INTERTANKO

1

• INTERTANKO
• Latin American Panel
• Miami.
• 16th November 2005
• Terminal Vetting Database
• Vetting Inspection Feedback Forms

2
THE TVD CONCEPT Although Ships are Vetted they
are Sometimes asked to Make Fast to Poor Quality
Berths WE KNOW THE VETTING PROCESS WORKS FOR
SHIPS, SO WHY NOT TRY IT ON THE TERMINALS ??
3
FROM THIS CONCEPT THE TERMINAL VETTING DATABASE
WAS BORN
4
From a Small Start We have over 107 Companies
Participating
5
THE FORM IS SIMPLE ONE PAGE USER FRIENDLY
6
The Ratings Explained

• 1. Poor Worse than average in all areas, needs
  a lot of improvement.
• 2. Below Average Worse than average in some
  areas, could use some improvements.
• 3. Average Fully adequate
• 4. Above Average Better than average in some
  regards.
• 5. Excellent Of a very high quality in all
  regards

7
A Detailed Overview of the Questions
8
(No Transcript)
9
The Primary Purpose of the TVD -

• TO SERVE TANKER OWNERS AND OPERATORS
• ENHANCE TERMINAL SAFETY
• REDUCE OPERATOR DOWNTIME
• SEEK MUTUAL COOPERATION WITH THE TERMINALS
• ENHANCE OVERALL EFFICIENCY

10
We Currently have over 7200 reports in the
Database
11
Number of reports received for each country
within Europe
12
Number of reports received for each country
within Asia
13
Number of reports received for each country
within Americas
14
Number of reports received for each country
within Australasia
15
Number of reports received for each country
within Africa
16
Number of reports received for each country
within the Middle East
17
Total Number of Countries listed within each
Region
18
ONLY 22 of Terminals will accept Slops
19
ONLY29 of Load Ports issue an MSDS
20
Top 10 Ports
N. Zealand Australia Colombia
Italy N. Zealand N. Zealand N.
.Zealand N. Zealand Panama Malaysia
21
The 10 Worse Ports
Russia USA
Argentina Egypt Brunei
Peru Libya Colombia China
Syria
22
Top 10 Terminals
N. Orleans Brofjorden N.
Plymouth Pascagoula Fawley Tuapse
San Nicolas Botany Bay Montreal
Riga (USA)
(Sweden) (New Zealand) (U.S.A)
(UK) (Russia) (Argentina)
(Australia) (Canada) (Latvia)

23
The 10 Worse Terminals
Banias Dos Bocas Sidi Kerir
Tumaco Balikpapan Zawia
Huangpu Seria Shekou
Tartous (Syria) (Mexico)
(Egypt) (Colombia) ( Indonesia)
(Libya) (China) (Brunei)
(China) (Syria)
24
3 LEVELS OF UTILITY

• Level 1 Vessel Manager can review terminals
• prior to vessels call

Level 2 Owners can review and follow up on any
problems individually with his terminal
counterparts
Level 3 The Intertanko Vetting Committee can be
tasked to follow up with any problem terminals
not responding to Owners observations
25

• TO DATE WE HAVE RECEIVED OVER 7200 REPORTS
• INDUCED AT LEAST TWO TERMINALS TO MAKE EXTENSIVE
  IMPROVEMENTS
• STARTED CONSTRUCTIVE DIALOGUES WITH MANY OTHERS.
• STARTED A NEW JOINT VENTURE WITH B.P.
  

26

• BP is closely cooperating with INTERTANKO on this
  project
• BP has amended its own terminal feedback report
  form to include the information required by
  INTERTANKO.
• BP has created an automated system so that a BP
  terminal report can be input directly to the
  INTERTANKO database.
• INTERTANKO is supplying feedback to BP on
  terminals that are reported with a low score.
• BP and INTERTANKO then work together to address
  safety concerns at these terminals.

27

• BUT THERE IS MUCH MORE TO DO !!!

• We need more direct inputting from each Company
• We need to streamline data entry procedures
• We need to keep building our database volume
• We need to keep marketing the product
• We are encouraging other Oil Companies to sign
  up.

28

• Thank You