SOSC 111 - Science Technology and Society Today: week 8 Lesson 15 R - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 14
About This Presentation
Title:

SOSC 111 - Science Technology and Society Today: week 8 Lesson 15 R

Description:

SOSC 111 - Science Technology and Society. Today: week 8 Lesson 15 ... Sponsor: Proctor and Gamble, makers of Pampers. White bread will not make you gain weight ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:52
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: CCS77
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: SOSC 111 - Science Technology and Society Today: week 8 Lesson 15 R


1
SOSC 111 - Science Technology and SocietyToday
week 8 Lesson 15R D Spending Who Should Pay
for these Innovations? Oct. 21, 1998
  • Dr. Vincent G. Duffy - IEEM
  • http//www-ieem.ust.hk/dfaculty/duffy/111
  • email vduffy_at_ust.hk

1
2
Today
  • Questions of the day
  • based on reading for today (2 - 1 page readings)
  • Alzheimers news clip Pres. Woo news clip

2
3
Q1. Why spend Research Development money?
  • What is the value?
  • Investment in the future
  • future products for consumers
  • company profitability economic growth
  • improve understanding of science, technology and
    society
  • maintain or improve quality of life

3
4
Q2. Should government be involved in making
decisions about RD spending? How can
government make informed decisions about
solving complex problems?
  • Some say.Govt simply not capable of choosing
  • True?
  • Does government know enough to decide spending
    areas?
  • On the one hand, it is true, there may be a
    narrow viewpoint represented.
  • However, it is true, government is made of a
    cross-section of different knowledge. So maybe
    it is ok for government to participate in such
    decisions.
  • What does the Alzheimers article argue?

4
5
Technology Health Alzheimer Gene is Near
Identification-reading1
  • What is Alzheimers disease?
  • Who will benefit from RD spending?
  • business or individuals?
  • The controversy commercialization of findings
  • should the researchers also be able to benefit
    from the commercialization of the research
  • some would argue, no and this could form the
    basis for their argument for hands off

5
6
Q.3 What does this article represent?
  • Programs that attempt to pick winners losers
    are corporate welfare
  • just support/handout to corporations.
  • True?
  • reasons for or against a hands off policy?
  • Some advocate for Hands off policy
  • Alzheimers article suggests...
  • Hands off...-no govt intervention in spending
    decisions
  • In favor of hands off policy

7
7
What about problems that are not profitable to
study?
  • Recall the benefits of science research are
    sometimes long term
  • therefore, it may not be profitable for industry
    to study some problems.
  • If it is not profitable in short term, industry
    may not pay
  • then...
  • Will we solve society problems if we ignore?

8
8
Why did Prof. Woo get involved? -reading 2
  • UST President comments on technology policy
  • discusses opinions on ...
  • should we have one?
  • who should pay?
  • somebody has to talk
  • frustrated by the govt hands-off policy

9
9
President Woo argues for...
  • Scientists as political advocates. Why?
  • Problem benefits of science are uncertain,
    unquantifiable and longterm
  • get technology policy closely coupled w/real
    problems
  • applied research
  • Make elected officials aware of value

10
10
Q.4 Who should pay?
  • O.K. Maybe government can help decidebut who
    should pay?
  • industry?________
  • government?_____
  • If only industry pays for RD what is the
    concern?
  • Maybe we can let free market decide?
  • Why might we care if only industry pays for RD?

11
11
Recall Businesses Governments?
Large Countries (based on Assets/size
of economy) Small Countries (based on
Assets/size of economy)
50 Largest companies How large are they?
And H.K.? Will this influence their
relationships?
12
12
Lets Consider Let industry pay?
  • Disposable cloth diapersenvironmentally equal
  • Based on water, power chemicals to clean cloth
    diapers
  • Arthur D. Little Consultants delivered to
    legislators
  • Sponsor Proctor and Gamble, makers of Pampers
  • White bread will not make you gain weight
  • Cooper Institute for Aerobic Research
  • Sponsor Wonder Bread Company
  • Chocolate may inhibit cavities
  • Princeton Dental Research Center
  • Sponsor M M Mars Company
  • Bias based on the interests of the sponsor

13
13
In summary The danger of a hands off policy
  • Key decisions will be left to board rooms of
    multi- national firms, discussing and deciding
    away from the public
  • Q4. Who should pay?
  • An independent sponsor
  • with potential benefits to all
  • where benefit not just to few or just one
    industry
  • How to decide?
  • informed debate in a public forum
  • those familiar with issues should be involved

14
14
Guest speaker Monday For section 3-special
arrangement
  • We will have a guest speaker on Monday
  • from ICAC, Karen Ho
  • the times will be 11am, 12noon, 3pm
  • Those in the 5pm section can come to 12 noon
  • room 5564 near lift 27-28
  • (or other time if you are not available at 12)
  • Please advise if you plan to come at 11 or 3pm.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com