Title: Who is there - and what are they doing? A case study with harmful algae
1Who is there - and what are they doing? A case
study with harmful algae
- Sonya Dyhrman, Biology Department
- Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution
- EARTH Workshop - July 2008
2Microbial oceanography
- Marine microbesare beneficial and important!
- produce and consume green house gases
- recycle organic matter
- power the marine food web
- account for roughly half of global primary
production (every other breath you take!)
3Outline
- Introduction to Microbial Oceanography
- What are Harmful Algal Blooms?
- Who is out there?
- Detecting Alexandrium catenella in the Puget
Sound - What are they doing?
- Detecting alkaline phosphatase activity
4The science you teach inspires!
2003 Publication in Limnology and
Oceanography Urease activity in cultures and
field populations of Alexandrium (previously
Gonyaulax)
1989 Bellarmine High School Marine Chemistry
Project Analysis of Parameters Affecting
Gonyaulax catenella Concentrations in
Quartermaster Harbor, Washington
51989
61989
2003
71989
2003
Thank you Mr. Nilsen!
8Outline
- Introduction to Microbial Oceanography
- What are Harmful Algal Blooms?
- Who is out there?
- Detecting Alexandrium catenella in the Puget
Sound - What are they doing?
- Detecting alkaline phosphatase activity
9What are harmful algal blooms?
- Proliferation or bloom of a marine
algae(phytoplankton) - Common name is Red Tide
- Not all blooms are red
- Toxic events can occur without water
discolorations - Toxic impacts can occur at low cell number
10Two modes of harmful impacts from blooms
- 1 Non-toxic effects, typically from high biomass
- Reduced light
- Oxygen depletion (hypoxia/anoxia)
11Brown tide
- Aureococcus anophagefferens
- Small cell from the Pelagophyte group of algae
- Non-motile
- No known toxin production
- Commonly blooms in the mid-Atlantic states,
permanently destroyed important shellfisheries in
Long Island Sound. - 2008 one of the worst blooms to date
- Can reach uncommonly high cell densities
- First whole genome sequence for a HAB species!
1http//ccmp.bigelow.org 2http//siddall.info/fift
een/bt.html 3http//www.scottsbt.com/misc/enviro/b
rowntide.html
12(No Transcript)
13Two modes of harmful impacts from blooms
- 2 Non-Toxic effects
- Toxic effects
- Direct human impact through direct exposure
- Indirect toxin impacts organisms on its
passage through the food web via trophic transfer
14Different HAB impacts
- Neurotoxic Shellfish Poisoning (NSP)
- Amnesic Shellfish Poisoning (ASP)
- Diarrhetic Shellfish Poisoning (DSP)
- Azaspiracid Shellfish Poisoning (AZP)
- Pfiesteria complex
- Ciguatera Fish Poisoning (CFP)
- Paralytic Shellfish Poisoning (PSP)
- Freshwater toxins
Karenia
Pseudoniztschia
Pfiesteria
Alexandrium
NSP
ASP
Pfiesteria complex
PSP
15Neurotoxic shellfish poisoning (NSP)
- Karenia brevis
- Athecate dinoflagellate
- Motile
- Brevetoxin (direct impacts)
- Commonly blooms in Florida, responsible for
manatee deaths in 1996-1997 and recurrent fish
kills that litter the beach. - Bloom reports have doubled in the last 30 years
16Amnesic shellfish poisoning (ASP)
- Pseudonitzschia australis
- Diatom
- Non-motile
- Domoic acid (Indirect impacts)
- Common along west coast. California blooms
responsible for sea lion deaths in 1999 and
recurrent shell-fish contamination.
17Domoic acid can accumulate in the food web
18Paralytic shellfish poisoning (PSP)
- Alexandrium fundyense, A. tamarense and A.
catenella - Thecate dinoflagellate
- Motile
- Forms cysts
- Saxitoxin (indirect impacts)
- Common globally in temperate waters. Present and
dangerous in the Pacific Northwest, and New
England. Responsible for recent human poisonings
the deaths of marine mammals.
19HAB seem to be getting worse
- Compared to 30 years ago, we have
- more algal toxins
- more toxic algal species
- more fisheries resources affected
- more areas affected
- higher economic costs
- A SERIOUS PROBLEM
20Possible mechanisms for the expansion of HAB
- Species dispersal or introduction via natural
currents, storms cyst deposition - More scientists, improved chemical analysis,
better communication - Increased aquaculture
- Dispersal by human activities (ballast water,
shellfish seeding) - Nutrient enrichment pollution
21Outline
- Introduction to Microbial Oceanography
- What are Harmful Algal Blooms?
- Who is out there?
- Detecting Alexandrium catenella in the Puget
Sound - What are they doing?
- Detecting alkaline phosphatase activity
22Who is there?
- How do we detect specific microbial
populations???? -
23Similar morphology is a challenge!
- Toxic Alexandrium can cause PSP at low cell
density. - Toxic/Non-toxic Alexandrium appear very similar.
24Identification and enumeration qPCR
Primers
DNA
X
X
- Test for the Alexandrium catenella gene
signature
25Standard curve
- Multiple strains of local Puget Sound Alexandrium
catenella are used to construct a standard curve.
26PSP in Puget Sound
- PSP in the Pacific Northwest has been known for
centuries (Trainer et al. 2003) - Captain Vancouver 1793 (British Columbia)
- WA State Dept. Health (WDOH) initiated shellfish
monitoring in the 1930s - Several thousand PSP assays in mussels collected
by volunteers from key sentinel sites each year - No concurrent monitoring for Alexandrium
catenella - the cause of PSP
Puget Sound WA
maps.google.com
27Key questions
- Was there toxicity in 2006?
- How few cells can we detect?
- Can we detect cells before shellfish toxicity?
- Does increasing cell number indicate lead to an
increase in toxicity? - What can we learn about Alexandrium catenella
bloom dynamics?
28Sampling system
29Volunteers
30Samples arrive in Woods Hole
31Catalog the samples
32Extract DNA
33Prepare samples and standards for qPCR
34Run qPCR
35Run qPCR
36Tabulate data and determine cell numbers
- With volunteer help we analyzed nearly 600 DNA
samples in 2006!
37Key questions
- Was there toxicity in 2006? - Yes
- How few cells can we detect?
- Can we detect cells before shellfish toxicity?
- Does increasing cell number indicate lead to an
increase in toxicity? - What can we learn about Alexandrium catenella
bloom dynamics?
38Key questions
- Was there toxicity in 2006?
- How few cells can we detect? - Very few the assay
is very sensitive! - Can we detect cells before shellfish toxicity?
- Does increasing cell number indicate lead to an
increase in toxicity? - What can we learn about Alexandrium catenella
bloom dynamics?
39(No Transcript)
40Key questions
- Was there toxicity in 2006?
- How few cells can we detect?
- Can we detect cells before shellfish toxicity?
Cells were detected at all stations before the
legal saxitoxin limit. - Does increasing cell number indicate lead to an
increase in toxicity? - Yes - at some stations - What can we learn about Alexandrium catenella
bloom dynamics?
41(No Transcript)
42Key questions
- Can we detect cells before shellfish toxicity?
- Does increasing cell number indicate lead to an
increase in toxicity? - What can we learn about Alexandrium catenella
bloom dynamics? Seasonal patterns are interesting
- but more work is required to identify what
factors cause Alexandrium catentella to bloom in
this system. (e.g. prediction is difficult)
43What are they doing?
- How do we the activities of specific microbial
populations???? -
44What are they doing?
- What nutrients are important and when?
- Nutrients like phosphorus can come in inorganic
and organic forms - The cells typically preferentially use the
inorganic form (PO4) - The enzyme alkaline phosphatase is required to
use organic phosphorus.
45Decreased toxicity on some organic nutrients
Organic
Inorganic
Dyhrman 2003
46Linking nutrients to bloom dynamics
Dyhrman 1999
47Key questions
- Do HAB use organic phosphorus? YES
- Prorocentrum minimum alkaline phosphatase
activity - Can blooms be controlled by phosphorus supply?
- Phosphorus stress in Narragansett Bay.
48Alkaline phosphatase activity
Dyhrman 1999
49Key questions
- Do HAB use organic phosphorus? YES
- Prorocentrum minimum alkaline phosphatase
activity - Can blooms be controlled by phosphorus supply?
YES - Phosphorus stress in Narragansett Bay.
50Inorganic phosphate concentration and the bloom
-P
P
Dyhrman 2001
51Summary
- Marine microbes are important!
- A very few microbes cause HAB - but they can lead
to serious problems with toxins in the food web - Molecular identification of DNA signatures is
improving HAB detection and monitoring. - New biochemical tools allow us to identify the
activities of HAB and trace the connections
between HAB events and nutrients.
52(No Transcript)
53Outreach
- How do you engage kids (8-12) with scientific
content on a broad scale? - Whyville, a virtual
world for kids www.whyville.net
Population 3.3 Million