Writing the Poster Text: Every Word Counts - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 34
About This Presentation
Title:

Writing the Poster Text: Every Word Counts

Description:

Reach more people both in and out of your field. More in-depth discussion of your work ... Using a transgenic mouse model in which human AGT is expressed only in the ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:74
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 35
Provided by: afeuer
Category:
Tags: counts | poster | text | word | writing

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Writing the Poster Text: Every Word Counts


1
Writing the Poster TextEvery Word Counts
  • APS Professional Skills Course
  • Making Scientific Presentations Critical First
    Skills

2
Why a Poster vs. Talk
  • Reach more people both in and out of your field
  • More in-depth discussion of your work
  • More efficient because people can read about your
    work during the time the poster is available,
    whether you are there or not
  • Less stressful

3
Difference Between Oral and Poster Presentations
Speaking to a few people at a time
Speaking before a large crowd of people
4
Why You Need a Great Poster
5
Writing the Poster
  • Decide on one essential concept you would like to
    get across
  • Know your audience
  • Should be easy to follow what you did and why you
    did it, even if you are not present
  • Succinct in wording
  • Figures easily understandable
  • Conclusions follow from data presented

6
Remember
  • Start early
  • Set deadlines
  • Plan for set backs
  • Allow additional time for
  • Editing
  • Proofreading
  • Printing problems

7
Organizing the Content
  • Title (from Abstract)
  • Background and Introduction
  • Methods
  • Results
  • Summary
  • Conclusion
  • Contact Information
  • Check meeting guidelines - may or may not
    include
  • Abstract
  • Literature Cited
  • Acknowledgements

8
Poster Title
  • Already written
  • Use same title as submitted in Abstract


Kidney-Specific Enhancement of Angiotensin II
Stimulates Endogenous Intrarenal Angiotensinogen
and Initiates Renal Injury in Gene-Targeted Mice
9
Background and Introduction
  • Hypothesis
  • Relevant question you are trying to answer
  • State as hypothesis
  • Minimum of background information and definitions
    to provide context
  • Description and justification of general
    experimental approach

10
Background and Introduction
  • Use inverted triangle model
  • Include photos if appropriate
  • Make it easy to read quickly
  • Short blocks of text
  • Use bullet points if possible
  • 200 words maximum

Big Picture
Current State of Knowledge
Hypothesis
11
Introduction Example
  • We recently reported that concomitant increases
    in proximal tubular angiotensinogen (AGT) mRNA
    and protein participate in increased intrarenal
    angiotensin (Ang) II leading to progressive
    development of hypertension and renal injury in
    Ang II-infused rats.

12
Introduction Example Contd
  • However, it has not been established if selective
    increases in intrarenal Ang II can be responsible
    for the stimulation of intrarenal AGT,
    development of progressive hypertension, and/or
    renal injury.

13
Introduction Example Contd
  • Objective
  • Using a transgenic mouse model in which human AGT
    is expressed only in the kidney, these
    experiments were performed to determine if
    selective renal overproduction of Ang II elicited
    by stimulating human AGT present only in the
    kidney in the presence of human renin will cause
    increases in endogenous mouse AGT mRNA and
    protein expression in kidneys leading to slowly
    progressive hypertension and renal injury.

14
Methods
  • Experimental design
  • Flow charts work well
  • Model system (if applicable)
  • If using animals/humans, include IACUC/IRB
    approvals
  • Name methods rather than give details
  • e.g., Northern blot
  • Statistical methods used
  • 200 words maximum

15
Methods Example
  • We used 3 groups of mice
  • 1. Single transgenic mice (A, N14) expressing
    human AGT only in the kidney regulated by
    kidney-specific androgen regulated protein
    promoter
  • 2. Double transgenic mice (D, N13) expressing
    human renin systemically in addition to human AGT
    only in the kidney
  • 3. Wild type (W, N12) of genetic background
    C57BL/6J mice

16
Methods Example contd
  • Exogenous human AGT protein is inactive in single
    transgenic mice because endogenous mouse renin
    cannot cleave human AGT to Ang I due to a high
    species-specificity.
  • All mice were monitored from 12 to 18 wks of age
    with free access to a regular diet and water.

17
Methods Example Contd
  • Measurements
  • 1. Systolic blood pressure Tail cuff method
  • 2. Human and mouse AGT mRNA in kidney and liver
    Real time RT-PCR
  • 3. Human and mouse AGT protein in kidney Western
    blot analysis
  • 4. Plasma and kidney Ang II SPE/RIA
  • 5. Renal injury
  • a) Interstitial collagen-positive area
    PicroSirius Red stain
  • b) Interstitial macrophage infiltration
    CD68-positive cell number
  • c) Thickness of afferent arteriolar wall IHC
    of aSMA plus elastin stain

18
Results
  • Focal point of poster
  • Enough information needed to support
    interpretation of the results
  • A story should unfold as you move from figure to
    figure
  • Group together data that are related
  • Use data that are directly related to the
    hypothesis
  • May not necessarily describe all results from
    study

19
Results
  • Say whether or not the experiment worked
  • Follow with qualitative and descriptive results
  • Follow with presentation of data analysis
  • Figures and tables (figures are best)
  • Each figure should be able to stand alone
  • Clear title
  • Axes well labeled
  • 200 words maximum

20
Results Example
21
Results Example Contd
22
Summary (of Results)
  • Not just a repeat of the Abstract
  • Bullet point list of key findings
  • May be first thing people read
  • Need to grab attention of the reader
  • State whether hypothesis was supported
  • Relevance of findings
  • 250 words maximum

23
Conclusion
  • Emphasize single most important point
  • Make sure conclusion addresses the hypothesis
  • If you have more than one question, need to have
    more than one answer
  • Very brief 50 words maximum

24
Summary/Conclusion Example
  • These data indicate that the selective renal
    overproduction of Ang II stimulates endogenous
    intrarenal mouse AGT mRNA and protein expression
    which may contribute to the slowly progressive
    hypertension and renal injury in the gene
    targeted mice even before the development of
    marked hypertension.
  • Locally generated Ang II may play important roles
    in the development of renal injury.

25
Summary/Conclusion Example contd
26
Literature Cited
  • Follow meeting guidelines on inclusion
  • Primary literature
  • Journal articles
  • Standard format
  • 10 references maximum

27
Literature Cited Example
  • 1. Kobori H, et al. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2001 12
    431-439.
  • 2. Kobori H, et al. Hypertension. 2001 37
    1329-1335.
  • 3. Kobori H, et al. Kidney Int. 2002 61
    579-585.
  • 4. Kobori H, et al. Hypertension. 2003 41
    42-49.
  • 5. Kobori H, et al. Hypertension. 2004 43
    1126-1132.

28
Acknowledgements
  • Follow meeting guidelines on inclusion
  • Funding sources
  • Grants (NIH, NSF, etc.)
  • Awards (departmental, society, if supported
    research)
  • Specific contributions to project
  • Laboratory assistance, equipment, statistics
  • Disclosure of conflicts of interest
  • 40 words maximum

29
AcknowledgementExample
  • Supported by NIDDK/NIH Grant XXXXX (LGN) and the
    National Kidney Foundation Grant YYYY(LGN).
  • Technical assistance by
  • Ms. My-Linh Rauv
  • Mr. Duy V. Tran
  • Mr. Dale M. Seth
  • Mr. Mark A. Cabrera

30
Further Information
  • Your contact information
  • Include your email address
  • Labs web page (if applicable)
  • 20 words maximum

31
Tips for Writing a Good Poster
  • Edit your text several times
  • Aim for 800 words maximum
  • Can you answer Yes to these questions?
  • Is only one main concept included?
  • Can your logic be followed without you explaining
    it?
  • Are the graphics self-explanatory?
  • Is there an explicit take-home message?
  • Did you and someone else proofread your text?

32
Ready to Move On
  • If you answered Yes to all those question
  • AND
  • Your collaborators (co-authors) agree
  • You can move on to
  • designing the poster!

33
Resources
  • Advice on Designing Scientific PostersColin
    Purrington, Swarthmore Collegehttp//www.swarthmo
    re.edu/NatSci/cpurrin1/posteradvice.htm
  • BIO 801 Poster PresentationsGary Ritchison,
    Eastern Kentucky University http//www.people.eku
    .edu/ritchisong/posterpres.html
  • Creating Effective Poster Presentations Create
    Your Poster George Hess Kathryn Tosney
    Leon Liegel http//www.ncsu.edu/project/posters/Ne
    wSite/CreatePosterOverview.html
  • Effective Use of Tables and Figures in Abstracts,
    Presentations, and PapersCharles G. Durbin,
    Jr.http//www.rcjournal.com/contents/10.04/10.04.
    1233.pdf

34
Resources
  • Poster-making 101Brian Pfohl, Bates
    Collegehttp//abacus.bates.edu/7Ebpfohl/posters/
  • The Poster Production ShowWomen in Science
    Project at Dartmouth, Dartmouth
    Collegehttp//www.dartmouth.edu/wisp/PosterShow/
    poster_pg3.html
  • Scientist's Guide to Poster PresentationsPeter
    J. Gosling, 1999, New York Springer 
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com