Title: SOSC 111 - Science Technology and Society Today: week 8 Lesson 15 R
1SOSC 111 - Science Technology and SocietyToday
week 8 Lesson 15R D Spending Who Should Pay
for these Innovations? Oct. 21, 1998
- Dr. Vincent G. Duffy - IEEM
- http//www-ieem.ust.hk/dfaculty/duffy/111
- email vduffy_at_ust.hk
1
2Today
- Questions of the day
- based on reading for today (2 - 1 page readings)
- Alzheimers news clip Pres. Woo news clip
2
3Q1. Why spend Research Development money?
- What is the value?
- Investment in the future
- future products for consumers
- company profitability economic growth
- improve understanding of science, technology and
society - maintain or improve quality of life
3
4Q2. Should government be involved in making
decisions about RD spending? How can
government make informed decisions about
solving complex problems?
- Some say.Govt simply not capable of choosing
- True?
- Does government know enough to decide spending
areas? - On the one hand, it is true, there may be a
narrow viewpoint represented. - However, it is true, government is made of a
cross-section of different knowledge. So maybe
it is ok for government to participate in such
decisions. - What does the Alzheimers article argue?
4
5Technology Health Alzheimer Gene is Near
Identification-reading1
- What is Alzheimers disease?
- Who will benefit from RD spending?
- business or individuals?
- The controversy commercialization of findings
- should the researchers also be able to benefit
from the commercialization of the research - some would argue, no and this could form the
basis for their argument for hands off
5
6Q.3 What does this article represent?
- Programs that attempt to pick winners losers
are corporate welfare - just support/handout to corporations.
- True?
- reasons for or against a hands off policy?
- Some advocate for Hands off policy
- Alzheimers article suggests...
- Hands off...-no govt intervention in spending
decisions - In favor of hands off policy
7
7What about problems that are not profitable to
study?
- Recall the benefits of science research are
sometimes long term - therefore, it may not be profitable for industry
to study some problems. - If it is not profitable in short term, industry
may not pay - then...
- Will we solve society problems if we ignore?
8
8Why did Prof. Woo get involved? -reading 2
- UST President comments on technology policy
- discusses opinions on ...
- should we have one?
- who should pay?
- somebody has to talk
- frustrated by the govt hands-off policy
9
9President Woo argues for...
- Scientists as political advocates. Why?
- Problem benefits of science are uncertain,
unquantifiable and longterm - get technology policy closely coupled w/real
problems - applied research
- Make elected officials aware of value
10
10Q.4 Who should pay?
- O.K. Maybe government can help decidebut who
should pay? - industry?________
- government?_____
- If only industry pays for RD what is the
concern? - Maybe we can let free market decide?
- Why might we care if only industry pays for RD?
11
11Recall Businesses Governments?
Large Countries (based on Assets/size
of economy) Small Countries (based on
Assets/size of economy)
50 Largest companies How large are they?
And H.K.? Will this influence their
relationships?
12
12Lets Consider Let industry pay?
- Disposable cloth diapersenvironmentally equal
- Based on water, power chemicals to clean cloth
diapers - Arthur D. Little Consultants delivered to
legislators - Sponsor Proctor and Gamble, makers of Pampers
- White bread will not make you gain weight
- Cooper Institute for Aerobic Research
- Sponsor Wonder Bread Company
- Chocolate may inhibit cavities
- Princeton Dental Research Center
- Sponsor M M Mars Company
- Bias based on the interests of the sponsor
13
13In summary The danger of a hands off policy
- Key decisions will be left to board rooms of
multi- national firms, discussing and deciding
away from the public - Q4. Who should pay?
- An independent sponsor
- with potential benefits to all
- where benefit not just to few or just one
industry - How to decide?
- informed debate in a public forum
- those familiar with issues should be involved
14
14Guest speaker Monday For section 3-special
arrangement
- We will have a guest speaker on Monday
- from ICAC, Karen Ho
- the times will be 11am, 12noon, 3pm
- Those in the 5pm section can come to 12 noon
- room 5564 near lift 27-28
- (or other time if you are not available at 12)
- Please advise if you plan to come at 11 or 3pm.