LTCOL B'A' Richards, Deputy Director Combat - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 16
About This Presentation
Title:

LTCOL B'A' Richards, Deputy Director Combat

Description:

Enhance the survivability of land forces in combat ... BUSHMASTER: 299. LAND 121 PH3A. LAND 121 PH3B. B VEH. 2015. 2020. 2010. M113: 766. M113AS3/4: 350 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:25
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: yurish
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: LTCOL B'A' Richards, Deputy Director Combat


1
LAND 400 UPDATE
SURVIVABILITY OF GROUND FORCES
LTCOL B.A. Richards, Deputy Director Combat
2
SCOPE
  • Government guidance
  • Justification
  • Development concepts
  • Current intent
  • Conclusion

3
SURVIVABILITY OF GROUND FORCES
  • Enhance the survivability of land forces in
    combat operations through the provision of new
    warfighting systems
  • Incrementally replace the Armys current combat,
    combat support and some combat service support
    systems

4
GOVERNMENT GUIDANCE
  • Life of type of current land fighting vehicle
    systems (M113AS3 and ASLAV) is about 2020
  • Commence replacement of some elements of the
    system from about 2015
  • Year of decision 2011-14
  • Estimated budget A1B-1.5B

5
STRATEGY
  • Land 400 Phase 1 will commence replacement of the
    ADFs combat team systems from 2015 to support a
    more survivable, capable and interoperable range
    of land combat options, with reduced operating
    costs and sustainable Australian content, to
    ensure the Australian Army remains above regional
    capabilities and continues to meet Government
    expectations

6
JUSTIFICATION
  • Achieve ADF strategic tasks
  • Meet future close combat capability requirements
  • Control net personnel and operating costs

7
COMPLEX WARFIGHTING
  • Enhance ground combat force survival
  • below the detection threshold
  • when the enemy seeks to hide in complex terrain
  • in penetrating complex terrain to win close
    combat
  • to create, support, request and/or coord
    recon-fire actions
  • when operating in small groups

8
FLEET TRANSITION
LEO 103
Retain/Rebuild M1A1?
M1A1 M88A2 66
LAND 400 PHASE 1
M113AS3/4 350
LAND 400
M113 766
BUSHMASTER 299
PHASES 2-3?
PHASE 4 ENHANCEMENT (Yet to be approved)
ASLAV 257
LAND 121 PH3A
LAND 121 PH3B
B VEH
2005
2015
2020
2010
9
DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT
10
Land 400 Combat System Encompasses all CVS in the
land output their platforms, integrated attribute
sub-systems and hosted weapons, sensors and
knowledgesystems allocated to combined arms teams
Phase 1 introduces priority CVS,establishes
system ILS Introduces an advanced Trainingsystem
Platforms Individual Combat Vehiclesincluding
unmanned systems
Attribute Sub-SystemsMob, surv, Knlge,
Leth,Sustain
Hosted Sub-SystemsMor, AD, AT, EW, Mob,CtrMob,
C4,
11
(No Transcript)
12
SYSTEM NEED STATEMENT
  • LAND 400 will deliver a future combat vehicle
    system consisting of network capable manned and
    unmanned ground and air platforms from 2015 with
    a superior balance of survivability, knowledge,
    lethality, mobility and sustainability that can
    survive and win combat in open and complex
    terrain within a wide range of environments, in
    order for Army to continue to present viable land
    combat options to Government.

13
KEY REQUIREMENTS
  • Under development
  • Key areas
  • deployment and mobility
  • survivability
  • lethality
  • command, control and ISR
  • support and sustainment

14
SENIOR GUIDANCE
  • More analysis needed to pass Troika and 1st Pass
    committees
  • Understanding required about Armys shape and
    rotation posture
  • Total scope of LAND 400 important
  • Assessment. Need to find balance between Army
    structures, project options and stakeholder
    preferences

15
WAY AHEAD
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2005
2012
REQTS OPTIONS
BUSINESS CASE
COMMITTEE
TENDER
BUSINESS CASE
COMMITTEE
2
2ND PASS?
16
CONCLUSION
  • LAND 400 will enhance the survivability of land
    forces in combat operations through the provision
    of new combat systems
  • It will require a sophisticated balance between
    Army structures, project options and stakeholder
    preferences
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com