The Obstacles and Opportunities in Advocating for NCSP Parity in Indiana Indiana Association of School Psychologists October 16, 2006, 1:30-3:00pm Indianapolis, IN - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 45
About This Presentation
Title:

The Obstacles and Opportunities in Advocating for NCSP Parity in Indiana Indiana Association of School Psychologists October 16, 2006, 1:30-3:00pm Indianapolis, IN

Description:

The Obstacles and Opportunities in Advocating for NCSP Parity in Indiana ... Indiana's School Academic Plan ... Indiana has narrowly defined school psychology ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:30
Avg rating:3.0/5.0

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Obstacles and Opportunities in Advocating for NCSP Parity in Indiana Indiana Association of School Psychologists October 16, 2006, 1:30-3:00pm Indianapolis, IN


1
The Obstacles and Opportunities in Advocating for
NCSP Parity in IndianaIndiana Association of
School PsychologistsOctober 16, 2006,
130-300pmIndianapolis, IN
  • Presenter
  • Stacy Kalamaros Skalski, PhD
  • Director of Public Policy
  • National Association of School Psychologists
  • sskalski_at_naspweb.org

2
Agenda for this Session
  • Overview of NCSP Parity
  • Developing an advocacy strategy for NCSP Parity
  • Understanding the obstacles and opportunities for
    Indiana
  • Crafting Indianas advocacy message using
    existing data
  • Planning for the future

3
What is NCSP Parity?
  • Most states and many local school districts award
    stipends to teachers holding national board
    certification.
  • NCSP parity refers to the need for school
    psychologists holding national certification to
    be treated equally to other educational
    professionals holding national certification.

4
Indianas School Academic Plan
  • Public Law 221 established a grant system through
    the Indiana Department of Education to fund
    school improvement plans with the goal of
    improving student learning. The school
    improvement plan must include a professional
    development component and monies may be used for
    National Board Certification for teachers.
  • See Indiana Code 20-20-31-12

5
Comparing the NBPTS and the NCSP
A comprehensive table comparing national
certification across school professionals is
available at http//nasponline.org/advocacy/certco
mparison.pdf
6
General Goals of the NCSP
  • To ensure a consistent level of training and
    field experience among school psychologists who
    hold the designation
  • To promote uniform credentialing standards across
    state education agencies and other bodies who
    credential school psychologists

7
General Goals of the NCSP continued
  • To link national accreditation of training
    programs (NCATE-NASP Approval) to a national
    credential (NCSP
  • To promote Nationally Certified School
    Psychologists as those who have met national
    levels of training and who are committed to
    ongoing professional development and to following
    NASP ethics.

8
National Board for Professional Teaching Standards
  • Proposition 1 Teachers are Committed to Students
    and Learning.
  • Proposition 2 Teachers Know the Subjects They
    Teach and How to Teach Those Subjects to
    Students.
  • Proposition 3 Teachers are Responsible for
    Managing and Monitoring Student Learning.
  • Proposition 4 Teachers Think Systematically
    about Their Practice and Learn from Experience.
  • Proposition 5 Teachers are Members of Learning
    Communities.

9
Pre-Requisites
NBPTS
NCSP
  • To qualify for national certification candidates
    must have a bachelors degree, a state teacher
    certification, and 3 years teaching experience.
  • To qualify for national certification NCSP
    candidates must have completed a minimum of 60
    semester hours of graduate study in School
    Psychology, culminating in a MA, Ed.S., Ph.D. or
    other recognized post-baccalaureate degree.
  • Supervised internship and a culminating 1,200
    clock-hour supervised internship.
  • All other applicants must provide documents of
    having met these pre-requisite standards.

10
Certification Requirements
NBPTS
NCSP
  • Complete a portfolio which may include videotapes
    of classroom interactions or discussions, and
    collections of certain kinds of student work.
  • An analysis of the teaching reflected in the
    videotape or student work is also required.
  • The portfolio also documents teachers work
    outside the classroom with families, colleagues,
    and the community.
  • The second component involves a written
    assessment which is comprised of four, 90-minute
    sessions.
  • NASP Standards require that school psychology
    candidates demonstrate competency in 11 domains
    of professional practice as part of their formal
    training.
  • Candidates must complete a NCSP Case Study.
  • Complete a 1,200 clock-hour supervised internship
    of which 600 hours must be in a school setting.
  • Achieve a passing score (660) on the National
    School Psychology Examination, administered by
    the Educational Testing Service (Praxis II NTE
    Test 10400)

11
Renewal Requirements
NBPTS
NCSP
  • The National Board for Professional Teaching
    Standards certification is good for 10 years.
  • Renewal includes identifying areas for
    professional growth and demonstrating how growth
    has occurred. Demonstration of Professional
    Growth Experiences (PGE) may be accomplished with
    written responses to specific prompts, videotape
    demonstration, and/or submission of student work
    samples as evidence of direct impact on learning.
  • NCSPs must engage in activities designed to
    maintain, expand, and extend their professional
    training and skills
  • Specifically, each NCSP must be renewed every
    three years with 75 contact hours of continuing
    professional development (CPD) activities
  • The hours must be fulfilled through a variety of
    NASP, state affiliate, or equivalent programs.

12
What is commonly heard about how NBPTS and NCSP
compare?
13
NCSP Challenges to Parity
  • 3-year pre-requisite practice requirement
  • Entry level Licensure
  • Grandfathering

14
Arguments for NCSP Parity with NBPTS
  • Graduate level training requirement.
  • Specific coursework training components
  • Supervised practice requirements are more
    extensive.
  • Highest level of certification currently
    available.
  • Ongoing professional development maintains high
    standards of practice
  • Significant benefits to states with NCSP parity

15
Focus on the Benefits to States
  • Salary stipends for NCSPs attract more highly
    qualified school psychologist applicants
  • Salary stipends demonstrate that the state or
    school district recognizes and acknowledges the
    importance of hiring school psychologists who
    meet nationally recognized standards for training
    and supervision.
  • Salary stipends promote higher levels of
    knowledge and competency as NCSP school
    psychologists must engage in ongoing and
    meaningful continuing professional development.
    (NOTE NCSPs share burden with district for
    professional development by active pursuit of the
    75 CPDs required for renewal.)

16
Where are you more likely to get board policies?
  • Districts with a current or future shortage of
    school psychologists
  • Districts where teachers and administrators are
    awarded a stipend for NBPTS
  • Districts where employment competition between
    school districts exists
  • Districts with a good relationship between school
    district bargaining entities (i.e. union) and
    school mental health professionals.

17
Where are you more likely to get board policies?
continued
  • Districts where school psychologists are serving
    on district-level committees
  • Districts where the benefits of school
    psychologists are well known
  • Districts with a School Psychologist Coordinator/
    Supervisor in Central Administration

18
Where are you more likely to get board policies?
continued
  • Districts where school psychologists have
    specific data supporting the cost-benefit of
    their services within the mission of schools.
  • Districts interested in broadening the role of
    school psychologists from diagnostician to
    intervention/prevention specialist (Example RTI)
  • Districts where employee contract language refers
    to all certified employees as teachers.

19
Top 10 Advocacy Tips for Achieving NCSP Parity
20
  • Tip 1
  • Convene a group of school psychologists
    interested in pursuing this issue.
  • Key Question
  • Are you willing to commit to this process long
    term?

21
  • Tip 2
  • Begin your committee discussions by evaluating
    what your assets and obstacles are in getting
    NCSP parity passed.
  • Key Question
  • What do we need?
  • (State Laws? School Board Policies? Both?)

22
  • Tip 3
  • Collect and Evaluate Data
  • Key Question
  • What do you have and what do you need?

23
  • Tip 4
  • Know who your allies are and be willing to build
    and nurture other essential relationships.
  • Key Question
  • Who will be the champions of your cause?

24
  • Tip 5
  • Determine where there is fertile ground for
    NCSP Parity.
  • Key Question
  • Are there existing school districts that support
    this cause or should support this cause due to a
    shortage or narrowly defined professional
    practices?

25
  • Tip 6
  • Prepare materials that clearly and simply explain
    why NCSP parity is essential and important for
    schools.
  • Key Question
  • What existing data, resources, and materials
    supports our cause?

26
  • Tip 7
  • Talk to leaders who have tackled NCSP parity
    successfully and unsuccessfully in their state or
    local communities.
  • Key Question
  • What are the major lessons learned about how to
    manage achieving NCSP parity?

27
  • Tip 8
  • Build a grassroots movement of practitioners
    committed to getting the message out and talking
    to key decision makers on the local and
  • state level.
  • Key Question
  • What infrastructure support (who, what, where,
    when) do you need to actively campaign for NCSP
    parity?

28
  • Tip 9
  • Teachers, students, and families need schools to
    recruit the best professionals and maintaining
    the highest standards for school psychological
    practice.
  • Key Question
  • Can you show how NCSP parity promotes high
    quality services, the mission and purpose of
    schools, and the goals of NCLB?

29
  • Tip 10
  • Be resilient and patient in your quest. Alter
    your course as necessary with the expectation
    that you will
  • achieve your goal.
  • Key Quote
  • Success is the ability to go from failure to
    failure without losing your enthusiasm.
  • Winston Churchill

30
NCSP Parity in State Law
  • Louisiana
  • Nevada
  • Oklahoma
  • Delaware

31
NCSP Parity in INDIANA DataReferencesCharvat,
J. (2005, March) NASP Study How many school
psychologists are there? Communiqué, 33,
12-14.Curtis, M., Lopez, A., Batsche, G.,
Smith, J. (2006, March) School Psychology 2005 A
National Perspective. Paper presented at the
annual meeting of the National Association of
School Psychologists, Anaheim, CACurtis, M.,
Lopez, A., Batsche, G., Smith, J. Unpublished
and unofficial results of the 2004-2005 NASP
Membership Survey. Final results are expected
soon! Stay tuned.
32
(No Transcript)
33
(No Transcript)
34
(No Transcript)
35
(No Transcript)
36
(No Transcript)
37
(No Transcript)
38
Skill Utilization of School Psychologists in
Indiana
What were doing most of the time now
What were trained to do
  • Assessment
  • Prevention activities
  • Crisis intervention
  • Behavioral interventions
  • Academic interventions
  • Consultation with teachers and parents
  • Counseling / Direct Services
  • In-services and Workshops for school staff
    parents
  • Research and Data Analysis
  • Special Education Assessment

39
Recruitment Competition with Neighboring States
  • Indiana has narrowly defined school psychology
    practice to the assessment of special education
    students.
  • Broader role practiced in OH, IL, and KY
  • Ratios of School Psychologist to Student are
    better in OH and IL. All states are sill above
    the national average and the maximum recommended
    NASP ratios.
  • Graduates tend to stay in state to practice. More
    graduate training programs to meet the demand in
    OH and IL.
  • Salaries in OH and IL are more on par with
    national average.

40
What Would NCSP Parity Cost in Indiana?
  • Total number of NCSPs in Indiana 197
  • Percentage of School Psychologists working in
    public schools with NCSP 50
  • Typical Annual Stipend of 2000
  • ESTIMATED PROGRAM COST
  • 394,000
  • First Year if only for Public School Employees
  • 197,000

41
Other Data Needed?
  • Vacancies (School District and State)
  • Number of unfilled positions
  • Number of positions filled by qualified and
    unqualified (temporary certification,
    contractual) personnel
  • Current attrition rates due to job or role
    dissatisfaction
  • Current attrition rates due to retirement
  • Future Shortage of School Psychologist
  • Average age of school psychologists
  • Capacity of IN training programs to meet the
    future demand for school practitioners

42
Lessons Learned from Other Sates
  • States need to build the capacity of school
    psychologists to become advocates (i.e. PPI)
  • An advocacy agenda (legislative or policy) for
    the state organization is essential
  • Strategies for accomplishing the advocacy agenda
    must be developed
  • Coalition building is fundamental
  • Information must be disseminated in a very timely
    fashion
  • Targeting key legislators/policy makers to enlist
    their support of legislation is critical

43
NCSP Questions and Resources
  • Joan Bohmann
  • NASP Director of Professional Standards and
    Continuing Professional Development
  • jbohmann_at_naspweb.org
  • Sawyer Hunley
  • National School Psychology Certification Board,
    Chair
  • sawyer.hunley_at_notes.udayton.edu
  • NASP Website
  • http//www.nasponline.org/certification/index.html

44
NCSP Parity Advocacy Questions Resources
  • Stacy Kalamaros Skalski
  • NASP Director of Public Policy
  • Email sskalski_at_naspweb.org
  • Candis Hogan
  • Oklahoma Delegate and
  • GPR Committee, Central Region Leader
  • hcandis_at_juno.com
  • NASP website
  • http//www.nasponline.org/advocacy/NCSPstateinitia
    tives.html

45
Final Thoughts, Questions, Discussion
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com