Global Status of GHS Presented by Paula Laux Senior Regulatory Specialist Wercs Professional Service - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 25
About This Presentation
Title:

Global Status of GHS Presented by Paula Laux Senior Regulatory Specialist Wercs Professional Service

Description:

So that a system exists where hazards are identically communicated to all ... Australia, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Brunei Darussalam, China, Cambodia, Fiji, India, ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:102
Avg rating:3.0/5.0

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Global Status of GHS Presented by Paula Laux Senior Regulatory Specialist Wercs Professional Service


1
Global Status of GHSPresented by Paula
LauxSenior Regulatory SpecialistWercs
Professional Services
2
Why was GHS developed?
  • So that a system exists where hazards are
    identically communicated to all those exposed

3
Why was GHS developed?
  • Today same product requires multiple MSDSs and
    labels in international trade
  • Today there are different classification schemes
    between Environmental, Industrial,
    Transportation, and Consumer sector - even in
    same country
  • Today the same substance/preparation requires
    different warnings based on jurisdiction

4
Who is the target audience?
  • Governments
  • Companies
  • Workers
  • Emergency Responders
  • Member of the Public
  • Consumers

5
What types of Chemicals are Regulated?
  • Hazardous Chemicals
  • Substances
  • Products
  • Mixtures
  • Pesticides
  • Consumers Products

6
What is GHS?
  • Globally Harmonized System of Classification and
    Labeling
  • Defines health, physical and environmental
    hazards
  • Establishes classification scheme using available
    data
  • Establishes a common hazard communication method
  • Explains how to apply the system
  • Supplies building blocks for countries to develop
    own laws

7
Published Guidance documents
  • Published by the United Nation Economic
    Commission for Europe (UNECE)
  • First publication in 2003
  • Revision 1 edition published in 2005
  • Referred to as UN Purple Book

8
What GHS Isnt?
  • A regulation or a standard
  • Not mandated until it becomes law in a given
    region
  • May require various regulatory authorities within
    region to pass laws

9
General Implementation Guidelines
  • GHS Voluntary international document- not
    binding treaty
  • When countries adopt GHS into their systems,
    there will be binding regulatory changes for
    industry
  • No international implementation schedule
  • Different systems/sectors require different time
    frames for GHS implementation

10
Canada Implementation
  • Looking for harmonization between NAFTA countries
  • Sectors WHMIS, Consumer Chemical, Pesticide
    control, and Transportation
  • Published, Comparison of Sector Interim
    Recommendations or Preferred Options (Feb, 2006)
  • Next steps Consultation with trading partners
    Economic analysis, Development of final
    recommendations, Decision making, Draft
    regulations, Regulatory process, Phasing in
    implementation
  • May revisit based on US and Mexican work.

11
EU Implementation
  • As per REACH, GHS SDS formats required already
    June 1, 2007
  • Sections 2/3 should be inverted
  • Transition period for GHS implementation 3 years
    for substances, 7-8 years for mixtures
  • Will require extended SDS for certain material
    with varying phase-in period

12
Japan Implementation
  • GHS labeling of ISHL (Industrial Safety and
    Health Law) 1-Dec-2006
  • GHS labeling technically applies to only 99 of
    the denoted ISHL materials
  • GHS classification manual does exist in English
  • 1500 GHS classification of chemicals regulated in
    Japan
  • Industrial labeling and SDS system based on GHS
  • Have approved risk based labeling for consumer
    products (Not consistent with GHS)

13
Other Asia-Pacific Countries
  • Australia, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Brunei
    Darussalam, China, Cambodia, Fiji, India,
    Indonesia, Islamic Republic of Iran, Japan, LAO,
    Malaysia, Maldives, Mongolia, Myanmar, Oman
    Philippines, QATAR, Republic of Korea, Sri Lanka,
    Thailand, Vietnam, Yemen
  • 20/23 Countries have plans to implement GHS
  • Several (New Zealand, Bahrain, Mauritius)
    countries have already adopted GHS

14
Other Asia-Pacific CountriesNew Zealand
  • GHS has been adopted in a legislative sense (GHS
    2003)
  • Revisions based on 2005 GHS (rev 1) expected in
    2007
  • Implementation not planned before 2008
  • List of GHS classified chemicals
  • Labeling being handled separately in order to
    align with major trading partner. (2010)

15
Other Asia-Pacific CountriesAustralia
  • GHS MSDS format was effective April 2006
  • GHS classification proposal- Addresses only
    workplace
  • Draft National Standard for the Control of
    Workplace Hazardous chemicals
  • Transition period 5 years for SDS
  • No intent to use GHS mixtures rule
  • Want to address a revised GHS hazardous
    substances list
  • Intent to make draft for labeling of Workplace
    Chemicals and Preparation of SDSs as well

16
USA ImplementationDOT
  • For harmonization of transportation (US DOT)
    voluntary compliance is now authorized, the
    provisions become mandatory on 1-Jan-2008
  • Exception to above for Division 3 and 6.1- old
    packing groups can be used until 1-Jan-2012
  • Environmentally hazardous substances will be
    considered for change in a separate rulemaking
    proceeding

17
USA ImplementationOSHA
  • Under a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
    (12-Sept-2006) OSHA considered modifying HCS to
    include
  • Changing criteria for classifying health
    physical hazards
  • Adopting standardized labeling requirements
  • Requiring a standardized order of information
    for MSDS
  • Final Rule anticipated at the end of 2008

18
USA ImplementationOther Agencies
  • EPA/FIFRA
  • Federal Register 25-Aug-2004 (situational
    analysis and white paper)
  • Stakeholder meeting 19-Oct-2006
  • CPSC
  • Beginning work on situation analysis
  • Current regulation includes consideration of
    risk,
  • but not environmental endpoints.

19
Best Source Of Implementation Information
  • www.unece.org/trans/danger/publi/ghs/implementatio
    n_e.html

20
Comparison of various regulations and pieces of
GHS classification acceptedCompiled from
multiple slides prepared by Michelle Sullivan,
Ph.D
21
Comparison of various regulations and pieces of
GHS classification acceptedCompiled from
multiple slides prepared by Michelle Sullivan,
Ph.D
22
Why was GHS developed?
  • So that a system exists where hazards are
    identically communicated to all those exposed

23
Other Challenges
  • Ingredient Disclosure (Purple book leaves it
    Competent Authority)
  • Additional Country Specific information that is
    outside classification
  • Labeling (especially for Consumer Products that
    have been historically risk based)

24
Global Status of GHS
  • Questions/Comments?

25
Global Status of GHSContact InformationPaula
LauxSenior Regulatory SpecialistWercs
Professional Services518 256-6774paulal_at_thewercs
.com
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com