Title: Pollutant Loading from Airshed
1Pollutant Loading from Airshed Watershed
Sources to Lake Tahoe Influence on Declining
Lake Clarity
John E. Reuter - University of California, Davis
2Presentation Topics
- Lake Tahoe and overview of impacts
- Transport of toxics to lake
- Atmospheric deposition, nutrient budget
nutrient limitation - Current research on nutrient and particle sources
- Linkage to Tahoe TMDL
3Introduction to Lake Tahoe and Key Environmental
Impacts
4Air Pollution - Just One of Multiple Ecosystem
Stressors
5Features of Lake Tahoe
Subalpine, oligotrophic, low nutrients in
soils 800 km2 drainage 500 km2 lake
surface 499 m max. depth 650 yr hydraulic
residence 80 land managed by USFS
Urban-wildland interface
6Lake Tahoe A Changing Ecosystem
- Significant portions are urbanized
- Increased resident population
- Millions of tourists
- Peak VMT gt1,000,000 miles/day
- Loss of wetland and runoff infiltration
- Extensive road network
- Land disturbance - soil erosion
- Air pollution
7Changing Landscape has Lead to Following Lake
Issues
- Loss in transparency
- Increased algal growth
- Changes in biodiversity
- Higher load of nutrients and fine-sediment
- Wetland/riparian habitat loss
- Invasion of non-native biota
- Air quality impacts
- Appearance of toxics (e.g. PCB, Hg, MTBE)
- Significant effort on part of state and federal
agencies, local government, universities and
environmental consultants to address these and
other issues
8Transport of Toxics to Lake and Incorporation
into Biota
- Air Pollution is Just Not a Local Issue
9Regional Transport of Mercury
Alan C. Heyvaert et al. (2000)
10Transport of Organic Toxics
S. Datta, F. Matsumura et al. (1998)
- Air, water, snow fish samples taken at Tahoe
and nearby lake showed measurable levels of PCBs - Low levels of contamination but mass balance
suggests - a) atmospheric sources dominate
- b) out-of-basin transport
11Atmospheric Deposition, Nutrient Budget
Nutrient Limitation
- Influence on Long-term Decline of
- Lake Clarity
12Unraveling Cause(s) for Declining Water Clarity
- Nutrients stimulate algae
- Fine-sediments directly reduces clarity (1-20 µm)
- Progressive accumulation leads to long-term
decline - Management strategy - P, N, sediment control
- Evidence for possible recovery
- TMDL, EIP other plans are addressing load
reduction
13Initial Lake Tahoe Nutrient Budget
Jassby et al. (1994), Reuter et al. (2000)
- Total-N Total-P
- Atmospheric Deposition 234 (59) 12.4 (28)
- Stream loading 82 (20) 13.3 (31)
- Direct runoff 23 (6) 12.3 (28)
- Groundwater 60 (15) 4 (9)
- Shore erosion 1 (lt1) 1.6 (4)
- Total 400 43.6
- Strongly suggests importance of AD for nutrients
- Little data on inorganic particle deposition
(soils) - Size and low nutrient condition of Tahoe
increases its importance - More work underway to improve initial estimate
(ARB, DRI, UCD)
14Change in Algal Response to Nutrients
Goldman et al. (1993), Jassby et al. (1994)
- Long-term shift from NP co-limitation to
consistent P limitation - Data strongly suggests that AD, with high NP
ratio is associated with this shift - Fundamental change in lake ecosystem function
- AD-N very important in coastal oceans
- Another example of airshed-watershed interaction
15Current Research on Nutrient and Particle Sources
- Not So Elementary My Dear Watson
16Current Research is a Work in Progress
- Sources of N, P and fine-sediment - local,
regional and global - In-basin or out-of-basin a key management
question - The Lake Tahoe Air Quality Research Scoping
Document (Cliff et al. 2000) identified need to
look at - Fires (controlled/wild)
- Road dust
- Vehicle exhaust
- Residential heating
- Upwind emissions
- LTADS -gt CARB and universities are addressing
source
17LTAM Predicts Smoke PM2.5 forWildfire
Prescribed Burns
S. Cliff T. Cahill (2002)
- PM2.5 (µg/m3) based on 3 fire scenarios
-
- a) Historical wildfire (12-16 ha)
- b) Hypothetical prescribed burn, 50-ha, Ward
Valley - c) Same as b, with 100-ha prescribed burn
- Significant implications for visibility and
source for direct deposition
18Aircraft Measurements of N P in Forest Fire
Smoke in and Around Tahoe Basin
Q. Zhang et al. (2002)
- TN - 5-6 x higher in forest fire smoke than clean
Tahoe air, with a greater contribution by ON - P - 10 x higher in smoke plume much less P in
slightly smokey air - Bulk deposition measured at Tahoe 5-10 times
during smoke period - Smoke can be nutrient source, but depends on
transport and deposition
19Aerosols at South Lake TahoeEvidence for the
Role of Road Dust
Cahill et al. (2003)
- Continuous monitoring of 8 size modes (0.09-35
µm) in summer and winter with Drum Sampler at
site downwind of Highway 50. Analysis for 32
elements done at 3 hr intervals. - Conclusions
- Hwy 50 major source of coarse particles
(2.5-35 µm) - Particles gtPM10 contain most P
- Previous AQ studies did not focus on larger
cuts - Hwy 50 also source of fine particles
(0.09-0.26 µm) from - diesels, smoking cars and fine ground road
soil - Transport out over lake occurs each night
- Data suggest that winter P is strong
associated with road - sanding/drying conditions while in summer
values are more consistent day-to-day
suggesting road dust from highway and
near-highway soils - Contribution to whole-lake P budget now being
evaluated -
20Linkage to Tahoe TMDL
- Total Daily Maximum Load
- Best Understood as Water Clarity Restoration Plan
21Elements of a TMDL
22Conceptual Load Reduction Model
Informed by Clarity model Multiple
potential solutions
Parameters are for illusrative purposes only
23 Load Reduction Matrix
24Example Load Reduction Alternatives
A Urban (34) U-2, U-6, U-14, U-26, U-56,
U-78 Atmospheric (12 ) A-3, A-7, A19,
A43 Stream Channels (20) ST-10, ST-34,
ST-43 Ground Water (12) GW-2, GW-4,
GW-18 Forested Areas (22) FA-11, FA-23,
FA-25 TOTAL REDUCTION 15,000 kg tbd/yr
C Urban (20) Atmospheric (15) Stream Channels
(30) Ground Water (25) Forested Area
(15) TOTAL REDUCTION 15,000 kg tbd/yr
B Urban (20) Atmospheric (25) Stream Channels
(25) Ground Water (15) Forested Areas
(15) TOTAL REDUCTION 15,000 kg tbd/yr
Parameters are for illustrative purposes only
25Conclusion
- Science-Based Decision Making
- Stakeholder Driven