Dutch approach - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Dutch approach

Description:

Introducing and implementing looked to be 'a piece of cake' ... descriptors (activities are concrete, realistic, imaginable, have an addressee) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:23
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: adrian64
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Dutch approach


1
(No Transcript)
2
Dutch approach
  • The Dutch approach to implement the ELP
  • Dick Meijer

3
Summary Dutch ELP-project
  • Since start very enthusiastic
  • Introducing and implementing looked to be 'a
    piece of cake'
  • Because of the aims and intentions of ELP
  • Almost all institutes were involved (exception
    teacher trainers !!!)
  • Tried to develop 7 different portfolios
    (implementation strategy all sectors should be
    involved)

4
  • Piloting ELPs
  • Different projects (e.g. border ELP in German)
  • Regulare meetings with teachers
  • Developing new descriptors
  • Developing learning activities

5
Conclusions after three years of piloting
  • So many different portfolios were not necessary
  • For the learners it was difficult to understand
    the descriptors (not used to look at foreign
    language learning that way)
  • Focussing on reporting function is not enough to
    implement ELP
  • Teachers need also to be 'owner' of the portfolio
    (involving them in new developments)
  • The ELP should be embedded in the curriculum

6
Dutch portfolios
  • Validated portfolios
  • 9 pupils (primary schools)
  • 12 pupils (lower secondary education)
  • 15 pupils (upper secondary education)
  • Vocational education
  • Migrants
  • Language portfolio for language teachers
  • English in primary and lower secondary education

7
Accessibility for (young) learners
  • One conclusion was descriptors are difficult to
    understand especially for (young) learners.
  • they did not always recognize communicative
    situations 'behind the descriptors'
  • they had difficulties to imagine foreign language
    situations if they are not used to go abroad

8
Consequences
  • If you want to implement the ELP, the problem of
    accessibility should be solved
  • The pedagogical role of the portfolio became more
    and more important
  • So
  • we tried to find ways to make the portfolio more
    accessible to the 'users'
  • We developed series of language learning
    activities, linked to the descriptors (activities
    are concrete, realistic, imaginable, have an
    addressee)

9
Checklist
  • Checklist exists of descriptors and situations
    and explanations
  • It links to learning activities

10
Dutch portfolio is a 'complex' project
  • No stand alone activities developing a common
    Dutch language portfolio website
  • Student/pupils Portfolio - efficient learning
    activities
  • Textbook authors (a.o.) Portfolio - language
    profiles (series of concrete interpretations of
    descriptors in terms of can do-statements)
  • Schools Portfolio and help for implementation
    (Focus on matching secondary and vocational
    education)
  • Implementation strategy ad hoc by trying to
    solve problems

11
Implementation strategies
  • ELP for everybody (now website)
  • Strong focus on pedagogical part
  • Involving teachers in school projects (at least
    two teachers)
  • Developing learning materials
  • Organizing workshops, seminars etc.
  • Articles written by professionals
  • Involvement of all pedagogical institutes
  • Maim aim learning a language becomes interesting
    and effective
  • Focus on ongoing learning

12
  • Almost no quantitative targets
  • Research projects on two ELP projects
  • Budget pro year

13
Situation now
14
  • 20.000 users
  • 2.000 teachers
  • 18.000 learners
  • Implementing activities (bottom up)
  • Networks of schools
  • Publishers
  • Teacher training institutes
  • ELPs for all learners (primary till adult
    education)
  • Curriculum activities ongoing learning, closing
    gap between schools and between upper and lower
    secondary

15
Workshop activity
  • Working in pairs to identify elements of
    relevance to your own practice (15 minutes)
  • Exchange information on implementation activities
    in a larger group (excluding teacher training
    activities) and identify the potentially most
    effective ones (30 minutes)
  • Coffee break (15.30)
  • First draft of an action plan related to own
    project (30 minutes)
  • Collect activities related to stakeholders and
    questions to the panel put them on posters (30
    minutes)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com