IST programme INTEGRATED PROGRAMME PORTFOLIO ANALYSIS 2004

1
IST programmeINTEGRATED PROGRAMME PORTFOLIO
ANALYSIS 2004
2
Outline of presentation

• Why IPPA 2004 ?
• Main findings
• Facts and figures
• Portfolio
• Reinforce European strengths
• Exploit new opportunities
• Ensure the co-evolution of technology and
  applications
• Future visions and emerging technologies (FET)
• Support infrastructure development
• SWOT analysis
• The future
• Portfolio analysis and impact observatory

3
WHY IPPA 2004 ?

• Contribute to impact analysis
• Help define priorities for IST WP 2005-06
• Contribute to IST priorities in FP7
• Consolidation of call 1 and call 2 statistical
  analysis
• Snapshot of the project portfolio for each SO
• of projects by instrument and budget
• Budget distribution () per participating country
• Budget for top 20 beneficiaries
• Budget per organisation type
• Objectives and planned deliverables
• For each SO, coverage in terms of effort, actors
  and expected impact
• SWOT analysis.

4
Facts and Figures

• Call 1
• Closed April 2003 funding 1070m
• 236 projects negotiated and launched
• Call 2
• Closed October 2003 funding 525m
• 148 projects under negotiation or launched
• Joint Call with production technologies
• Closed April 2003 funding 60m
• FET (Future and Emerging technologies) Open
• Continuous call funding 60m

5
IST Calls 2003-04 Implementation

• 1,9 out of 3,8 Billion spent in calls in
  2003-04
• More than 400 projects supported
• Out of 2500 proposals received
• More than 6500 participations
• Oversubscription

Funding per InstrumentIST Calls 1 2
6
Participation (I)
7
Participation (II)
8
IST Calls 2003-04 Participation
Academia
Industry
Non-profit org.
9
Participants Highlights

• Organisations from Germany 1 in 15 out of 23
  SOs
• The Fraunhofer Ges. Institutes in top 20 in 21
  SOs
• University of Karlsruhe best funded university
• Italian organisations 1 in 4 SOs
• France 1 in 3 SOs
• Industry top participants Philips, CEA,
  Alcatel, Telefonica, France Telecom, Siemens,
  Ericsson and Nokia

10
Top 20 participants

• FRAUNHOFER GESELLSCHAFT
• INTERUNIVERSITAIR MICRO-ELECTRONICA CENTRUM VZW
• DAIMLERCHRYSLER AG
• COMMISSARIAT A L'ENERGIE ATOMIQUE
• SIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT
• FRANCE TELECOM
• CENTRE NATIONAL DE LA RECHERCHE SCIENTIFIQUE
• UNIVERSITAET KARLSRUHE (TH)
• TELEFONICA
• STMICROELECTRONICS SA
• PHILIPS ELECTRONICS NEDERLAND B.V.
• BRITISH TELECOMMUNICATIONS PLC
• INSTITUTE OF COMMUNICATION AND COMPUTER SYSTEMS
• INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG
• TECHNICAL RESEARCH CENTRE OF FINLAND
• CONSIGLIO NAZIONALE DELLE RICERCHE
• KUNGLIGA TEKNISKA HOEGSKOLAN
• DFKI GMBH
• THALES COMMUNICATIONS S.A.

11
IST Calls 2003-04 Concentration

• Concentration of effort and building critical
  mass
• Total number of projects selected 3 times less
  than FP5 for an equivalent budget
• Average budget of Integrated Projects 5 times
  larger than FP5 projects
• Setting up managing larger projects a
  challenge

12
IST Calls 2003-04 Integration

• More intensive collaboration between various
  actors
• Integrated Projects 2-3 times as many partners
  per project
• From industry, academia and public research labs
• Concern over SME participation
• Integration of effort in an enlarged Europe
  important
• International co-operation

13
Lessons for WP 2005-06 preparation

• Large oversubscription in some fields
• Networked Government, Networked Business, ICT
  forHealth, Technology Enhanced Learning/ Access
  to Cultural Heritage, software, Risk
  Management and Mobile applications Around 10
• Low SMEs participation
• Call1 16 Call2 17
• NoEs 7 IPs 15 STREPs 24
• Integration of the ICT research effort in an
  enlarged Europe
• Participation of Member States that joined the EU
  recently and of Associated Candidate Countries
  below expectations (3 to 4)
• International co-operation
• Domain-specific approaches are needed

14
Lessons on new instruments

• Observations coherent with conclusions of the
  Marimon panel.
• Further concentration
• More ambitious proposals (IPs)
• STREPs continue to be a flexible and well
  understood instrument
• Issues concerning NoEs
• governing rules
• optimal size of NoEs.
• added-value wrt co-ordination actions or SSAs.
• budgeting rules
• practical implementation of lasting
  integration.
• integration across disciplines or across borders.
  
• lack of industrial involvement in NoEs.

15
Portfolio analysis
130 MEuros
450 MEuros
120 MEuros
420 MEuros
480 MEuros
16
Defining the SOs Five main groups (1)

• Reinforce leadership where Europe has
  demonstrated strengths, e.g.
• mobile communications and services, broadband
  communications
• micro-opto electronics µsystems,
• networked audiovisual systems...
• Seize new opportunities that arise from the AmI
  vision and address weaknesses / threats critical
  for its realisation, e.g.
• multimodal interfaces, semantic-based knowledge
  handling,..
• embedded systems,...
• Knowledge and computing GRIDs,
• Security and dependability,

17
Defining the SOs five main groups (2)

• Continued support to leading / challenging
  applications, responding to emerging needs, e.g.
• eHealth, eInclusion, eLearning and culture,
• Entertainment and leisure content
• business support tools, networked
  organisations,...
• Support to research at the frontier of knowledge
• FET open
• FET proactive
• Cognitive systems
• Support to infrastructure development
• Research networking test beds
• Open development platforms
• IST for safety in transport, risk management,..

18
Reinforce leadership where Europe has
demonstrated strength

• Microelectronics
• Microsystems
• Mobile and broadband communications
• Audio-visual systems and consumer electronics
• Objective maintain and further develop Europes
  position on the global scale
• improved structuring of research activities
• continuity of action
• standards and open environments
• pushing the limits of technology

19
Focus CMOS Post CMOS 89 MEuros

20
FP 6-IST Call 1 Processes, Materials, Equipment
Devices - A European Nano-Electronics Cluster
12 projects of ca. 89 M funding...
Materials Defects
Nano Devices Architectures
Virtual 300mm (Fl.Wafer)0
NanoCMOS SINANO Si Processes Devices for
features down to 10 nm
More Moore EUV 45/32/22 nm node
Altern. BE opto on Si (PICMOS)
DesignTechnol. for compound PAs (TARGET)
Altern. FE Ge high k (ET4US)
New Memory Concepts (Nosce Memorias)
Litho-Metrology (Ocsli)
21
Example IP NANOCMOS

• Funding 24.17 million euro (first phase of 27
  months)
• Partners STMicroelectronics, Philips, Infineon,
  IMEC, CEA-LETI, CNRS, FhG-IISB, ZFM, IBS,
  Isiltec, Magwel, ACIES.
• Objectives
• keeping Europe at the forefront of
  nano-electronics
• pushing the limits of semiconductor performance
  and density
• pioneering changes in materials, process modules,
  device architectures and interconnections,
  modelling and simulation work.
• demonstrating the feasibility of 45nm CMOS
  technologies
• exploratory research on critical issues for 32nm
  and 22nm technologies
• aims at pilot manufacturing of 45nm technology in
  2008-09
• Part of a coordinated strategic effort
• ? MEDEA proposal for second phase (integration
  and validation 45nm CMOS 300mm wafer)
• ? links with SINANO Network-of-Excellence (9,9 M
  funding, 3 years, 43 partners)

22
Some Key European Technology Projects
1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003
2004 2005
0.35mm FE 0.35mm BE
ADEQUAT
ADEQUAT-1
ADEQUAT-2
0.25mm FE 0.35mm BE
0.18mm FE 0.25mm BE
ADEQUAT COIN
ACE
0.18-0.15mm FE 0.18mm BE
DAMASCENE
Copper inter.
100 nm FE
HUNT
MEDEA T201
90 nm Full Integr
ARTEMIS
65 nm FE
ULISSE
Cu/low k
MEDEA T207
65 nm Full Integr.
NESTOR
45/32/22 FE
NANOCMOS
45demo 32/22 studies, followed by MEDEA 45
nm full int.
23
Mobile and Wireless Systems beyond 3G
102 MEuro

24
Different Cycles of Innovation
Short cycles

up to

a year
Short cycles

up to
a year
Dynamic evolution of services
Services
Dynamic evolution of services
Services
Regular updates of targets required
Regular updates of targets required
Medium cycles

several years
Medium cycles

several years
Networks
for IP based functions (e.g. for mobility)
Networks
for IP-based functions (e.g. for mobility)
operation
Migration to IPv6 will take longer
Systems B3G in
Long cycles

up to
a decade
Long cycles

up to
a decade
Investigation and test of new radio technology
Investigation and test of new radio technology
Radio
Radio
Regulation and allocation of spectrum
Regulation and allocation of spectrum
Development of radio products
Development of radio products
Source Mobile Technology Platform
25
Mobile and Wireless Systems beyond 3G

• Dynamic network composition
• WWI AMBIENT
• Personal Area networks
• MAGNET
• Smart Antennas
• ACE (NoE)

New instruments coverage
Satellite overlay network MAESTRO SATNEX (NoE)
End to end service delivery /Convergence DAIDALOS

• UWB systems
• PULSERS
• New Radio access
• for terrestrial systems Beyond 3G
• WINNER
• NEWCOM (NoE)

Re-configurable radio and networks E2R
26
Daidalos
Application / Content
Pervasive services framework and API
Personalised
Platform for Pervasive Applications
Context adaptation
information delivery
and communication
Rules and policy engine
Context inference engine
Personalisation user interfaces
Service Provisioning
Multimedia
Session migration
Conferencing
Mobile data transfer
Telephony
-
SIP
Network management
Mobility
Network
Content
Content
context
context
Pricing
Pricing
Mobility
Mobility
Management
Adaptation
Adaptation
Information
Information
Broadcast
Broadcast
Location
Signalling
Location information
Information
Multicast
Multicast
Resource Monitoring
Resource Management
A4C
QoS
QoS
Metering
Metering
Security
Security
A4C
Mobile IPv6
Access Technologies
DVB
-
T W
-
CDMA TD
-
CDMA Ethernet WLAN
Bluetooth
wireless
wireless
fixed
fixed
infrastructure
infrastructure
ad hoc
ad hoc
27
Broadband for All
85.4 MEuro

28
Broadband Projects Coverage
Optical Core Network Technologies
Broadband Access Technologies
LASAGNE
NOBEL (IP)
29
Explore new opportunities that will lead to
future markets

• Opto-electronics
• Embedded technologies
• Semantic-based knowledge systems
• Display technologies
• Intelligent interfaces and environments
• Security-related developments
• GRID research

30
Opto-electronics and Photonics
56 MEuro
13.5
SME estimate 13
31
Coverage
OPTIMIST-EPIC-COST, Athens 2004
H. Rajbenbach
32
Photonics Technology coverage
16 selected proposals

Microelec / Photonic integration
Active / passive integration (Photonic Integrated
circuits)
Active components (Lasers and LED)
Passive components
Nanophotonics, Photonic crystals
33
Example TERANOVA

• Research
• Terahertz Sensing Imaging for
• - Biotechnology (bio molecule and DNA sensing)
• - Healthcare (medical imaging)
• - Security (access control, explosives,
  bio-agents)
• - Process Monitoring (micro- nanoelectronics)
• Partnership
• Large Industry (BAe Systems, Evotec, Renishaw,
  Thales)
• SMES (Alpes Lasers, Femtolasers, TeraView)
• Universities (Aachen, Delft, Durham, Leeds,
  Neuchatel, Freiburg
• Paris-VII, Pisa, Wien)
• Contract
• IP, 4 years, 5 M grant

H. Rajbenbach
34
Embedded systems
58 MEuro
35
IP Example DECOS (19 Partners )

• Industrial Partners
• Audi Electronics Venture, Airbus, EADS,
  Infineon, TTTech, Fiat, Profactor, Hella,
  Liebherr, Thales, Esterel
• Research Centers
• ARC Seibersdorf (Co-ordinator), SP Swedish Test.
  Res. Inst.
• Universities
• TU Vienna, TU Darmstadt, TU Hamburg, Uni Kassel,
  Uni Kiel, Uni Budapest

• Duration 3 Years,
• Budget 14.3 Mio
• EU Funding 9 Mio

36
DECOS Motivation
Facilitate the systematic design deployment of
integrated electronic subsystems in embedded
systems through

• Electronic Hardware Cost Reduction
  (fewer ECUs, cables, connectors)
• Enhanced Dependability by Design
  
• (clear partitioning of safety-critical
  
• and non safety-critical subsystems
• by design)
• Reduced Development Costs
  (modular certification, reuse of software
• components, structured integration for
• communication computational elements)
• Diagnosis and Maintenance
  (diagnosis of transient and intermittent
  component failures)
• Intellectual Property (IP) Protection

37
DECOS Application Areas

• Automotive
• Aerospace
• Railways
• Industrial Control
• Medical Systems
• Autonomous Systems

• DECOS will develop structured guidelines for
  domain-independant and technology independent
  integration.

38
New opportunities Focus Semantic-based knowledge
systems
73 MEuro
39
Leading and challenging applications responding
to emerging needs

• e-Government
• e-Business
• ICT for health care
• e-Inclusion
• e-Safety
• e-Learning
• e-Culture
• Objective
• Exploit new markets that will emerge from the
  deployment of societal applications
• Bring technology closer to peoples needs

40
EGov/eBusiness
41
EGov/eBusiness participation
eBusiness
eGovernment
42
Leading applications Focus eGovernment
Text-to-Speech and Speech Synthesis
42
Maturity
43
FP6 Integrated Project


e
-
e
-
Admin
ICT functionalities to deliver an Integrated Open
System City Platform (IOSCP)..
Mobility
System

System
Integrated Open System

City Platform



Local eG
overnment Interface based on
XML, XSL, VRML, eGIF other standards

Decision and analysis system supported by
GIS and other analysis tools such as data
mining, etc.

Integrated multi
-
di
mensional
database with intelligent

information management.
e
-
Land
-
Includes spatial data for buildings
Use
and land, economic, social, and

environmental data.

System





e
-
Inclusion

Wired
Wireless

System

System



Project Number 507860
44
eHealth
45
FET
Open
Proactive
46
Conclusion SWOT analysis (I)

• Strengths
• FP6 orientations have been well received
• Focus on Europes major strengths continues
• FET remains an incubator
• From short-term to long term and from generic to
  applied research.
• Weaknesses
• High oversubscription in some fields
• SME participation
• Participation of New Member States
• Participation of third countries

47
Conclusion SWOT analysis (II)

• Opportunities
• Multi-disciplinarity
• New Member States
• Embedding of ICT in applications
• Impact on EU-wide policies
• Key technologies will help solve trust and
  security challenges
• FET as a pathfinder
• Threats
• New instruments need new and adequate ways of
  management and monitoring
• Involvement of SMEs
• IPR issues in large consortia
• Concentration on short term issues
• Role and performance of NoEs in some areas.
• Fragmented value chains, still more integration..
• Different innovation cycles

48
Next steps

• Statistics need to be refined
• Content analysis needs to be deepened More
  semantics
• IPPA as an integral part of wider Impact
  Analysis