EPICS Limitations PowerPoint PPT Presentation

presentation player overlay
1 / 9
About This Presentation
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: EPICS Limitations


1
EPICS Limitations
  • Bob Dalesio
  • Marty Kraimer

2
Limited view point
  • These slides are written from a limited
    perspective
  • Many people could and should add the limitations
    that they encounter to this.
  • It is a collaboration and that is an invitation
    to voice what is wrong (and volunteer to fix some
    of it)

3
There is no device abstraction in the database
  • What are devices?
  • Power Supplies w Magnets
  • Scope
  • What are the properties
  • multiple inputs and commands
  • states taking data, ramping, turning off
  • multiple status bits over temp, on/off etc.
  • Does each command and status become a channel
  • Does the value / status fit the command / state
    model
  • Does a device use channels for interfaces to hw
  • Does a device disallow control of output channels
    it use
  • Marty is working on a new database to overcome
    this.

4
System Limitations
  • The database can process as many as 100K records
    per second in the new power PCs faster
    processors.
  • But, the fastest response time to an interrupt is
    on the order of 30 usecs for interrupt latency
    and record processing
  • Distributed IOCs can run loops over Channel
    Access at about 20 Hz, care must be taken to
    handle loss of communication.
  • Faster applications must be done in dedicated
    hardware (interface it to EPICS for integration
    and expose all variables and configuration
    parameters)
  • There is no way to add channels to a running IOC
    without restarting it (redundant IOCs may limit
    the impact)

5
Channel Access Limitations
  • There are currently 2 versions of the Server
  • There is no built in name introspection
  • What to do about an interface to devices? a thin
    interface supports general purpose / reusable
    clients
  • Currently we can only monitor on value dead band,
    alarm dead band, or change of alarm status. It
    would be nice if we could monitor on
  • Frequency or dead band per client
  • Monitor device when a certain state is true (BPMs
    used for different virtual beam lines)
  • No support for synchronous gets from variety of
    IOCs (there are at least two instances of data
    silo for getting synch data but not in the
    release of EPICS)
  • The support for arrays is weak
  • The time base and offset are not in the array
    data
  • There is no direct support for multi dimensional
    arrays.
  • No support for subarrays in the protocol
  • Arrays are not buffered only pointers to the
    arrays are buffered
  • There is no support to direct the record to
    process for a get or put this is decided
    statically in the field description in the .dbd
    file.

6
Database Limitations
  • Only time stamp, display limits and control
    limits meta data can be obtained. It would be
    nice if some new metadata or data structures were
    available
  • Statistical information
  • Data from the past? Statistical data from the
    past?
  • Message / State Data?
  • Data to support device implementation
  • There is weak support for process control
    algorithms for PID and lead/lag control and no
    control loop cascading support
  • The record set and record reference manual needs
    to be updated.
  • Redundancy is supported in a limited way but
    there is no fielded device support that takes
    advantage of this capability.

7
Configuration tools are limited
  • Reusable relational database tools for
    configuration are nearly non-existent.
  • All configuration tools are done in stand alone
    tools not in an integrated environment.

8
Clients
  • Adherence to industrial standards for tools like
    a state-transition tool
  • Integrated develop environment would be nice is
    CSS becoming this?
  • Physics applications are not tightly integrated
    with the control system and frequently these
    tools recreate functionality that is ready in
    other client tools.
  • Web based technology is not available in a
    uniform way.

9
Conclusions
  • Our community has successfully delivered control
    systems for a number of applications.
  • The ability to share software and hardware
    solutions is enhanced by working on the same base
    even though it is flawed.
  • The architecture supports the ability to create
    work-arounds.
  • There is always work that can be done to improve
    productivity and reliability while reducing
    costs.
  • The community should actively inform us when
    things are not working or if you have a better
    solution that we could use.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com