Title: Presentation of Czech SAO - National Report on EU Financial Management
1 SUPREME AUDIT OFFICE CZECH
REPUBLIC Audit of state budget finances spent
on the provision of investment incentives and
investment aid
2- Introduction
- Basic details of the audit
-
- Audit begun.. . 2005
- Audited funds ... CZK 5.5 billion
- Number of auditors .. 17
- Number of auditees . 21
- Shortcomings found . CZK 1.5 billion
- Audit completed. 2006
-
3- Subject of the audit
- use of state budget finances spent on the
provision of investment incentives awarded by the
government and provided on the basis of a written
Memorandum of Understanding Declaring a Common
Intention (contract) - Nature of the audit
- ex post audit
-
4- Auditees
- ministries (Ministry of Finance MoF and
Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs MoLSA)
- providers of state budget finances spent on
investment incentives - public entities
- commercial enterprises
- beneficiaries of state budget finances spent on
investment incentives - private entities
-
5Investment incentives system MoLSA ?
appropriations for new job creation ?
appropriations for employee training
(re-training) MoF ? special-purpose
appropriations and other special-purpose
appropriations concerning legal persons income
tax
6Aims of the audit
- The aim of the audit was determined by its
subject and by the possibilities for scrutinising
activities. - What could be checked?
- Use of state budget finances spent on the
provision of investment incentives. - What could not be checked?
- The overall benefits stemming from the provision
of investment incentives (it is less than 10
years since they were provided). -
7Scrutiny of audited activities
During audit the Office scrutinises and appraises
(Section 4 (1) of Act No. 166/1993 Coll., on the
Supreme Audit Office)
Compliance with the law
Efficiency
Effectiveness
Legal analysis of contract
Some performance audit methods and elements used
Some performance audit methods and elements used
Audit
8Performance audit methods employed
- Brainstorming
- used to generate new ideas and techniques and
for subsequent selection of - the most suitable method for appraising the
economy, efficiency and - effectiveness of the audited activities (3E)
- Benchmarking
- defining individual audited activities and
specifying standards for their - monitoring, compiling standards
-
- Modelling
- used to check the functionality of standards,
empirical units, ascertainment - methods and techniques and to fine-tune them
- modelling uses fictitious companies and the
values measured in them for 3E - appraisal of the expenditure of state budget
finances on individual investment - incentives
9Performance audit methods employed
- Audit block diagrams
- guideline block diagrams used for scrutiny of
efficiency and effectiveness, - scrutiny of measures to eliminate found
shortcomings and legality check - Productivity diagrams
- used to express the results of efficiency
indicator measurement for the public - expenditure under scrutiny
-
- Value charts
- used to express the results of effectiveness
indicator measurement for the - public expenditure under scrutiny
-
- Comparative analysis (benchmarking)
- depicts the volume of output generated by input
sources and makes it - possible to compare the efficiency and
effectiveness of expenditure of state - budget finances on the provided investment
incentives using measured - indicators
10Sources used during the audit
- Previous audit
- Preliminary study for the audit
- Audit programme
- Information obtained between the end of the
previous audit and the start - of this audit
11Findings from the previous audit
- CZK 1,352 million spent on investment incentives
provided by government resolution not by act
of parliament - the investment incentives manual lacked the
basic requisites for demonstrating its validity - the provision of a tax-based investment
incentive was not tied to a fixed minimum period
of time for doing business in the Czech Republic
and to fulfilment of the terms for the provision
of other investment incentives - Response
- CZK 12.5 million was returned to the state
budget in some cases the MoF had not reached a
decision on the shortcomings by 31.12.2005.
12Preparation of the audit
- Preliminary study
- necessary to prevent errors in the audit
programme - brainstorming done in the preliminary study
stage involved three direct - participants/heads of audit groups
-
- modelling of the procedures contained in the
preliminary study made it - possible to compile a relatively precise audit
programme and enabled - auditors to work efficiently at the auditees
13Audit input and output
Intended for the public
Audit conclusion
Output
Appeal against decisions on objections
Objections to the audit protocol
Audit protocols
Intended for auditors
Input
Previous audit, information obtained, preliminary
study, audit programme
14Audit findings - I
- investments supported by investment incentives
attained a value of over - CZK 21 billion by the end of 2005
- (CZK 12 billion more than in the contracts)
- 4,810 new jobs created (1,438 more than
negotiated) - 2,481 employees trained (by the end of 2005)
- by government resolution annexes are concluded
to the contracts with commercial enterprises that
enable the companies to apply for increased,
additional special-purpose appropriations related
to legal persons income tax these increased
state budget outlays do not widen the range of
the companies obligations, however - contract annexes - companies make
bigger profits - - the
state merely incurs increased expenditure,
with a risk of further increases -
15Audit findings II
- under the signed contracts additional
special-purpose appropriations were - limited by the size of the appropriation
disbursed in the first five years - - the annexes removed this limitation
- - the
sole criterion is thus the admissible intensity
of state aid - the states outlays will be greater than
originally considered and cannot be precisely
estimated in five companies where a calculation
could be made the expected increased expenditure
amounts to at least CZK 801 million - provision of investment aid to companies
operating in the services sector - - not regulated by law
16Features of the audit
- the audit scrutinised - compliance with the law
- - effectiveness and achieved effects
-
- the audit - important for parliament
and citizens - - performed at the
right time to maximise impacts - - effective benefits
outweigh the cost of resources used in the
audit (cost of CZK 7 million) - elimination of risks represents savings in state
budget expenditure of - more than CZK 801 million value added is at
least CZK 794million - eliminating the detected risks will enable
better working of the public - sector
-
-
17Risks
-
- under the contract annexes state budget finances
are not put towards the achievement of a new goal
risk the expenditure will bring no further
benefits for the state -
- in the contracts the value of investments for
calculating the admissible public aid intensity
is not limited either by the size of investment
or a deadline for investing (it is not possible
to estimate the total state budget expenditure on
appropriations) - risk all additional finances invested in fixed
assets by companies make it possible to draw down
larger additional special-purpose appropriations
than previously envisaged
18-
- the provider relaxes the new job creation
condition by allowing the - companies to include employees taken on before
the contract was signed - non-compliance with the terms for appraising
fulfilment of the obligation to - create jobs risk of unjustified drawdown of
state budget finances - non-existence of legislation governing the
provision of appropriations to - investors in the services sector
- - risk of the shortcomings found in the audit
being repeated
19Recommendations to government
-
-
- when concluding annexes to contracts negotiate
counter-performance from - the commercial enterprises in return for the
provided financing - draft legislation for the provision of
investment aid in the services sector - ensure that MoLSA adheres to the precise wording
of contractual - provisions when performing control
20Thank you for your attention Vladimír
Ruta vladimir.ruta_at_nku.cz Phone 420476140724
www.nku.cz
21-
- QuestionsCommentsDiscussion