The Navigable Waters Protection Act Regulatory Inefficiency A Prime Example - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

The Navigable Waters Protection Act Regulatory Inefficiency A Prime Example

Description:

Identify projects and develop suitable criteria to appropriately risk manage ... by-clause and gap analysis of existing legislation. Identification of ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:32
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: pearce
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Navigable Waters Protection Act Regulatory Inefficiency A Prime Example


1
The Navigable Waters Protection ActRegulatory
Inefficiency - A Prime Example
  • Presentation to NRCan
  • Regulatory Efficiency Workshop
  • March 8, 2007 - Ottawa

2
Overview
  • The Act (NWPA)
  • The Program (NWPP)
  • The Challenges
  • Current Initiatives

3
The Act - History
  • One of the oldest pieces of legislation
  • 1882 An Act respecting Bridges over Navigable
    Waters constructed under authority of Provincial
    Acts
  • 1883 named works added
  • bridges
  • booms
  • Dams
  • causeways
  • 1886 wharves, docks, piers, and other
    structures added
  • 1985 latest amendment (purely editorial)

4
The Act Administration
  • Administered by NWPP Within -
  • 1882 1966 Department of Public Works
  • 1966 1996 Transport Canada (Canadian Coast
    Guard)
  • 1996 2004 Fisheries and Oceans (Canadian
    Coast Guard)
  • March 2004 Transport Canada (Marine Safety)

5
The Program Mandate
  • To ensure the ongoing protection and safety of
    marine navigation and the protection of the
    marine environment in Canadian navigable waters
  • Definition of Navigable - .any body of water
    which is capable, in its natural state, of being
    navigated by floating vessels of any description
    for the purpose of transportation, recreation or
    commerce, and includes a canal or any other body
    of water created or altered for public use, as a
    result of the construction of any work

6
The Program Organization
  • NWPP FTE Distribution
  • NWPP HQ 5 persons
  • Quebec 7 persons
  • Atlantic 15 persons
    (NS/PEI/NB)
  • 9 persons
    (NFLD)
  • Prairie Northern 9 persons
    (MB/SK/AB/NWT/NU/YK)
  • Ontario 10 persons
  • Pacific 11 persons
  • Total NWPP Staff 66 persons (42 Officers)

7
The Program Other Authorities
  • Direct Responsibilities
  • National Energy Board Act (Section 108 109)
  • Canada Shipping Act
  • Receiver of Wrecks
  • Private Buoy Regulations Policy and Enforcement
  • Indirect Responsibilities
  • Canadian Environmental Assessment Act
  • Species at Risk Act

8
The Program Application Workload
9
The Program EA Workload
  • Environmental Assessment Considerations
  • DFO transfers partially funded 9 TC EA FTES. TC
    has identified requirements for 21 EA FTEs.
    Currently risk managing shortfall.
  • Number of TC EAs completed in 2003-04 123
  • Number of TC EAs underway or completed between
    April 2004 and January 2005
  • 763 - NWPA 611 / Other 152
  • New EA responsibilities related to large and
    complex projects pipelines (incl. MVGP and
    Alaskan), LNG terminals, hydro projects,
    aquaculture and mining

10
The Challenges
  • Legislative
  • Command and Control legislation I.e.
    advertising, plan deposit
  • Navigable waters and works in until out
    concept
  • Named Works no consideration of dimension or
    impact
  • on navigation
  • Operating Context
  • New waterway uses vs. NWPP resources severe
    imbalance and increasing (i.e. aquaculture, LNG
    terminals, recreational boating etc...)
  • Increasingly complex and administratively
    demanding environmental legislative framework
    (CEAA/SARA)
  • increased knowledge of requirements by clients
    and opponents
  • ISO certification
  • Increasingly litigious culture

11
The Challenges
  • Resource Levels
  • Gap (resources to demand for service) widening
    due, in part
  • to new and expanded waterway uses (i.e.
    waterfront property development, recreational
    boating, aquaculture)
  • Demand for more energy and raw materials
  • Projects are increasingly remote
  • More Canadian waters annually
  • No cost recovery authority
  • Political
  • NWPA is a tool of choice for hidden agendas
  • to mediate personal disputes
  • to prevent development
  • to achieve environmental objectives

12
The Challenges Impact
  • Including, but not limited to
  • Inefficient use of already severely limited and
    strained resources
  • Increasingly lengthy Approval process leading to
    corresponding economic and financial impacts
    to clients
  • Increased potential for litigation and liability
    proportionate to the expanded use of risk
    management methodologies
  • Minimal compliance monitoring and enforcement
    capability
  • Increased non-compliance increased safety
    hazard
  • REGULATORY INEFFICIENCY AND INEFFECTIVENESS

13
Current Initiatives
  • Comprehensive Departmental Resource Review
  • Review levels/locations
  • reallocate to provide best service to client
  • Class Screenings and Exclusion List
  • Work collaboratively with CEAA and clients to
    further develop, educate the client to and expand
    their use of Class Screenings and works suitable
    for Exclusion List
  • Stick to Mandate
  • We have redrafted Canada Gazette and Public
    Advertisement Notices to indicate response to
    only navigational issues.
  • Review of NWPP Processes Practices
  • Perform a review of existing policies, processes
    procedures
  • Streamline different processes under the NWPA to
    improve national delivery (standardization and
    consistency)

14
Current Initiatives
  • Risk Management
  • Identify projects and develop suitable criteria
    to appropriately risk manage minor works
    projects.
  • Recently approved minor work projects
  • Dredging
  • Water Intakes
  • Erosion Protection Works
  • Winter Crossings
  • Aerial Cables
  • Pipeline Crossings
  • Decks and Boathouses
  • Submarine Cables
  • Minor Waterways (awaiting final approval)
  • Emergency Measures (under development)

15
Ultimately
  • We must modernize the Act
  • To respond to Canadians demands for a faster
    and more efficient approval process
  • To use available program resources in a more
    efficient and effective manner
  • To adapt it to respond appropriately to new
    governance strategies and policy directions
  • To address repeated demands for reform from
    Provincial / Territorial / Municipal levels of
    government as well as industry (TAC, FPAC, CPPA)
  • To meet government objective of Smart
    Regulation

16
However
  • The reality is.
  • Roughly 3-4 years would be required to complete
    such an effort with a dedicated project team
  • Environmental lobby will most probably view
    modernization as an attempt to water-down
    environmental responsibilities
  • Not currently identified as a policy priority in
    the Conservative platform

17
We will be ready
  • NWPA Modernization Review
  • Internal dedicated Departmental Project Team
    established in September 2006 (7 month mandate)
  • Phase 1 - Internal review only at this time
  • Clause-by-clause and gap analysis of existing
    legislation
  • Identification of policy issues internal and
    external
  • Draft Policy Framework Document
  • Draft Public Consultation Discussion Paper
  • Draft Communications Strategy/Plan
  • Draft Memorandum to Cabinet
  • Phase 2 - Approval / external consultations

18
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com