Thermodynamics and thermal measurements at the nanoscale - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 38
About This Presentation
Title:

Thermodynamics and thermal measurements at the nanoscale

Description:

Thermodynamics and thermal measurements at the nanoscale – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:158
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 39
Provided by: serveurwe
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Thermodynamics and thermal measurements at the nanoscale


1
Thermodynamics and thermal measurements at the
nanoscale
  • Florian ONG, Olivier BOURGEOIS
  • Institut Néel, Grenoble
  • GDR Physique Mésoscopique, Aussois Mars 2007

2
Overview
  • How is macroscopic thermodynamical description
    affected as one reduces system sizes ?
  • a thermodynamical limit is not reached
  • a importance of fluctuations
  • High Surface/Volume ratio
  • a Surface Energy term in Uint
  • a Loss of extensivity of U and S
  • Are local variables well defined ?
  • What are the effects of confinement ?
  • What changes in heat transfer when phonon mean
    free path and/or wavelength exceeds samples
    dimensions ?

3
Motivations
  • To bring a different and innovative point of view
    on mesoscopic physics (complementary to
    electrical transport, magnetization,
    spectroscopy)
  • To predict heat transfers in nanodevices, to
    control heating processes

4
Outline
  • Temperature at the nanoscale
  • Some thermodynamic descriptions of small systems
  • Thermal transport in nanoconductors
  • Specific heat nanocalorimetry

5
Existence of temperature at nanoscale
  • Thermodynamical limit fundation
  • interaction I between parts of a system becomes
    negligible, and so extensivity can hold
  • How does I scale when N is finite ?
  • What is the minimum size of a system to define T ?

6
Temperature at nanoscale
Hartmann et al. PRL 93 80402 (2004)
  • MODEL
  • 1D macroscopic chain of N identical particles at
    temperature T
  • (ie described by a canonical state at T)
  • First neighbour interaction Vj,j1
  • Division into NG groups of n particles
  • QUESTIONS
  • How does In scale with n ?
  • What is the minimal groupe size nmin so as Tloc
    is defined (ie so as reduced density matrix may
    be approximated by a canonical one at Tloc)

7
Hartmann et al. PRL 93 80402 (2004)
Hartmann et al. EPL 65 613 (2004)
  • RESULTS
  • Inter-group interaction In a
  • Condition on n so as a group can be described by
    thermodynamics
  • If Tloc exists, Tloc T

Width of the energy distribution of the total
system
EXAMPLE Vj,j1 harmonic potential
nmin constant for T gt qD a (T/ qD )3
for T lt qD nmin depends on T (quantum
effect) lmin nmin a0 Carbon lmin 10 µm
at 300K Silicium lmin 10 cm at 1K !!!
(1D chain) (100nm for 3D)
8
Hills nanothermodynamics
  • Motivations
  • Early 1960s study of macromolecular solutions
  • 2000s growing interest due to nanofabrication
    progress
  • Growing interest in completely open systems
    (µ,p,T)
  • (open aggregates in biology, metastable
    droplets in vapor)
  • Philosophy
  • Before Gibbs dE TdS pdV at equilibrium
    (1st principle)
  • Late XIXth Gibbs generalized by allowing
    variations of the number of molecules dE TdS
    pdV µdN
  • introduction of Free Energy functions
  • treatment of various equilibria (chemical
    reactions, phase transitions)

9
Hill NanoLett. 1 273 (2001)
  • Hills contribution Gibbs description cannot
    hold for small systems, because a surface energy
    term N2/3 cannot be neglected
  • there should be another term added in the
    right-hand side of the 1st principle
  • Modification of Gibbs equation at the ensemble
    level
  • S system containing N equivalent and
    non-interacting small systems
  • S is a macroscopic system obeying Eq Gibbs new
    term
  • dEt TdSt - pdVt µdNt EdN
  • E subdivision potential system chemical
    potential

10
Hill NanoLett. 1 273 (2001)
  • Consequences
  • In macrosystems surface/edges effectsare
    negligible, so E 0
  • -SdT Vdp Ndµ 0
  • Gibbs-Duhem relation intensive variables
    (µ,T,p) are not independent !
  • (usual choice of (T,p) couple to describe
    systems)
  • Back to small systems
  • Integration gives Et TSt pVt µNt
    EN
  • dE -SdT Vdp Ndµ
  • In contrast to macrosystems, (µ,T,p ) are
    independent
  • ( A macrosystem has one less degree of freedom
    ! )

11
  • Consequences
  • Influence of environnement
  • Energy, entropy depend on the choice of
    environnemental variables
  • Fluctuations
  • completely open systems (µ,p,T) large
    fluctuations of extensive parameters (N,V,S)

Hill NanoLett. 1 273 (2001)
Hill Chamberlain NanoLett. 2 609 (2002)
1/N for macrosystem 1 for small system
12
Abes Nanothermodynamics
  • Hill Modification of thermodynamical relation
    by adding a term.
  • Consequence
  • large fluctuations of variables
  • Abe Incorporation of fluctuations at the
    beginning ( by averaging the Boltzmann-Gibbs
    distribution over a T distribution)

13
Rajagopal, Pande Abe, Proceedings of Indo-US
Workshop (2004)
  • c²-distribution of b1/kT width q-1
  • theory of large deviations

Tsallis Entropy (pi microstate probability)
If q1 (no temerature fluctuations) one
recovers Gibbs entropy
14
Thermodynamics with Tsallis entropy
Beck EPL 57 329 (2002)
  • relevant for systems with long range
    interactions, and for systems with T fluctuations
    and/or dissipation of energy
  • Hydrodynamic tubulence
  • Scattering processes in particle physics
  • Self-gravitating systems in astrophysics
  • Non additivity of Tsallis Entropy
  • Thermodynamics principles
  • 1st law OK (conservation of Energy)
  • 3rd law OK (defines the ordered state)
  • 2nd law OK if Abe et al. PRL 91 120601
    (2003)

15
Thermal transport in 1D conductors
  • -- Study of thermal conductivity k in
    monocrystaline conductors whose size is smaller
    than the dominant phonon wavelength.
  • For silicium qD(Si)625K
  • 1K lT0.1 µm
  • 100 mK lT1 µm
  • Bulk Diamond has the higher k reported what
    about carbon nanotubes ?
  • Analogy with Landauer description of transport
    one thermal conductance quantum per channel

16
Thermal Conductance of CNTs
  • CNTs vs Silicium nanowires
  • SWNT d1nm real 1D behavior
  • C-C strongest chemical bond in nature
  • (Diamond k2300-3320 W/m.K)
  • ph-ph scattering limited by interfaces with
    vacuum (restricted number of final states)
  • other scattering processes limited by high
    structural perfection
  • Exceptionally high thermal conductivity is
    predicted (k6600 W/mK)
  • Berber et al. PRL 84 4613 (2000)
  • Possible Waveguide for heat transfer ??

17
Thermal Conductance of CNTs
Hone et al. PRB 59 R2514 (1999)
  • Macroscopic Bundles of SWCNTs (d1.4 nm)
  • K(T) measured by a comparative method
  • Measure of selec(T) (non metallic for
    Tlt150K)
  • Room T ksingleCNT 1750-5800 W/m.K

Wiedman Franz ratio k/(selec T) gt 100
L0 Transport is dominated by phonons at low T
  • Low T
  • ka T for Tlt30K
  • Energy-independent mean free path
  • 0.5-1.5 µm , due to surface scattering

18
Kim et al. PRL 87 215502 (2001)
First measure of k of a single MWCNT (d14 nm,
L2.5µm) Suspended SiN device T 8-370 K
Room T k gt 3000 W/m.K mfp 500 nm T gt 320 K
Umklapp phonon scattering Tlt320 K nearly
ballistic transport
Ballistic or diffusive transport ? remains
unclear !
19
Thermal conductance of crystaline nanostructures
  • Conductive wires metals, nGaAs
    (electron heating technique, 1985-1995)
  • poor e-ph scattering at low T
  • e- short-circuit the thermal transport
  • Phonon contribution hard to isolate

20
Isolation of phonon contribution Fon et al. PRB
66 45302 (2002)
  • Better understanding of phonon scattering
    mechanisms
  • kbeamltlt kbulk reduction of mfp due to
  • enhanced surface scattering
  • reduction of group velocity
  • reduction of DOS
  • 4-10 K diffuse surface scattering
  • ( ldo (4K) 10 nm 3D model )
  • 20-40 K Umklapp processes turn on

Comparative measurement (4-40K)
21
Thermal conductance 3w method
Lu et al. RevSciInst 72 2996 (2001)
4 point probe resistance measurement
transducer is ac-biased by a current I and V is
measured with a lock-in amplifier
- V1w(T) gives access to R(T) and R(T) - V3w(T)
carries thermal information
Limiting cases
g characteristic time for axial thermal
processes
22
Application of 3w method
  • Tgt1.3K
  • K(T) 2,6.10-11 T3 W/K
  • With fitting param mfp set to 620 nm
    scattering by specular reflexions on surfaces
  • Low T deviation increased mfp due to ldom (T)gt
    roughness

Bourgeois et al. JAP 101 16104 (2007)
  • Roughness effect experimental study of
    conductors with a modulated width
  • see Cleland et al. PRB 64 172301 (2001) for
    predictions

ldom(T) L
L
see Jean-Savin Herons poster for latest
measurements
23
Quantized Thermal Conductance
Maynard PRB 32 5440 (1985) disordered
systems prediction of universal regime of
phonon thermal conductance
L TL
  • Rego et al. PRL 81 232 (1998)
  • Landauer formalism heat flow between two phonon
    reservoirs

R TR
va(k)dwa/dk is canceled by the 1D DOS dk/dwa
24
  • Now 2 hypotheses
  • Adibaticity of contacts
  • Only acoustic phonons contribute to thermal
    transport at low temperature
  • In this limit, the conductance of one 1D
    ballistic channel
  • has the upper bound

g0 1 pW/K x T
(Another derivation Blencowe et al. PRB 59 4992
(1998) is based on quantization of classical
mechanics describing the lattice)
25
Measurement of g0
Schwab et al. Nature 404 974 (2000)
- SiN suspended membrane (60nm thick) - 2 Cr/Au
transducers - Noise thermometry - Adiabaticity
achieved through catenoidal contacts (cf Rego PRL
1998)
4 modes per conductor (1 longitudinal, 2
transverse, 1 torsional) 4 conductors A plateau
at 16g0 is expected at low T Limits of this
(beautiful) experiment - never reproduced -
parasitic thermal conductance of superconducting
Nb leads unclear that it can be neglected
26
Why are there no conductance steps ?
Quantization of electronic transport sharp
steps each time a conductance
channel opens up
Quantization of thermal transport we observe
only a plateau at low T
Phonon case - occupation tuned by T when T
increases more states are occupied - Range of
effective modes and thermal broadening are both
tuned by T the width of the distribution masks
the quantum signature of transport !
Electron case - states are full or empty
discontinuous steps characterize change of
occupation - eF tuned by gate voltage Width of
thermal broadening tuned by T two independent
parameters
27
Low temperature Specific heat (LTSH)
Isolated system
dQ introduced
dT measured
Adiabatic method
28
LTSH techniques for small systems
  • Adiabatic method impossible to isolate system
    from thermal bath !
  • Two methods adapted to Tlt1K and small systems
  • - Relaxation method (time constant method)
  • - ac method
  • In both cases C Csyst Caddenda
  • need for high resolution DC/C
  • need for highly sensitive thermometry

29
Relaxation Method
Bachmann et al. RevSciInst 43 205 (1972)
  • Heating power P0
  • Sample heated at T0 DT
  • Heater turned of

t1 relaxation time t1 C/K C(DT/P0)
  • Advantages
  • - accuracy 1
  • easy to average numerous decays
  • can be used with sample of poor thermal
    conductivity
  • Drawbacks
  • - small C need for fast electronics
  • difficulty to determine t1 accurately

30
ac calorimetry method
F. Sullivan and G. Seidel, Phys. Rev. 679 173
(1968)
Oscillating power P0 injected at frequency f
Oscillations of temperature dTac at same
frequency f
t1 relaxation time to the bath t2 internal
diffusion time Kb thermal conductance to the
bath Ks internal thermal conductance
31
  • Simplifications
  • Structuration of calorimeter Kb ltlt Ks
  • Choice of frequency (experimental)
  • Conditions of Quasi-adiabaticity

C P0/(2pfdTac)
  • Drawbacks
  • accuracy 5
  • restriction of frequencies
  • high internal heat conduction required
  • Advantages
  • - detect very small changes of C
  • stationary method averaging

32
Recent achievements
33
  • Bourgeois et al. PRL 94 57007 (2005)
  • Suspended Silicium membrane (5-10 µm thick)
  • assembly of 106 non interacting objects
  • addenda 50 pJ/K at 0.5 K
  • ac method
  • Copper heater and NbN thermometer
    (metal-insulator transition at tunable T)
  • Best Resolution DC/C5x10-5 at O.5 K
  • sensitivity 500 kB/object
  • Fon et al. Nanolett 5 1968 (2005)
  • Suspended SIN (120 nm thick)
  • Single object
  • addenda 0.4 fJ/K at 0.6 K
  • relaxation method
  • Au heater and AuGe thermometer (resistive)
  • Best resolution DC/C1x10-4 at 2K
  • sensitivity 36000 kB/object

34
Thermal signature of Little-Parks effect
F.R. Ong et al. PRB 74 140503(R) (2006)
f0-periodic Modulation of phase diagram first
free-contact measure
f0-periodic modulation of the height of the C
jump at the transition
35
Vortex matter in superconducting disks
  • Modulation by external magnetic field H of Tc and
    of DC
  • more pronounced than in the ring geometry
  • no periodicity !
  • (fluxoid is quantized in a non-rigid contour)

Giant vortex states Y(r,q)f(r)exp(2pLq)
vorticity L number of vorticies threading a
single disk
36
Vortex matter in superconducting disks
  • phase transitions between successive giant vortex
    states
  • strong hysteresis and metastability
  • Hnup penetration field of the nth vortex
  • Hndwn expulsion field of the nth vortex

37
Vortex matter in superconducting disks
  • good agreement and complementary to Baelus et
    al., PRB 58 140502 near Tc
  • different behaviors are expected between FC and
    zero field cooled (ZFC) scans of CH(T)

38
Summary
  • Theoritical descriptions of thermodynamics of
    small systems do exist
  • their experimental demonstration is still
    challenging
  • only non-extensivity has been demonstrated
  • (modulation of heat capacity by external
    parameter, geometry dependence)
  • Thermal conductance of 1D conductors
  • CNTs subject to large uncertainties
  • quantum of thermal conductance still has to be
    demonstrated
  • better knowledge needed to improve heat capacity
    nanosensors
  • Heat capacity sensors
  • towards the measurement of a single nano-object
  • behaviour at low T (lt100 mK) is problematic (e-ph
    coupling, internal conduction) better
    knowledge through experiments !
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com