Pollutant Loading from Airshed - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 25
About This Presentation
Title:

Pollutant Loading from Airshed

Description:

... of N & P in Forest Fire Smoke in and Around Tahoe ... TN - 5-6 x higher in forest fire smoke than clean Tahoe air, with a greater contribution by ON ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:45
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: johnr135
Learn more at: https://p2ric.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Pollutant Loading from Airshed


1
Pollutant Loading from Airshed Watershed
Sources to Lake Tahoe Influence on Declining
Lake Clarity
John E. Reuter - University of California, Davis
2
Presentation Topics
  • Lake Tahoe and overview of impacts
  • Transport of toxics to lake
  • Atmospheric deposition, nutrient budget
    nutrient limitation
  • Current research on nutrient and particle sources
  • Linkage to Tahoe TMDL

3
Introduction to Lake Tahoe and Key Environmental
Impacts
4
Air Pollution - Just One of Multiple Ecosystem
Stressors
5
Features of Lake Tahoe
Subalpine, oligotrophic, low nutrients in
soils 800 km2 drainage 500 km2 lake
surface 499 m max. depth 650 yr hydraulic
residence 80 land managed by USFS
Urban-wildland interface
6
Lake Tahoe A Changing Ecosystem
  • Significant portions are urbanized
  • Increased resident population
  • Millions of tourists
  • Peak VMT gt1,000,000 miles/day
  • Loss of wetland and runoff infiltration
  • Extensive road network
  • Land disturbance - soil erosion
  • Air pollution

7
Changing Landscape has Lead to Following Lake
Issues
  • Loss in transparency
  • Increased algal growth
  • Changes in biodiversity
  • Higher load of nutrients and fine-sediment
  • Wetland/riparian habitat loss
  • Invasion of non-native biota
  • Air quality impacts
  • Appearance of toxics (e.g. PCB, Hg, MTBE)
  • Significant effort on part of state and federal
    agencies, local government, universities and
    environmental consultants to address these and
    other issues

8
Transport of Toxics to Lake and Incorporation
into Biota
  • Air Pollution is Just Not a Local Issue

9
Regional Transport of Mercury
Alan C. Heyvaert et al. (2000)
10
Transport of Organic Toxics
S. Datta, F. Matsumura et al. (1998)
  • Air, water, snow fish samples taken at Tahoe
    and nearby lake showed measurable levels of PCBs
  • Low levels of contamination but mass balance
    suggests
  • a) atmospheric sources dominate
  • b) out-of-basin transport

11
Atmospheric Deposition, Nutrient Budget
Nutrient Limitation
  • Influence on Long-term Decline of
  • Lake Clarity

12
Unraveling Cause(s) for Declining Water Clarity
  • Nutrients stimulate algae
  • Fine-sediments directly reduces clarity (1-20 µm)
  • Progressive accumulation leads to long-term
    decline
  • Management strategy - P, N, sediment control
  • Evidence for possible recovery
  • TMDL, EIP other plans are addressing load
    reduction

13
Initial Lake Tahoe Nutrient Budget
Jassby et al. (1994), Reuter et al. (2000)
  • Total-N Total-P
  • Atmospheric Deposition 234 (59) 12.4 (28)
  • Stream loading 82 (20) 13.3 (31)
  • Direct runoff 23 (6) 12.3 (28)
  • Groundwater 60 (15) 4 (9)
  • Shore erosion 1 (lt1) 1.6 (4)
  • Total 400 43.6
  • Strongly suggests importance of AD for nutrients
  • Little data on inorganic particle deposition
    (soils)
  • Size and low nutrient condition of Tahoe
    increases its importance
  • More work underway to improve initial estimate
    (ARB, DRI, UCD)

14
Change in Algal Response to Nutrients
Goldman et al. (1993), Jassby et al. (1994)
  • Long-term shift from NP co-limitation to
    consistent P limitation
  • Data strongly suggests that AD, with high NP
    ratio is associated with this shift
  • Fundamental change in lake ecosystem function
  • AD-N very important in coastal oceans
  • Another example of airshed-watershed interaction

15
Current Research on Nutrient and Particle Sources
  • Not So Elementary My Dear Watson

16
Current Research is a Work in Progress
  • Sources of N, P and fine-sediment - local,
    regional and global
  • In-basin or out-of-basin a key management
    question
  • The Lake Tahoe Air Quality Research Scoping
    Document (Cliff et al. 2000) identified need to
    look at
  • Fires (controlled/wild)
  • Road dust
  • Vehicle exhaust
  • Residential heating
  • Upwind emissions
  • LTADS -gt CARB and universities are addressing
    source

17
LTAM Predicts Smoke PM2.5 forWildfire
Prescribed Burns
S. Cliff T. Cahill (2002)
  • PM2.5 (µg/m3) based on 3 fire scenarios
  • a) Historical wildfire (12-16 ha)
  • b) Hypothetical prescribed burn, 50-ha, Ward
    Valley
  • c) Same as b, with 100-ha prescribed burn
  • Significant implications for visibility and
    source for direct deposition

18
Aircraft Measurements of N P in Forest Fire
Smoke in and Around Tahoe Basin
Q. Zhang et al. (2002)
  • TN - 5-6 x higher in forest fire smoke than clean
    Tahoe air, with a greater contribution by ON
  • P - 10 x higher in smoke plume much less P in
    slightly smokey air
  • Bulk deposition measured at Tahoe 5-10 times
    during smoke period
  • Smoke can be nutrient source, but depends on
    transport and deposition

19
Aerosols at South Lake TahoeEvidence for the
Role of Road Dust
Cahill et al. (2003)
  • Continuous monitoring of 8 size modes (0.09-35
    µm) in summer and winter with Drum Sampler at
    site downwind of Highway 50. Analysis for 32
    elements done at 3 hr intervals.
  • Conclusions
  • Hwy 50 major source of coarse particles
    (2.5-35 µm)
  • Particles gtPM10 contain most P
  • Previous AQ studies did not focus on larger
    cuts
  • Hwy 50 also source of fine particles
    (0.09-0.26 µm) from
  • diesels, smoking cars and fine ground road
    soil
  • Transport out over lake occurs each night
  • Data suggest that winter P is strong
    associated with road
  • sanding/drying conditions while in summer
    values are more consistent day-to-day
    suggesting road dust from highway and
    near-highway soils
  • Contribution to whole-lake P budget now being
    evaluated

20
Linkage to Tahoe TMDL
  • Total Daily Maximum Load
  • Best Understood as Water Clarity Restoration Plan

21
Elements of a TMDL
22
Conceptual Load Reduction Model
Informed by Clarity model Multiple
potential solutions
Parameters are for illusrative purposes only
23
Load Reduction Matrix
24
Example Load Reduction Alternatives
A Urban (34) U-2, U-6, U-14, U-26, U-56,
U-78 Atmospheric (12 ) A-3, A-7, A19,
A43 Stream Channels (20) ST-10, ST-34,
ST-43 Ground Water (12) GW-2, GW-4,
GW-18 Forested Areas (22) FA-11, FA-23,
FA-25 TOTAL REDUCTION 15,000 kg tbd/yr
C Urban (20) Atmospheric (15) Stream Channels
(30) Ground Water (25) Forested Area
(15) TOTAL REDUCTION 15,000 kg tbd/yr
B Urban (20) Atmospheric (25) Stream Channels
(25) Ground Water (15) Forested Areas
(15) TOTAL REDUCTION 15,000 kg tbd/yr
Parameters are for illustrative purposes only
25
Conclusion
  • Science-Based Decision Making
  • Stakeholder Driven
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com