Title: The PRISM Toolkit: A Strategy for Improving Consent Form Readability
1The PRISM Toolkit A Strategy for Improving
Consent Form Readability
- caBIG Data Sharing Intellectual Capital
Meeting - January 22-23, 2007 ? Philadelphia, PA
- Sarah M. Greene, MPH
- Group Health Center for Health Studies
2Presentation Overview
- Health Literacy and the Birth of the CHS PRISM
Project - About the PRISM Readability Toolkit
- Examples Applying PRISM to Informed Consent
Materials - Uptake and Insights about Remaining Work
3Health Literacy the Birth of PRISM
- PRISMs humble, grass-roots origins
- Initial idea experienced research assistant and
editor tasked with identifying best study
materials (consent forms, recruitment letters) in
use at our Group Health Center for Health Studies
(CHS) and opportunities for improving, creating
templates - Readability emerged almost immediately as the
primary area of concern. - Discovered that consent forms rarely met IRBs
8th grade reading-level target - Analysis of study materials from 32 studies
fielded from 2000-2005 - Average reading level was 11.2
- Nearly one-third of consent forms were at 12th
grade or higher - Coincident with the IOMs report Health
Literacy A Prescription to End Confusion - Opportunity to leverage broader focus on HL
within the context of our work
4PRISM Project to Review Improve Study
Materials
- The PRISM Readability Toolkit - Contents
- How this Toolkit Can Help You
- What You Should Know Before Using this Toolkit
- The Principles of Plain Language
- How to Determine Reading Level
- Quick Reference Guide for Improving Readability
- Editing Checklist for Participant Materials
- Resources for Informed Consent Documents
- Resources for HIPAA Authorization Documents
- Other project components
- Customized workshops and ongoing dissemination
- Plain language editing service to ensure
readability
5Key PRISM principles
- Readability is more than just using simple
wordscommunicating clearly in writing entails
the use of - A conversational writing style including active
voice, 1st person - Short simple sentences and paragraphs, steering
clear of jargon and medical terms as much as
possible - Reader-friendly formatting (white space, bold,
bullets, etc.) - Keeping readers needs in mind as material is
organized presented - Most important info first, steps in a research
study presented chronologically - This last bullet can be tricky
- Especially with consent forms, IRBs, study
sponsors, or risk management folks may stipulate
how and in what order information is presented
6Strategies and Tactics Used in PRISM
- Reading materials aloud
- Having an unfamiliar (preferably non-research)
person read materials - Use Microsoft Words built-in readability
calculator for - Flesch-Kinkaid (reported as a grade level)
- Flesch Reading Ease (reported as a value 0-100)
- of passive-voice sentences
- Use visual aids as appropriate to explain complex
concepts - Use road signs to help reader navigate
(bullets, headers, format) - Dont fear the white space
7PRISM Toolkit Consent Form References
- Consent form templates
- University of South Florida
- Johns Hopkins
- Guidelines for developing consent forms
- University of Illinois at Chicago
- Association of American Medical Colleges
- Helpful HIPAA authorization templates
- University of California (system wide)
stand-alone HIPAA template - Seattle Childrens Hospital Research Institute
stand-alone HIPAA template - University of South Florida stand-alone HIPAA
template, and HIPAA language within the consent
templates - Johns Hopkins University HIPAA language within
the consent template
8PRISM Principles in Action Before After
Examples (1)
If you agree to participate, we will arrange a
screening interview with you at our research
clinic. During this interview, you will be asked
to do some tasks that measure your thinking and
problem-solving abilities and answer questions
about your medical history and occupational
history. If you are willing, a trained technician
will obtain a blood sample of approximately two
tablespoons. This visit should take approximately
two hours. If you are eligible to participate in
the study, every two years we will repeat the
initial assessment procedures at the Center for
Health Studies, and we will periodically review
your medical record to see if there is a change.
If you agree to be in the study, we will invite
you to an interview at our research clinic.
During this interview, we will ask you to do some
tasks that measure your thinking and
problem-solving abilities. We will also ask you
questions about your medical and work histories.
If you are willing, we will take a blood sample
of about two tablespoons. This visit should take
about two hours. If you are eligible for the
study, we will ask you to come in for a similar
interview and blood draw every two years. We will
also check your medical record from time to time
to see if there is a change.
Original 13.2 Revised 7.2
9PRISM Principles in Action Before After
Examples (2)
- By signing this form, you consent to (authorize)
the use of health information from your Group
Health medical records needed for this study,
which would include your use of health care
services such as number and types of medications,
clinic visits, laboratory test results and
hospitalizations. Some of the information
collected will be about mental health medications
and visits. We will collect this information for
a period of one year before your first telephone
survey date and one year after your first
telephone survey date.
- If you sign this form, you are authorizing us to
use health information from your Group Health
medical records for this study. This means you
are giving consent for us to collect some
information from your medical records. We will
not look at your entire medical record. Instead,
we will use a computer to collect information
about your use of health care services,
including - number and types of medications.
- clinic visits.
- lab test results.
- trips to the hospital.
- mental health medications and visits.
- We will collect this information for a period of
about two years, starting one year before your
first phone survey and ending one year after.
Original 14.8 Revised 6.5
1017-page patient-friendly word list Useful, if
labor intensive to create!
11Impact at Our Research Center Data from the
PRISM Editing Service
- Reviewed grade levels of consent forms, letters
and other materials before and after the PRISM
in-service edited between October 2005 - October
2007
Among 51 unique materials Before editing 9.8 (range 6.6 - 14.1) After editing 7.7 (range 5.3 10.3)
Among 19 consent forms Before editing 10.6 (range 7.8 14.1) After editing 8.6 (range 6.9 10.0)
12Interfacing with our IRB
- Resounding endorsement from IRB administrator
members - Investigators/project teams (especially those
external to our research center) are strongly
encouraged to use PRISM editing service as a
means of ensuring IRB approval - Still, this has not completely precluded consent
form editing by the IRB, occasionally with
negative impact on readability
13Uptake
- PRISM dissemination to research and
clinically-oriented personnel - Local Regional Workshops, Toolkit Distribution
- Multiple in-house trainings for staff faculty
- Sparked wider interest Plain Language
initiative in Group Health - University of Washington
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
- Puget Sound Health Alliance
- Seattle-King County Public Health Department
- Nationally featured resource at conferences,
other web sites - NHLBI
- Americas Health Insurance Plans
- NIH Roadmap/NECTAR contractors
- PRIMR Human Research Protections Conference
So what???
14Creating a culture of health literacy within the
research enterprise
- Providing evidence or a business case that
resonates with researchers, leaders and
end-users. - Evidence could include proven improvement in
study participant/patient comprehension,
satisfaction, or medication adherence. - The business case could include fewer calls to
study coordinator (in research setting) customer
service (in healthcare) or decreased costs
related to medication or treatment errors. - In our research setting, we hope to mount a study
which demonstrates that PRISM-ified materials
result in higher recruitment rates, retention and
lower costs since recruitment is completed more
effectively and efficiently - Our success was driven in part by accessible,
simple resources, an internal champion with
leaderships support, data, and early wins
15Still Much Work to Be Done
- Even in our own shop, where PRISM took root and
flourished, its inordinately difficult to change
old habits researchers are accustomed to
writing for their peers on study sections and
journal editorial boards, and using materials
that have worked on bygone studies - To get to health literate consent forms, our
strategy has included - A product (the PRISM Toolkit)
- A person (the in-house editing team)
- A culture change (leadership, IRB,
organizational buy-in) - Weve created awareness, built skills among our
staff, and have a centralized resource. - Readability is on the radar screen, but not quite
embedded in everyones DNA
Each of these is necessary, but probably not
sufficient
16Thank you!
- Contact us at prism_at_ghc.org