Assessment of Engineering Reasoning in Student Journals - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Assessment of Engineering Reasoning in Student Journals

Description:

3D sketch and design decisions. Design calculations and criteria check ... to better understand project decisions in support of published milestone reports. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:32
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: grm3
Learn more at: http://www.cdio.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Assessment of Engineering Reasoning in Student Journals


1
Assessment of Engineering Reasoning in Student
Journals
Engineering Industrial Design Business
2
About Polytechnique
  • Third-largest teaching and research establishment
    in Canada and first in Québec.
  • First in Canada for the scope of its engineering
    research.
  • 30,000 students graduated since 1873.
  • 1,000 graduates per year.
  • 27 of Quebec trained engineers are Polytechnique
    graduates.
  • 220 professors.
  • 50 of our graduates work for Small-Medium
    Enterprises.
  • Operating budget of 85 million Cdn.
  • Annual research budget of 60.5 million Cdn.

2
3
About our capstone projects
  • Projects done in collaboration with industrial
    customers
  • Students from three schools collaborate in a
    common project team
  • Polytechnique (engineering)
  • University def Montréal (industrial design)
  • HEC Montréal (business, marketing, management)
  • Large scale multidisciplinary teams (up to 20
    students per team)
  • 8 month long projects (6000 to 8000 student hours)

3
4
Learning project structure and journals
5
Capstone project (2007)
Project 333 Ecology-Economy-Experience
Design François-Olivier Dagneau, Louis Drouin
Customer ITAQ, Quest Enterprises
5
6
Capstone project (2008)
Project AUA Advanced Urban Bus
Exterior Marc-André Rémillard Interior Maryse
Pelletier Seating Karine LeBon
Customer ITAQ, CDCQ
6
7
Capstone project CAMAQ (2008)Aerospace industry
consortium for education
Prototype manufacturing from CAD data
7
8
Project 1 (2009)
Exterior-interior Étienne Bérubé, Daniel Racine
8
9
Project 2 (2009)
Exterior Stéphane Carrier Interior Paul
Ta Seating Catherine Lagacé
Driver compartment Cléo Poirier, Maude Blanchard
9
10
Journal assessment
Text Graphics Graphics and text Engineering
reasoning
Date and week number Time spent Page
number External source references Meeting
minutes
10
11
Journal samples
First year student
11
12
Journal samples
Fourth year student
Date of journal entry
Time spent
3D hand drawn dimensioned sketch
Documented question to be adressed
Supporting calculations
12
13
Journal samples
Fourth year student
Documented hypothesis
3D sketch and design decisions
Design calculations and criteria check
13
14
Journal assessment
Criteria Evaluation Grade
1) How many types of information in logbook. 40/40  10-13 types 32/40  8 à 9 types 24/40  6 à 7 types 16/40  6 and less 40
2) Engineering reasoning demonstration 30/30  Excellent 20/30  Good 10/30  Must improve 30
3) Individual task identification and completion Assigned tasks Completed work Documented progression Timesheet 30/30  Excellent 20/30  Good 10/30  Must improve 30
Total Total 100
14
15
1- Content type
15
16
2- Critical thinking
Personal problem framing and resolution abilities
measured not solution quality. Solution quality
measured in the team reports.
16
17
3- Project information
  • Personal meeting notes and actions to do present
  • Individual tasks assigned and clearly identified
  • Written elements to prove the student worked on
    his assigned tasks
  • Demonstration of progress over time towards
    completion of the tasks
  • Compilation of all personal hours spent on the
    project
  • Entries to the journal are marked with the date
    they were done on
  • Empty pages identified as intentionally left
    blank
  • No ripped out pages to insure integrity of the
    content timeline

17
18
Outcomes
  • Students learn to document their personal work
    and questions on a daily basis in a centralized
    document (their project journal).
  • Students share journal content at a moment notice
    during team meetings.
  • Students find for themselves the value of
    documenting personal work when questioned on work
    done 6 months ago.
  • Students use teacher feedback to adjust their
    journal writing.
  • New recently revealed outcomes
  • 3 year project fosters use of old student
    journals in team transitions.
  • Students use older journals to better understand
    project decisions in support of published
    milestone reports.
  • Students voluntarily leave their journals to the
    team who will continue their work after they have
    left the project.

18
19
Future developments
  • Journal tagging methodology testing in
    preparation of electronic journal format.
    (Collaboration with the University of Bath)

19
20
For information
  • Clement Fortin
  • Director of mechanical engineering
  • École Polytechnique
  • clement.fortin_at_polymtl.ca

20
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com