SOCIAL PERCEPTION AND DISAFFILIATION IN ADOLESCENT SEXUAL OFFENDERS - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 35
About This Presentation
Title:

SOCIAL PERCEPTION AND DISAFFILIATION IN ADOLESCENT SEXUAL OFFENDERS

Description:

DEALER'S BABY PLEA IS REJECTED. CRUEL DRUNK KILLED PUPPIES ... Phillip Murphy, Liverpool John Moores University presented data ... ( Edwards, 1984) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:86
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 36
Provided by: psyc106
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: SOCIAL PERCEPTION AND DISAFFILIATION IN ADOLESCENT SEXUAL OFFENDERS


1
Scotlands Futures Forum
2
Drug use and harm
  • Dr. David Shewan
  • Research Director
  • Glasgow Centre for the Study of Violence
  • Glasgow Caledonian University

3
Drug use and society
  • Psychoactive drug use - including alcohol and
    tobacco - is widespread within most societies.
  • Problems associated with drug use, and particular
    drugs, are primarily focused upon health and
    crime these can seriously and tragically affect
    the individual user, family, friends, loved ones.
  • Drug problems can affect local communities,
    criminal justice systems, health services,
    employment and economic productivity at a global
    level the illegal drug trade can have a negative
    impact on entire countries.

4
Drug Use and Society
  • Most drug use is relatively non-problematic,
    causing little harm to self and/or others.
  • This involves a number of protective factors,
    ranging from personal to societal. A distinction,
    albeit not straightforward, can be made between
    controlled and addicted use.

5
A Scottish newspaper, 14/7/07
  • I OVERDOSED ON 14 CUPS OF ESPRESSO
  • DEALER'S BABY PLEA IS REJECTED
  • CRUEL DRUNK KILLED PUPPIES
  • TEETOTALLERS GET STONED
  • ROBIN WILLIAMS BACK ON THE WAGON
  • DESPERATE SCOTLANDS POOREST KIDS

6
A Scottish newspaper, 17/06/06
  • Homophobic thugs jailed for 28 years over
    murder
  • Two army psychiatric casualties every day in Iraq
  • Wife-killer dies in prison
  • Suspect charged in shooting incident
  • Boy held over womans death
  • Pub glass ban could make drinking more
    dangerous
  • Hunt after sleeping girl seen locked in car
    boot
  • Girl, 3, targeted by paedophile in McDonalds
  • Domestic abuse helpline calls soaring

7
Same Scottish newspaper, same day
  • Good response to appeal over schoolgirl attacks
  • Eight-year-old among 500 Scots children in drugs
    rehab
  • Golden eagle found poisoned with banned pesticide
    bait on Deeside
  • Youngest mother to be taken into care
  • Bomber hid explosive in his shoe
  • Slums spread as more people become city dwellers
  • Pentagon excludes press from Guantanamo
  • Snipers claim four more killings
  • Ship evacuated after bomb hoax
  • Wifes severed head found at crash site

8
The relationship between risk, drug user,
drug use, and drug-related outcome is
heterogeneous and complex
9
The Medical Model of Substance Addiction
  • Assumes detrimental effects to the individual and
    society.
  • Assumes that drugs do things to people and make
    them behave in certain ways.
  • Psychological factors are seen as secondary, and
    social and cultural factors are mainly just
    referred to.
  • Treatment is usually necessary to stop further
    deterioration.

10
Drug, Set, and Setting
  • DRUG - the pharmacological action of the
    substance.
  • SET - underlying and learned psychological
    aspects of the user (and the influence of genetic
    and biological characteristics).
  • SETTING - situational factors, and the wider
    social and cultural context.

11
Set
  • Many problematic drug users also have (other)
    mental health problems.
  • These could be underlying health problems, they
    could be exacerbated by problematic drug use,
    they may be the result of problematic drug use.
  • There is strong and increasing evidence that many
    problematic drug users are seriously traumatised
    (c.f. The Barlinnie Project).

12
Can you pass the Acid Test
  • On Becoming a Marijuana User (Becker, 1963).
    Arguably one of the earlier modern day examples
    of harm reduction advice
  • To learn how to take the drug to recognise the
    effects to interpret the effects as pleasant.
  • Becker also applied these principles to LSD use
    in the 1960s.
  • As predicted, after an initial flurry of novice
    LSD users entering hospital, these numbers
    drastically reduced.

13
Set - in denial?
  • A paper by Phillip Murphy, Liverpool John Moores
    University presented data from 328 ecstasy users
    and reported that even after two years regular
    use most still felt positive about the drugs
    effects and wished to keep using for this reason.
    His conclusion
  • It is likely that some users come to prefer the
    person they are, and the world they experience,
    under the influence of the drug. This may be seen
    as a form of psychological dependence, even
    though they are not physically addicted to it
    (Quoted in The Observer, 2004).

14
At the top of the hierarchy of harmful drugs of
misuse heroin.
  • The opiates are drugs of addiction anyone who
    takes an opiate for a long enough time will
    become addicted. (Edwards, 1984).
  • Although
  • People who use heroin are highly disposed to
    having serious personal and social problems
    before they touch heroin heroin is a worse
    drug only because worse people use it.
    (Robins, et al. 1980, 2005).

15
At the top of the hierarchy of harmful drugs of
misuse heroin.
  • And it has been argued
  • Their addicts heroin use is anything but an
    escape from life. They are actively engaged in
    meaningful activities seven days a week. They are
    always on the move and must be alert, flexible
    and resourceful. (Preble and Casey, 1969).
  • Some patterns of heroin use can be non-intrusive
    to the user and society. A more integrative
    theoretical understanding of drug use does not
    rest on assumptions about the causal effect of
    simply taking a particular drug heroin (Shewan
    and Dalgarno, 2005).

16
Setting
  • The Rat Park Experiments (Alexander, et al.,
    1994)
  • These involved creating an environment in which
    to carry out these experiments which in an
    experimental psychology context closely resembled
    as practically possible a natural environment.
    As described by Alexander (1994)
  • Rat Park, as it came to be known, was airy and
    spacious, with about 200 times the square footage
    of a standard laboratory cage. It was also
    scenic, (with a peaceful British Columbia forest
    painted on the plywood walls), comfortable, (with
    empty tins, wood scraps, and other desiderata
    strewn about the floor), and sociable (with 16-20
    rats of both sexes in residence at once).
    p.24.

17
Setting
  • Nothing that we tried instilled a strong
    appetite for morphine or produced anything that
    looked like addiction in rats that were housed in
    a reasonably normal environment. p.27.

18
Crack Babies
  • Long-term American research with crack babies
    has indicated that these children are impaired,
    however this impairment has little to do with
    prenatal cocaine exposure and a lot to do with
    social exclusion most crack babies have heard
    gunshots by age 7. Such findings are unpopular
    for many obvious reasons poverty is harder to
    tackle, less easy and popular to campaign
    against, than drug use (Stanton Peele, website).

19
Shewan and Dalgarno, (2005) Controlled Heroin
Use
  • Participants were recruited through social
    networks and must have
  • Illicitly used opiates at least ten times in each
    of the preceding two years.
  • Never been in treatment for any drug (including
    alcohol).
  • Never served a custodial sentence.
  • 126 people living in Glasgow. 75 were male, 25
    female, the mean age was 28.5 years.

20
(No Transcript)
21
(No Transcript)
22
SES, Education, and the general population
  • Occupational status (I highest)
  • SES category I II III IV V
  • Heroin sample 9 29 53 9 0
  • UK population 5 23 48 18 6
  • At the time of the study, levels of the
    population currently in higher education in
    Scotland, was recorded at 47 of the general
    population (Universities Scotland, 2001).
  • There were no significant differences between the
    controlled heroin use sample and the general
    population on either of these variables
    possibly the most important finding in the study.

23
(No Transcript)
24
(No Transcript)
25
Cocaine
  • 65 of those who had used cocaine had used it in
    the six months prior to interview
  • The mean years of use for cocaine was 8 years
  • 52 of those who had used cocaine had used it
    with opiates the main reason being to enhance
    the effects of both drugs.

26
Availability and motivation
  • 84 of the sample reported that for them heroin
    was very easy or easy for them to obtain.
  • 98 of the sample rated heroin as very
    enjoyable to use.
  • These questions werent asked about cocaine, but

27
Injecting and sharing
  • 25 had ever injected 15 had injected within
    the two years prior to interview.
  • Ongoing regular injecting was confined to 5 of
    the sample.
  • 10 had ever shared injecting equipment 3 had
    shared in the two years prior to interview.
  • No participant had tested positive for HIV. One
    participant had tested positive for hepatitis C.

28
Research outcomes
  • At the conclusion of the study, 7 (6/85) of the
    follow-up sample had entered specialist treatment
    for their drug (heroin) use.
  • No participant had died.
  • No participant was serving a custodial sentence.
  • One participant had gone to Amsterdam, had a sex
    change operation (and seemed happy enough).

29
Implications
  • Drugs assumed to be addictive may not necessarily
    be used in an addicted way (e.g. heroin,
    cocaine).
  • Drugs assumed to be harmful may not be
    necessarily so. Drugs assumed to drive criminal
    behaviour may not necessarily do so.
  • Researchers require to collect data from hidden
    populations and not rest primarily on assumptions
    about the causal effects of simply taking a
    particular drug.

30
Drug, Set, and Setting
  • Acknowledges the complexity of drug use and
    addiction provides a model for comparing factors
    associated with problematic versus
    non-problematic drug use.
  • It is a valid framework to predict and explain,
    for example, controlled versus addicted heroin
    use.

31
A medical approach
  • Can be overstated.
  • But, it can be argued, has a range of practical
    values - an improvement in treatment and
    interventions more sympathetic approach from
    family, employers, the criminal justice system.
  • But does a focus on drug help in this respect?

32
Drug, set, and setting
  • Acknowledges the complexity of drug use and
    addiction.
  • Provides a model for comparing factors associated
    with problematic versus non-problematic use of
    particular drugs.
  • As a theory it requires appropriate sampling.
  • It is a useful framework to predict and explain,
    for example, controlled heroin use. Or, chaotic
    use of name drug.

33
Visible harms, unobtrusive users
  • Typically, controlled drug users have jobs, are
    well-educated, and are law-abiding and productive
    members of the community.
  • They also happen to use a lot of drugs, including
    the most harmful. But as drug users, they were
    indeed unobtrusive.
  • So, what would be the ethics of criminalising
    this group because of their drug use? Would this
    be the greater harm?

34
So what do you do?
  • Help people with problems, including their
    problems with drug misuse provide the full range
    of treatment and care options.
  • Education, prevention, harm reduction.
  • Generally, leave people alone who seem okay, and
    dont have problems with the drugs they use.
  • From whatever angle, what use the Misuse of Drugs
    Act?

35
The Delphic System
  • Your expert views please, on
  • Smoking it heroin, right, youll maybe just
    get a little buzz, but if you inject it then
    youre phewww bingoed! So then, of course if
    they tried smoking it and theyre not getting
    their hands on enough of it, which they probably
    arenae, then they try injecting it like whoa
    what a difference!, ken?. So then theyre
    injecting it. Why? Because it works better than
    smoking it. You understand what I mean? male
    prisoner.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com