa situazioni
legali e mediche a confronto - The infertile patient in Europe
- Legal and medical situation -
- or the negative impact of fertility tourism
- Conrad Engler
- Secretary
- of
- Fertility Europe
- European Patient Umbrella Organisation
- Milano, 16th February 2008
2Who we are
- Fertility Europe has officially been founded on
the 19th November 2007. - Fertility Europe is an association of European
organisations, democratic, independent,
non-profit and neutral in terms of political and
religious affiliation, representing those having
difficulties in conceiving. - Fertility Europe aims to be the voice of those
affected by difficulties in conceiving,
particularly in relation to human rights. - Fertility Europe undertakes political advocacy in
the interest of people with difficulties in
conceiving on the European level focussing on the
European Commission in Brussels and the European
Parliament in Strasbourg.
3Founding Committee
- Chair Geertrui De Cock Belgium
- Vice Chair Denisa Priadkova Slovakia
- Secretary Conrad Engler Switzerland
- Member Clare Browne United Kingdom
- Member José Van der Schoor - Netherlands
4Founding Members
- Infertility Network UK - United Kingdom
- Verein Kinderwunsch (Association Childwish) -
Switzerland - De Verdwaalde Ooievaar Netwerk Fertiliteit (The
Lost Stork - Fertility Network) - Belgium - Association MAIA - France
- Magna Mater - Hellenic Fertility Association -
Greece - Freya - Netherlands
- Obcianske zdruenie BOCIAN (Civil Association
Stork) - Slovakia - Asociacion de Ayuda a la Fertilidad - Genera
(Help to Fertility Association) - Spain - Lombik Bebi Alapitvany (Test Tube Babies
Foundation) - Hungary - Nadace Materskánadeje (Maternity Hope Foundation)
- Czech Republic
5The Patients Perspective
The main priorities for Fertility Europe and for
those affected by difficulties in conceiving
are - Have access to high quality infertility
investigation, treatment, diagnostic, support,
advice and guidance - To be fully informed on all
assisted conception/ reproduction treatment
possibilities and to accept or to reject the
diagnosis or treatment without any
discrimination. - Education in the field of
protection of reproductive health and a
pro-active approach to family planning.
6The Patients Needs
- Best investigation, diagnostic, consultation
and treatment (golden standards) - Improve the
success rates - Research and development for
innovation and patient friendly solutions -
Education not only about contraception, but also
about fertility and the effects of the age -
Harmonization of the regulations all over
Europe - To avoid fertility tourism because of
restrictive laws in some countries - Reduce
multiples (allow eSET)
7Patients advocacy
- The recognition of infertility as a medical
condition which causes suffering and as such is
worthy of reimbursement to provide equity of
access to proven medical treatments. - Ways to enlighten people about medical,
psychological and social opportunities and
problems associated with infertility. - - Increased community awareness and understanding
of the difficulties problems faced by those
facing experiencing difficulties in conceiving. - - Public discussion of new and evolving areas in
of ART in order to promote understanding and to
facilitate revisions of legislation and
professional guidelines.
8EU advocacy
- European Commission in Brussels
- Active role in European Patients Plattform
- Direct contacts to the European Commission
- Influence EU via national health authorities
- Joint venture with ESHRE
- Patient organizations and ART specialists work
together - European Parliament
- Direct contacts with members of parliament
- Show the influence of different regulations in
the countries for the ART tourism through Europe
with negative impacts for concerned couples and
the donors in poorer countries with an increase
of fertility tourism
9(No Transcript)
10(No Transcript)
11Legal situation
P Permitted / F Forbidden / N Not regulated
12Reimbursment
Y Yes / N No / - Not regulated or allowed
13Legislation overview
- Huge differences
- There are enormous varieties from extremely
restrictive legislation up to liberal regulations
or no legal restrictions. - Mentality and religion
- The reasons for liberal or restrictive regulation
are mainly political debates based an mentality
of the country (Switzerland), the history
(Germany) and the role of religion (Italy). - The most restrictive countries
- Italy has in Europe the most restrictive
regulation - Followed by Germany and Switzerland
- The most liberal countries
- Nordic countries, Belgium, England
14Legislation overview
- The impact of reimbursement
- There is a clear correlation between the number
of IVF cycles and the regulation of the
reimbursement - The better the reimbursement system, the more
cycles and the higher the IVF birth rate - In Germany the reduction of the reimbursement to
50 of the costs led to e reduction of the
number of IVF cycles to also 50 !
15Fertility tourism
- European or even global business
- People who can afford it travel for Assited
Reproductive Treatment (ART) all over Europe or
even overseas - The reasons for fertility tourism
- The stricter the regulation is, the bigger the
interest in fertility tourism - People ask abroad for in their own country
forbidden techniques (e.g. egg donation, prenatal
genetic diagnosis (PGD), elective single embryo
transfer, help or saver babies, surrogagy - Lower costs can have an impact (Eastern European
Countries)
16Fertility tourism
- The effects of fertility tourism
- New clinics in the Italian speaking part of
Switzerland for couples coming from Italy - Special offers and clinics in Eastern Europe
(main reasons price and egg donation without
waiting lists for patients and stand by donors) - Aggressive marketing and PR strategies of clinics
in liberal countries (e.g. Austria, Spain,
Eastern countries) - Focussing on selection (gender, characteristics
and qualities, intelligence a.s.o) - Specialisation on genetic diseases and testing
- Offer possibilities for same-sex couples
17Fertility tourism
- The negative impact of fertility tourism
- Only rich people can afford it
- Two class medicine
- Lower birth rate in restrictive countries
- Economic loss for the restrictive countries
- Pure financial interests for poor people in
Eastern countries especially for egg donation - Lack of quality and monitoring
- Unethical practices
18Fertility tourism
- Recipes against fertility tourism
- Brake the taboo to talk about it and to name it
- Advocacy on the national and European Level
- Harmonization of the regulation in Europe
- Ethical debate about the negative impact of bans
for patients - Joint venture in advocacy of patients and their
organizations with the doctors and the IVF
clinics - Address the negative impacts to administration,
governments and members of parliaments - Awareness campaigns in the media about the
positive impact of forbidden techniques for
concerned people (genetic diseases, help babies
a.s.o) with the coming out of patients