High-Brightness Electron Source: Expression of Intent - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 14
About This Presentation
Title:

High-Brightness Electron Source: Expression of Intent

Description:

... to FNAL, ANL, LBNL, DOE, and NSF asking for encouragement ... Will submit university proposals to DOE & NSF which will increase university contributions. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:154
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: GeraldC1
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: High-Brightness Electron Source: Expression of Intent


1
High-Brightness Electron Source Expression of
Intent
  • Courtlandt L. Bohn
  • Northern Illinois University/Fermilab
  • 14 May 2002
  • (Presented to Fermilabs Accelerator Advisory
    Committee)

2
Photoinjector Three (Pi3)
  • A collaboration for the construction and
    operation of a high-brightness electron beam at
    Fermilab.
  • Advanced beam research and machine development.
  • The collaboration presently includes seven
    universities and three laboratories.
  • An Expression of Intent submitted 02/11/02 to
    FNAL, ANL, LBNL, DOE, and NSF asking for
    encouragement to begin a design report.

3
Motivation
  • Fundamental beam and accelerator physics
  • Wakefield laser acceleration.
  • Bunch Compression.
  • Flat Polarized Beams.
  • Emittance Reduction.
  • All of which will promotes growth and innovation
    through university training of accelerator
    physicists.
  • Support for the new generation of linear
    colliders, FELs, and synchrotron radiation
    sources (1 micron emittance and 270 micron
    pulses)
  • Demonstrate that injector specifications can be
    met.
  • Platform to study generation of required beams.
  • Develop expertise and infrastructure for LC
    efforts.
  • Utilizes superconducting RF cavities and will
    foster Midwest and national development of the
    technology.

4
Notional Layout of Photoinjector (as envisioned
by DESY cf. Conceptual Design of the XFEL
Photoinjector by M. Ferrario, K. Floettmann, B.
Grigoryan, T. Limberg, Ph. Piot)
Output Beam for FEL LC bunch charge is 3.2 nC
Energy 140 MeV ? 300 MeV
5
Major Components
  • Drive laser (provides a flexible pulse structure
    and train) with a CsTe photocathode (high QE).
  • Emittance compensating solenoids.
  • A DESY donated 1.3 GHz, 8 cavity cryomodule
    (immediate acceleration reduces emittance growth
    due to space charge).
  • 3rd Harmonic superconducting RF section to
    correct non-linearities in longitudinal phase
    space.
  • Four-dipole compression stage.
  • Diagnostic matching section.
  • A domestically developed cryomodule.

6
Laser and Gun Requirements(based on FEL
requirements)
7
Simulation Results Transverse Parameters
8
Simulation Results Longitudinal Parameters
9
Longitudinal Phase Space Before and After
3rd-Harmonic Section
10
Phase Space After Bunch Compressor
AFTER
BEFORE
11
Collaboration/Contributions
  • Modeled on particle physics collaborations.
  • Envision the laboratories (Fermilab, Argonne,
    LBNL, DESY) taking responsibility for larger
    projects.
  • Infrastructure (Fermilab, ANL for chemistry)
  • RF Gun (ANL), High repetition RF Gun (LBNL)
  • Cryomodules (DESY, Pi3)
  • 3rd Harmonic (Fermilab/LBNL)
  • Compressor (Fermilab/ANL)
  • While the universities (Chicago, Michigan, NIU,
    Northwestern, Pennsylvania, Rochester, UCLA ) .
  • Contribute personnel (e.g., students!) to
    laboratory-based projects
  • Take responsibility for smaller projects
  • Simulations
  • Laser
  • Diagnostics

12
Scope Support
  • Scope
  • Schedule Approximately a 5 year construction
    project.
  • Cost A ball-park figure of 30M including
    MS, labor
  • Collaboration working on (phased) schedule and
    cost
  • Funding prospects
  • Laboratory contributions will be crucial.
  • Requested significant DoEd funding (3M ? 2 years
    6M)
  • Expect continued state support through Illinois
    Consortium of Accelerator Research (ICAR). Total
    grant now 2.5M/yr would submit additional
    request.
  • Will submit university proposals to DOE NSF
    which will increase university contributions.

13
A Staged Scenario
  • Some observations
  • Optimistic about DoEd support
  • Multi-laboratory interest
  • Funding agencies cautious, partially associated
    with LC technology choice, partially with
    resource limitations
  • Suggests an intermediate path compatible with LC
    choice
  • Reduced initial cost
  • Permits pursuit of beam physics
  • Does not foreclose on future options.
  • 1st Stage
  • Upgraded FNPL at new Fermilab site
  • Footprint infrastructure consistent with
    eventual expansion to 1 mm and 300 MeV
  • Current gun, additional Tesla cavities or
    cryomodule, 3rd Harmonic cavity, new compressor
  • 2nd Stage (a year or two later)
  • Proposal for 1 mm and 300 MeV will benefit from
    additional time and experience
  • Axially symmetric gun and second cryomodule

14
Conclusions
  • Pi3 will greatly strengthen HEP and the
    laboratories
  • A small scale program already proven successful.
  • A collaborative model to promote accelerator
    physics (will be opened to additional
    institutions).
  • Strengthens accelerator physics infrastructure.
  • Supports development of new technologies and
    machines.

The collaboration has requested laboratory
assistance to develop a design report by the end
of August.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com