PESTICIDE EXPOSURE OF ETHNIC MINORITY HMONG FARMERS IN NORTH THAILAND - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 46
About This Presentation
Title:

PESTICIDE EXPOSURE OF ETHNIC MINORITY HMONG FARMERS IN NORTH THAILAND

Description:

Intensive Permanent Field Cultivation, MSM Village. 5 ... pesticides in their homes for control of mosquitoes, ants, cockroaches and mice ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:38
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 47
Provided by: kunstadt
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: PESTICIDE EXPOSURE OF ETHNIC MINORITY HMONG FARMERS IN NORTH THAILAND


1
PESTICIDE EXPOSURE OF ETHNIC MINORITY HMONG
FARMERS IN NORTH THAILAND
  • PETER KUNSTADTER, PhD
  • UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO
  • UCSF-Fresno Medical Education Program, Asian
    Health Program
  • ltarttown_at_itsa.ucsf.edugt
  • TIPPAWAN PRAPAMONTOL, PhD
  • CHIANG MAI UNIVERSITY
  • Research Institute for Health Sciences
  • ltrhxxo005_at_chiangmai.ac.thgt
  • Paper prepared for meeting of the Society for
    Occupational and Environmental Health, Bethesda,
    Md., July 2002. Research supported by University
    of California Pacific Rim Research Program

2
Background
  • The purpose of this study is to describe the
    exposure to pesticides, and some exposure risk
    factors of Hmong people in northern Thailand
  • Hmong are the second largest minority group in
    the border highlands of northern Thailand
  • Hmong were traditionally labor intensive, land
    extensive subsistence slash and burn (swidden)
    farmers
  • Upland (dry) rice was their main subsistence crop
  • Opium was their main cash crop

3
  • By the late 1980s Government restrictions on
    access to, and use of land had almost completely
    stopped shifting cultivation and the growing of
    opium poppies.
  • At the same time construction of a highland road
    network allowed Hmong farmers to get their bulky
    or perishable products to lowland markets.
  • Hmong and other highlanders switched to intensive
    permanent field cultivation of non -narcotic cash
    crops with heavy use of chemicals.

4
Intensive Permanent Field Cultivation, MSM Village
5
  • Farmers and their families can be exposed to
    chemicals
  • During application, or from drift from
    application
  • When in fields or in contact with crops after
    application
  • When chemicals are transported or stored
  • When in contact with contaminated clothing or
    equipment
  • When contaminated clothing or equipment is stored
    or cleaned
  • When contaminated food or water is consumed
  • Farm families also make use of pesticides in
    their homes for control of mosquitoes, ants,
    cockroaches and mice

6
  • Development projects and agriculture officials
    often suggest use of pesticides but give little
    advice to highland farmers on proper use.
  • Hmong farmers buy their chemicals from stores in
    town.
  • These stores are the major sources of information
    on types of chemicals to buy and methods of use,
    including safety precautions.
  • Types of pesticides and other chemicals change
    every year, depending on what is available in the
    market.

7
Hmong farmers use a large number of different
chemicals to control weeds and insects, and to
improve yield and appearance of crops
8
  • Hmong use of chemicals is highly seasonal, and
    chemicals are often applied in a cocktail
    including several components (e.g., insecticide
    hormone adherent).

9
(No Transcript)
10
Litchi Tree Loaded with Fruit, KCK Village, April
2002. Farmers believe that fruit at this stage
must be sprayed frequently for best quality,
appearance and price before harvest in May and
June.
11
Information from survey responses indicates there
is little overlap between times of use of
insecticides and herbicides
12
Materials and Methods 1999-2001
  • We selected 3 highland rural and one lowland
    urban site to get an idea of the range of
    exposure to pesticides.
  • Between 1999 and 2001 we interviewed and screened
    a total of 582 Hmong adult volunteers in 3 rural
    communities where cash crops are grown, and in an
    urban center.
  • Interviews included information on socioeconomic
    and demographic characteristics, and pesticide
    related behavior and beliefs.
  • We repeated blood draw and surveys in one of
    these communities (KCK) in 2002, and included
    children in the study population.

13
Location of Study Sites MY (1999), KCK (2000,
2002), MSM (2000), CM Urban (2001)
14
Screening for Pesticide Exposure
  • We screened for exposure to organo-phosphate or
    carbamate pesticides with a sensitive paper test
    of cholinesterase inhibition (Tovivich 1994).
    The test indicates 4 levels of response
    normal, safe, risky, and dangerous.

15
Results 1999 through 2001
  • Risky dangerous levels of cholinesterase
    inhibition
  • 20.5 in MY, mid-January 1999
  • 29.1 in KCK in mid-February 2000
  • 68.9 in MSM in late February-early March 2000
  • 56.5 in urban CM, late February 2001
  • Highest rates were among individuals of
    reproductive age.
  • Women had the same rates as men in MSM, but
    womens rates were lower in other communities.
  • Women had less education, less Thai language
    ability, were less likely to have information
    about health risks, and were less likely than men
    to wear protective clothing when applying
    pesticides.
  • Many individuals reported symptoms following
    pesticide application.

16
Implications from the 1999-2001 data
  • The fact that individuals who do not themselves
    apply pesticides implies widespread environmental
    contamination with pesticides.
  • Differences in rates associated with sampling at
    different times of the year implies an
    association between timing of application and
    rate of exposure.
  • The generally high rates of exposure among adults
    imply that children may also be exposed.
  • Self-perceived symptoms reported to follow
    exposure to pesticides implies that there may be
    health problems associated heavy pesticide
    exposure.

17
Materials and Methods 2002
  • In April 2002, in the first stage of a 13-month
    longitudinal study, we enrolled and screened 207
    Hmong residents age gt1 year in 30 randomly
    selected households in KCK, one of the rural
    villages surveyed in 2000
  • All study participants age gt15 years were
    interviewed concerning pesticide-related beliefs
    and behavior
  • Finger stick blood was collected from all study
    participants for screening tests
  • Venous blood was drawn from 2 adults in each
    sample household for analysis of chromosome
    aberrations
  • White T-shirts were distributed to two adults in
    each sample household at time of blood draw for
    collection of dust samples
  • Water and food samples were also collected for
    analysis

18
  • Our current study is designed to capture
    information on seasonal variation in
    pesticide-related behavior and exposure to
    pesticides
  • We sampled blood at the time of the heaviest use
    of insecticides (April 2002),
  • We will sample again at the end of the period of
    use of herbicides (early October 2002),
  • We will sample when little or no pesticide has
    been applied for several months (January 2003)
  • We will sample again at the time of heaviest use
    (April, 2003)

19
  • We obtained informed consent from all
    participating adults (age gt20) we obtained
    consent from parents for all participating
    children (age lt19) and we obtained informed
    assent for all children age 15-19.

20
  • We achieved a high rate of participation from
    registered residents of the randomly selected
    households (207/232 89).
  • One randomly selected household declined and was
    replaced.
  • Reasons for not participating in screening
  • Under 1 year old, 4 (ineligible for this study)
  • Working or in school elsewhere, 13
  • Temporarily away from village, 5 (in fields 4,
    visiting relatives 1)
  • Declined participation, 3
  • The very young age distribution of our sample
    population (median age 16 years) is consistent
    with other demographic surveys of the Hmong.

21
(No Transcript)
22
Results 2002
  • Social and demographic characteristics
  • Education and Thai language ability are strongly
    associated with age and sex
  • Younger ages have more education
  • Younger ages are more likely to speak Thai and be
    literate in Thai
  • Women in older age groups have much less
    education than men, and are much less likely to
    be able to speak Thai
  • The bulk of the population (70) is either
    animist or animist Buddhist
  • More than 90 of those age gt20 are farmers

23
(No Transcript)
24
(No Transcript)
25
(No Transcript)
26
(No Transcript)
27
Pesticides are applied much more often by men
than by women, and are usually applied by machine
spray
28
  • Results of cholinesterase inhibition screening
    for pesticide exposure
  • The total of those with risky or dangerous
    levels of cholinesterase inhibition was 156/207
    75.4
  • The highest rates of dangerous exposure are
    among children, age 1 through 9 years (39) and
    10 through19 years (26.8).
  • Men age 10 through19 and age 20 through 39 have
    significantly higher exposure than women of those
    ages

29
(No Transcript)
30
Highest rates of dangerous exposure are among
children, age 1-9 years and 10-19 years
31
  • Substantial numbers of individuals self-reported
    that they experienced symptoms following exposure
    to pesticides, with major differences between men
    and women
  • Headache and dizziness were reported more
    frequently by men
  • Blurred vision, numbness in feet or hands, or
    itching were reported more frequently by women
  • There was no clear pattern of self-reported
    symptoms by age

32
(No Transcript)
33
Pesticide Spray in Litchi Orchard, KCK Village.
Sprayer is not wearing gloves, boots or face mask.
34
Children Play around Spray Equipment with Little
or No Protective Clothing
35
  • Large numbers of individuals reported that they
    did not take appropriate precautions to prevent
    exposure to pesticides including wearing masks,
    gloves, boots or protective clothing, or staying
    out of fields after pesticides were applied
  • The highest proportions of those who did not take
    these precautions were children age 1 through 9
    years, followed by those age 10 through 19 years
  • Women were generally less likely to take these
    precautions than were men

36
Proportions of KCK Respondents Not Using
Protective Clothing when Pesticides Were Applied,
or Not Staying out of Fields after Application,
by Age and Sex
37
Discussion
  • Within the past 20 to 30 years Hmong farmers have
    undergone a rapid transition from organic
    labor-intensive subsistence farming to
    chemical-intensive cash crop farming for lowland
    markets.
  • Seasonality of use of pesticides implies the need
    to screen at appropriate seasons.
  • Screening for cholinesterase inhibition among
    Hmong farmers and their families in northern
    Thailand has shown consistently high rates of
    risky or dangerous exposure to
    organophosphate or carbamate pesticides.

38
  • High rates of exposure among all age groups,
    including both those who do and those who do not
    themselves apply pesticides, suggests that
    pesticides are pervasive in the village
    environment.
  • The high levels of exposure found among young
    children and the young age structure of this
    population implies an unusually large number of
    children are at risk of high exposure.
  • Substantial numbers of individuals report
    symptoms following exposure that are consistent
    with effects of pesticides.

39
  • Incomplete use of protective clothing and
    avoidance of fields after pesticide application
    may contribute to high levels of pesticide
    exposure.
  • Older villagers, especially women, are less
    likely than younger villagers to have had any
    education and to be able to speak, read or write
    the national language.
  • This implies the need for linguistically
    appropriate health education to reduce exposure
    to pesticides.

40
  • Use of pesticides is viewed as economically
    essential.
  • Parents normally take their children with them to
    the field.
  • Children help with tasks in the fields or play in
    the fields during pesticide application, and are
    often at risk of exposure because they very
    rarely take precautions to prevent exposure.
  • This implies the need to tailor plans for
    intervention to the local cultural, economic and
    physical environment.

41
  • We are reporting results of the research fully to
    village leaders and to study participants, and
    are encouraging them to participate in the
    development of locally appropriate methods of
    reducing exposure, e.g., collaboration among
    villagers to restrict spraying in defined areas
    to specific days, and organizing child care in
    the village to keep young children away from
    spraying and out of sprayed fields.

42
Reporting Results to Villagers and Counseling on
their Meaning
43
Strengths and Weaknesses of this Study
  • Strengths
  • This study includes a substantial, randomly
    selected population, with a high rate of
    participation.
  • Study design is based on knowledge of local
    behavior and the research is conducted with
    active participation of villagers.

44
  • Weaknesses
  • The rapid screening test using sensitized paper
    is not truly quantitative, and has not been
    compared with a gold standard. We plan to
    assess reliability and validity by comparison
    with standard laboratory methods within the next
    few months.
  • The rapid test measures only cholinesterase
    inhibition, presumably from carbamate and
    organophosphates, and does not indicate exposure
    to other classes of pesticides known to be used
    extensively by villagers.
  • As yet we have no direct measure of health
    consequences of exposure.

45
Acknowledgements
  • We would not have been able to do this study
    without the assistance of many people
  • We gratefully acknowledge the assistance of the
    many Hmong villagers who have contributed time as
    participants in this project.
  • The staff of the Toxicology Laboratory, Research
    Institute for Health Sciences, Chiang Mai
    University, collected and processed the
    biological and environmental samples,
    efficiently, speedily and with great respect for
    the study participants.
  • Staff of the Statistics Department, Research
    Institute for Health Sciences speedily and
    accurately entered the data reported on here.

46
  • The staff of the Chet Yawt Subdistrict Health
    Station, Ministry of Public Health graciously
    assisted in medical follow-up.
  • Dr. Prasit Leepreecha of the Social Research
    Institute, Chiang Mai University, has
    participated extensively, especially in
    discussions with villagers concerning potential
    interventions.
  • Ms. Rasamee Thawsirichuchai, and Mr. Weerachon
    Yangyernkun have participated in all phases of
    planning, community preparation, data collection,
    data coding and interpretation of results.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com