Effects of Mepiquat Regimes on Fiber Length Uniformity - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Effects of Mepiquat Regimes on Fiber Length Uniformity

Description:

Effects of Mepiquat Regimes on Fiber Length Uniformity – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:39
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 44
Provided by: steve1229
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Effects of Mepiquat Regimes on Fiber Length Uniformity


1
Effects of Mepiquat Regimes on Fiber Length
Uniformity
  • 2007 Beltwide Cotton Conference
  • Steve M. Brown and Andy Knowlton
  • The University of Georgia

2
(No Transcript)
3
Google Hits for Mepiquat, etc.
  • mepiquat 58,700
  • mepiquat research 21,000
  • mepiquat plant growth regulator 19,300
  • mepiquat experiment 844
  • mepiquat trial - 562

4
Plant Physiologist FTEs
  • Grants / gifts
  • Abstracts
  • Papers
  • Popular articles
  • Newsletters
  • Meetings
  • Decision aids
  • Rates
  • Timing
  • Programs
  • Formulations
  • Rainfastness
  • Tank mixtures

5
(No Transcript)
6
(No Transcript)
7
(No Transcript)
8
(No Transcript)
9
Fiber LengthUNIFORMITY
10
USDA Cotton ClassificationUnderstanding the Data
  • Length uniformity index is a three-digit number
    that is a measure of the degree of uniformity of
    the fibers in a sample to the nearest tenth. The
    descriptive terms listed below may be helpful in
    explaining the measurement results.
  • Descriptive Designation Length Uniformity
  • Very Low lt 76.5 Low 76.5 79.4
    Average 79.5 82.4 High 82.5
    85.4 Very High gt 85.4

11
Fiber QualityLength Uniformity
UHM length
Mean length
Mean length
Uniformity
UHM length
reflects SHORT FIBER CONTENT (lt 0.5 inch)
12
Fiber QualityLength Uniformity
Mean length
If all fibers are of equal length uniformity
100.0
Mean length
Uniformity
UHM length
13
Georgia -- Fiber Length Uniformity
  • Late 1990s National Textiles reported problems,
    suggest correlation with UNIF, SFC
  • 2003 GA crop creates serious concerns in U.S.
    textile industry
  • 2004 EFS Conference Wm Dunnavant addresses
    Georgia problem
  • Several U.S. textile choose to discriminate
    against GA cotton

14
What is the problem with Georgia Cotton?
15
UNIFORMITY1998-2006 SE Crop
16
Uniformity Index
2003
17
Mid-South and SoutheastUniformity 2005/06
82.0 / 82.4
81.8/ 82.4
81.5 / 82.0
80.7 / 81.2
81.4 / 82.3
81.3 / 81.6
80.2 / 80.4
80.7 / 80.8
80.3 / 80.4
80.2 / 80.2
18
REVIEWQuantification of Fiber Quality and the
Cotton Production-Processing Interface A
Physiologists Perspective
  • Bradow and Davidonis, Journal of Cotton Science,
    2000. 434-64

19
Factors Implicated with Fiber Length and
Uniformity
  • Genetics
  • Environment temperature, water, light,
    fertility
  • Harvesting, ginning, processing
  • Disruption of fiber development
  • Bug damage, Fertility, Stresses
  • Fruiting period / duration?
  • Fruiting position in-canopy variation
  • Site of initiation on seed
  • Day length / longitude?

20
(No Transcript)
21
UGA Micro-Gin (HVI) 2005Georgia Stink Bug Trials
GA 2005 Untreated Bug-Free
Lint/acre 707 1271
Lint 35.89 37.12
MIC 4.26 4.49
UHM (32nds) 35.72 36.21
UI 81.39 81.86
STR 30.00 29.90
Rd 76.15 78.63
b 8.87 8.03
HVI Cotton Incorporated N8 locations
22
Factors Implicated with Fiber Length and
Uniformity
  • Genetics
  • Environment temperature, water, light,
    fertility
  • Harvesting, ginning, processing
  • Disruption of fiber development
  • Bug damage, Fertility, Stresses
  • Fruiting period / duration?
  • Fruiting position in-canopy variation
  • Site of initiation on seed
  • Day length / longitude?

23
Fiber variation within CANOPY
24
Fiber variation within FRUTING POSITION
25
Fiber variation within BOLL / LOCK
26
Fiber variation on the SEED
27
Sources of Fiber Quality Variation
  • Canopy
  • Boll/Lock
  • Seed

28
Can Bloom Duration InfluenceFiber Length
Uniformity?
29
2006 Experiments
  • OBJECTIVES
  • Variety by Mepex
  • Mepex Timing
  • Can compression of fruiting period affect UNIF?
  • Aggressive Stance Application (Two Sites)
  • Evaluate possible yield and quality effects of
    misapplication (rate).

30
Objective Is it Genetics or Bloom Duration?
Experiment 1
  • DP 555 BG/RR
  • 1. Aggressive MC
  • 16 oz PHS
  • 24 oz PHS 10d
  • 24 oz PHS 25d
  • 2. Aggressive Growth
  • 8 oz PHS
  • 8 oz 1st bloom
  • DP 444 BG/RR
  • 3. Aggressive MC
  • 16 oz PHS
  • 16 oz PHS 10d
  • 4. Aggressive Growth
  • 8 oz 1st bloom

31
Effects of MC TIMING Experiment 2
  • Untreated
  • 12 oz PHS / PHS10d / PHS20d /
  • As needed
  • 12 oz PHS10d / PHS20d / PHS30d
  • 12 oz 1st BL / 1st BL10d / 1st BL20d
  • DP 555 BG/RR

32
Effects of Excessive Stance (Rate) Experiment
3a, 3b
  • Untreated
  • Mepex 8 oz MHS / 10d / 2wks
  • Stance 3 oz MHS / 10d / 2wks
  • Stance 8 oz MHS / 10d / 2wks
  • DP 555 BG/RR
  • 3a SunBelt Expo 3b Lang Farm, Tifton

33
Experimental Methods
  • Irrigated culture 3 sites Tifton, 1 site SunBelt
    Expo
  • Planting dates May 3 or 6, 2006
  • Plot size 4 or 6 rows by 40 ft
  • Treatments applied with self propelled sprayer or
    CO2 backpack sprayer
  • Harvest dates Sep 21 or 28, 2006
  • Plot harvest processed at UGA Micro Gin
  • Fiber samples analyzed by Star Labs

34
Experiment 1Variety by MC Program
35
Experiment 1Variety by MC Program
Trt Yield lb/A UNIF Length in
DP555 M 1837a 81.63b 1.138a
DP555 G 1778a 81.84b 1.136a
DP444 M 1379b 82.58a 1.125ab
DP444 G 1382b 82.56a 1.118b
LSD (0.10) 192 0.30 0.017
36
Experiment 2Initiation of MC
Trt Yield lb/A UNIF Length in
UTC 1851ab 82.05a 1.145b
PHS, , 1814b 81.88a 1.155a
PHS10d, , 1943a 82.04a 1.147b
1st Bl, , 1861ab 82.32a 1.157a
LSD (0.10) 104 0.57 0.007
37
Experiment 3a (Expo)Excessive Stance
Trt Yield lb/A UNIF Length in
UTC 1895a 80.32b 1.113c
Mepex 8oz (3x) 1874a 80.88a 1.127b
Stance 3 oz (3x) 2033a 80.94a 1.139b
Stance 8 oz (3x) 1624b 81.16a 1.160a
LSD (0.10) 183 0.43 0.007
38
Experiment 3b (Tifton)Excessive Stance
Trt Yield lb/A UNIF Length in
UTC 1768a 82.03c 1.122d
Mepex 8oz (3x) 1790a 82.07bc 1.137c
Stance 3 oz (3x) 1731a 82.28a 1.160b
Stance 8 oz (3x) 1690a 82.73a 1.187a
LSD (0.10) 122 0.23 0.010
39
Experiment 3 (Expo and Tifton)Excessive Stance
Trt UNIF Expo UNIF Tifton Length Expo Length Tifton
UTC 80.32b 82.03c 1.113c 1.122d
Mepex 8oz 80.88a 82.07bc 1.127b 1.137c
Stance 3 oz 80.94a 82.28a 1.139b 1.160b
Stance 8 oz 81.16a 82.73a 1.160a 1.187a
LSD (0.10) 0.43 0.23 0.007 0.010
40
Summary
  • DP 444 BG/RR had slightly greater UNIF than DP
    555 BG/RR
  • Varying the initiation of MC programs had no
    effect on UNIF
  • Stance increased UNIF and UHM length

41
Future Work
  • Thorough REVIEW of work related to fiber length
    UNIF (physiology, ginning, geography, pest mgt,
    etc.)
  • Explore the effects of genetics vs flowering
    period on UNIF with mechanical means
  • Explore the effects of MC and MC cyclanalide on
    fiber quality

42
(No Transcript)
43
What the U.S. textile mills really want is
cotton that is long as rope, strong as a cable,
thin as baby hair, and cheap as _at_!
  • --- Cotton Sage
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com