Title: Fisheries Subsidies Negotiations in the WTO Background and current state of play
1Fisheries Subsidies Negotiations in the
WTOBackground and current state of play
- By Manleen Dugal
- June 2 2009, Geneva
2Doha and Hong Kong Mandate
-
- Doha Mandate (2001)
- to clarify and improve WTO disciplines on
fisheries subsidies, taking into account the
importance of this sector to developing
countries - Para 9, Annex D of HKD (2005) ..strengthen
disciplines on subsidies in the fisheries sector,
including through the prohibition of certain
forms of fisheries subsidies that contribute to
overcapacity and over-fishing. - and
- .Appropriate and effective special and
differential treatment for developing and
least-developed Members should be an integral
part of the fisheries subsidies negotiations,
taking into account the importance of this sector
to development priorities, poverty reduction, and
livelihood and food security concerns
3Statistical facts concerning the state of global
fisheries resources
4Some other interesting statistics
- Fleet overcapacity has been on an increasing
trend, approximating 50 percent in 2008, despite
a relative decline in fleet sizes (FAO, 2009) - Global fishing fleets remain far larger than can
be sustainably employed (FAO, 2008) - Productivity of marine capture fisheries has been
essentially flat since the late 1980s due to
increasing levels of depletion (FAO, 2008)
5Statistics on worldwide fisheries subsidies
- Total global annual fishing subsidies are worth
USD 15-35 billion and come in a wide variety of
forms such as direct cash grants, tax breaks,
loan guarantees and provision of goods and
services (World Bank Technical Paper 1998, WWF
(2001)) - and
- 80 of the global fisheries subsidies is granted
by developed countries (Joint Study by World Bank
and FAO) - 90 of all officially reported fishing subsidies
are granted by only seven members Japan, EU, US,
Canada, Russia, Korea and Chinese Taipei (WWF
factsheet, 2009)
6Economic rationale behind the Mandate
- Fisheries subsidies cause overcapacity and
overfishing resulting in depletion of fish stocks - Fisheries subsidies cause trade distorting
effects through production and export market
distortions - FRIENDS OF the FISH Group Australia, Chile,
Ecuador, Iceland, New Zealand, United States,
Peru, Philippines
7The legal rationale behind the Doha mandate
- Legal inadequacy of existing disciplines under
the ASCM to address all fisheries-related
concerns - Significant practical problems in applying ASCM
disciplines to fisheries issues - The general rules of the ASCM are not designed to
address the exceptional and distinctive market
distortions that subsidies in the fisheries
sector can generate.
8High Stakes for the ACP Group
- Residents of many ACP countries are familiar
with the sight of foreign commercial fishing
vessels plying the waters off their coasts, often
in direct competition with local fishing
communities. A number of them have also witnessed
the depletion of native fish stocks that can
result from the activities of subsidized foreign
fleets (Schorr, 2004) - Small island states and other coastal
developing countries (which would include several
ACP states) are among the most likely to be
injured by the overfishing and market distortions
that result from harmful fishing subsidies
maintained by major fishing powers. (Schorr,
2004)
9- Draft legal text of the Chair of the WTO
Negotiating Group on Rules (Fisheries) and
reactions of WTO Members on key elements
10The Prohibition
- The list of prohibitions in the current list
under the Draft Chairs Text includes - subsidies provided for vessel acquisition,
construction, repair, renewal, renovation,
modernization for fishing and service vessels - subsidies for operating costs of fishing or
service vessels (including licence fees or
similar charges, fuel, ice, bait, personnel,
social charges, insurance, gear, and at-sea
support) - Subsidies for in-or near-port processing
activities for products of marine wild capture
fishing subsidies for port infrastructure - Subsidies for price and income supports
- Subsidies contained in the onward transfer of
fishing rights under fishing access arrangements
between Members - Subsidies where benefits are conferred to IUU
vessels (Article I, Draft Chairs Text, 2007)
11Proposed Provisions for Special and Differential
Treatment (SD) for LDCs and non-LDC fishing
operations
- Blanket exemption for Least-Developed Countries
(LDCs) from the proposed prohibited list of
subsidies, i.e., unlimited and unconditional
right to provide fisheries subsidies. - General view that SD provisions for non-LDC,
non-subsistence fishing operations should not
amount to a "blank check
12Proposed SD treatment for subsistence-oriented
fisheries
- Carte Blanche exemptions for subsidies to
subsistence-oriented fisheries, with only
indicative management conditionality - Conditions placed on the current definition of
subsistence-oriented fishing in the Draft Chairs
text - too narrow?
13 Proposed Treatment for non-LDC small-scale and
industrial fisheries
- Conditional exemptions for subsidies to port
infrastructure and other physical facilities,
income support for fishers, and price support for
fishers products - Limitation placed on use of certain
capacity-enhancing subsidies and operating cost
subsidies, to decked vessels less than 10m in
length only.
14 Proposed Treatment for non-LDC small-scale and
industrial fisheries
- Limitation contained in the Draft Chairs Text
for exemptions for capacity-enhancing subsidies
provided to vessels active within a Members EEZ
only. - Additional conditions (additional to Article V)
placed on the above of exemptions, as follows
1) prior scientific stock assessment of fish
stocks 2) assessment being subject to peer review
at the FAO
15 Proposed Treatment for non-LDC small-scale and
industrial fisheries
- Explicit exclusion of government-to-government
transfer of funds from the scope of the
prohibition - SDT exemptions for subsidy elements contained in
the onward transfer of fishing rights, where the
fishery in question is within the EEZ of a
developing country Member
16Proposed Treatment for Fisheries management
Systems
- Internationally recognized best practices
- As reflected in, e.g.
- Code of Conduct (FAO)
- Fish Stocks Agreement (FAO)
- Compliance Agreement (FAO)
- - Including technical guidelines and plans of
action for the aforementioned instruments
17Proposed Treatment for Fisheries management
Systems
- List of compulsory measures relating to the
- Management and conservation of fish stocks,
- Fishing capacity, effort and catch, and
- Fishing vessels.
18Proposed Treatment for Fisheries management
Systems
- Management and conservation of fish stocks
- Science-based stock assessment
- Species-specific quotas, seasons and other stock
management measures - Research and other measures related to
conservation and stock maintenance and
replenishment
19Proposed Treatment for Fisheries management
Systems
- Fishing capacity, effort and catch
- Capacity and effort management measures
- Establishment and allocation of fishing rights,
or allocation of exclusive quotas, and related
enforcement measures - System for reporting data on effort, catch and
discards
20Proposed Treatment for Fisheries management
Systems
- Fishing vessels
- Vessels registries
- Vessel monitoring
21Proposed Treatment for Fisheries management
Systems
- Adoption and implementation of pertinent
domestic - Legislation
- Administrative/judicial enforcement mechanisms
22Proposed Treatment for Fisheries management
Systems
- Transparency
- Notification of information on the nature and
operation of national fisheries management system
to relevant FAO body/another relevant intl
organization - Notified information is subject to peer review
- Peer review is precondition for granting of
subsidies
23Proposed Treatment for Fisheries management
Systems
- Notification to SCM Committee of references for
- domestic legislation and enforcement mechanisms
- Notifications made to other intl organizations
- Documents related to the peer reviews conducted
by those organizations - Contact information for enquiry point
- Enquiry point to answer all reasonable enquiries
24