JMR - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

JMR

Description:

'Do the characteristics that lead to a diagnosis of ... examining same patients only agree on diagnosis in 28% of cases (neurosis) Thomas Szasz (1961) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:32
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: sgspsycho
Category:
Tags: jmr | hoax | neurosis

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: JMR


1
Rosenhan (1973)
  • JMR

On Being Sane in Insane Places
2
Diagnosing mental illness
  • How do we diagnose mental illness?
  • What are the pitfalls?
  • What are the consequences of labelling someone as
    mentally ill?

3
Research question
  • Do the characteristics that lead to a diagnosis
    of abnormality reside in the PATIENTS or in the
    ENVIRONMENTS they are observed in?
  • Operationalised
  • If normal people attempted to be admitted to
    psychiatric hospitals, would they be detected as
    being sane?

4
Mental illness
  • Difficult to define. Medical classifications
    exist (eg. DSM IV or ICD 10) these list symptoms
  • Problems with medical classification
  • 1. Problems often arent physiological, cant be
    tested (eg. X-rays for broken bones)
  • 2. Depends on whether we believe the patient

5
Important Issues
  • 1. Reliability
  • Does the system always diagnose in the same way?
  • 2. Validity
  • Does the system really measure mental illness
  • ? can it tell who is ill and who isnt?

6
Some studies
  • Kreitman (1961)
  • 2 psychiatrists examining same patients only
    agree on diagnosis in 28 of cases (neurosis)
  • Thomas Szasz (1961)
  • Argues mental illness is a myth
  • ? its a label society gives to odd behaviour
    (very subjective)

7
Diagnostic reliability
  • David Rosenhan investigates diagnostic reliability
  • Can doctors distinguish between sane and insane?
  • If they can, classification is VALID
  • If they fail, classification is useless,
    misleading and harmful

8
The study
  • Method Field experiment (participant
    observation)
  • Setting 12 hospitals in different American State
  • Mix of old new
  • Some short-staffed, some not
  • 1 private, 11 state-funded

9
The participants
  • 8 pseudopatients, 5 male, 3 female, no history
    of mental disorder
  • psychology student
  • 3 psychologists (incl. Rosenhan bias?)
  • psychiatrist
  • paediatrician
  • painter
  • Housewife
  • They will pretend to be mental patients!

10
Procedure 1
  • Change names occupations
  • Phone for appointment
  • Arrive, claim to be hearing voices
  • Voices unfamiliar, but same sex
  • Voices are unclear, but sound like saying
    empty, hollow and thud
  • Words chosen to suggest an existential crisis
    (Who am I? Whats it all for? My life is empty
    and hollow!)

11
Procedure 2
  • If admitted, pseudopatients stop pretending to be
    abnormal
  • They were nervous (novel situation, fear of
    discovery)
  • Pseudopatients have to get out by convincing
    staff they are sane
  • They are model patients but must write up
    observations (secretly, but overtly when found
    out)

12
Diagnosis schizophrenia
  • All but one pseudopatient admitted with diagnosis
    of schizophrenia
  • Discharged not as sane but with diagnosis of
    schizophrenia in remission (no such thing!)
  • Diagnosis of schizophrenia
  • Disorders of thought (delusions)
  • Disorders of perception (hallucinations, eg.
    voices)
  • Motor symptoms (odd movements)
  • Affective symptoms (inappropriate emotions)
  • Impaired life functioning (no job, friends,
    relationships)
  • Sufferers show problems in a number of areas, but
    pseudos showed only one symptom (voices)

13
Results Results
  • Length of stay 7 52 days
  • (mean 19 days)
  • Staff never detected pseudopatents
  • Other patients visitors knew they were sane
  • (35 out of 118 patients rumbled the pseudos)
  • Significantly, staff interpreted pseudos sane
    behaviour in the light of their insane label

14
The stickiness of labels
  • Labelling patients as schizophrenic coloured
    other perceptions eg
  • Normal life experiences interpreted as abnormal
    by interviewers
  • Normal behaviours interpreted as pathological
  • Labels are sticky because, once theyre stuck
    on, theyre hard to remove

15
Normal seen as abnormal 1
  • EG 1 Pseudos ordinary life histories
  • Pseudos didnt lie about these
  • Close to mother in early childhood, close to
    father during adolescence
  • Medical staff distort this in case notes the
    patient manifests a long history of considerable
    ambivalence in close relationships, which begins
    in early childhood
  • ? fits in with theories about schizophrenia

16
Normal seen as abnormal 2
  • EG 2 Pseudos took notes and feared staff would
    realise the hoax from this. But staff viewed
    writing behaviour as part of the symptoms.
  • EG 3 Pseudo pacing up and down asked if he was
    nervous, when really he was bored.
  • EG 4 Patients with little to look forward to
    queue outside canteen 30mins before food served.
    Doctor described this as the oral-acquisitive
    nature of their syndromes

17
Staff attitudes 1
  • Pseudos ask staff for info
  • ? Pardon me, Mr or Dr or Mrs X, could you tell
    me when I will be presented at the staff
    meeting?" or "...when am I likely to be
    discharged?"
  • Patients frequently ignored!
  • Rosenhan set up a Control condition
  • ? a young person approaches psychology staff at
    university or doctor in medical centre, responses
    noted
  • Control students usually acknowledged!

18
Staff attitudes 2
19
Staff attitudes 3
  • These attitudes produce powerlessness and
    depersonalisation
  • ? see Zimbardo, its like a prison
  • Patients deprived of legal rights
  • Freedom of movement restricted
  • Minimal privacy
  • Physical punishments in front of other patients
  • (not other staff ie. patients arent credible
    witnesses)

20
So why the mistakes?
  • Doctors biased towards type-one errors (playing
    safe)
  • ? diagnose healthy people as sick more often than
    sick people as healthy
  • Also called a false positive
  • A type-two error is diagnosing sick people as
    healthy (false negative)
  • Will doctors misdiagnose genuine patients as sane?

21
Experiment 2
  • Setting a large teaching hospital for the
    mentally ill
  • Staff warned that pseudopatients would seek
    admission in next 3 months
  • Staff asked to rate new patients on 10-point
    scale to say if they were faking
  • (1 definite faker, 10 genuinely ill)

22
Experiment 2 - results
  • All new patients were genuine NO pseudopatients

23
Conclusions 1
  • We cannot distinguish the sane from the insane in
    psychiatric hospitals
  • The environment distorts the meaning of behaviour
  • Sticky labelling, powerlessness etc. not
    conducive to healing
  • But there is hope
  • Community care facilities may change the
    environment behaviour is seen in
  • Mental health workers now trained to be aware of
    labelling and sensitive to patients needs

24
Conclusions 2
  • Easy to misdiagnose schizophrenia does it
    really exist at all or is it just a label of odd
    behaviour?
  • Schizophrenia occurs in all cultures recovery
    rate faster in less developed countries
  • Strong genetic link MZ twin studies show
    varying concordance (15-69)
  • Affects 1 of population males/females equally
  • Starts 17-35 years (young adulthood)
  • Sometimes gradual, sometimes sudden may be
    started by stress
  • Can a plea of insanity justify reduced sentences
    if we cannot define insanity?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com