Pixel Sensor Submission - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 8
About This Presentation
Title:

Pixel Sensor Submission

Description:

P-stop (meet design rule of vendor, new chip size, new module size) Moderated p-spray ... Try out the submission process ourselves. New chip size, new module size ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:36
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 9
Provided by: swa70
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Pixel Sensor Submission


1
Pixel Sensor Submission
  • ATLAS
  • Prototype 1 CiS, SII (p-stopp-spray)
  • Prototype 2 CiS, IRST (moderated p-spray)
  • PreProduction CiS, TESLA
  • CMS
  • 1st prototype CSEM (p-stop)
  • USCMS SINTEF (p-stop)
  • 2nd prototype SINTEF (p-stop)
  • PSI ? (moderated p-spray? p-stop)
  • ALICE
  • 1st prototype Canberra (p on n)

2
BTeV Submission
  • 1st prototype
  • Joint submission with US-CMS (p-stop)
  • Bids received SINTEF, CSEM,CiS, Eurysis
  • No bid Hamamatsu
  • SINTEF and CSEM chosen
  • CSEM submission held up by CMS
  • SINTEF 22 wafers in total (5 oxygenated, 3 high
    resistivity)

3
SINTEF wafers summary
  • Single-chip yield excellent
  • Leakage current low, BD voltage meet or exceed
    spec (gt 300V)
  • 5-chip module yield (see figure)
  • After irradiation Vd lt Vbd up to 4x1014 p/cm2
    (low resistivity wafers)
  • Normal wafers about the same characteristics as
    oxygenated wafers

4
SINTEF five chip modules
5
Next steps
  • Two more prototype submissions planned
  • Moderated p-spray (NDA with ATLAS, Licence
    Agreement with Garching Innovation GmbH)
  • P-stop (meet design rule of vendor, new chip
    size, new module size)

6
Moderated p-spray
  • Received prototype 2 wafers and preprod. Wafers
    from ATLAS
  • Probing results (Ritas presentation)
  • Irradiation test end of January
  • Detectors mated to preFPIX2tb (bench test,
    irradiation test, beam test)
  • Try out the submission process ourselves
  • New chip size, new module size
  • RFP sent to CiS, Eurysis, SINTEF, TESLA
  • Bids received from CiS, SINTEF, and TESLA (see
    next slide)
  • Big difference in quote and details of the
    responses
  • After checking with Purchasing Dept, proposed to
    drop TESLA (quote unrealistic and not enough
    detail)
  • Still waiting to get more details from CiS
    (testing procedure, material spec)
  • SINTEF details on testing of modules

7
Preconceptual RD Draft Timeline
8
Discussion
  • ATLAS wafers (probing results)
  • More questions to the vendors?
  • Status of the mask design
  • Remaining issues
  • Simulation
  • Submission schedule
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com