Progress in evaluating converted cotton race stocks for resistance to whiteflies and aphids - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Progress in evaluating converted cotton race stocks for resistance to whiteflies and aphids

Description:

Goal: Do plants within one CRS show variability in resistance characteristics ... Selection criteria - whitefly survival and developmental time: Which is better? ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:32
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: marytoo
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Progress in evaluating converted cotton race stocks for resistance to whiteflies and aphids


1
Progress in evaluating converted cotton race
stocks for resistance to whiteflies and aphids
  • Mary M. Toothaker
  • Dr. Marvin Harris
  • Dr. C. Wayne Smith
  • Texas AM University

2
Why is this necessary?
  • With the eradication of the boll weevil,
    secondary pests such as whiteflies and aphids
    have become important pests
  • Honeydew from excessive whitefly and aphid
    populations affect ginning and reduce quality of
    the fiber
  • Feeding by excessive populations of aphids and
    whiteflies can decrease nutrient availability

(Photo Richard Sequeira)
3
  • Aphids and whiteflies are also known vectors of
    many plant viruses
  • Aphids becoming an increasing problem with use of
    Bt cotton
  • Aphid populations have been shown to be higher in
    Bt fields than non-Bt fields, probably because of
    a decreased use of insecticides

Cotton Leaf Crumple Virus, transmitted by Bemisia
tabaci
4
Selecting for Resistance
  • Research done in 2003 - 2004 confirmed that 6
    cotton race stocks (CRS) out of a selection of
    116 photoperiod-insensitive race stocks showed
    resistance to whitefly
  • TX0154
  • TX0156
  • TX0188
  • TX0195
  • TX0221
  • TX0242

5
Selecting for Resistance
  • TX0154 and TX0156 were shown to be significantly
    lower in percent survival
  • TX0188, TX0195, TX0221, TX0242 were shown to be
    significantly longer in developmental time

6
Selecting for Resistance
  • Goal Do plants within one CRS show variability
    in resistance characteristics compared to a known
    susceptible
  • Selection criteria - whitefly survival and
    developmental time Which is better?

7
Selecting for Resistance - Whitefly
  • 4 plants of each CRS, 3 leaves per plant
  • Excised leaf technique
  • Ten adult whiteflies were placed and contained on
    each leaf

8
Selecting for Resistance - Whitefly
  • Whiteflies removed after 24 hours and clip cages
    placed on same area
  • Number of eggs laid were counted and recorded
  • Nymphs allowed to hatch and develop for 14 days
  • After 14 days, the number of each instar was
    counted every 24 hours until all had completed
    development or died
  • Mean number of days to adulthood and percent
    mortality were calculated for each plant within
    each race stock

9
(No Transcript)
10
(No Transcript)
11
Current Research
  • 20 whole plants (6-8 leaf stage) of each CRS and
    a susceptible control (DP or PSC355)
  • Three cages per plant
  • 7-8 adult whiteflies per cage

12
Results
13
Results
14
Results
15
Discussion
  • Mortality appears to be the better selection
    criteria
  • Much more variation within each CRS in percent
    mortality than the controls using excised leaf
    technique
  • Days to adulthood appear to be slightly higher in
    the test groups than the controls

16
Breeding
  • By using whole plants, individual plant
    selections (IPS) can be made within each CRS
    using this selection criteria

17
Other Projects
  • Use water-sensitive paper to measure honeydew
    production
  • Quantify amount of honeydew produced per acre
    over time
  • Could determine aphid numbers in a field by
    measuring the honeydew produced

in conjunction with USDA
18
Proof of Concept
Honeydew production by pecan aphid on a known
susceptible variety of pecan
Honeydew production on a suspected resistant
variety of pecan
19
Acknowledgements
  • Cotton, Inc.
  • Texas AM University Department of Entomology
  • Alexandra Gomezplata
  • Jessica Honaker
  • Robert Puckett
  • Allen Dean
  • Sarah Skrivanek
  • Texas AM University Plant Growth Facilities
  • Roger Horn
  • Texas AM University Department of Soil Crop
    Sciences
  • Kasi Clay
  • Dawn Deno
  • USDA-ARS-SPARC
  • Dr. Juan Lopez
  • Dr. Dan Martin
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com