TOF%20Tracking%20What%20have%20we%20learned%20-%20What%20do%20we%20need? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

TOF%20Tracking%20What%20have%20we%20learned%20-%20What%20do%20we%20need?

Description:

Collecting more data (should be ok next run) ... MC. No T0 correction, no slew. correction, and no path- length correction yet. Frank L. H. Wolfs ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:86
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: FrankW159
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: TOF%20Tracking%20What%20have%20we%20learned%20-%20What%20do%20we%20need?


1
TOF TrackingWhat have we learned - What do we
need?
  • E. Johnson, N. Khan, W. Skulski, F. Wolfs
  • PHOBOS Time-of-Flight Group
  • University of Rochester
  • Rochester, NY 14627

2
Outline
  • Straight-line tracking
  • Correlation between SPECN track and TOF
    multiplicity.
  • How well does it work?
  • What have we learned?
  • Curved tracking
  • Correlation between SPECN track and TOF
    multiplicity.
  • How do we make it work?
  • How well does it work?
  • What have we learned so far?
  • TOF PID with curved tracks
  • Does it work?
  • What do we need to optimize TOF PID?

3
Straight-line tracking
  • Use Inkyu Parks code to create straight-line
    tracks.
  • The number of hits on the TOF is about 2 - 3
    times the number of reconstructed tracks (vertex
    dependent).
  • A clear correlation exists between the hits on
    the TOF and the straight-line tracks.

z lt 1 cm
4
Straight-line Tracking
  • Create straight-line tracks
  • Use theta-track to extrapolate to TOF
  • Use hits on last two planes to extrapolate to TOF
  • Conclude that using the last two hits improves
    TOF - SPEC matching.

??TC 0.3 ??TB 0.2
5
Impact of multiplicity on TOF trackingMust use
y position to improve Signal/Noise!!

6
Using straight-line tracks for vertical position
calibration of the TOF
  • The vertical position of the TOF scintillators
    can be determined using the vertical position
    information from the track.
  • Due to vertical segmentation of last silicon
    planes, we need to use the azimuthal track angle.
  • A clear correlation is observed between y(track)
    and y(TOF).
  • Procedure works nicely for the central
    scintillators, but not for those near 32.5 and 90
    degrees.

7
Curved Tracks and TOF Multiplicity
  • The number of straight-line tracks in all layers
    of SPECN with field-off scales with the TOF
    multiplicity (the number of TOF hits is 2 - 3
    times the number of spectrometer tracks).
  • The number of straight-line tracks in the first 6
    layers of SPECN with field-on also scales with
    the TOF multiplicity (the number of TOF hits is 2
    times the number of straight-line tracks).

8
Curved Tracks and TOF Multiplicity
  • The number of straight-line tracks in the first 6
    layers of SPECN with field-on scales with the TOF
    multiplicity.
  • Number of curved tracks in SPECN peaks at 1,
    independent of TOF multiplicity.
  • Only events with at least two tracks can be used
    for TOF-based particle identification.

9
Curved Tracking
Simulation for pions
  • Use Gunthers DSTs with curved tracks.
  • Use last two hits in SPECN and do a linear
    extrapolation to the TOF.
  • Expect a correlated angular shift as a function
    of momentum.

10
B-, PID 9 Positive charges, bending backward
Correlated Hits.
11
B-, PID 8Negative charges, bending forward
Correlated Hits.
12
B, PID 9 Negative charges, bending backward
Correlated Hits.
13
B, PID 8 Positive charges, bending forward
Correlated Hits.
14
Track matchingFirst observations
  • Signal to background ratio is poor 15 - 10 for
    central events.
  • Width of the correlated peak is about 5 (FWHM).
  • Corrections to be made
  • Momentum dependence this reduces the width to
    about 2 (FWHM).
  • Position/angle dependence expect that this will
    reduce the width to about 1 (FHWM).
  • Corrections will improve signal to background
    ratio to 11 - 2.
  • Using the vertical position information will
    further improve this ratio.

15
TOF PID
  • We like to use protons and Kaons to optimize
    individual slewing corrections for PMTs. Most
    background from secondaries have a shorter
    time-of-flight.
  • Current limitations
  • Very few tracks from last data run (728 protons
    and 606 Kaons). Only half of these are directed
    to the TOF.
  • To understand procedures, low multiplicity data
    are crucial.

B- PID 9
16
TOF PID
No T0 correction, no slew correction, and no
path- length correction yet.
  • Observed correlation between TOF and P is
    consistent with expectations.
  • What would we like to have?
  • 100 protons per scintillator (minimum bias data)
    24000 total.
  • Currently we have at most a few hundred protons
    total, mostly from central events.
  • Achieve good calibration data set by
  • Collecting more data (should be ok next run).
  • Improving tracking efficiency (get more protons
    per event).

B- PID 9
MC
17
Summary and To-Do List
  • Capability to match SPECN tracks and TOF hits has
    been developed for both field-on and field-off
    data.
  • Straight-line tracks useful for vertical position
    calibration.
  • Finish vertical position calibration for
    scintillators located close to 32.5 degrees and
    90 degrees.
  • Optimize slewing corrections by using separate
    rise times for each PMT channel (various
    procedures are under consideration).
  • Correct TOF for path length variations for curved
    tracks.
  • Use vertical position info to improve matching
    efficiency.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com