Presentation of Czech SAO - National Report on EU Financial Management - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Presentation of Czech SAO - National Report on EU Financial Management

Description:

SUPREME AUDIT OFFICE CZECH REPUBLIC. Audit of state budget finances spent on the ... create jobs risk of unjustified drawdown of state budget finances ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:11
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: polkj
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Presentation of Czech SAO - National Report on EU Financial Management


1

SUPREME AUDIT OFFICE CZECH
REPUBLIC Audit of state budget finances spent
on the provision of investment incentives and
investment aid
2
  • Introduction
  • Basic details of the audit
  • Audit begun.. . 2005
  • Audited funds ... CZK 5.5 billion
  • Number of auditors .. 17
  • Number of auditees . 21
  • Shortcomings found . CZK 1.5 billion
  • Audit completed. 2006

3
  • Subject of the audit
  • use of state budget finances spent on the
    provision of investment incentives awarded by the
    government and provided on the basis of a written
    Memorandum of Understanding Declaring a Common
    Intention (contract)
  • Nature of the audit
  • ex post audit

4
  • Auditees
  • ministries (Ministry of Finance MoF and
    Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs MoLSA)
  • providers of state budget finances spent on
    investment incentives
  • public entities
  • commercial enterprises
  • beneficiaries of state budget finances spent on
    investment incentives
  • private entities

5
Investment incentives system MoLSA ?
appropriations for new job creation ?
appropriations for employee training
(re-training) MoF ? special-purpose
appropriations and other special-purpose
appropriations concerning legal persons income
tax
6
Aims of the audit
  • The aim of the audit was determined by its
    subject and by the possibilities for scrutinising
    activities.
  • What could be checked?
  • Use of state budget finances spent on the
    provision of investment incentives.
  • What could not be checked?
  • The overall benefits stemming from the provision
    of investment incentives (it is less than 10
    years since they were provided).

7
Scrutiny of audited activities
During audit the Office scrutinises and appraises
(Section 4 (1) of Act No. 166/1993 Coll., on the
Supreme Audit Office)
Compliance with the law
Efficiency
Effectiveness
Legal analysis of contract
Some performance audit methods and elements used
Some performance audit methods and elements used
Audit
8
Performance audit methods employed
  • Preliminary study
  • Brainstorming
  • used to generate new ideas and techniques and
    for subsequent selection of
  • the most suitable method for appraising the
    economy, efficiency and
  • effectiveness of the audited activities (3E)
  • Benchmarking
  • defining individual audited activities and
    specifying standards for their
  • monitoring, compiling standards
  • Modelling
  • used to check the functionality of standards,
    empirical units, ascertainment
  • methods and techniques and to fine-tune them
  • modelling uses fictitious companies and the
    values measured in them for 3E
  • appraisal of the expenditure of state budget
    finances on individual investment
  • incentives

9
Performance audit methods employed
  • Audit programme
  • Audit block diagrams
  • guideline block diagrams used for scrutiny of
    efficiency and effectiveness,
  • scrutiny of measures to eliminate found
    shortcomings and legality check
  • Productivity diagrams
  • used to express the results of efficiency
    indicator measurement for the public
  • expenditure under scrutiny
  • Value charts
  • used to express the results of effectiveness
    indicator measurement for the
  • public expenditure under scrutiny
  • Comparative analysis (benchmarking)
  • depicts the volume of output generated by input
    sources and makes it
  • possible to compare the efficiency and
    effectiveness of expenditure of state
  • budget finances on the provided investment
    incentives using measured
  • indicators

10
Sources used during the audit
  • Previous audit
  • Preliminary study for the audit
  • Audit programme
  • Information obtained between the end of the
    previous audit and the start
  • of this audit

11
Findings from the previous audit
  • CZK 1,352 million spent on investment incentives
    provided by government resolution not by act
    of parliament
  • the investment incentives manual lacked the
    basic requisites for demonstrating its validity
  • the provision of a tax-based investment
    incentive was not tied to a fixed minimum period
    of time for doing business in the Czech Republic
    and to fulfilment of the terms for the provision
    of other investment incentives
  • Response
  • CZK 12.5 million was returned to the state
    budget in some cases the MoF had not reached a
    decision on the shortcomings by 31.12.2005.

12
Preparation of the audit
  • Preliminary study
  • necessary to prevent errors in the audit
    programme
  • brainstorming done in the preliminary study
    stage involved three direct
  • participants/heads of audit groups
  • modelling of the procedures contained in the
    preliminary study made it
  • possible to compile a relatively precise audit
    programme and enabled
  • auditors to work efficiently at the auditees

13
Audit input and output
Intended for the public
Audit conclusion
Output
Appeal against decisions on objections
Objections to the audit protocol
Audit protocols
Intended for auditors
Input
Previous audit, information obtained, preliminary
study, audit programme
14
Audit findings - I
  • investments supported by investment incentives
    attained a value of over
  • CZK 21 billion by the end of 2005
  • (CZK 12 billion more than in the contracts)
  • 4,810 new jobs created (1,438 more than
    negotiated)
  • 2,481 employees trained (by the end of 2005)
  • by government resolution annexes are concluded
    to the contracts with commercial enterprises that
    enable the companies to apply for increased,
    additional special-purpose appropriations related
    to legal persons income tax these increased
    state budget outlays do not widen the range of
    the companies obligations, however
  • contract annexes - companies make
    bigger profits
  • - the
    state merely incurs increased expenditure,
    with a risk of further increases

15
Audit findings II
  • under the signed contracts additional
    special-purpose appropriations were
  • limited by the size of the appropriation
    disbursed in the first five years
  • - the annexes removed this limitation
  • - the
    sole criterion is thus the admissible intensity
    of state aid
  • the states outlays will be greater than
    originally considered and cannot be precisely
    estimated in five companies where a calculation
    could be made the expected increased expenditure
    amounts to at least CZK 801 million
  • provision of investment aid to companies
    operating in the services sector -
  • not regulated by law

16
Features of the audit
  • the audit scrutinised - compliance with the law
  • - effectiveness and achieved effects
  • the audit - important for parliament
    and citizens
  • - performed at the
    right time to maximise impacts
  • - effective benefits
    outweigh the cost of resources used in the
    audit (cost of CZK 7 million)
  • elimination of risks represents savings in state
    budget expenditure of
  • more than CZK 801 million value added is at
    least CZK 794million
  • eliminating the detected risks will enable
    better working of the public
  • sector


17
Risks
  • under the contract annexes state budget finances
    are not put towards the achievement of a new goal
    risk the expenditure will bring no further
    benefits for the state
  • in the contracts the value of investments for
    calculating the admissible public aid intensity
    is not limited either by the size of investment
    or a deadline for investing (it is not possible
    to estimate the total state budget expenditure on
    appropriations)
  • risk all additional finances invested in fixed
    assets by companies make it possible to draw down
    larger additional special-purpose appropriations
    than previously envisaged

18
  • the provider relaxes the new job creation
    condition by allowing the
  • companies to include employees taken on before
    the contract was signed
  • non-compliance with the terms for appraising
    fulfilment of the obligation to
  • create jobs risk of unjustified drawdown of
    state budget finances
  • non-existence of legislation governing the
    provision of appropriations to
  • investors in the services sector
  • - risk of the shortcomings found in the audit
    being repeated

19
Recommendations to government
  • when concluding annexes to contracts negotiate
    counter-performance from
  • the commercial enterprises in return for the
    provided financing
  • draft legislation for the provision of
    investment aid in the services sector
  • ensure that MoLSA adheres to the precise wording
    of contractual
  • provisions when performing control

20
Thank you for your attention Vladimír
Ruta vladimir.ruta_at_nku.cz Phone 420476140724
www.nku.cz
21
  • QuestionsCommentsDiscussion
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com