Swine Manure: Does It Add or Subtract From Your Bottom Line - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 17
About This Presentation
Title:

Swine Manure: Does It Add or Subtract From Your Bottom Line

Description:

Amount of Manure Available, Nutrient Concentration, Acres Available for Nitrogen ... Economics of Supplying Nutrient Needs of 1,000 Acres of Corn (120-50-50) With ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:211
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: billla6
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Swine Manure: Does It Add or Subtract From Your Bottom Line


1
Swine Manure Does It Add or Subtract From Your
Bottom Line?
2
Possible Applications for the Economic Model
  • Calculating the Economic Value of Manure to a
    Livestock Enterprise
  • Manure Sale/Transfer Decisions
  • Measuring the Economic Impact of Environmental
    Regulations

3
Things to Consider in Comparing Manure
Application Systems and Fine-tuning a System
  • Amount of Manure Available, Nutrient
    Concentration, Acres Available for Nitrogen-Using
    Crop and Fertility Needs/A
  • Capital and Labor Availability and Time Window
    for Applying (Weather Risk)
  • Equipment and Management Required for Uniform
    Application
  • Yield Impacts of Manure Application Not Directly
    Related to N, P, and K Amounts
  • Phosphorus Banking for Future Years (Assuming Low
    Soil Tests)

4
(No Transcript)
5
The Economic Model
  • Fertilizer replacement value
  • Machinery economic costs of ownership and
    operation
  • Time required
  • application time
  • travel and loading time (tank systems)

6
Model input parameters
7
Model input parameters (continued)
8
Model input parameters (continued)
9
Economics of Supplying Nutrient Needs of 1,000
Acres of Corn (120-50-50) With One Million
Gallons of Manure (60-50-40 per 1,000 Gallons),
Producer Perspective
10
Impact of Later Years' Crop Nutrient Needs, Yield
Effects, and Soil Test Levels on the Economics of
Supplying Crop Needs With Manure, 1,000 Acres of
Corn
11
Impact of Later Years' Crop Nutrient Needs, Yield
Effects, and Soil Test Levels on the Economics of
Supplying Crop Needs With Manure, 1,000 Acres of
Corn (continued)
12
(No Transcript)
13
Conclusions
  • Manure with high nutrient concentration has more
    potential for a high fertilizer replacement
    value.
  • Low rate manure is usually less profitable to
    apply than is commercial fertilizer.
  • High nutrient manure is suited to low application
    rate technology.
  • Low nutrient manure is suited to high rate
    application technology such as drag hose systems.
  • Higher crop needs favor high nutrient manure.
  • It is difficult to use manure in a cost effective
    way when crop needs are low.

14
Conclusions
  • Low rate application introduces risks with
    nutrient availability and uniformity of
    application.
  • Some starter may be advisable. Low-rate
    application introduces risks related to nutrient
    availability and uniformity of application. Some
    equipment may deliver manure unevenly at low
    rates, particularly at the ends of wide booms.
    Also, errors in availability estimates,
    inaccurate calibration, or environmental
    conditions that reduce nutrient availability can
    result in deficiency situations. Some commercial
    starter or pop-up fertilizer is advisable when
    manure is relied on as a major source of
    nutrients.
  • Low rate application extends the non-NPK yield
    benefits to more acres if those acres are
    available.
  • In an economic analysis of a particular operation
    such as applying manure, the method used to
    determine ownership costs of tractors or other
    equipment that is shared with other operations is
    critical in the analysis.

15
Conclusions
  • Under conditions of high crop need and
    high-density manure, cost-effective hauling
    distances are greater than commonly believed.
  • Application time is probably more constraining
    under these conditions. Low-rate application may
    result in unreasonably long time requirements for
    application, depending on how equipment is
    matched to manure volume.
  • With low crop need and low-density manure,
    cost-effective hauling distance falls
    dramatically and a waste disposal mode is soon
    reached.

16
Conclusions
  • The role of the custom applicator needs to be
    considered in the design of policies for
    discouraging over-application of manure.
  • The path of least resistance for a custom
    applicator with a certain income goal might be to
    offer a competitive per-gallon charge and then
    apply at a high rate to maximize volume and
    revenue. Educational programs might be needed to
    identify combinations of per-gallon custom
    charges and per-acre application rates that allow
    both the producer and the custom applicator to
    prosper.

17
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com