Linking watersheds and streams through functional modeling of watershed processes - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

Linking watersheds and streams through functional modeling of watershed processes

Description:

Linking watersheds and streams through functional modeling of watershed processes ... (and SPARROW) Accumulate downstream. Overlapping watersheds ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:154
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: DavidMT8
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Linking watersheds and streams through functional modeling of watershed processes


1
Linking watersheds and streams through functional
modeling of watershed processes
  • David Theobald, Silvio Ferraz, Erin Poston, and
    Jeff Deems
  • Natural Resource Ecology Lab
  • Dept of Recreation Tourism
  • Colorado State University
  • Fort Collins, CO 80523 USA
  • 19 May 2004

2
Watershed - Stream


Stand-alone watershed
Process/Functional Zonal
Accumulate Up/down (net.)
Watershed HUCs/WBD Reach
Contributing Areas (RCAs) Grain (Resolution)
3
Watershed - Stream


Stand-alone watershed Watershed-based analyses (HUCs) Tesselation of true, adjoint catchments
Process/Functional Zonal
Accumulate Up/down (net.)
Watershed HUCs/WBD Reach
Contributing Areas (RCAs) Grain (Resolution)
4
Watershed-based analyses
  • agricultural, urban (e.g., ATtILA)
  • Average road density (Bolstad and Swank)
  • Dam density (Moyle and Randall 1998)
  • Road length w/in riparian zone (Arya 1999)
  • But 45 of HUCs are not watersheds

Southern Rockies Ecosystem Project. 2000.
EPA. 1997. An ecological assessment of the US
Mid-Atlantic Region A landscape atlas.
5
Watershed - Stream

Overlapping watersheds - Delineate watershed from outlet
Stand-alone watershed Watershed-based analyses (HUCs) Tesselation of true, adjoint catchments ?
Process/Functional Zonal
Accumulate Up/down (net.)
Watershed HUCs/WBD Reach
Contributing Areas (RCAs) Grain (Resolution)
6
(No Transcript)
7
Watershed - Stream

Overlapping watersheds Tesselation catchments accumulate downstream
Stand-alone watershed Watershed-based analyses (HUCs) Tesselation of true, adjoint catchments ?
Process/Functional Zonal
Accumulate Up/down (net.)
Watershed HUCs/WBD Reach
Contributing Areas (RCAs) Grain (Resolution)
8
Upper and lower Colorado Basin Flows to
downstream HUCs
9
Watershed - Stream

Overlapping watersheds Accumulate downstream FLOWS (and SPARROW)
Stand-alone watershed Watershed-based analyses (HUCs) Tesselation of true, adjoint catchments ?
Process/Functional Zonal
Accumulate Up/down (net.)
Watershed HUCs/WBD Reach
Contributing Areas (RCAs) Grain (Resolution)
10
Reach Contributing Areas (RCAs)
  • Automated delineation
  • Inputs
  • stream network (from USGS NHD 1100K)
  • topography (USGS NED, 30 m or 90 m)
  • Process
  • Grow contributing area away from reach segment
    until ridgeline
  • Uses WATERSHED command

11
RCA example
  • US ERF1.2 1 km DEM 60,833 RCAs

12
Reaches are linked to catchments
  • 1 to 1 relationship
  • Properties of the watershed can be linked to
    network for accumulation operation

13
Watershed - Stream
Hydrologic distance Instream Up vs. down?
Overlapping watersheds Accumulate downstream FLOWS (and SPARROW)
Stand-alone watershed Watershed-based analyses (HUCs) Tesselation of true, adjoint catchments ?
Process/Functional Zonal
Accumulate Up/down (net.)
Watershed HUCs/WBD Reach
Contributing Areas (RCAs) Grain (Resolution)
14
Types of Distance
  • As the crow flies
  • As the seed floats (A?B)
  • As the fish swims (C??D)
  • Upstream length (B up)
  • Network (dams, fragmentation)

15
Upstream 66 km
Mainstem Upstream 37 km
Network 16 km (down) 6 km (up)
Downstream 298 km
16
Watershed - Stream
Hydrologic distance Instream Up vs. down? FLOWS
Overlapping watersheds Accumulate downstream FLOWS (and SPARROW)
Stand-alone watershed Watershed-based analyses (HUCs) Tesselation of true, adjoint catchments ?
Process/Functional Zonal
Accumulate Up/down (net.)
Watershed HUCs/WBD Reach
Contributing Areas (RCAs) Grain (Resolution)
17
RCAs are linked together but spatial
configuration within an RCA?
1. Ignore variability 2. Buffer streams 3.
Buffer outlet
18
2 major hydro. processes w/in RCA
  • 1. Overland (hillslope) Distance (A to A)
  • 2. Instream flow Distance (A to O)

19
Flow distance overland instream
  • Hydro-conditioned DEM (e.g., EDNA)
  • FLOWDIRECTION
  • FLOWLENGTH

20
Flow distance overland
  • Hydro-conditioned DEM (e.g., EDNA)
  • Burn stream into FLOWDIRECTION
  • FLOWLENGTH

21
Flow distance instream
  • Hydro-conditioned DEM (e.g., EDNA)
  • FLOWDIRECTION
  • FLOWLENGTH from outline overland FLOWLENGTH

22
Summary
  • RCAs networked together w/in RCA distances
  • Practical framework for flexible,
    functional-based applications
  • Plans
  • Use cost-weighting for w/in RCA distances
  • FLOWS tools Fall 2004

23
  • Thanks!
  • Comments? Questions?
  • Funding/Disclaimer The work reported here was
    developed under the STAR Research Assistance
    Agreement CR-829095 awarded by the U.S.
    Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to Colorado
    State University. This presentation has not been
    formally reviewed by EPA.  The views expressed
    here are solely those of the presenter and
    STARMAP, the Program (s)he represents. EPA does
    not endorse any products or commercial services
    mentioned in this presentation.
  • STARMAP www.stat.colostate.edu/nsu/starmap
  • RWTools email davet_at_nrel.colostate.edu

Funding/Disclaimer The work reported here was
developed under the STAR Research Assistance
Agreement CR-829095 awarded by the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to Colorado
State University. This presentation has not been
formally reviewed by EPA.  The views expressed
here are solely those of the presenter and
STARMAP, the Program (s)he represents. EPA does
not endorse any products or commercial services
mentioned in this presentation.
Funding/Disclaimer The work reported here was
developed under the STAR Research Assistance
Agreement CR-829095 awarded by the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to Colorado
State University. This presentation has not been
formally reviewed by EPA.  The views expressed
here are solely those of the presenter and
STARMAP, the Program (s)he represents. EPA does
not endorse any products or commercial services
mentioned in this presentation.
Funding/Disclaimer The work reported here was
developed under the STAR Research Assistance
Agreement CR-829095 awarded by the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to Colorado
State University. This presentation has not been
formally reviewed by EPA.  The views expressed
here are solely those of the presenter and
STARMAP, the Program (s)he represents. EPA does
not endorse any products or commercial services
mentioned in this presentation.
CR - 829095
CR - 829095
CR - 829095
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com